Suresh L. Paul's scientific contributions
What is this page?
This page lists the scientific contributions of an author, who either does not have a ResearchGate profile, or has not yet added these contributions to their profile.
It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.
If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.
If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.
It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.
If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.
If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.
Publications (10)
This chapter discusses the economic valuation of agro‐waste with an emphasis on developing countries. Specifically, a general overview of the cost‐benefit analysis technique of economic valuation is outlined to contextualize the costs and consequences of agro‐waste recycling and reclamation programs. We first enumerate all anticipated costs and ben...
This chapter discusses the economic valuation of agro waste with an emphasis on developing countries. Specifically, a general overview of the cost-benefit analysis technique of economic valuation is outlined to contextualize the costs and consequences of agro waste recycling and reclamation programs. We first enumerate all anticipated costs and ben...
Using a large sample of publicly traded firms from 1994-2002, we study the type of firms that female executives prefer to work in. We find that (1) female executives predominantly work in high risk firms and in high risk industries, (2) female CEOs have higher dismissal probability and female non-CEO executives (CFO, COO and President), in general,...
Using a large sample of publicly traded firms from 1994-2002, we study the type of firms that female executives prefer to work in. We find that (1) female executives predominantly work in high risk firms and in high risk industries, (2) female CEOs have higher dismissal probability and female non-CEO executives (CFO, COO and President), in general,...
Using a large sample of publicly traded firms from 1994-2002, we study the type of firms that female executives prefer to work in. We find that (1) female executives predominantly work in high risk firms and in high risk industries, (2) female CEOs have higher dismissal probability and female non-CEO executives (CFO, COO and President), in general,...
Using a large sample of publicly traded firms from 1994-2002, we study the type of firms that female executives prefer to work in. We find that (1) female executives predominantly work in high risk firms and in high risk industries, (2) female CEOs have higher dismissal probability and female non-CEO executives (CFO, COO and President), in general,...
Of all the proposals that are voted upon in annual shareholder meetings, proposals aimed at protecting or eliminating shareholder rights are the ones that do not conform to the recommendations made by Institutional Shareholder Services. That is, proposals that eliminate rights pass despite ISS "AGAINST" recommendations and proposals that protect ri...
Anti-takeover provisions, and in some sense, all governance provisions are viewed as vital instruments to prevent value decreasing attempts of takeover. Recent literature focuses on these provisions as instruments which facilitate managerial entrenchment. We study a sample of firms which repeal governance provisions and the reasons behind the repea...
Citations
... There are two main reasons for the prevailing gender segregation in the labour market. The first is candidates' preference for specific occupations and segments of the labour market, which according to some leads women to prefer jobs with lower pay and career prospects (Sahni et al. 2010;Skyt et al. 2004). The second and most interesting for this study is employers' preferences for workers with specific genders. ...
![[object Object]](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/409034944466945-1474532938576_Q64/Herman-Sahni.jpg)
... CEO duality, or having the CEO also serve as board chair, has been positively associated with poison pills (Mallette and Fowler, 1992). But Paul et al. (2009) found that firms with higher institutional ownership were more likely to repeal anti-takeover provisions. Some researchers found that insider ownership was negatively associated with poison pills (Danielson and Karpoff, 1998;Davis, 1991;Heron and Lie, 2006;Mallette and Fowler, 1992). ...
Reference: Poison pills and CEOs: The résumé matters
... WDIRECT takes on value one in firm-year cases where at least one female director is present and zero otherwise. Eq. (2) also includes important controls for CEO age (Barro and Barro, 1990; Burress and Zucca, 2004) and tenure (Barro and Barro, 1990; Paul and Sahni, 2010). As CEO compensation may well be enhanced in cases where the chief executive also serves as company " Chairman, " we include a separate interaction term CEO*CHAIR in Eq. (2). ...
Reference: Versão final publicada no journal
