Stefanie Seisenberger’s research while affiliated with Babraham Institute and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (18)


Figure 1. Total methylation is stable in UN sperm, with significant locus specific changes (A) Experimental design: F1 generation: Dams were randomised on pregnancy day 12.5 to control (C) or undernutrition (UN) groups and UN food intake restricted to 50%. Postnatal litters were equalised to eight pups and animals fed ad libitum. F2 generation: control F1 females mated at age 2 months with non-sibling control or UN males and fed ad libitum to produce: CC -both parents controls; CU -control dam, UN sire. (B) Independent sperm DNA samples were quantified and pooled in equimolar ratios to generate two pools per condition. Control pools: n=8, 5 litters. UN pools: n=8, 4 litters. Following MeDIP-seq two independent C vs UN comparisons identified DMRs where methylation FC >1.5x and binomial p-value <0.0001 in both independent biological replicates. (C) Mass spectrometry quantification of control and UN sperm 5-methyl-cytosine (above) and 5-hydroxymethyl-cytosine (below). E14 ESCs are shown for comparison. (D) Heatmap of 111 hypomethylated DMRs (left) and 55 hypermethylated DMRs (right). Hypermethylated DMRs did not validate.
Figure 2. Bisulphite mutagenesis validation of hypomethylated DMRs in an expanded panel of F1 males' sperm 17 genomic regions validated (Table 1). Data plotted: mean +/− SEM. (C: n=12, 5 litters; UN: n=11, 4 litters) * P<0.05 ** P<0.01, *** P<0.001 unpaired two-tailed t-test. 
Figure 3. DMRs are enriched in intergenic non-repetitive regions and CpG islands 
Figure 4. DMRs regain methylation late during PGC reprogramming and retain nucleosomes in mature sperm
Figure 5. Analysis of methylation at F1 sperm DMRs in F2 brain and liver at E16.5 F2 E16.5 CC and CU brain and liver methylation of F1 sperm previously validated hypomethylated DMRs, measured by bisulphite pyrosequencing. Data presented as mean +/ − SEM. Brain per condition n = 16, ≥ 3 litters; Liver per condition n = 12, 3 litters.

+1

In utero effects. In utero undernourishment perturbs the adult sperm methylome and intergenerational metabolism
  • Article
  • Full-text available

July 2014

·

255 Reads

·

556 Citations

Science

·

·

·

[...]

·

Anne C Ferguson-Smith

Adverse prenatal environments can promote metabolic disease in offspring and subsequent generations. Animal models and epidemiological data implicate epigenetic inheritance, but the mechanisms remain unknown. In an intergenerational developmental programming model affecting F2 mouse metabolism, we demonstrate that the in utero nutritional environment of F1 embryos alters the germline DNA methylome of F1 adult males in a locus-specific manner. Differentially methylated regions are hypomethylated and enriched in nucleosome-retaining regions. A substantial fraction is resistant to early embryo methylation reprogramming, which may have an impact on F2 development. Differential methylation is not maintained in F2 tissues, yet locus-specific expression is perturbed. Thus, in utero nutritional exposures during critical windows of germ cell development can impact the male germline methylome, associated with metabolic disease in offspring.

Download


Figure 1
Conceptual links between DNA methylation reprogramming in the early embryo and primordial germ cells

March 2013

·

57 Reads

·

117 Citations

Current Opinion in Cell Biology

DNA methylation is a carrier of important regulatory information that undergoes global reprogramming in the mammalian germ line, including pre-implantation embryos and primordial germ cells (PGCs). A flurry of recent studies have employed technical advances to generate global profiles of methylation and hydroxymethylation in these cells, unravelling the dynamics of methylation erasure at single locus resolution. Active demethylation in the zygote, involving extensive oxidation, is followed by passive loss over early cell divisions. Certain gamete-contributed methylation marks appear to have evolved non-canonical mechanisms for targeted maintenance of methylation in the face of these processes. These protected sequences include the imprinting control regions (ICRs) required for parental imprinting but also a surprising number of other regions. Such targeted maintenance mechanisms may also operate at certain sequences during early PGC migration when global passive demethylation occurs. In later gonadal PGCs, imprints must be reset and this may be achieved through the targeting of active mechanisms including oxidation. Thus, emerging evidence paints a complex picture whereby active and passive demethylation pathways operate synergistically and in parallel to ensure robust erasure in the early embryo and PGCs.



