Suat Irmak’s research while affiliated with Pennsylvania State University and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (343)


Concurrent Response of Soybean to Fixed‐ (Full and Limited) and Variable‐Rate Irrigation Management in Three Soil Types: I. Soil Water Dynamics
  • Article

May 2025

Irrigation and Drainage

S. Irmak

·

T. A. Hinn

·

M. S. Kukal

·

A. T. Mohammed

This research investigated soybean soil water dynamics under different irrigation levels in three different soil types in the same field concurrently. Treatments imposed in each soil type were: (i) variable‐rate irrigation (VRI), (ii) fixed‐rate full irrigation (FRI‐1″ or FRI‐25.4 mm) and (iii) fixed‐rate limited irrigation (FRI‐0.75″ or FRI‐19 mm). In 2018, VRI received 75% less water than FRI‐1″ and received 49% less water than FRI‐0.75″. In 2019, VRI received 100% more irrigation than FRI‐1″ and 41% less than FRI‐0.75″. Soil water dynamics of each treatment in the same soil and between the soils exhibited substantial interannual variations. Soil type had substantial and greater impact on soil moisture dynamics than irrigation treatments. Total available water (TAW), dry spell and antecedent soil moisture were impacted to a greater extent by the spatial soil properties than irrigation treatments. The range of field capacity (FC), permanent wilting point (PWP), TAW, dry spell soil moisture and antecedent soil moisture quantified for each soil type spatially and temporally in the same research field with respect to soil moisture dynamics and impacts on irrigation requirements for different irrigation management strategies provide a beneficial scope of understanding the effects of these spatially variable soil properties on water management. The research also provides substantial evidence in terms of the critical importance of detailed quantification, analyses and understanding of the soil properties that must be considered for successful implementation of VRI technology.


Concurrent Response of Soybean to Fixed (Full and Limited) and Variable Rate Irrigation Management in Three Soil Types: II. Growth, Yield, Evapotranspiration and Water Productivity

May 2025

·

1 Read

·

1 Citation

Irrigation and Drainage

Soybean growth, yield, crop evapotranspiration (ETc) and crop water use efficiency (CWUE or crop water productivity, CWP) under different irrigation levels in three different soil types in the same field were investigated concurrently. Treatments in each soil type were: (i) variable rate irrigation (VRI), (ii) fixed rate full irrigation (FR‐1″) and (iii) fixed rate limited irrigation (FR‐0.75″). There was not enough evidence suggesting the superiority of VRI over FRI‐1″ or FRI‐0.75″ in terms of improving yield or CWUE. Leaf area index (LAI) and plant height were stronger functions of soil types than irrigation treatments. Growing season cumulative grass‐reference evapotranspiration (ETo) and cumulative precipitation were 629 and 489 mm, respectively, in 2018; and 589 and 551 mm, respectively, in 2019. Variations in yield among irrigation treatments for both seasons were not significant ( p > 0.05). Soil type, rather than irrigation treatments, explained variation in yield with statistical significance ( p < 0.05). Soil types had substantial impact on ETc and CWUE. Since spatial variability in soil properties has a profound impact on soybean growth, yield, ETc and CWUE, soil variability in horizontal and vertical domain must be considered for developing accurate management zones and prescriptions for VRI, and for in‐season VRI, FRI and limited irrigation management for successful and effective operations.


How is Nitrogen Use Efficiency Impacted by Varying Contributions from Fertilizer, Manure, and Biological Fixation in U.S. and Global Croplands?

January 2025

·

2 Reads

Journal of the ASABE

Varshini Kumanan

·

Raj Cibin

·

Suat Irmak

·

[...]

·

Meetpal S. Kukal

Highlights NUE response to N addition is dependent on N source (fertilizer, manure, and biological fixation). Random forest models captured 71% and 47% NUE variance for CONUS and global croplands. Contribution from biological N fixation was most important for explaining NUE variance, followed by manure and fertilizer contributions. ABSTRACT. Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) is a useful indicator of the tradeoffs among cropland harvest nitrogen (N) and total N fertilization. Total N fertilization can be fulfilled by different sources depending on local availability, livestock production, land use and crop distribution, and economics, all of which change drastically in space and time. While NUE assesses crop harvest N response to total N fertilization, it typically does not distinguish between N fertilization sources, and thus little is known on how varying contributions from diverse N inputs impact NUE achieved in a region and year. Here, we use long-term (1961–2020) N budgets combined with random forest modeling to address this knowledge gap for global croplands, with a finer spatial emphasis on conterminous United States (CONUS) croplands. Random forest models using fractional fertilization contributions (F fert , F manure , and F bnf for synthetic fertilizers, livestock manure, and biological N fixation, respectively) and captured 71% and 47% of space-time variance in NUE for CONUS and global croplands, respectively. F bnf was the most important predictor for explaining variance in county/country-year NUE, followed by F manure , and F fert . Contributions from each of the input sources exerted distinct controls on NUE through its observed ranges and these controls were visualized using partial dependence plots for NUE. The models establish that regions and years where a higher proportion of total N fertilization is met by biological N fixation (relative to fertilizers and manure) have higher NUE. Overall, our findings improve understanding of how NUE may be optimized by managing diverse N sources with the aim of meeting economic and sustainability goals. Keywords: Chemical fertilizers, Livestock, Nitrogen cycle, Nutrient budgets, Nutrients.


