Stijn P. Andeweg’s research while affiliated with National Institute for Public Health and the Environment and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (31)


Adjusted mean post- vs pre-infection CIS-fatigue scores with 95% CI over time since first SARS-CoV-2 infection, by covariable
Each panel visualizes the adjusted mean post- vs pre-infection CIS-fatigue scores with 95% CI over time since infection and colored by covariable level. Results are adjusted for the other shown covariables and time since infection is included as penalized spline. CIS = Checklist Individual Strength; CI = Confidence Interval.
Adjusted prevalence of severe fatigue with 95% CI over time since first SARS-CoV-2 infection, by covariable
Each panel visualizes the adjusted prevalence of severe fatigue with 95% CI over time since infection and colored by covariable level. Results are adjusted for the other shown covariables and time since infection is included as penalized spline. CI = Confidence Interval.
Adjusted prevalence of severe fatigue with 95% CI before and after Delta and Omicron SARS-CoV-2 infections and in matched uninfected participants
Infected and uninfected participants were matched on month and year of pre-infection CIS-fatigue assessment, the pre-infection CIS-fatigue score, age group (18–59 years, 60–85 years), sex (male, female), medical risk condition (yes, no), and vaccination status (unvaccinated, primary vaccinated, booster vaccinated). CIS = Checklist Individual Strength; CI = Confidence Interval.
Prospective cohort study of fatigue before and after SARS-CoV-2 infection in the Netherlands
  • Article
  • Full-text available

March 2025

·

39 Reads

Anne J. Huiberts

·

Siméon de Bruijn

·

Stijn P. Andeweg

·

[...]

·

Mirjam J. Knol

Fatigue is one of the most common persistent symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection. We aimed to assess fatigue during and after a SARS-CoV-2 infection by age, sex, presence of a medical risk condition, SARS-CoV-2 variant and vaccination status, accounting for pre-infection fatigue and compared with uninfected individuals. We used data from an ongoing prospective cohort study in the Netherlands (VASCO). We included 22,705 first infections reported between 12 July 2021 and 9 March 2024. Mean fatigue scores increased during infection, declined rapidly in the first 90 days post-infection, but remained elevated until at least 270 days for Delta and 120 days for Omicron infections. Prevalence of severe fatigue was 18.5% before first infection. It increased to 24.4% and 22.5% during acute infection and decreased to 21.2% and 18.9% at 90 days after Delta and Omicron infection, respectively. The prevalence among uninfected participants was lower than among matched Delta-infected participants during the acute phase of the infection and 90 days post-infection. For matched Omicron-infected individuals this was only observed during the acute phase. We observed no differences in mean post- vs pre-infection fatigue scores at 90-270 days post-infection by vaccination status. The impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on the prevalence of severe fatigue was modest at population level, especially for Omicron.

Download

Using SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein antibodies to detect (re)infection

February 2025

·

10 Reads

We assessed the validity of serum total anti-nucleoprotein Immunoglobulin (N-antibodies) to identify SARS-CoV-2 (re)infections by estimating the persistence of N-antibody seropositivity and boosting following infection. From a prospective Dutch cohort study (VASCO), we included adult participants with ≥2 consecutive self-collected serum samples, 4–8 months apart, between May 2021–May 2023. Sample pairs were stratified by N-seropositivity of the first sample and by self-reported infection within the sampling interval. We calculated the proportions of participants with N-seroconversion and fold-increase (1.5, 2, 3, 4) of N-antibody concentration over time since infection and explored determinants. We included 67,632 sample pairs. Pairs with a seronegative first sample (70%) showed 89% N-seroconversion after reported infection and 11% when no infection was reported. In pairs with a seropositive first sample (30%), 82%–65% showed a 1.5- to 4-fold increase with a reported reinfection, and 19%–10% without a reported reinfection, respectively. After one year, 83% remained N-seropositive post-first infection and 93%–61% showed a 1.5-fold to 4-fold increase post-reinfection. Odds for seroconversion/fold increase were higher for symptomatic infections and Omicron infections. In the current era with limited antigen or PCR testing, N-serology can be validly used to detect SARS-CoV-2 (re)infections at least up to a year after infection, supporting the monitoring of COVID-19 burden and vaccine effectiveness.





