Simon Choat’s research while affiliated with Kingston University and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (13)


Decolonising economics and politics curricula in UK universities
  • Article
  • Full-text available

October 2023

·

74 Reads

·

6 Citations

Simon Choat

·

·

This article explores initiatives to decolonise the curriculum via two specific disciplines, namely Economics and Politics, both of which have tended to marginalise the study of race, empire, and colonialism and whose canonical thinkers are overwhelming white. By providing the first comparative analysis of decolonising initiatives in these disciplines, this article: investigates the extent to which Economics and Politics curricula in UK universities have been ‘decolonised’; explores the factors which affect support for or resistance to decolonisation; and analyses the extent to which these factors share common roots in both disciplines. Our comparative method allows us to shed light on drivers of resistance that affect all disciplines alike and those that are rooted within specific disciplines. Using an audit of UK undergraduate courses and a survey of academics, we show that neither Politics nor Economics can plausibly claim to have made much progress in decolonising curricula. However, more progress has been made in Politics, and Politics staff are more informed about and less hostile to decolonising initiatives than Economics staff. We locate one of the reasons for this difference in the epistemological and ideological idiosyncrasies of the dominant neoclassical paradigm in Economics. We therefore argue that initiatives to decolonise the curriculum must take into account potential discipline-specific obstacles.

Download

Modern political thought at Kingston University.
Decolonising the political theory curriculum

October 2020

·

193 Reads

·

21 Citations

Politics

Recent calls to ‘decolonise the curriculum’ are especially pertinent to the teaching of political theory, which has traditionally been dominated by a canon made up overwhelmingly of White (and male) thinkers. This article explores why and how political theory curricula might be decolonised. By mapping core political theory modules provided at UK universities, and examining associated textbooks, the article shows that non-White thinkers and discussions of colonialism and race are marginalised and neglected. It then argues that there are intellectual, political, and pedagogical reasons why this neglect is problematic and should be reversed. Finally, the article reflects on the experience of rewriting and delivering a core second-year undergraduate modern political thought module at a post-92 London university, including assessing the impact of the changes on the attainment gap between White students and Black and minority ethnic students.


The Iron Cage of Enterprise or the Restoration of Class Power? Approaches to Understanding Neoliberalism

March 2019

·

44 Reads

·

5 Citations

Political Studies Review

Recent Foucauldian critiques of neoliberalism – especially those by Wendy Brown, Béatrice Hibou, and Pierre Dardot and Christian Laval – have argued that the Marxist interpretation of neoliberalism as a class project is reductive and economistic, and have instead conceptualised neoliberalism as a form of governmental rationality. This article compares these two influential approaches to understanding neoliberalism. It will outline the central features of the Foucauldian and Marxist approaches, assess the strengths and weaknesses of both approaches, and argue that a synthesis of the two approaches is both possible and desirable. While the Foucauldian approach enables a microphysics of everyday neoliberalism and its modes of subjectivity, it is argued that such an analysis must be placed within the broader, macrostructural approach of Marxism. The article thus defends Marxism against its Foucauldian critique, while nonetheless encouraging Marxists to engage with Foucauldian accounts of neoliberalism which they have so far tended to ignore.



Everything for Sale? Neoliberalism and the Limits of Michael Sandel’s Philosophical Critique of Markets

January 2018

·

128 Reads

·

6 Citations

New Political Science

Contesting the central tenets of mainstream economic theory, Michael Sandel’s work on markets argues that the marketization of certain goods risks corrupting the value of those goods, and that a reinvigorated public discourse is needed to establish the appropriate use of markets. This article assesses Sandel’s work on markets, arguing that although it provides a convincing critique of liberal defenses of the market, it does not do enough to challenge marketization itself. To illuminate the flaws of Sandel’s argument, the article contrasts it with Marxist critiques of neoliberalism, arguing that the latter oppose the expansion of markets and market thinking in more comprehensive and productive ways. Specifically, it is argued that Sandel ignores the one market that underpins all other markets, namely the labor market; erroneously suggests that marketization is caused by the dominance of market thinking; and fails to appreciate the class interests that are served by growing marketization.


