Shuangfeng Wang’s research while affiliated with Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (3)


YFP‐HSC70.1 fusion constructs and HSC70.1 RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) assays. (a) Schematic drawing and folding structures of HSC70.1 mRNA YFP fusion and deletion constructs used in the study. Left panel: YFP‐HSC70.1 (CDS 1–1953); YFP‐HSC70.1M with altered codon usage (wild‐type (WT) CDS + modified CDS 1192–1953); YFP‐HSC70.1 ΔSVR (CDS 1–1812); YFP‐HSC70.1M ΔSVR (WT CDS 1–1191 + modified CDS 1192–1812); YFP‐SVR (CDS 1813–1953), and YFP(s)::HSC70.1 (WT CDS 1–1953 preceded by a stop codon). SVR, short variable region. Right panel: Predicted folding of each HSC70.1 construct according to co‐transcriptional folding (Co‐Fold; Proctor & Meyer, 2013). Red arrows: five stable regions consistent with RNA folding predicted according to minimal free energy (MFE; Supporting Information Figs S1, S2). (b) Schematic drawing indicating PCR primers used to detect HSC70.1, HSC70.1ΔSVR, HSC70.1M, and BAG1 transcripts in Arabidopsis thaliana RIP samples. HSC70.1 FP1/RP1: specific for WT (endogenous) HSC70.1 and YFP‐HSC70.1 does not amplify YFP‐HSC70.1ΔSVR and YFP‐HSC70.1M. HSC70.1 FP2/RP2: specific for WT HSC70.1, YFP‐HSC70.1, and YFP‐HSC70.1ΔSVR. HSC70.1M FP3/RP3: specific for YFP‐HSC70.1M. BAG1 FP1/RP1: Specifically match to BAG1 3′ region. (c) Control PCR with FP2/RP2 and FP3/RP3 primer pairs showing that they discriminate between HSC70.1 and HSC70.1M sequences. (d) RT‐PCR assays on RNA from YFP‐HSC70.1, YFP‐HSC70.1 ΔSVR, YFP‐SVR, and YFP‐HSC70.1M input and RIP samples. Lanes 1, 2, and 3 indicate three biological replicates. Left and middle panel: RT‐PCR assays to detect HSC70.1, HSC70.1ΔSVR, SVR, and HSC70.1M. Right panel: control RT‐PCRs with ACTIN2‐specific primers. Bottom right panel: RT‐PCR assays to detect BAG1 RNA from YFP‐HSC70.1 RIP samples. Black arrows, presence of HSC70.1; orange arrows, presence of endogenous (WT) HSC70.1; red arrows, presence of HSC70.1M and BAG1 transcript in RIP samples; arrowheads, no transcript detected. INPUT, DNaseI‐treated cell extracts used for RIP assays. H2O, PCR contamination control with water instead of cDNA.
HSC70.1 RNA‐binding capacity measured by microscale thermophoresis and autoregulatory feedback regulation of translation. (a) Microscale thermophoresis experiment. In vitro synthesized BAG1 and HSC70.1 RNAs ranging between 1 μM and 30 pM were titrated against cell lysates from transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana plants expressing YFP‐HSC70.1 fusion protein. Binding curves were evaluated and plotted as fraction bound against increasing RNA concentrations. Differences in binding are visible as a shift of the sigmoidal binding curve along the x‐axis. Error bars, SE. (b) EC50 estimation for both curves. The EC50 of BAG1 toward HSC70.1 is c. 9 times higher than toward HSC70.1 indicating a significantly higher affinity of HSC70.1 protein toward HSC70.1 compared with BAG1. Significance was calculated using a two‐tailed Student's t‐test (n = 3; P < 0.05). Error bars, SE. (c) Inhibition of YFP‐HSC70.1 vs YFP translation in the presence of increasing concentrations of YFP‐HSC70.1 protein. YFP‐HSC70.1 was extracted from 10‐d‐old transgenic plants and added to the in vitro wheat germ expression assay translating either YFP (control) or YFP‐HSC70.1. Anti‐GFP/YFP antibody was used to detect YFP‐HSC70.1 protein added, and Greenlys was used to detect newly synthesized YFP‐HSC70.1 and YFP. (d) Relative ratios of in vitro translated YFP‐HSC70.1 and YFP protein (see also Supporting Information Fig. S6b). (e) Model of the predicted effect of HSC70.1 inhibiting its own translation on the refolding of misfolded client proteins. A stress event is assumed to occur (at t = 200 s) that gives rise to a sudden increase in misfolded protein. How quickly this amount of misfolded protein decreases shows how well the HSC70.1 system performs. The model predicts no (blue), slow (red), or a fast (green) refolding of client proteins due to sudden (acute) chaperone demands with no feedback or with translational feedback of HSC70.1 on its own translation (for details, see the Results section, Fig. S6c; Table S3). (f) Western blot (WB) assays on 14‐d‐old YFP, YFP‐HSC70.1, and YFP‐HSC70.1 ΔSVR transgenic wild‐type (WT) plants used for HSC70.1 inhibitor (VER‐155008) treatment (0, 15, 30, and 60 min). YFP, YFP‐HSC70.1, and YFP‐HSC70.1 ΔSVR fusion