Antibody levels following vaccination and breakthrough infection. (A, D, G) pre-infection antibody concentrations by time since first vaccination for N-, S1, and RBD-specific IgG, respectively (n = 598). Colors indicate the vaccination status at the time of blood collection. Measurements from the same individual are connected (gray line). (B, E, H) Post-breakthrough infection antibody concentrations by time since positive test for N-, S1-, and RBD-specific IgG, respectively (n = 520). Circle colors indicate the history of previous infection (see methods) and circles are filled by pre-infection N, S1, or RBD concentration. Absent pre-infection sample is indicated in grey. Black line shows the estimated mean serological response in not previously infected. Shaded areas represent 95% confidence envelopes. Red horizontal line indicates the seropositivity threshold for N (14.3 BAU/mL) and S1 (10.1 BAU/mL). (C, F, I) Histograms of the pre-infection and post-infection concentrations for N-, S1-, and RBD-specific IgG, respectively.
Estimated probability of N-seropositivity by time since positive test. (A) Estimates of the probability of N-seropositivity as a function of time since positive test and history of previous infection (n = 479). Shaded areas represent 95% confidence intervals/envelopes. (B) Estimates of the probability of N-seropositivity as a function of time since positive test, history of previous infection and COVID-19 symptom status (n = 474). Shaded areas represent 95% confidence intervals/envelopes.
Estimates of the mean S1 antibody levels as a function of time since infection and vaccination in not previously infected (n = 447). Panels show the different time since vaccination (30 days intervals) and x-axis the time since breakthrough infection. Orange and green indicate the persons with and without N-specific antibodies following breakthrough infection. Shaded areas represent 95% confidence intervals/envelopes. RBD estimates are shown in Fig. S2.
Ratio of the RBD Omicron BA.1 over RBD Delta serological response for Delta and Omicron BA.1 infections in not previously infected individuals. Different subplots indicate time since infection in days. See Fig. S3 for additional antigenic target ratio results. P-value is indicated with ***for < 0.001, **for < 0.01, *for < 0.05 and not significant (NS).
Assessment of hybrid population immunity to SARS-CoV-2 following breakthrough infections of distinct SARS-CoV-2 variants by the detection of antibodies to nucleoprotein

October 2023

·

32 Reads

·

7 Citations

Immunity induced by vaccination and infection, referred to as hybrid immunity, provides better protection against SARS-CoV-2 infections compared to immunity induced by vaccinations alone. To assess the development of hybrid immunity we investigated the induction of Nucleoprotein-specific antibodies in PCR-confirmed infections by Delta or Omicron in vaccinated individuals (n = 520). Eighty-two percent of the participants with a breakthrough infection reached N-seropositivity. N-seropositivity was accompanied by Spike S1 antibody boosting, and independent of vaccination status or virus variant. Following the infection relatively more antibodies to the infecting virus variant were detected. In conclusion, these data show that hybrid immunity through breakthrough infections is hallmarked by Nucleoprotein antibodies and broadening of the Spike antibody repertoire. Exposure to future SARS-CoV-2 variants may therefore continue to maintain and broaden vaccine-induced population immunity.


COVID-19 vaccination-induced antibody responses and waning by age and comorbidity status in a large population-based prospective cohort study

October 2023

·

26 Reads

Background Information on the magnitude and duration of antibody levels after COVID-19 vaccination in different groups may be useful for prioritizing of additional vaccinations. Methods Serum samples were collected every six months in a prospective cohort study among adults in the Netherlands. Geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) of antibodies against the receptor binding domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein were calculated after the primary series, first, and second booster vaccinations. Effects of age (18-59 vs 60-85 years) and medical risk conditions on GMC 2-6 weeks and 21-25 weeks after each vaccination, and on waning during 3-25 weeks after each vaccination, were estimated by linear regression. Results We included 20,816, 16,820 and 5,879 samples collected after primary, first and second booster vaccination, respectively. GMCs at 2-6 and 21-25 weeks after primary series were lower in participants with older age or medical risk conditions. After the first booster, older age was associated with lower GMC at 2-6 weeks, higher GMC at 21-25 weeks, and slower waning. GMCs or waning after the first and second boosters (only 60-85) were not associated with medical risk conditions. Conclusions Since antibody differences by age and medical risk groups have become small with increasing number of doses, other factors such as disease severity rather than antibody levels are useful for prioritization of additional vaccinations.