Science, Agency and Ontology: A Historical-Materialist Response to New Materialism

November 2017

·

231 Reads

·

68 Citations

Political Studies

In recent years, the work of a diverse range of thinkers has been grouped together under the label ‘new materialism’. This article offers a critical introduction to new materialism that challenges its understanding of historical materialism. It aims to demonstrate not that historical materialism is superior to new materialism, but rather that the latter would benefit from engaging with rather than ignoring or dismissing the former. It begins by defining new materialism in relation to its reappraisal of science, its concept of agency and its underlying ontology. Second, it locates new materialism by demonstrating how and why many new materialists are hostile to historical materialism. Finally, it responds to new materialist criticisms of historical materialism, arguing both that there are potential areas of agreement between the two materialisms and that historical materialism offers valuable resources for analysing historically specific and asymmetric power relations.


Marx for his times

July 2017

·

15 Reads

Global Intellectual History

This article is a review essay of Gareth Stedman Jones’s biography Karl Marx: Greatness and Illusion. It begins by situating the book in relation to existing biographies before outlining Stedman Jones’s approach, which is to conceive of Marx’s works as interventions within contexts which the historian of ideas must reconstruct. I argue that although the book provides an excellent account of the political contexts within which Marx lived and worked, its interpretations of his writings are frequently ungenerous, unbalanced, and misleading. I defend Marx against charges that his work was economically confused, politically naïve, and overly abstract, using the Grundrisse in particular for illustrative purposes. I also take issue with Stedman Jones’s methodology, questioning whether it is desirable or possible to separate Marx from Marxism and return him to his nineteenth-century context. I end by suggesting that Stedman Jones’s attempt to return Marx to his context brings into focus the contexts of Stedman Jones’s own intellectual development.


Marxism and anarchism in an age of neoliberal crisis

January 2016

·

89 Reads

·

11 Citations

Capital & Class

Challenging claims of a recent ‘anarchist turn’, this article argues that calls for a ‘left convergence’ between anarchism and Marxism should be treated with caution. It sets out to establish what distinguishes Marxism from anarchism today, and argues that the former contains superior resources with which to challenge the current dominance of neoliberalism. In order to elucidate the strengths of Marxism, it addresses three common anarchist criticisms of Marxism, concerning its authoritarian strategies; its economic reductionism; and its lack of moral or ethical perspective. It argues that each of these criticisms inadvertently highlights the advantages of Marxism over anarchism.



Politics, power and the state: A Marxist response to postanarchism

October 2013

·

36 Reads

·

3 Citations

Journal of Political Ideologies

Recent years have seen the development of a new form of anarchism. Under the label ‘postanarchism’, writers such as Todd May, Saul Newman and Lewis Call have sought to combine the insights of anarchism with those of recent Continental philosophy, in particular post-structuralism. A central but neglected element of postanarchist thought is its critique of Marxism. The main aim of this article is to counter the postanarchist dismissal of Marxism. It will: introduce the key ideas and arguments of postanarchism; locate its critique of Marxism, demonstrating its importance to the postanarchist project; and highlight weaknesses in the postanarchist critique of Marxism. It argues that the postanarchist portrayal of Marxism is reductive and misleading. Contrary to postanarchist claims, many post-structuralists have drawn inspiration from Marxism rather than rejecting it: as such, Marxism anticipates many of the post-structuralist-inflected ideas of postanarchism, in particular their approach to the state, power, subjectivity and politics. In addition, some Marxist criticisms of classical anarchism apply equally to postanarchism, thus raising questions to which postanarchists should respond.


Citations (8)


... George DeMartino and Deirdre McCloskey, among others, have published on the lack of professional ethics in economics. Decoloniality, however, has not been discussed as part of economics education (Choat et al. 2024). Decoloniality, as we understand it, demands a shift towards practices that are inclusive, equitable, and reflective of the plurality of voices and experiences, particularly those from the Global South. ...