Figure 1: Distribution of DNA methylation in DAUDI cells. (a) The graphs show genome-wide distributions of CpG methylation of the human nuclear, EBV and mitochondrial genomes. The y axis indicates DNA methylation levels assessed by SOLiD BS-seq. Green: human nuclear CpG methylation; red: EBV CpG methylation; blue: mitochondrial CpG methylation. (b) Significantly methylated non-CpG sites of DAUDI within RefSeq genes (comprising 424 969 306 non-CpGs) are 6.7-fold enriched compared with those outside of RefSeq genes (comprising 689 750 660 non-CpGs). Red: fraction of significantly methylated non-CpGs of DAUDI within RefSeq genes; blue: fraction of significantly methylated non-CpGs of DAUDI outside of RefSeq genes. OR: odds ratio.
Figure 2: Correlation of DNA methylation levels and transcriptional states. CpG methylation levels were averaged for annotated RefSeq gene regions and transcripts are clustered by their expression level in present (n=7662 transcripts) and absent (n=5429 transcripts) calls. A strong dependency of the location of CpGs related to their distance to the TSS and the transcript expression level can be observed. Green: average methylation pattern for present transcripts; red: average methylation pattern for absent transcripts.
Base-pair resolution DNA methylome of the EBV-positive Endemic Burkitt lymphoma cell line DAUDI determined by SOLiD bisulfite-sequencing

January 2013

·

173 Reads

·

28 Citations

Leukemia

Leukemia is one of the leading journals in hematology and oncology. It is published monthly and covers all aspects of the research and treatment of leukemia and allied diseases. Studies of normal hemopoiesis are covered because of their comparative relevance.


DNA methylation reprogramming in the mammalian life cycle. DNA methylation marks represent an epigenetic barrier in mammalian development that is demolished when developmental potency has to be restored and subsequently re-built with the commitment to a particular cell fate. This first occurs following fertilization, when the DNA methylation marks of the parental gametes are erased in two waves of demethylation. In the first wave, the paternal pronucleus (shown in blue) undergoes rapid demethylation in the zygote, which is followed by a passive loss of DNA methylation marks in the maternal genome (shown in red) over the subsequent cell divisions. Re-establishment of DNA methylation marks commences in the ICM of the developing embryo, which forms an epigenetic barrier (dashed line) in the developmentally more restricted epiblast. PGCs (shown in green) inherit the epigenetic signature from the epiblast, and DNA methylation is again erased on a global scale concomitant with the restoration of developmental potency. Note that DNA methylation at DMRs of imprinted genes become reset in PGCs but are protected from reprogramming in the early embryo. With further development into fully specialized gametes, DNA methylation marks are re-established and developmental potency is restricted. This epigenetic barrier (dashed line) will be demolished once more in the zygote of the next generation as part of the continuous cycle of DNA methylation reprogramming.
Pathways for removal of DNA methylation. Cytosine (C) is methylated at the 5′ carbon position by DNMT enzymes to generate 5-methylcytosine (5mC). This can be lost passively owing to a lack of maintenance at DNA replication (dashed line), or actively processed by enzymatic activity. 5mC can be deaminated to thymine (T) by the AID/APOBEC deaminases (blue), or oxidized to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) by the TET enzyme family (brown). 5hmC itself may be deaminated to 5-hydroxymethyluracil (5hmC), or further oxidized by TET activity to 5-formylcytosine (5fC) and 5-carboxylcytosine (5caC). The T, 5hmU, 5fC and 5caC derivatives can be excised by glycosylases (beige) such as TDG, single strand-selective monofunctional uracil DNA glycosylase 1 (SMUG1) and methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 4 (MBD4) to initiate the BER pathway resulting in their replacement with unmodified C. Alternatively, 5fC and 5caC can be lost passively through lack of maintenance; 5caC may also be converted to C by a decarboxylation reaction. For clarity, demethylation catalysed by the elongator complex is not shown.
Reprogramming DNA methylation in the mammalian life cycle: Building and breaking epigenetic barriers

