Stijn van Kessel’s research while affiliated with Queen Mary University of London and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (38)


Populism, the far right and EU integration: beyond simple dichotomies
  • Article

December 2024

·

6 Reads

·

2 Citations

Journal of European Integration

Stijn van Kessel

Figure 1. Data used in conjunction with The PopuList.
The PopuList: A Database of Populist, Far-Left, and Far-Right Parties Using Expert-Informed Qualitative Comparative Classification (EiQCC)
  • Article
  • Full-text available

September 2023

·

681 Reads

·

105 Citations

British Journal of Political Science

Matthijs Rooduijn

·

·

·

[...]

·

With a proliferation of scholarly work focusing on populist, far-left, and far-right parties, questions have arisen about the correct ways to ideologically classify such parties. To ensure transparency and uniformity in research, the discipline could benefit from a systematic procedure. In this letter, we discuss how we have employed the method of ‘Expert-informed Qualitative Comparative Classification’ (EiQCC) to construct the newest version of The PopuList (3.0) – a database of populist, far-left, and far-right parties in Europe since 1989. This method takes into account the in-depth knowledge of national party experts while allowing for systematic comparative analysis across cases and over time. We also examine how scholars have made use of the previous versions of the dataset, explain how the new version of The PopuList differs from previous ones, and compare it to other data. We conclude with a discussion of the strengths and limitations of The PopuList dataset.

Download

Geographical areas covered for each party.
Why do party elites incentivise activism? The case of the populist radical right

July 2023

·

86 Reads

·

7 Citations

Party Politics

Partisan dealignment in Western Europe has gone hand in hand with the decline of electoral participation and active membership in political parties. Yet political participation and activism are not necessarily a thing of the past, and scholars have for instance observed these characteristics in several contemporary populist radical right parties (PRRPs). Drawing on the analysis of 124 interviews with party representatives from four European PRRPs (the League, the Finns Party, Flemish Interest and the Swiss People’s Party), we ask what motivates PRRP elites to foster the creation of tight communities of activists. Three reasons appear to stand out: campaigning prowess (to gain public support); legitimising the party; and organisational survival. The final section offers reflections on the wider implications of our study and suggests avenues for future research, questioning the assumption that parties are necessarily and uniformly shifting away from activism and societal rootedness.




Mobilising around Europe: a conceptual framework and introduction to the special section

March 2022

·

40 Reads

·

7 Citations

This article provides a conceptual framework and introduction to the special section ‘Mobilising around Europe: pro and anti-EU politics in an era of populism and nationalism’. By means of its four articles, the special section seeks to address the ‘politicisation of Europe’ outside of the conventional party-political arena. Whilst the future of European integration has become increasingly contested, not least due to the rise of Eurosceptic political parties of the populist radical right, we observe that politicisation has also occurred in the protest arena through grassroots activism. The contributions in this special section analyse these mobilisations, which have thus far received limited scholarly attention, and the positions and frames activists and various social movement organisations (SMOs) adopt concerning the future of European integration. By doing this, these articles reveal the often complex and context-dependent stances towards ‘Europe’ amongst actors across the ideological spectrum, which extend beyond dichotomous pro-/anti-EU positions.


Right-Wing Populist Party Organisation Across Europe: The Survival of the Mass-Party? Introduction to the Thematic Issue

November 2021

·

88 Reads

·

30 Citations

Politics and Governance

This thematic issue assesses the organisational forms of a broad range of right-wing populist parties (RWPPs) across Europe (12 in total). It interrogates received wisdom about the supposed leader-centeredness of such parties and investigates, in particular, the extent to which the mass party, as an organisational model, remains popular among RWPPs. This introduction presents the aims, research questions, and analytical framework of the issue and justifies its selection of cases. The resilience of the mass party model highlighted in many articles challenges the dominant trend that party organisation literature has identified: a unidirectional shift towards “catch-all,” “electoral-professional,” or “cartel” organisations.


