Stuart A Binder-Macleod’s research while affiliated with University of Delaware and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (147)


Overview of CEDRS (A) CEDRS is a portable central drive measurement system that can be attached to any standard evaluation bed. The foot, shank, and thigh are secured to the device with strapping, and an over-the-head harness prevents vertical translation of the participant during testing. An integrated electronics box stores data, provides real-time feedback, and integrates electrical stimulation signals with torque readings. The integrated stimulation applies 15 biphasic pulses at 150 mA and 100 Hz during central drive tests; pulse width was individualized for each participant. (B) The testing protocol begins with a maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) to potentiate the muscle, which is immediately followed by a pulse duration ramp that is used to identify the optimal pulse duration for each participant. In brief, during the pulse duration ramp, the pulse duration of the twitch stimulation is progressively increased from 50 µs to 600 µs by 50 µs increments. The pulse duration resulting in the largest twitch response is chosen for subsequent burst superimposition testing, conducted as per the testing protocol.
Accuracy of CEDRS (A) Maximum plantarflexor strength measurements using CEDRS are highly accurate compared to the gold standard with (B) small mean differences between devices.
Validation of Adjustment Equation (A) A third-order polynomial explains most of the variance in device-measured and true central drives. (B) There is not a significant difference in residuals across baseline torque values.
Post-stroke Validation. Differences between paretic, non-paretic, and neurotypical limbs for maximum plantarflexor strength and maximum force generating ability (A) and central drive (B) (p < 0.05). Data are presented as the Mean ± SE. Relationships between paretic limb plantarflexion central drive and (C) six-minute walk test (6MWT) distance and (D) distance-induced %Δ6MWT speed ([min6-min1]/min1; * p < 0.05; ⁺ the y-axis in (B) and x-axis in (C,D) presents the range of central drive measurement, from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating full central drive (i.e., full volitional access to the maximum force-generating ability of the plantarflexor muscles)).
Overview of CEDRS (A) CEDRS is a portable central drive measurement system that can be attached to any standard evaluation bed. The foot, shank, and thigh are secured to the device with strapping, and an over-the-head harness prevents vertical translation of the participant during testing. An integrated electronics box stores data, provides real-time feedback, and integrates electrical stimulation signals with torque readings. The integrated stimulation applies 15 biphasic pulses at 150 mA and 100 Hz during central drive tests; pulse width was individualized for each participant. (B) The testing protocol begins with a maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) to potentiate the muscle, which is immediately followed by a pulse duration ramp that is used to identify the optimal pulse duration for each participant. In brief, during the pulse duration ramp, the pulse duration of the twitch stimulation is progressively increased from 50 μs to 600 μs by 50 μs increments. The pulse duration resulting in the largest twitch response is chosen for subsequent burst superimposition testing, conducted as per the testing protocol.

+3

A Portable, Neurostimulation-Integrated, Force Measurement Platform for the Clinical Assessment of Plantarflexor Central Drive
  • Article
  • Full-text available

January 2024

·

91 Reads

·

2 Citations

·

·

·

[...]

·

Plantarflexor central drive is a promising biomarker of neuromotor impairment; however, routine clinical assessment is hindered by the unavailability of force measurement systems with integrated neurostimulation capabilities. In this study, we evaluate the accuracy of a portable, neurostimulation-integrated, plantarflexor force measurement system we developed to facilitate the assessment of plantarflexor neuromotor function in clinical settings. Two experiments were conducted with the Central Drive System (CEDRS). To evaluate accuracy, experiment #1 included 16 neurotypical adults and used intra-class correlation (ICC2,1) to test agreement of plantarflexor strength capacity measured with CEDRS versus a stationary dynamometer. To evaluate validity, experiment #2 added 26 individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis and used one-way ANOVAs to test for between-limb differences in CEDRS’ measurements of plantarflexor neuromotor function, comparing neurotypical, non-paretic, and paretic limb measurements. The association between paretic plantarflexor neuromotor function and walking function outcomes derived from the six-minute walk test (6MWT) were also evaluated. CEDRS’ measurements of plantarflexor neuromotor function showed high agreement with measurements made by the stationary dynamometer (ICC = 0.83, p < 0.001). CEDRS’ measurements also showed the expected between-limb differences (p’s < 0.001) in maximum voluntary strength (Neurotypical: 76.21 ± 13.84 ft-lbs., Non-paretic: 56.93 ± 17.75 ft-lbs., and Paretic: 31.51 ± 14.08 ft-lbs.), strength capacity (Neurotypical: 76.47 ± 13.59 ft-lbs., Non-paretic: 64.08 ± 14.50 ft-lbs., and Paretic: 44.55 ± 14.23 ft-lbs.), and central drive (Neurotypical: 88.73 ± 1.71%, Non-paretic: 73.66% ± 17.74%, and Paretic: 52.04% ± 20.22%). CEDRS-measured plantarflexor central drive was moderately correlated with 6MWT total distance (r = 0.69, p < 0.001) and distance-induced changes in speed (r = 0.61, p = 0.002). CEDRS is a clinician-operated, portable, neurostimulation-integrated force measurement platform that produces accurate measurements of plantarflexor neuromotor function that are associated with post-stroke walking ability.