proteins were detected by YFP antibody. (g) Line plot representing average density of bands measured on western blots relative to mock control (n = 3 independent experiments). Significance was calculated using Student's t‐test (two tails); P‐values indicated by lowercase letters: a, b < 0.001. (h) qRT‐PCR assays on samples from 14‐d‐old YFP, YFP‐HSC70.1, and YFP‐HSC70.1 ΔSVR transgenic WT plants treated with HSC70.1 inhibitor VER‐155008 for 0, 15, 30, and 60 min. Compare with nontreated samples, all treated samples show no significant differences in YFP and YFP‐HSC70.1 transcript levels (P‐values > 0.05; n = 3 biological replicates; 4 technical replicates). Y‐axis: relative transcript levels of YFP and YFP‐HSC70.1 normalized to UBQ10. Error bars, SE. Significance was calculated using Student's t‐test (two tails).
Mobility of the YFP‐HSC70.1 transcript fusion variants in grafted Arabidopsis thaliana. (a) YFP fluorescence detected by confocal local scanning microscopy (CLSM) in leaves, graft junctions, and primary roots of grafted YFP fusion transgenic/wild‐type (WT; Col‐0) plants. Blue color, auto‐fluorescent; green color, YFP fluorescence. Three independent lines (each n > 30 plants) were used for each graft combination showing a similar YFP signal distribution. Bars, 200 μm. (b) RT‐PCR detection of YFP fusion constructs in root and shoot samples from grafted plants. Grafted plant material was pooled (n > 6) and tested for transcript presence in shoots and roots (45 PCR cycles). Note that transcript absence was additionally confirmed by 50 PCR cycles. Red arrows, presence; red arrowheads, absence of YFP RNA fusion constructs in grafted WT (Col‐0) tissue. Bar, BASTA transcript expressed by the transgenic plants serving as a RT‐PCR contamination control; ACTIN, positive RT‐PCR control with ACTIN2‐specific PCR primers.
Single‐cell expression and intercellular movement of YFP‐HSP70.1 fusions. (a) Representative confocal local scanning microscopy (CLSM) images of Nicotiana benthamiana epidermal cells bombarded with 35S promoter constructs expressing YFP‐HSC70.1, YFP‐HSC70.1ΔSVR, YFP‐SVR, or YFP. Green, YFP fluorescence; blue, chloroplastic auto‐fluorescence; white arrows, neighboring cells with YFP fluorescence. Numbers indicate the fraction of analyzed YFP‐expressing cells that show a YFP signal in neighboring cells. Bars, 100 μm. (b) Intercellular movement ratio in % of all expressing cells and fraction showing movement to one or two and more (≥ 2) neighboring cells. Significance was calculated using Student's t‐test (two tails); P‐values indicated by lowercase letters: a, b < 0.01; b, c < 0.05; a, c < 0.001. (c) Size distribution of cells with detected incidents of cell‐to‐cell mobility. Note that the maximum diameter was measured and that individual points indicate cells in which the YFP construct moved. Significance was calculated using Student's t‐test (two tails). No significant difference was detected (P‐values a > 0.19).
Mobile HSC70.1 transcript rescues hsc70.1 hsp70.4 root growth. (a) Representative pictures of analyzed Arabidopsis thaliana wild‐type (WT; Col‐0), hsc70.1, hsp70.4, hsc70.1 hsp70.4, YFP‐HSC70.1 #1 (hsc70.1 hsp70.4), YFP‐HSC70.1 #2 (hsc70.1 hsp70.4), YFP‐HSC70.1M #6 (hsc70.1 hsp70.4), YFP‐HSC70.1M #9 (hsc70.1 hsp70.4), and YFP‐HSC70.1M‐1 #11 (hsc70.1 hsp70.4) plants 14 d after germination. (b) Quantitative data of measured primary root length of WT and indicated mutant plants. Box plot graph: boxes denote variation between datasets and means; error bar, ±SE; black dots, measurements out of ±SE range. n, number of analyzed plants. Significance was evaluated using one‐way ANOVA (α = 0.05) followed by multiple comparisons of means using Tukey's HSD test at the 0.05 significance level. P‐value indicated by lowercase letters: 0.006 < a, b < 0.018; b, c < 1.53E‐06; a, c < 5.24E‐12. ab, no significant differences (P‐value > 0.24). (c) RT‐PCR detection of YFP‐HSC70.1 transcript in root and shoot samples from YFP‐HSC70.1 #1 (hsc70.1 hsp70.4)/hsc70.1 hsp70.4 grafted plants. Grafted plant material was pooled (n > 6) and tested for transcript presence in shoots and roots (45 PCR cycles). Note that transcript absence was additionally confirmed by 50 PCR cycles. Red arrows, presence of YFP HSC70.1 RNA in grafted root tissue. Bar, BASTA transcript expressed by the transgenic plants serving as a RT‐PCR contamination control; ACTIN2, positive RT‐PCR control with ACTIN2‐specific PCR primers.