Figure 1: Relative reduction in the reproduction number by testing and tracing, with contributions of the control levels testing and informal tracing, manual tracing, and tracing app; (a) results with the baseline parameter set with parameter values reported in Tables 1-3; (b) results with the baseline parameter set where the population is subdivided into two separate groups with low and high adherence (see sections 2.4 and 2.6) (c) sensitivity analysis with each analysis adjusting exactly one parameter (see section 2.3.5 and Supplement S2 for parameter values)
Figure 2: Analysis for future scenarios for the effectiveness of testing, manual tracing, and digital contact tracing in the base setting and a society with (little) restrictions, both with and without formal manual tracing (a) Reduction in the reproduction number, in the top row the app notification is by authorities while in the bottom row the app notification is by the user him/herself (24 vs 8 hours) (b) For the same six parameter sets the effect of a higher percentage app users on the reduction of the reproduction number
Parameters of the behaviour model. Adherence levels of actions in response to triggers
Parameters of the transmission model
Effectiveness of a COVID-19 contact tracing app in a simulation model with indirect and informal contact tracing

June 2023

·

33 Reads

During the COVID-19 pandemic, contact tracing was used to identify individuals who had been in contact with a confirmed case so that these contacted individuals could be tested and quarantined to prevent further spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Many countries developed mobile apps to find these contacted individuals faster. We evaluate the epidemiological effectiveness of the Dutch app CoronaMelder, where we measure effectiveness as the reduction of the reproduction number R. To this end, we use a simulation model of SARS-CoV-2 spread and contact tracing, informed by data collected during the study period (December 2020 - March 2021) in the Netherlands. We show that the tracing app caused a clear but small reduction of the reproduction number, and the magnitude of the effect was found to be robust in sensitivity analyses. The app could have been more effective if more people had used it, and if time intervals between symptom onset and reporting of contacts would have been shorter. The model used is novel as it accounts for the clustered nature of social networks and as it accounts for cases informally alerting their contacts directly after symptom onset, without involvement of health authorities or a tracing app.


Assessment of hybrid population immunity to SARS-CoV-2 following breakthrough infections of distinct SARS-CoV-2 variants

June 2023

·

25 Reads

Immunity induced by vaccination and infection, referred to as hybrid immunity, provides better protection against SARS-CoV-2 infections compared to immunity induced by vaccinations alone. To assess the development of hybrid immunity we investigated the induction of Nucleoprotein-specific antibodies in PCR-confirmed infections by Delta or Omicron in vaccinated individuals (n = 520). Eighty-two percent of the participants with a breakthrough infection reached N-seropositivity. N-seropositivity was accompanied by Spike S1 antibody boosting, and independent of vaccination status or virus variant. Following the infection relatively more antibodies to the infecting virus variant were detected. In conclusion, these data show that hybrid immunity through breakthrough infections is hallmarked by Nucleoprotein antibodies and repertoire broadening of Spike antibodies. Exposure to future SARS-CoV-2 variants may therefore continue to maintain and broaden vaccine-induced population immunity.


Fig. 1. Transmission pairs by class (primary school P1-P8, secondary school S1-S6) in the period between 1 March and 28 March for infectors and between 1 March and 4 April for infectees. The size of the bubbles shows the number of pairs per setting. Transmission pairs with an unknown setting are excluded. The color of the bubbles indicates the fraction of transmission (the fractions of the three settings Home, School and Other add up to one for each school year combination) in A -the home setting. B -the school setting. C -other settings than household and school setting.
Fig. 2. Chord-diagram showing the absolute difference in transmission pairs between school years (difference A→B, A←B). Only those arrows are shown for which there is a significant asymmetry in the direction of pairs. Colors indicate the infector age class.
Fig. 3. Mean distances in kilometers for primary and secondary school transmission pair combinations with confidence interval. Red bars indicate mean distances without transmission pairs within the same PC6 (zero distance), blue bars indicate mean distances including transmission pairs within the same PC6.
Fig. 4. Transmission chains with frequency of infections between primary and secondary school, with at least one infected child not living in the same household as the others. Only chains are shown where the setting of transmission of the first pair in the chain is either 'home' or 'school', with the setting of transmission for the second pair in the chain being the other of the two settings. Red indicates that the transmission of the first pair took place in the 'home' setting and thus the transmission setting of the second pair is 'school'. For blue, it is the other way around. Percentages on the right indicate what part of triplets consists of only secondary (S), primary and secondary (in any order, P + S) or only primary school children (P).
Empirical evidence of transmission over a school-household network for SARS-CoV-2; exploration of transmission pairs stratified by primary and secondary school

