June 2024
·
662 Reads
·
16 Citations
This comparative analysis examines the nursing and midwifery regulatory frameworks of Ghana, South Africa, Kenya, and Liberia to identify strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement. The analysis reveals that while Ghana and South Africa have relatively comprehensive and up-to-date frameworks, Kenya and Liberia face challenges related to the scope and currency of their legislation and the effectiveness of their regulatory bodies. Key recommendations include conducting comprehensive reviews and harmonization of regulatory frameworks, strengthening the capacity of regulatory bodies, establishing formal requirements for continuous professional development, promoting collaboration and sharing of best practices, enhancing transparency and accountability in regulatory processes, and investing in research and data collection. The analysis holds significant policy implications for strengthening healthcare governance and improving the quality of care in these countries. By providing a roadmap for evidence-based policy decisions and targeted interventions, this analysis can drive meaningful change and improvement in the governance of nursing and midwifery in Ghana, South Africa, Kenya, and Liberia.