Stephen Ross’s research while affiliated with University of Ulster and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (3)


Figure 1. A diagram of the search protocol and screening process results. SA = statistical analysis, ML = machine learning.
Figure 2. Eligible papers categorized by dairy cattle methane emission prediction approach.
Figure 3. An overview of the strengths and limitations of each dairy cattle methane emission prediction approach. CH 4 = methane, DMI = dry matter intake, MFA = milk fatty acids, MIRS = mid infrared spectroscopy, ECMY = energy corrected milk yield, BW = body weight, GC = gas chromatography, ML = machine learning.
Approaches for Predicting Dairy Cattle Methane Emissions: From Traditional Methods to Machine Learning
  • Literature Review
  • Full-text available

August 2024

·

52 Reads

·

2 Citations

Journal of Animal Science

Stephen Ross

·

·

·

[...]

·

Masoud Shirali

Measuring dairy cattle methane (CH4) emissions using traditional recording technologies is complicated and expensive. Prediction models, which estimate CH4 emissions based on proxy information, provide an accessible alternative. This review covers the different modeling approaches taken in the prediction of dairy cattle CH4 emissions and highlights their individual strengths and limitations. Following the guidelines set out by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA); Scopus, EBSCO, Web of Science, PubMed and PubAg were each queried for papers with titles that contained search terms related to a population of “Bovine,” exposure of “Statistical Analysis or Machine Learning,” and outcome of “Methane Emissions”. The search was executed in December 2022 with no publication date range set. Eligible papers were those that investigated the prediction of CH4 emissions in dairy cattle via statistical or machine learning (ML) methods and were available in English. 299 papers were returned from the initial search, 55 of which, were eligible for inclusion in the discussion. Data from the 55 papers was synthesized by the CH4 emission prediction approach explored, including mechanistic modeling, empirical modeling, and machine learning. Mechanistic models were found to be highly accurate, yet they require difficult-to-obtain input data, which, if imprecise, can produce misleading results. Empirical models remain more versatile by comparison, yet suffer greatly when applied outside of their original developmental range. The prediction of CH4 emissions on commercial dairy farms can utilize any approach, however, the traits they use must be procurable in a commercial farm setting. Milk fatty acids (MFA) appear to be the most popular commercially accessible trait under investigation, however, MFA-based models have produced ambivalent results and should be consolidated before robust accuracies can be achieved. ML models provide a novel methodology for the prediction of dairy cattle CH4 emissions through a diverse range of advanced algorithms, and can facilitate the combination of heterogenous data types via hybridization or stacking techniques. In addition to this, they also offer the ability to improve dataset complexity through imputation strategies. These opportunities allow ML models to address the limitations faced by traditional prediction approaches, as well as enhance prediction on commercial farms.

Download


Citations (2)


... In contrast, mechanistic models are constructed to represent physiological processes. While the complexity of mechanistic models and their dependence on parameters that are difficult to obtain can make their use impractical in some settings (Ross et al., 2024), they can nonetheless be valuable research tools to understand the dependency of AFA efficacy on rumen parameters and optimize AFA implementation. ...

Reference:

A review of key microbial and nutritional elements for mechanistic modeling of rumen fermentation in cattle under methane-inhibition
Approaches for Predicting Dairy Cattle Methane Emissions: From Traditional Methods to Machine Learning

Journal of Animal Science

... ML models opt for the same datadriven approach as empirical models, yet unlike empirical models, which rely on statistical inference, they are specifically designed for accurate predictions. Via an exotic algorithmic menu, in combination with hybridization and stacking techniques (Baker et al., 2018;Brownlee., 2021;Ross et al., 2023) ML models provide the necessary flexibility required to facilitate cross-talk and identify relationships between the diverse range of proxy traits available for the prediction of dairy cattle CH 4 emissions today (Negussie et al., 2017). This flexibility allows ML models to overcome the limitations of current prediction approaches, by providing an opportunity to combine the versatility of the data-driven empirical approach, with the accuracy of the theory-based mechanistic. ...

A Novel Mixed Effects Random Forest Approach for Predicting Dairy Cattle Methane Emissions
  • Citing Conference Paper
  • December 2023