Download

Ankle stiffness modulation during different gait speeds in individuals post-stroke

September 2022

·

24 Reads

·

4 Citations

Clinical Biomechanics

Background Neurotypical individuals alter their ankle joint quasi-stiffness in response to changing walking speed; however, for individuals post-stroke, the ability to alter their ankle quasi-stiffness is unknown. Individuals post-stroke commonly have weak plantarflexor muscles, which may limit their ability to alter ankle quasi-stiffness. The objective was to investigate the relationship between ankle quasi-stiffness and propulsion, at two walking speeds. We hypothesized that in individuals post-stroke, there would be no difference in their paretic ankle quasi-stiffness between walking at a self-selected versus a fast speed. However, we hypothesized that ankle quasi-stiffness would correlate with gait speed and propulsion across individuals. Methods Twenty-eight participants with chronic stroke walked on an instrumented treadmill at their self-selected and fast-walking speeds. Multilevel models were used to determine the relationships between ankle quasi-stiffness, speed, and propulsion. Findings Overall, ankle quasi-stiffness did not increase within individuals from a self-selected to a fast gait speed (p = 0.69). A 1 m/s increase in speed across participants predicted an increase in overall ankle quasi-stiffness of 0.02 Nm/deg./kg (p = 0.03) and a 1 N/BW change in overall propulsion across participants predicted a 0.265 Nm/deg./kg increase in overall ankle quasi-stiffness (p < 0.0001). Interpretation Individuals post-stroke did not modulate their ankle quasi-stiffness with increased speed, but across individuals there was a positive relationship between ankle quasi-stiffness and both speed and peak propulsion. Walking speed and propulsion are limited in individuals post-stroke, therefore, improving either could lead to a higher functional status. Understanding post-stroke ankle stiffness may be important in the design of therapeutic interventions and exoskeletons, where these devices augment the biological ankle quasi-stiffness to improve walking performance.


What I Know: The Value of Mentoring and Leadership

December 2021

·

8 Reads

·

1 Citation

Physical Therapy

Stuart Binder-Macleod, PT, PhD, FAPTA, the 51st Mary McMillan lecturer, is the Edward L. Ratledge Professor of Physical Therapy and associate vice president for clinical and translation research at the University of Delaware (UD). He served as the chair of UD's department of physical therapy for 16 years, and his research laboratory had more than 25 years of continuous National Institutes of Health funding, including major funding for projects involving the development and testing of treatment interventions for individuals demonstrating poststroke hemiparesis. A recipient of multiple honors from the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) and its components, Binder-Macleod also served on the task force that created the American Council of Academic Physical Therapy, and he currently serves on the Board of Trustees of the Foundation for Physical Therapy Research.



