Stanislav V. Gordeyev’s scientific contributions

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (5)


Comparison of Shack-Hartmann and digital holographic wavefront sensing using a benchtop turbulence generator
  • Conference Paper
  • Full-text available

October 2024

·

23 Reads

·

·

Darren Getts

·

Stanislav V. Gordeyev

This work presents a comprehensive characterization of a benchtop optical-turbulence simulator system using a Shack—Hartmann (SH) wavefront sensor, an off-axis digital holography (DH) wavefront sensor, and a far-field imaging camera. The system employs two spatial-light modulators (SLMs) to impose turbulent phase screens with prescribed statistics onto a laser beam, simulating atmospheric turbulence. We conduct tests to compare the system’s performance against wave-optics simulations by varying turbulence strength, varying the modeled propagation distance, and using both SLMs to model beam propagation. The results show that the DH wavefront measurements have a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.02–0.03 µm compared to the simulated wavefronts, while the SH measurements have a RMSE of 0.02–0.05 µm compared to the DH wavefront measurements. We also assess the system’s ability to model beam propagation. Here, we find that the extent of phase disagreement increases with increasing propagation distances. Overall, the results of a Monte–Carlo simulation that models a 25 cm beam along a 1 km path reveal that DH measurements closely match the known turbulence parameters whereas the SH measurements generally underestimate turbulence strength. At large, this work informs system designers of how different wavefront sensors perform in varying optical-turbulence conditions.

Download




Figure 1: Sketch of main flow features in flow over a hemispherical turret. Figure reproduced from Kalensky et. al. 2024 with permission. 5
Figure 2: Exploded view of turret components and the plate that connects the turret to the wind tunnel.
Figure 3: Spanwise force spectra for a hemispherical turret. Figure reproduced from Roeder et. al. 2022 with permission. 25
Figure 4: Vibration modes of the plate and turret assembly up to 914 Hz.
Figure 5: Location of accelerometers used for impact excitation testing. The canister is facing towards sensor 3. Wind tunnel flow direction goes from top to bottom.

+5

Preliminary aero-mechanical jitter analysis of hemispherical turrets

October 2024

·

35 Reads

·

2 Citations

This work presents preliminary results on aero-mechanical jitter of a hemispherical optical turret. A simplified geometry with a hemispherical shell and optics-holding canister was designed to reduce degrees of freedom and provide better insight into fundamental physics. Modal analysis of the turret and mounting plate to the wind tunnel, performed using finite element analysis (FEA), revealed significant plate displacements in the lowest frequency modes. Three mounting plate thicknesses (1/4”, 1/2”, and 1”) were tested. Wind tunnel tests at the University of Notre Dame’s White Field Mach 0.6 wind tunnel assessed turret vibrations at speeds from Mach 0.2 to 0.5, using accelerometers and Shack-Hartmann tilt sensors. Two scenarios were tested: one with the turret inside the tunnel exposed to the flow, and another with the turret attached outside of the wind tunnel so that it is only excited by the base motion of the wind tunnel. The 1/4” plate showed tilt measurements ranging from 30 to 190 microradians when exposed to flow, compared to 10 to 50 microradians in the baseline case. The 1/2” and 1” plates exhibited lower tilts and less distinction between flow and baseline conditions. Overall, the simplified turret only had about three vibration modes affecting tilt, with strong spatial agreement between experimental and FEA modal patterns.

Citations (2)


... I n many cases in experiments, only sparse sensor data is available, when a full field measurement is desired. For the case of the work that inspired the analysis done here, we are interested in aerodynamic forcing on a hemisphere [1]. However, to calculate forcing we need pressure over an area, thus knowledge of the full pressure field is required. ...

Reference:

Sparse sensing and surface pressure field reconstruction for flow over a hemisphere
Preliminary aero-mechanical jitter analysis of hemispherical turrets