February 2023

·

93 Reads

·

8 Citations

Epidemics

Background: Children play a key role in the transmission of many infectious diseases. They have many of their close social encounters at home or at school. We hypothesized that most of the transmission of respiratory infections among children occur in these two settings and that transmission patterns can be predicted by a bipartite network of schools and households. Aim and methods: To confirm transmission over a school-household network, SARS-CoV-2 transmission pairs in children aged 4-17 years were analyzed by study year and primary/secondary school. Cases with symptom onset between 1 March 2021 and 4 April 2021 identified by source and contact-tracing in the Netherlands were included. In this period, primary schools were open and secondary school students attended class at least once per week. Within pairs, spatial distance between the postcodes was calculated as the Euclidean distance. Results: A total of 4059 transmission pairs were identified; 51.9% between primary schoolers; 19.6% between primary and secondary schoolers; 28.5% between secondary schoolers. Most (68.5%) of the transmission for children in the same study year occurred at school. In contrast, most of the transmission of children from different study years (64.3%) and most primary-secondary transmission (81.7%) occurred at home. The average spatial distance between infections was 1.2 km (median 0.4) for primary school pairs, 1.6 km (median 0) for primary-secondary school pairs and 4.1 km (median 1.2) for secondary school pairs. Conclusion: The results provide evidence of transmission on a bipartite school-household network. Schools play an important role in transmission within study years, and households play an important role in transmission between study years and between primary and secondary schools. Spatial distance between infections in a transmission pair reflects the smaller school catchment area of primary schools versus secondary schools. Many of these observed patterns likely hold for other respiratory pathogens.


Citations (22)


... Although mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 are both mRNA vaccines, their formulations differ in the amount of mRNA encoding the spike protein (mRNA-1273, 100/50 μg; BNT162b2, 30 μg), the lipid nanoparticle delivery systems, and the mRNA structure and composition [6,7,10,11]. In real-world studies, differences in immunogenicity have been observed, particularly in high-risk populations, including a meta-analysis showing higher seroconversion rates and total antibody titers for recipients of a primary series mRNA-1273 versus BNT162b2 in immunocompromised individuals [12], as well as studies showing increased neutralizing antibody titers for patients with medical conditions receiving primary series and booster doses of mRNA-1273 versus BNT162b2 [13][14][15]. Similarly, differences in effectiveness have been observed in real-world studies for high-risk populations, such as older adults and immunocompromised individuals [16,17]. ...

Reference:

Comparative Effectiveness of mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 COVID-19 Vaccines Among Adults with Underlying Medical Conditions: Systematic Literature Review and Pairwise Meta-Analysis Using GRADE
COVID-19 vaccination-induced antibody responses and waning by age and comorbidity status in a large population-based prospective cohort study
  • Citing Article
  • July 2024

Vaccine

... The SARS-CoV-2 outbreak has considerably increased the scientific research motivation around strategies including contact tracing. In particular, DCT apps have attracted the attention of Public Health authorities and the scientific community as well, [16,17]. DCT apps allow to collect the information automatically, and provide fast processing times but also come with drawbacks regarding privacy and the data protection standards ruling in most countries, see [18]. ...

Effectiveness of a COVID-19 contact tracing app in a simulation model with indirect and informal contact tracing
  • Citing Article
  • December 2023

Epidemics

... Spike S1 antibodies are therefore less suitable to detect SARS-CoV-2 infections in a highly vaccinated population, leaving antibodies against the Nucleoprotein (N), one of the structural proteins of SARS-CoV-2, a more specific marker to identify (re)infection [5]. While a relative increase in antibodies can be used as a marker for reinfection [6][7][8], it is currently unknown how long N-antibodies persist after infection and which increase in N-antibodies can reliably detect reinfection. ...