Figure 1. (A) Propulsion is produced when an ankle plantarflexion moment (M PF ) is generated and when the limb is oriented behind the body (θ). (B) Combining isometric strength testing with muscle electrostimulation allows assessment of both a muscle's maximum voluntary strength and strength capacity. The ratio of these force measurements is used to compute central drive.
Figure 2. (A) Maximum plantarflexion force produced voluntarily and with a superimposed burst of electrical stimulation for the paretic and nonparetic plantarflexors of 40 people poststroke. (B) Deficits in central drive to the paretic and nonparetic plantarflexors, computed as the ratio of maximum voluntary strength and strength capacity. Error bars are the standard error. *P < 0.05.
Figure 3. Relationship between paretic limb propulsion and walking speed is moderated by the central drive to the paretic plantarflexors. Simple slopes are calculated using ±1 standard deviation of the moderator variables-walking speed and central drive to the paretic plantarflexors.
Figure 4. (A) Paretic limb propulsion and (B) interlimb propulsion asymmetry ratio for four (n = 10) subgroups created by stratifying study participants based on their walking speed and central drive to the paretic plantarflexors. Error bars are the standard error.
Central Drive to the Paretic Ankle Plantarflexors Affects the Relationship Between Propulsion and Walking Speed After Stroke

January 2020

·

1,283 Reads

·

33 Citations

Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy

Background and purpose: The ankle plantarflexor muscles are the primary generators of propulsion during walking. Impaired paretic plantarflexion is a key contributor to interlimb propulsion asymmetry after stroke. Poststroke muscle weakness may be the result of a reduced force-generating capacity, reduced central drive, or a combination of these impairments. This study sought to elucidate the relationship between the neuromuscular function of the paretic plantarflexor muscles and propulsion deficits across individuals with different walking speeds. Methods: For 40 individuals poststroke, we used instrumented gait analysis and dynamometry coupled with supramaximal electrostimulation to study the interplay between limb kinematics, the neuromuscular function of the paretic plantarflexors (ie, strength capacity and central drive), propulsion, and walking speed. Results: The strength capacity of the paretic plantarflexors was not independently related to paretic propulsion. Reduced central drive to the paretic plantarflexors independently contributed to paretic propulsion deficits. An interaction between walking speed and plantarflexor central drive was observed. Individuals with slower speeds and lower paretic plantarflexor central drive presented with the largest propulsion impairments. Some study participants with low paretic plantarflexor central drive presented with similarly fast speeds as those with near-normal central drive by leveraging a compensatory reliance on nonparetic propulsion. The final model accounted for 86% of the variance in paretic propulsion (R = 0.86, F = 33.10, P < 0.001). Discussion and conclusions: Individuals poststroke have latent paretic plantarflexion strength that they are not able to voluntarily access. The magnitude of central drive deficit is a strong indicator of propulsion impairment in both slow and fast walkers.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A298).


Distance-Induced Changes in Walking Speed After Stroke: Relationship to Community Walking Activity

August 2019

·

41 Reads

·

15 Citations

Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy

Background and purpose: Physical inactivity is a major contributing factor to reduced health and quality of life. The total distance walked during the 6-Minute Walk Test is a strong indicator of real-world walking activity after stroke. The purpose of this study was to determine whether measurement of distance-induced changes in walking speed during the 6-Minute Walk Test improves the test's ability to predict community walking activity. Methods: For 40 individuals poststroke, community walking activity (steps/d), the total distance walked during the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWTtotal), and the difference between the distances walked during the final and first minutes of the test (Δ6MWTmin6-min1) were analyzed using moderated regression. Self-efficacy, assessed using the Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale, was also included in the model. Results: Alone, 6MWTtotal explained 41% of the variance in steps/d. The addition of Δ6MWTmin6-min1 increased explanatory power by 29% (ΔR = 0.29, P < 0.001). The final model accounted for 71% of steps/d variance (F4,32 = 19.52, P < 0.001). Examination of a significant 6MWTtotal × Δ6MWTmin6-min1 interaction revealed a positive relationship between 6MWTtotal and steps/d, with individuals whose distances declined from minute 1 to minute 6 by 0.10 m/s or more presenting with substantially fewer steps/d than those whose distances did not decline. Discussion and conclusions: Coassessment of distance-induced changes in walking speed during the 6-Minute Walk Test and the total distance walked substantially improves the prediction of real-world walking activity after stroke. This study provides new insight into how walking ability after stroke can be characterized to reduce heterogeneity and advance personalized treatments.