Systems-Level Response of Crop Nitrogen Removal to Nitrogen Inputs in U.S. Agriculture

January 2025

·

4 Reads

Journal of the ASABE

Highlights Crop N removal response to N inputs shows diminishing N removal beyond 163.08 kg ha-1. N inputs at which diminishing returns are observed have increased. N inputs at which diminishing returns are observed are specific to crop belts. Proportion of counties that show N inputs exceeding the optimal level has increased. ABSTRACT. The response of nitrogen (N) removal by crops to an increase in fertilization strongly determines the profitability and sustainability of agricultural systems and informs nutrient management decisions at the producer level. These response functions are analyzed for agronomic and economic optima achieved at field scales for evaluating production, economic, and environmental goals. However, such assessments are lacking for entire regional agroecosystems to allow understanding of the response of N removal collectively across all crops grown during the year (N removal ) to total N fertilization (i.e., all manageable N sources, N in ) historically. Here, we address this knowledge gap by leveraging a large-scale N budget and statistical techniques to characterize space-time variability and trends in historical (1987–2016) county-level N removal , N in , and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) across the conterminous U.S. (CONUS). We intend to evaluate crop belt-specific characteristics of diminished returns in N removal to N in response and change over time. N in , N removal , and NUE were subject to drastic spatial variation in long-term mean values, interannual variability, and long-term change, which were quantified and mapped to understand their spatiotemporal distributions. Pooled across all counties and years, N removal shows diminished returns when N in reached 163 kg ha ⁻¹ (N in, bp ). Upon quantifying and analyzing year-specific diminished returns, we found that N in, bp has increased during 1987–2016, and so has the NUE achieved prior to attaining diminished returns. The proportion of counties (6%–22%) where N in exceeds N in, bp also increased, and counties that repeatedly demonstrated such exceedance during 1987–2016 were identified. Values of N in,bp are specific to crop belts within the U.S., the majority of which also show increased N in, bp over time. Specifically, barley, beans, and sugarbeets (198 kg ha ⁻¹ ), and alfalfa and barley (190 kg ha ⁻¹ ) belts showed notably greater N in,bp relative to the national mean (163 kg ha ⁻¹ ), while N in,bp for corn grain and soy belts was similar to the national mean. Overall, these findings represent a comprehensive assessment of how systems-level N removal across U.S. agriculture has historically responded to change in N in , a prerequisite for guiding mitigation and adaptation policy and efforts. Keywords: Fertilizer, Manure, Nitrogen cycle, Nitrogen use efficiency, Yield.



Figure 1. Daily average air temperature (C) and precipitation (mm) during crop growing seasons in 2021 and 2022 at Clay Center, NE, and their 30-yr long-term averages (1991-2020). The weather data were sourced from the Automated Weather Data Network (AWDN) of the High Plains Regional Climate Center (HPRCC) accessible at https://hprcc.unl.edu/ awdn .
Figure 3. The interaction effects of irrigation and crop type on (A) mean soil water depletion (mm) and (B) total seasonal evapotranspiration (mm) at the experimental site near Clay Center, NE, in 2021 and 2022. No VC, plots without volunteer corn; VC, plots with volunteer corn. The error bars represent standard error of the mean estimates. Different alphabetical letters indicate treatment means are significantly different (P ≤ 0.05).
Effect of center-pivot and subsurface drip irrigation systems on growth and evapotranspiration of volunteer corn in corn, soybean, and sorghum
  • Article
  • Full-text available