January 2013

·

1,335 Reads

·

449 Citations

In mammalian development, epigenetic modifications, including DNA methylation patterns, play a crucial role in defining cell fate but also represent epigenetic barriers that restrict developmental potential. At two points in the life cycle, DNA methylation marks are reprogrammed on a global scale, concomitant with restoration of developmental potency. DNA methylation patterns are subsequently re-established with the commitment towards a distinct cell fate. This reprogramming of DNA methylation takes place firstly on fertilization in the zygote, and secondly in primordial germ cells (PGCs), which are the direct progenitors of sperm or oocyte. In each reprogramming window, a unique set of mechanisms regulates DNA methylation erasure and re-establishment. Recent advances have uncovered roles for the TET3 hydroxylase and passive demethylation, together with base excision repair (BER) and the elongator complex, in methylation erasure from the zygote. Deamination by AID, BER and passive demethylation have been implicated in reprogramming in PGCs, but the process in its entirety is still poorly understood. In this review, we discuss the dynamics of DNA methylation reprogramming in PGCs and the zygote, the mechanisms involved and the biological significance of these events. Advances in our understanding of such natural epigenetic reprogramming are beginning to aid enhancement of experimental reprogramming in which the role of potential mechanisms can be investigated in vitro. Conversely, insights into in vitro reprogramming techniques may aid our understanding of epigenetic reprogramming in the germline and supply important clues in reprogramming for therapies in regenerative medicine.






Citations (10)


... The TET family comprises three subtypes of methylcytosine dioxygenase, including TET1, TET2, and TET3, each of which is involved in various physiological and pathological processes. The importance of TET1 in the development of embryonic stem cells has been proven [3][4][5], whereas TET2 has been shown to be pivotal in the progression of inflammatory diseases [6,7], atherosclerosis [8,9], diabetes [10], clonal hematopoiesis [8,11], and cancer [10,12]. TET3 has been implicated in promoting the growth of acute myeloid leukemia and the activation of leukemia stem cell-associated pathways [13], as well as in the upregulation of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC) levels in synovitis tissues of rheumatoid arthritis [14]. ...

Reference:

Tet Methylcytosine Dioxygenase 3 Promotes Cardiovascular Senescence by DNA 5‐Hydroxymethylcytosine‐Mediated Sp1 Transcription Factor Expression
Dynamic regulation of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mouse ES cells and during differentiation
  • Citing Article
  • January 2011

Nature

... The study however did not include females which means we cannot tell whether different drugs of abuse also show sexually dimorphic transgenerational effects. Human studies have long identified trends of transgenerational epigenetic inheritance which means specific rodent studies are required to identify the underlying mechanisms especially since reports in transgenerational studies on diet have found persistence of behavioural phenotype changes despite the epigenetic markers being wiped out (Bottom et al. 2022;Gapp et al. 2014;Radford et al. 2014). ...

In utero undernourishment perturbs the adult sperm methylome and intergenerational metabolism
  • Citing Article
  • January 2014

... Methylation of genes in the male germ line is generally believed to be largely eliminated at fertilization, and stem cells in the early embryo then undergo re-methylation in a cell typespecific way (Lee et al. 2014). However, recent findings from genome-wide DNA methylation studies indicate that some differentially methylated regions are resistant to genome-wide demethylation and de novo re-methylation during embryogenesis and have the potential to affect the next generation (Tang et al. 2015;Radford et al. 2014). On the other hand, we previously conducted genome-wide DNA methylation analyses of F2 embryos by gestational arsenic exposure and reported that the decrease of global DNA methylation levels and the predominance of hypoDMCs observed in F1 sperm were also detected in F2 embryos. ...