Stimulation of paralysed quadriceps muscles with sequentially and spatially distributed electrodes during dynamic knee extension

January 2019

·

618 Reads

·

20 Citations

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Background During functional electrical stimulation (FES) tasks with able-bodied (AB) participants, spatially distributed sequential stimulation (SDSS) has demonstrated substantial improvements in power output and fatigue properties compared to conventional single electrode stimulation (SES). The aim of this study was to compare the properties of SDSS and SES in participants with spinal cord injury (SCI) in a dynamic isokinetic knee extension task simulating knee movement during recumbent cycling. Method Using a case-series design, m. vastus lateralis and medialis of four participants with motor and sensory complete SCI (AIS A) were stimulated for 6 min on both legs with both electrode setups. With SES, target muscles were stimulated by a pair of electrodes. In SDSS, the distal electrodes were replaced by four small electrodes giving the same overall stimulation frequency and having the same total surface area. Torque was measured during knee extension by a dynamometer at an angular velocity of 110 deg/s. Mean power of the left and right sides (PmeanL,R) was calculated from all stimulated extensions for initial, final and all extensions. Fatigue is presented as an index value with respect to initial power from 1 to 0, whereby 1 means no fatigue. Results SDSS showed higher PmeanL,R values for all four participants for all extensions (increases of 132% in participant P1, 100% in P2, 36% in P3 and 18% in P4 compared to SES) and for the initial phase (increases of 84%, 59%, 66%, and 16%, respectively). Fatigue resistance was better with SDSS for P1, P2 and P4 but worse for P3 (0.47 vs 0.35, 0.63 vs 0.49, 0.90 vs 0.82 and 0.59 vs 0.77, respectively). Conclusion Consistently higher PmeanL,R was observed for all four participants for initial and overall contractions using SDSS. This supports findings from previous studies with AB participants. Fatigue properties were better in three of the four participants. The lower fatigue resistance with SDSS in one participant may be explained by a very low muscle activation level in this case. Further investigation in a larger cohort is warranted.


a The knee dynamometer measuring the power output of the right leg during stimulation with the SES setup. The leg brace, the lever arm with the load cell and the chain drive system are visible. b SDSS setup with the four small electrodes replacing the active electrodes. Electrodes were placed as close as possible to the located motor points. c SES setup with two pairs of electrodes. Active electrodes were placed on the motor points of m. vastus medialis and m. vastus lateralis. Motor points are highlighted with an orange cross (colour figure online)
The curve represents the power output of one stimulated leg extension (Pstim) with its characterising output parameters
a Power output (Pmean) during the 6-min stimulated knee extension of one subject’s right leg. b, c The corresponding power curves of six consecutive stimulated knee extensions (Pstim) of the same subject during the initial phase (b) and during the final phase (c)
a Power output (Pmean) during the 6-min stimulated knee extension and b scaled power output (Pmean,s) during the 6-min stimulated knee extension, with Pstim scaled to an input pulse width of 100 µs. The circles represent the mean of 20 consecutive knee extensions. The error bars show the standard deviations
Data samples for Pmean (a–c) and Pmean,s (d–f) for the initial (a, d), the final (b, e) and the overall (c, f) stimulation phases for both setups; the green lines link the sample pairs from each subject; the red bars depict mean values. D is the difference between the paired samples. MD is the mean difference (red bar) with its 95% confidence interval (CI) in blue. Inclusion of the value 0 within the 95% CI in a signifies a non-significant difference in this case, conforming with p > 0.05 (Table 1). For all other tests, b–f, the value 0 lies outwith the CI, thus signifying significant differences between SES and SDSS with p < 0.05 (Table 1) (colour figure online)
Power output and fatigue properties using spatially distributed sequential stimulation in a dynamic knee extension task

September 2017

·

196 Reads

·

24 Citations

European Journal of Applied Physiology

Purpose: The low power output and fatigue resistance during functional electrical stimulation (FES) limits its use for functional applications. The aim of this study was to compare the power output and fatigue properties of spatially distributed sequential stimulation (SDSS) against conventional single electrode stimulation (SES) in an isokinetic knee extension task simulating knee movement during recumbent cycling. Methods: M. vastus lateralis and m. vastus medialis of eight able-bodied subjects were stimulated for 6 min on both legs with both setups. In the SES setup, target muscles were each stimulated by a pair of electrodes. In SDSS, four small electrodes replaced the SES active electrodes, but reference electrodes were the same. Torque was measured during knee extension movement by a dynamometer at an angular velocity of 110°/s. Mean power (P mean) was calculated from stimulated extensions for the first 10 extensions, the final 20 extensions and overall. Fatigue is presented as an index, calculated as the decrease with respect to initial power. Results: P mean was significantly higher for SDSS than for SES in the final phase (9.9 ± 4.0 vs. 7.4 ± 4.3 W, p = 0.035) and overall (11.5 ± 4.0 vs. 9.2 ± 4.5 W, p = 0.037). With SDSS, the reduction in P mean was significantly smaller compared to SES (from 14.9 to 9.9 vs. 14.6 to 7.4 W, p = 0.024). The absolute mean pulse width was substantially lower with SDSS (62.5 vs. 90.0 µs). Conclusion: Although less stimulation was applied, SDSS showed a significantly higher mean power output than SES. SDSS also had improved fatigue resistance when compared to conventional stimulation. The SDSS approach may provide substantial performance benefits for cyclical FES applications.