Reference:

Decoloniality, scientific progress, and research ethics in economics
Decolonising economics and politics curricula in UK universities

... The second thread involves debates over the scientific method, quantitative vs. qualitative, numeric data vs. historical event interpretation, and probabilistic predictions vs. normative proposals (Gerring, 2017). The third thread debates the discipline's social justice issues, including gender, race, and identity (Ahrens et al., 2021;Choat, 2021;Shames & Wise, 2017). A deep delve into those debates reveals that all of them revolve around issues related to the scientific character of the discipline, as it is understood by various participants. ...

Decolonising the political theory curriculum

Politics

... While popular leftism seeks to challenge neoliberalism politically, I want to suggest, perhaps controversially, that it is more fruitful to see popular leftism as having emerged 'in and against' neoliberalism, rather than being straightforwardly 'anti-neoliberal'. Here, I understand neoliberalism to refer to an economisation and marketisation of everyday life, in which there is a widespread dissemination of an entrepreneurial mode of conduct and subjectivity throughout a whole variety of social, cultural, and political spheres Choat, 2019). As Wendy Brown argues in her most recent book, 'nothing is untouched by a neoliberal mode of reason and valuation and . . . ...

The Iron Cage of Enterprise or the Restoration of Class Power? Approaches to Understanding Neoliberalism
  • Citing Article
  • March 2019

Political Studies Review

... As pointed out by several authors (e.g. Bruni & Sugden, 2013;Choat, 2018;Qizilbash, 2019;Satz, 2010;Wempe & Frooman, 2018), the idea of moral limits to markets has been developed by a number of authors before Sandel (2012a). These earlier authors include Walzer (1983), MacIntyre (1984, Radin (1986), Anderson (1993), Satz (2010) and even Sandel's (2010) earlier book on justice. ...

Everything for Sale? Neoliberalism and the Limits of Michael Sandel’s Philosophical Critique of Markets
  • Citing Article
  • January 2018

New Political Science

... , Müller 2015. Discussions following this can be found within archaeology (see, e.g., Whitmore 2014, Alberti et al. 2013:1-44, Olsen et al. 2012, Hodder & Lucas 2017 but also within several other disciplines (see Knapet & Malafouris 2008, Harvey 2009, Karlholm 2017, Choat 2017. ...

Science, Agency and Ontology: A Historical-Materialist Response to New Materialism
  • Citing Article
  • November 2017

Political Studies

... 41-42). Choat (2016) writes that the focus on mutual aid in anarchist movements is, in part, a way to practice prefigurative politics: "because [anarchists] look to a non-hierarchical and decentralised future, they support nonhierarchical and decentralised strategies in the present" (p. 97). ...

Marxism and anarchism in an age of neoliberal crisis
  • Citing Article
  • January 2016

Capital & Class

... The critical and cultural theory experienced and received by the Americans through the last decades fairly will be a good paradigm to understand the characteristic of my interviewees (Kim, 2015b;Kim, 2015c). A trace to the root of human science or philosophy in America naturally turns on the European tradition needless to mention the kind of White supremacy or its history (Choat, 2012). [1] This leads to the receptive intellectual waves across several decades in history, in which three major countries influence much to shape the paradigm of critical and cultural theories. ...

Marx Through Post-Structuralism: Lyotard, Derrida, Foucault, Deleuze By Simon Choat
  • Citing Article
  • January 2011

Global Discourse

... First, it uses a post-structuralist approach. It takes into account that post-structuralists do not search for the essence of "things" but how "things" are transformed to become "beings" (Bacchi & Goodwin, 2016;Bourdieu & Passeron, 1990;Choat, 2013;Foucault, 1972;Goldstein, 2012;Larsson, 2018). The authors use the post-structuralist approach to elaborate on the bureaucrats' cognitive behavior using the ratchet principle (Jackson & Carter, 2007). ...

Politics, power and the state: A Marxist response to postanarchism
  • Citing Article
  • October 2013

Journal of Political Ideologies