Right-Wing Populist Party Organisation Across Europe: The Survival of the Mass-Party? Conclusion to the Thematic Issue

November 2021

·

81 Reads

·

18 Citations

Politics and Governance

This article provides a comparative conclusion to the thematic issue on the organisational characteristics of 12 right-wing populist parties (RWPPs) across Europe. We observe that many RWPPs—at least partially—adopt features of the mass party model. This finding illustrates the ideological aspects behind organisational choices: For populist parties, in particular, it is important to signal societal rootedness and “closeness to the people.” It furthermore challenges the idea that there is a one-way teleological movement towards more lean, electoral-professional kinds of party organisation. At the same time, the case studies clearly illustrate that RWPP leaders and executives continue to exercise great power over their members, who are essentially offered “participation without power.”


The Welfare Agenda of the Populist Radical Right in Western Europe: Combining Welfare Chauvinism, Producerism and Populism*

January 2021

·

350 Reads

·

58 Citations

Swiss Political Science Review

Recent scholarship on the populist radical right tends to imprecisely describe the welfare agenda of this party family with reference to its key ideological characteristics of nativism, authoritarianism, and populism. We propose an alternative analytical framework that considers the multidimensionality of welfare state positions and the “deservingness criteria” that underlie ideas about welfare entitlement. Applying this framework to a sample of four European populist radical right parties, we conclude that three interrelated frames inform their welfare agenda. These parties, we argue, advocate social closure not only on the basis of the deservingness criterion of identity (welfare chauvinism), but also on criteria of control, attitude, and reciprocity (welfare producerism) and on an antagonism between the people and the establishment (welfare populism). Understanding the welfare agenda of the populist radical right requires us to move beyond welfare chauvinism and to reconsider the concept of welfare producerism and its interaction with welfare chauvinism.



Citations (24)


... We include speeches by MEPs belonging to parties that have been classified as far-right in The PopuList (Rooduijn et al., 2024). In addition, we add far-right parties that gained representation in the EP but are not included in The PopuList because they failed to meet its selection criteria (i.e., at least 2 percent of votes or one seat in national parliamentary elections). ...

Reference:

Far‐Right Illiberalism in the European Parliament
The PopuList: A Database of Populist, Far-Left, and Far-Right Parties Using Expert-Informed Qualitative Comparative Classification (EiQCC)

British Journal of Political Science

... Carter 2005;Rooduijn 2015), developing effective and cohesive organisations (e.g. Albertazzi & van Kessel 2023;de Lange & Art 2011), and even adapting to the pressures that come from holding power at the national level (e.g. Albertazzi & McDonnell 2015;Zaslove 2012). ...

Why do party elites incentivise activism? The case of the populist radical right

Party Politics

... Comparative efforts in the field have largely focused on why governments opt for non-mandatory referendums (e.g., Closa, 2007;Mendez et al., 2014;Oppermann, 2013;Posser, 2016), while studies adopting a politicization framework have tended to analyze electoral or parliamentary arenas. There have been few comparative analyses of referendum-driven politicization (see Fagan & van Kessel, 2023;Hoeglinger, 2016;Hurrelmann et al., 2013;Hutter et al., 2016;Statham & Trenz, 2013a, 2013bVetters et al., 2009). These studies have often focused on a limited number of prominent cases and have yielded inconclusive results, especially regarding the types of challengers and issue-framing contests magnified in direct democratic contexts. ...

The Failure of Remain: Anti-Brexit Activism in the United Kingdom
  • Citing Book
  • January 2023

... This theory offers insights into the behaviors and interactions of actors involved in these movements, helping researchers understand the dynamics of ecological movements and their effects on nature conservation. van Kessel (2022) have demonstrated the significant impact of social movements in addressing critical ecological issues (Singh, 2023). For instance, the environmental justice movement in Warren County, North Carolina, in the late 1970s and early 1980s is considered a landmark case. ...

Mobilising around Europe: a conceptual framework and introduction to the special section
  • Citing Article
  • March 2022

... Although far-right youth organisations can be crucial for the far right's broader mobilisation and radicalisation, knowledge about their development and role is scarce. Studies have only recently devoted more attention to the far right's party organisation (Heinisch and Mazzoleni, 2016;Van Kessel and Albertazzi, 2021), although it is considered a key factor for electoral persistence (De Lange and Art, 2011). Even less attention is paid to (far-right) youth wings, which are part of the broader party organisation and can fulfil important recruitment and socialisation functions for parties. ...