Assessment of hybrid population immunity to SARS-CoV-2 following breakthrough infections of distinct SARS-CoV-2 variants by the detection of antibodies to nucleoprotein

... 21,22 Likewise, there is evidence that schools play a role in the spread of infectious diseases during outbreaks. 23 In that regard, one common immediate action after the declaration of major outbreaks has been to close schools to protect the children against the risk of acquiring the disease. 24 The gathering of children in schools during a public health emergency caused by an infectious disease constitutes a major risk for the further spread because of the prolonged physical exposure during intra and extramural school activities. ...

Empirical evidence of transmission over a school-household network for SARS-CoV-2; exploration of transmission pairs stratified by primary and secondary school

Epidemics

... Case-only studies among SARS-CoV-2-positive individuals have previously been employed to compare the protection offered by vaccines against different variants (13,(15)(16)(17). However, variantspecific estimates of XBB.1.5 ...

Higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.4/5 infection than of BA.2 infection after previous BA.1 infection, the Netherlands, 2 May to 24 July 2022

European Communicable Disease Bulletin

... have shown their potential to escape vaccine-induced humoral immunity, resulting in many vaccine breakthrough infections and the development of hybrid immunity [2][3][4][5][6][7] . Previous infection with Omicron protects against subsequent infections by other Omicron variants, and this protection may be better than hybrid immunity induced by SARS-CoV-2 variants preceding Omicron 8,9 . ...

Higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.4/5 infection than of BA.2 infection after previous BA.1 infection, the Netherlands, 2 May to 24 July 2022
  • Citing Preprint
  • September 2022

... A scientific advance with the potential to end the COVID-19 pandemic are vaccines 23 . Vaccines protect not only the vaccinated party from a severe course of the disease, but a vaccinated individual is also a safer interaction partner for others 24 . Importantly, a high proportion of vaccinated individuals in a social group also lower the threat of contamination for 'at-risk' persons (whose immune system might not be able to build up effective immunization in response to the vaccine) 25,26 . ...

Vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 transmission and infections among household and other close contacts of confirmed cases, the Netherlands, February to May 2021 COVID-19 surveillance and epidemiology team

... Our results show that the overall SAR in student residence units is estimated to be around 8%, which is lower than the SAR observed in Belgian households during a similar study period [14] and other household transmission studies during the alpha dominant prevaccination era [15,16]. The results are in line with the 7.8% SAR, observed in student residences in a study taking place in a similar setting in the United Kingdom [17]. ...

Rapid communication Vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 transmission to household contacts during dominance of Delta variant (B.1.617.2), the Netherlands, August to September 2021

... [67][68][69][70][71] This results in an increase in susceptibility to infection in individuals who only received primary vaccination series or were only infected with ancestral variants and not vaccinated compared to individuals with hybrid immunity. 72 Other studies have reported an increase in protection against Omicron BA.4/5 infection in individuals who suffered a breakthrough infection with Pre-Alpha/Alpha, Delta or Omicron BA.1 variants compared to individuals who received a primary vaccination regimen with ChAdOx1 or BNT162b2 followed by BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 third vaccination without previous infection, even though Ab levels generated by breakthrough infection and third vaccination were similar. 73 Our San Diegan cohorts also exhibited similar trends regarding Abs generated by hybrid immunity vs vaccination only; however, we note that the small cohort size was limited by the availability of individuals that met the specific inclusion criteria for this study. ...

Protection of COVID-19 vaccination and previous infection against Omicron BA.1, BA.2 and Delta SARS-CoV-2 infections

... To estimate the YLD due to "long COVID", we followed previous studies and assumed that approximately 1-in-7 patients (i.e., 13.3%) of mild to moderate cases would suffer post-acute consequences for 28 days, reflecting evidence from the literature [14,25,30,31]. Given that the E-SUS database does not provide the duration of mild to moderate cases, we defined the mean duration of this health state as ten days as proposed by the Center For Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and also applied in similar studies (see for example [15,[31][32][33]). We calculated the duration of "severe" cases as the mean duration of hospitalisations not requiring ICU admission and of "critical" cases as the mean duration of hospitalizations requiring ICU admission. ...

The estimated disease burden of acute COVID-19 in the Netherlands in 2020, in disability-adjusted life-years

European Journal of Epidemiology