In utero effects. In utero undernourishment perturbs the adult sperm methylome and intergenerational metabolism

Science

... DNAm occurs by the addition of a methyl group onto a cytosine-phosphate-guanine base pairing (CpG site), which can decrease/inhibit expression (hypermethylation) or increase expression (hypomethylation) of a gene (Bird, 1986). The prenatal period is a time of particularly high DNAm activity, subsequent methylation of specific CpG sites in specific tissues is critical to embryonic development (Breton-Larrivée et al., 2019;Seisenberger et al., 2013). DNAm occurring in utero also influences gene expression throughout the lifespan (Vaiserman & Lushchak, 2021). ...

Conceptual links between DNA methylation reprogramming in the early embryo and primordial germ cells

Current Opinion in Cell Biology

... Lastly, Siebert (2018) reported results of differential DNAmethylation of Burkitt lymphoma (BL) versus other B-cell lymphomas, including germinal centre B-cell like diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (GCB DLBCL) and FL (Kreck et al, 2013;Kretzmer et al, 2015;Siebert, 2018). Kretzmer et al (2015) demonstrated significant overexpression of mutant SMARCA4 and differentially methylated regions (DMR) in BL versus other B-cell lymphomas. ...

Base-pair resolution DNA methylome of the EBV-positive Endemic Burkitt lymphoma cell line DAUDI determined by SOLiD bisulfite-sequencing

Leukemia

... These erasures facilitate totipotency, while the reestablishment of DNA methylation marks directs cells towards a specific fate. However, studies have shown that the germlines of mice, pigs, and humans exhibit incomplete erasure of DNA methylation (Kearns et al., 2000;Sutherland et al., 2000;Tang et al., 2015;Guo et al., 2017;Gómez-Redondo et al., 2021), with primordial germ cells retaining about 10% of their methylation marks (Seisenberger et al., 2012), while the inner cell mass of the blastocyst retains roughly 20% (L. Wang et al., 2014). ...

The Dynamics of Genome-wide DNA Methylation Reprogramming in Mouse Primordial Germ Cells

Molecular Cell

... PFAS can potentially disrupt DNA methylation, histone modification dynamics, and non-coding RNA expression, thereby compromising the precise epigenetic programming required for normal development. Of particular significance are the two waves of epigenetic reprogramming during embryogenesis, which reset and reestablish parent-of-origin methylation patterns critical for imprinting, transposon silencing, and lineage specification [43,47,49,107,108]. Recent advancements in high-resolution and single-cell epigenomic profiling include techniques such as chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq), ATAC-seq, reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS), and nascent transcript profiling, which have significantly refined our understanding of these processes. ...

Reprogramming DNA methylation in the mammalian life cycle: Building and breaking epigenetic barriers

... Sequencing-based methods for methylome analysis can be classified into two groups: bisulfite conversionbased and enrichment-based methods [40]. The former is considered to be the gold standard of DNA methylation analysis [41], however, they are hampered by inefficiencies due to the inability to differentiate between 5mC and 5hmC [42], the degradation of input DNA during conversion, high costs, and limited coverage. ...

Methylome analysis using MeDIP-seq with low DNA concentrations

Nature Protocols

... В то же время было мало понимания о влиянии деметилирования ДНК до открытия ферментов транслокации Ten-eleven (TET) и их способности к деметилированию путем окисления 5-метилцитозина 5mC до 5-гидроксиметилцитозина (5hmC), а также других производных [43]. Исследования показали, что общий уровень 5hmC в геномной ДНК существенно снижен во многих солидных опухолях, что связано с пониженными уровнями экспрессии членов семейства TET [44,45]. Белки семейства TET способствуют локусспецифическому обратному метилированию ДНК в нормальных клетках, в конечном итоге регулируя экспрессию генов [44]. ...

Dynamic regulation of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mouse ES cells and during differentiation

Nature

... DNA methylation usually occurs on CpG islands, mostly in the proximal promoter region of the human genome [7]. DNA methylation alters an individual's biological function by regulating gene expression or genome sequence stability [8]. It can keep transcription factors out of two gene promoters, inhibit transcription factor binding and change chromatin structures. ...

Retrotransposons and germ cells: Reproduction, death, and diversity

F1000 Biology Reports