October 2024

·

108 Reads

·

1 Citation

Weed Science

Volunteer corn ( Zea mays L.) is a competitive weed in corn-based cropping systems. Scientific literature does not exist about the water use of volunteer corn grown in different crops and irrigation systems. The objectives of this study were to characterize the growth and evapotranspiration (ET a ) of volunteer corn in corn, soybean [ Glycine max (L). Merr.], and sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] under center-pivot irrigation (CPI) and subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) systems. Field experiments were conducted in south-central Nebraska in 2021 and 2022. Soil moisture sensors were installed at depths of 0 to 0.30, 0.30 to 0.60, and 0.60 to 0.90 m to track soil water balance and quantify seasonal total ET a . Corn was the most competitive, as volunteer corn had the lowest biomass, leaf area, and plant height compared with the fallow. Soybean was the least competitive with volunteer corn, as the plant height, biomass, and leaf area of volunteer corn in soybean were similar to fallow at 15, 30, 45, and 60 d after transplanting (DATr). Averaged across crop treatments, irrigation type did not affect volunteer corn growth at 15 to 45 DATr. Soil water depletion and ET a were similar across crop treatments with and without volunteer corn, as water was not a limiting factor in this study. The ET a of volunteer corn was the highest in soybean (623 mm), followed by sorghum (622 mm), and corn (617 mm) under CPI. The SDI had higher irrigation efficiency, because without affecting crop yield, it had 3%, 6%, and 8% lower ET a in soybean (605 mm), sorghum (585 mm), and corn (571 mm), respectively. Although soil water use did not differ with volunteer corn infestation, a soybean yield loss of 27% was observed, which suggests that volunteer corn may not compete for moisture under fully irrigated conditions; however, it can impact the crop yield potential due to competition for factors other than soil moisture.

Download



Assessing water distribution and efficiency by coupled hydraulic-hydrological modeling for irrigation canal network

June 2024

·

112 Reads

·

1 Citation

Paddy and Water Environment

In South Korea, performance of irrigation systems can be improved through hardware changes, such as canal linings and the installation of control structures, as well as through operational improvements, such as proper and timely operation, and improved communication between water supply agencies and water users. Improving irrigation water delivery performance through canal networks is one of the most economically essential options in meeting growing water demands and sustaining the productivity of irrigated agriculture. In this study, for the purpose of evaluating the efficient use of water resources in agricultural productions and operations, we analyzed the distribution of amount of water for each irrigated area and irrigation efficiency using a hydraulic-hydrological model, EPA-SWMM (United States Environmental Protection Agency Storm Water Management Model). In addition, we assessed agricultural water supply and water supply vulnerability using irrigation efficiency indicators. As a result of the agricultural water distribution simulation, the canals located in the upstream showed a high irrigation efficiency of more than 60%, and the canals located in the downstream showed a low irrigation efficiency of less than 50%. Based on the results, the critical areas can be successfully identified where water is scarce in the irrigation area and monitoring the spatio-temporal agricultural water distribution can be more effectively realized.


Sunflower germplasms’ response to different water and salinity stress levels in greenhouse and field conditions under subsurface drip irrigation

May 2024

·

13 Reads

Irrigation and Drainage

Sunflower ( Helianthus annuus L.) is moderately tolerant to salt and water stress, but its production can still be significantly and adversely affected by increases in these stressors as a result of the negative impacts of climate change on agricultural soil and crop productivity. The morphological and productivity (dry head weight, dry root weight, dry shoot weight, head diameter, whole seed weight, crude protein content, crude oil content, palmitic acid, stearic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, eicosanoic acid, 11‐eicosenoic acid, homo‐gamma‐linolenic w6 acid, lignoceric acid and plant height) responses of modern sunflower germplasms to different levels of salt and drought stress under greenhouse and field conditions were investigated and analysed. Six germplasms were evaluated under three salt concentrations (0, 150 and 250 mM), and two germplasms were evaluated for drought response under three irrigation levels. Significant differences in the response of sunflower germplasms to water and salinity were detected. The same germplasms exhibited significant differences in response to water and salinity between the treatments, which also varied significantly between the germplasms for the same treatment. The irrigation level significantly influenced the amount of oil but not the crude protein or fatty acid composition. The results and information of this research can aid in selecting and improving sunflower productivity under adverse (i.e. saline and drought) conditions.


Citations (85)


... They must ensure sufficient pressure to meet service standards, [20]. Furthermore, these approaches used 107 a deterministic method to synchronize energy production and consumption [21], 108 demonstrating a surplus of 25% [22]. However, prior research has not addressed 109 this issue, and practitioners should tackle this question to better manage a PIN 110 better. ...

Reference:

Sizing optimisation under irradiance uncertainty of irrigation systems powered by off-grid solar panels
Sensitivity study of the Predictive Optimal Water and Energy Irrigation (POWEIr) controller’s schedules for sustainable agriculture systems in resource-constrained contexts
  • Citing Article
  • November 2024

Computers and Electronics in Agriculture

... The 100% ETc regime provides the largest leaf area, measuring 3,490 ± 58.897 cm², compared to 2,819.2 ± 59.173 cm² for the 50% ETc regime. The outcomes obtained with the 100% ETc water regime are consistent with those of Singh et al. (2024). ...

Effect of center-pivot and subsurface drip irrigation systems on growth and evapotranspiration of volunteer corn in corn, soybean, and sorghum

Weed Science

... Exploring the "genotype-phenotype-environment" interactions under field conditions is of great significance for crop breeding and cultivation [1,2]. However, conventional crop phenotyping observation is based on manual measurement, which is labor-intensive and less efficient, with inconsistent measurement standards and a limited number of observed samples [3]. ...