Control of lateral weight transfer is associated with walking speed in individuals post-stroke

June 2017

·

377 Reads

·

65 Citations

Journal of Biomechanics

Restoring functional gait speed is an important goal for rehabilitation post-stroke. During walking, transferring of one’s body weight between the limbs and maintaining balance stability are necessary for independent functional gait. Although it is documented that individuals post-stroke commonly have difficulties with performing weight transfer onto their paretic limbs, it remains to be determined if these deficits contributed to slower walking speeds. The primary purpose of this study was to compare the weight transfer characteristics between slow and fast post-stroke ambulators. Participants (N=36) with chronic post-stroke hemiparesis walked at their comfortable and maximal walking speeds on a treadmill. Participants were stratified into 2 groups based on their comfortable walking speeds (≥ 0.8 m/s or < 0.8 m/s). Minimum body center of mass (COM) to center of pressure (COP) distance, weight transfer timing, step width, lateral foot placement relative to the COM, hip moment, peak vertical and anterior ground reaction forces, and changes in walking speed were analyzed. Results showed that slow walkers walked with a delayed and deficient weight transfer to the paretic limb, lower hip abductor moment, and more lateral paretic limb foot placement relative to the COM compared to fast walkers. In addition, propulsive force and walking speed capacity was related to lateral weight transfer ability. These findings demonstrated that deficits in lateral weight transfer and stability could potentially be one of the limiting factors underlying comfortable walking speeds and a determinant of chronic stroke survivors’ ability to increase walking speed.


Citations (93)


... For instance in patients with spastic muscles, increased stiffness, and hyperactive stretch reflexes are often observed, making it challenging to accurately measure the force [96]. Additionally, patients with cognitive impairments may have difficulty understanding or consistently following instructions, which can directly affect the accuracy of forcebased assessments [97,98]. Incomplete SCI (iSCI) patients may also not be suitable for force-based performance assessments due to common symptoms such as muscle weakness and spasticity, which significantly affect the consistency and reliability of force measurements [99]. ...

Reference:

Patient performance assessment methods for upper extremity rehabilitation in assist-as-needed therapy strategies: a comprehensive review
A Portable, Neurostimulation-Integrated, Force Measurement Platform for the Clinical Assessment of Plantarflexor Central Drive

... 9,14,59,60 Reduced peak angle of ankle joint plantarflexion is a hallmark of stroke survivor gait. [3][4][5]11,23 Muscle weakness and/or spasticity of the calf musculature reduces the power generating capacity of the ankle joint complex, limiting push-off capabilities to aid propulsion and movement in the direction of travel, 22,61,62 which can also reduce step length and increase stance time. However, in this study, only peak plantarflexion moment of the ankle joint on the nonparetic leg significantly correlated to walking speed, although the peak moment was similar between slow, fast, and control groups, suggesting that the function of the ankle joint may not be the key determinant in stroke survivor gait; undoubtedly, though, it remains an important factor. ...

Ankle stiffness modulation during different gait speeds in individuals post-stroke
  • Citing Article
  • September 2022

Clinical Biomechanics

... Moreover, results on FES based gait assistance/improvement presented in [6]- [10] have primarily focused on drop foot correction. In these results, FES mainly targets the TA muscle during the swing phase, foregoing stimulation of plantarflexors, which are critical for push-off [11]. Efficacy of FES stimuli to plantarflexor muscles has been shown for correcting post-stroke gait deficits [3] and improving walking after SCI [12]. ...

