Stephan Daubitz's scientific contributions
What is this page?
This page lists the scientific contributions of an author, who either does not have a ResearchGate profile, or has not yet added these contributions to their profile.
It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.
If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.
If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.
It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.
If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.
If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.
Publications (3)
Was bringt eigentlich die Einführung eines Fahrradverleihsystems? Wie viele neue Fahrgäste für den öffentlichen Verkehr werden durch eine Marketingkampagne gewonnen? Dieses Handbuch liefert das nötige Wissen, um die Wirkungen kommunaler Maßnahmen im Verkehr zu evaluieren. Modell stand das englischsprachige Handbuch „Evaluation Matters“, das von der...
Citations
... As such, monitoring the co-creation process and co-design throughout its various stages and constantly recording users' behaviour, engagement patterns, and opinions can provide the main insights into assessing the impact of the co-creation and co-design approach. If available, quantitative data such as participant numbers is helpful as well in supporting evaluation, providing both additional information and a means of validating the qualitative input, but it alone provides an insufficient basis for evaluating the involvement of stakeholders [86,87]. It is therefore important to combine several methods and tools to gather input for evaluation, especially highlighting collective discussions between participants, using interviews and direct contact with evaluation target groups, combined with more quantifiable and standard surveys helping to keep track of progress over time, and collecting standardised information from the evaluation target groups. ...