High-throughput physiological phenotyping of crop evapotranspiration at the plot scale
  • Citing Article
  • August 2024

Field Crops Research

... Actual evapotranspiration is affected by many factors, which interact with each other, resulting in obvious differences in the spatiotemporal patterns of AET under different environments (Bafti et al., 2024;Guo et al., 2024). Understanding the effects of different influencing factors on AET will help to better predict and manage water resources, plan agricultural production, and respond to the impacts of climate change on ecosystems Irmak, 2024;Perez et al., 2024). In this study, we first analyzed the spatiotemporal evolution patterns of AET in global land areas from 2001 to 2019. ...

Maize response to different subsurface drip irrigation management strategies: Yield, production functions, basal and crop evapotranspiration
  • Citing Article
  • July 2024

Agricultural Water Management

... Corn volunteers compete for moisture, sunlight, space, and nutrients, thereby reducing crop yield and requiring herbicide application for their control (Chahal et al. 2014;Chahal and Jhala 2016). Volunteer corn is not only a problematic weed in corn-soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] cropping systems (Beckie and Owen 2007;Chahal and Jhala 2016), but also in other cornbased crop rotations such as with sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) (Kniss et al. 2012), edible dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) (Sbatella et al. 2016), cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) (Clewis et al. 2008), and continuous corn (Striegel et al. 2020) where seed corn or special-purpose corn is grown (Singh et al. 2024). Volunteer corn density of 10 plants m −2 can reduce corn yield by 19% (Steckel et al. 2009), and in a study conducted in Nebraska, volunteer corn at a density of 1 plant m −2 reduced soybean yield by 22% (Chahal and Jhala 2016). ...

Pollen‐mediated gene flow from herbicide‐resistant yellow corn to non‐genetically engineered food‐grade white corn

... Reducing N inputs increased PFP compared to the N plus plot; however, conventional fertilizer management showed similar PFP to the reduced N plot, albeit inconsistently. Improved PFP with lower applications has also been reported by Irmack et al. [29] and Chen et al. [30]. ...

Maize nitrogen uptake and use efficiency, partial factor productivity of nitrogen, and yield response to different nitrogen and water applications under three irrigation methods
  • Citing Article
  • August 2023

Irrigation and Drainage

... The calibration of crop non-conservative parameters followed a trialand-error approach, as recommended by developers and performed by other authors (Abedinpour et al., 2012;Amiri et al., 2024;César Augusto Terán-Chaves et al., 2022;Hsiao et al., 2009;Kanda et al., 2021;Mubvuma et al., 2021;Raes et al., 2012;Oiganji et al., 2016;Paredes et al., 2014;Raes et al., 2012;Sandhu and Irmak, 2019;Wellens et al., 2022;Zeleke et al., 2011). Initially, simulations used estimated or guessed parameter values, which were iteratively adjusted based on comparisons with measured experimental data. ...

Comparison of the AquaCrop and CERES‐Maize models for simulating maize phenology, grain yield, evapotranspiration and water productivity under different irrigation and nitrogen levels

Irrigation and Drainage

... It is often used for the inversion of crop water indicators [17]. LAI is closely related to vegetation transpiration [18]. Therefore, it is worth exploring whether thermal infrared images can provide effective support for inverting the LAI of maize by reflecting the difference in canopy temperature. ...

Transpiration Dynamics in Co-Located Maize, Sorghum, and Soybean Closed Canopies and Their Environmental Controls
  • Citing Article
  • January 2024

Journal of Natural Resources and Agricultural Ecosystems

... Due to the complexity of crop responses under different drought conditions, it is difficult to accurately describe and quantify the effects of drought on the crop growth process. Crop models can mechanistically simulate important physiological and growth processes such as photosynthesis, transpiration, and biomass accumulation of crops under various drought conditions (Tojo Soler et al., 2013;Irmak et al., 2024). The entire process of crop growth under continuous drought at different growth stages can be simulated more conveniently using a crop model after the localization by field experiments. ...

Evaluation of CERES-Maize model for simulating maize phenology, grain yield, soil–water, evapotranspiration, and water productivity under different nitrogen levels and rainfed, limited, and full irrigation conditions

Irrigation Science

... This method is particularly beneficial for crops like corn and soybeans, which require consistent moisture. In regions like south-central Nebraska, CPI optimizes the timing and distribution of irrigation, improving overall yields by preventing water stress during critical growth periods [9]. While CPI is more cost-effective for large fields and is widely used for crops like corn and soybeans, it is less precise and can lead to higher water loss through evaporation [9]. ...

Evapotranspiration of Palmer amaranth ( Amaranthus palmeri ) in maize, soybean, and fallow under subsurface drip and center-pivot irrigation systems

Weed Science