Central Drive to the Paretic Ankle Plantarflexors Affects the Relationship Between Propulsion and Walking Speed After Stroke

Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy

... The total distance covered dur-ing the 6MWT is considered a key predictor of post-stroke community walking activity [26]. More recently, assessing whether or not an individual speeds up or slows down during the test (i.e., the distance-induced change in six-minute walk test speed; %∆6MWT speed) has been shown to improve prediction of community walking activity, beyond using the 6MWT distance alone [27]. The %∆6MWT speed was calculated, as a percentage, as the difference in distance walked in the first versus sixth minutes, divided by the distance walked in the first minute. ...

Distance-Induced Changes in Walking Speed After Stroke: Relationship to Community Walking Activity
  • Citing Article
  • August 2019

Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy

... Each electrode activates a different pool of motor units at a lower frequency than SES, while still maintaining a strong, fused muscle contraction. This approach has been shown to effectively reduce muscle fatigue when the electrodes are placed over different synergistic muscle bellies [24][25][26][27] or even over the same muscle belly [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. The latter method, known as spatially distributed sequential stimulation (SDSS), uses four small, closely spaced electrodes placed over the same surface as the SES electrode. ...

Stimulation of paralysed quadriceps muscles with sequentially and spatially distributed electrodes during dynamic knee extension

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

... Each electrode activates a different pool of motor units at a lower frequency than SES, while still maintaining a strong, fused muscle contraction. This approach has been shown to effectively reduce muscle fatigue when the electrodes are placed over different synergistic muscle bellies [24][25][26][27] or even over the same muscle belly [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. The latter method, known as spatially distributed sequential stimulation (SDSS), uses four small, closely spaced electrodes placed over the same surface as the SES electrode. ...

Power output and fatigue properties using spatially distributed sequential stimulation in a dynamic knee extension task

European Journal of Applied Physiology

... Individuals with hemiparesis due to stroke frequently exhibit an asymmetric CoM motion in the frontal plane. This asymmetry includes a greater distance between the CoM and the stance foot [10] and a more variable CoM state (i.e., position and velocity) [11], [12] when the body is transferred towards the paretic (i.e. during paretic steps) versus the non-paretic side (i.e. during non-paretic steps). Such asymmetric CoM transfer motion in the frontal plane is associated with slower walking speeds and a higher risk of falling [10], [13]. ...

Control of lateral weight transfer is associated with walking speed in individuals post-stroke
  • Citing Article
  • June 2017

Journal of Biomechanics

... Full volitional access to the force-generating capacity of muscle is a hallmark of unimpaired neuromotor function and can be measured clinically as the central drive ratio (i.e., the ratio of the forces produced without and with superimposed electrical stimulation [1,2]). The maximum force produced without stimulation is the muscle's voluntary strength capacity (MVC), whereas the maximum force produced with electrical stimulation is the muscle's maximum force-generating ability (MFGA). ...

Comparison of Techniques to Determine Human Skeletal Muscle Voluntary Activation
  • Citing Article
  • June 2017

Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology

... Among these treatments, functional electrical stimulation (FES) has been shown in previous studies to be effective in improving the clinical outcomes of patients with stroke (6)(7)(8). FES is a rehabilitation approach that involves synchronizing electrical stimulation with motor and sensory nerve fibers during functional motor tasks (9). In contrast to isolated electrical stimulation, FES utilizes rhythmic electrical stimulation targeted at specific muscles to induce functional movements that mimic voluntary contractions, thereby restoring lost functionalities (10). ...

Single Session of Functional Electrical Stimulation-Assisted Walking Produces Corticomotor Symmetry Changes Related to Changes in Poststroke Walking Mechanics
  • Citing Article
  • February 2017

Physical Therapy

... As such, it is likely that these lower extremity muscles (e.g., VMO and BF) have comparable hotspots given the known non-discrete cortical representations. (Palmer et al. 2017; Davies 2020) Our sub-analysis confirmed the BF were most likely in a rested state during the motor mapping procedure. This may raise concerns on the stimulation intensity used to activate the VMO in its active state and the ability to activate the rested BF. ...

Characterizing differential post-stroke corticomotor drive to the dorsi- and plantarflexor muscles during resting and volitional muscle activation
  • Citing Article
  • January 2017

Journal of Neurophysiology