Right-Wing Populist Party Organisation Across Europe: The Survival of the Mass-Party? Conclusion to the Thematic Issue

Politics and Governance

... In recent decades, populist radical right parties (PRRPs) have made significant electoral gains in Europe and beyond. 1 While earlier academic studies focused primarily on examining the reasons behind this renewed 'swing to the right' (Betz, 1994;Mudde, 2007), recent scholarship has started to analyse how these parties organize themselves (Art, 2011;Böhmelt et al., 2022;Ellinas, 2020). Taken together, these studies reveal considerable diversity when it comes to PRRP organization (e.g., Heinisch and Mazzoleni, 2016b; van Kessel and Albertazzi, 2021). For instance, while the Dutch Partij voor de Vrijheid (Party for Freedom or PVV) has developed a leader-centric structure, others, like the Vlaams Belang (Flemish Interest Party or VB), have embraced traditional 'mass party' models (Albertazzi and van Kessel, 2021). ...

Right-Wing Populist Party Organisation Across Europe: The Survival of the Mass-Party? Introduction to the Thematic Issue

Politics and Governance

... We test if this welfare-chauvinism narrative affects with whom solidarity is formed, taking migration background into account. We achieve this by recognising the income disparities between the working class and other social classes and explicitly noting that some political parties advocate prioritising the improvement of incomes for working-class individuals without a migration background, as is present in the programmes and rhetoric of radical right programmes (Abts et al. 2021;Chueri 2023). ...

The Welfare Agenda of the Populist Radical Right in Western Europe: Combining Welfare Chauvinism, Producerism and Populism*

Swiss Political Science Review

... There is, however, a crucial difference between Hungary and Portugal in terms of the impact of populist politics on government policies. Hungary has become a crystallized case of populist governance (Rooduijn et al. 2023) as the exclusionary right-wing populist party Fidesz has been in government position since 2010. Among major indicators of democratic development Freedom House scores reflect a moderate democratic backsliding of Hungary, while the V-Dem Liberal Democracy Index indicates that Hungary has recently deviated markedly from the liberal democracy path (Figure 1), even pointing to a shift towards a hybrid regime. ...

The PopuList: An Overview of Populist, Far Right, Far Left and Eurosceptic Parties in Europe.

... While there are many valuable studies on each of these two important concepts (i.e., populism and competitive authoritarianism), there is still a fertile ground for research about the intersectionalities between these concepts (we discuss the commonalities and differences of the concepts in great detail in our literature review). This article aims to shed light on these commonalities by particularly focusing on the demand side of populism and competitive authoritarianism as to how supporters of populist incumbent parties in competitive authoritarian regimes tackle salient issues for the public (for some illuminating works on this issue, see Eberl, Huber, Mede, & Greussing, 2023;Kaltwasser & Van Hauwaert, 2020;Schulz et al., 2018;Spruyt, Keppens, & Van Droogenbroeck, 2016;Van Kessel, Sajuria, & Van Hauwaert, 2021). ...

Informed, uninformed or misinformed? A cross-national analysis of populist party supporters across European democracies
  • Citing Article
  • January 2020

... Relatedly, the categories of 'hard' and 'soft' Euroscepticism devised by Szczerbiak and Taggart in the 2000s, discriminating between fundamental and contingent opposition to European integration, still supply the most popular approach. However, academic understandings of hard Euroscepticism (hereinafter HE) have increasingly tended to ascribe this category only to parties that pursue EU withdrawal altogether (e.g., Bortun, 2022;Heinisch et al., 2021;Taggart and Pirro, 2021;Van Kessel et al., 2020). Such exclusive interpretationsbesides drifting away from HE as defined in earlier work by Szczerbiak and Taggart (2003, 2008b, 2018)arguably end up concealing the actual extent of principled opposition to the EU. ...

Eager to leave? Populist radical right parties’ responses to the UK’s Brexit vote
  • Citing Article
  • January 2020

British Journal of Politics & International Relations