+3

Noncell‐autonomous HSC70.1 chaperone displays homeostatic feedback regulation by binding its own mRNA
  • Article
  • Full-text available

January 2023

·

93 Reads

·

11 Citations

·

·

Shuangfeng Wang

·

[...]

·

The HSC70/HSP70 family of heat shock proteins are evolutionarily conserved chaperones involved in protein folding, protein transport, and RNA binding. Arabidopsis HSC70 chaperones are thought to act as housekeeping chaperones and as such are involved in many growth‐related pathways. Whether Arabidopsis HSC70 binds RNA and whether this interaction is functional has remained an open question. We provide evidence that the HSC70.1 chaperone binds its own mRNA via its C‐terminal short variable region (SVR) and inhibits its own translation. The SVR encoding mRNA region is necessary for HSC70.1 transcript mobility to distant tissues and that HSC70.1 transcript and not protein mobility is required to rescue root growth and flowering time of hsc70 mutants. We propose that this negative protein‐transcript feedback loop may establish an on‐demand chaperone pool that allows for a rapid response to stress. In summary, our data suggest that the Arabidopsis HSC70.1 chaperone can form a complex with its own transcript to regulate its translation and that both protein and transcript can act in a noncell‐autonomous manner, potentially maintaining chaperone homeostasis between tissues.

Download

Conceptional overview of the applied transgene-free genome editing methods via mobile CRISPR–Cas9
a, Scheme of CRISPR–Cas9-mediated transgene-free gene editing by grafting. b,c, Predicted folding structures of the gNIA1-TLS and Cas9-TLS RNAs according to co-transcriptional folding. Red boxes indicate the two types of TLS motifs TLS1 (tRNAMet) and TLS2 (tRNAMet ΔDT) used in the study.
Cas9 and gNIA1-TLS fusions move from root to shoot inducing NIA1 edits in juvenile Arabidopsis
a, Three weeks after grafting shoot (S) and root (R) samples were harvested from plants cultured on 5 μM estradiol and 0% sucrose 0.5 MS medium. b, RT–PCR detection (45 PCR cycles) of Cas9 and gNIA1 transcripts (each sample a pool of 4–6 grafted plants) in transgenic root and grafted wild-type scion samples. Stars indicate presence of Cas9-TLS and gNIA1-TLS amplicons in Col-0 wild-type. M indicates molecular weight markers. RT–PCR of kanamycin (Kan) and hygromycin (Hyg) transcripts were used as contamination controls. Note that transcript absence was confirmed using 50 PCR cycles. c, Chlorotic leaf phenotype of nia1 chimeric mutant in juvenile grafted plants. Dashed boxes indicate chlorotic phenotype detected in wild-type leaves. TG1, Cas9 × gNIA1 (control); TG2, Cas9-TLS1 × gNIA1-TLS1; and TG3, Cas9-TLS2 × gNIA1-TLS2. d, Genomic PCR assays to detect edited NIA1 fragment with a deletion. PCR amplicons marked by stars indicate CRISPR–Cas9-induced mutations in wild-type tissue. Four independent replicates (4–6 pooled root or shoot samples) per graft combination were analyzed. Expected wild-type NIA1 amplicon is 1,469 bp and edited NIA1 is approximately 430 bp. e, Edits induced by mobile CRISPR–Cas9 confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Red bases indicate gNIA1 target 1 and gNIA1 target 2 sequences. Bold and underlined bases indicate the two protospacer-adjacent motif sites of the gRNA.
Source data
Cas9- and gNIA1-TLS fusion constructs are functional and mobile in adult plants
a, Appearance of grafted plants (43 days after grafting) grown on soil and treated with 5 μM estradiol. b, RT–PCR detection (45 PCR cycles) of Cas9 and gNIA1 transcripts in rootstock (R) and grafted wild-type tissues samples from silique (Sil), flower (Flo), cauline leaf (Cau), stem (St), and rosette (Ro). Four independent replicates (each sample a pool of three grafted plants) were analyzed. Stars indicate RT–PCR Cas9-TLS and gNIA1-TLS amplicons detected in wild-type scion samples. Kan and Hyg transcripts serve as contamination controls. Note that transcript absence was confirmed by 50 PCR cycles. c, RT–qPCR detection of mobile Cas9-TLS transcripts in scion tissues and in grafted rootstock (Root). y-axis, mean 2−ΔΔct\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$2^{-\Delta\Delta c_t}$$\end{document} values; log10 scale. Each value represents the mean of three independent biological replicates presented as black dots on the bar. Note that every 2−ΔΔct\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$2^{-\Delta\Delta c_t}$$\end{document} data point below the dashed line represents technical background as measured with wild-type scion samples grafted onto wild-type rootstocks with no Cas9 transcript present. Significance was calculated using Student’s t-test (two tails); P values indicated by a, b, and c: a,b = 8.31567 × 10⁻²²; b,c = 1.16396 × 10⁻²²; a,c = 1.90267 × 10⁻¹¹. d, Genomic PCR to detect NIA1 edited fragments in siliques and flowers. Samples were from the same plant material as analyzed in c. e, Mobile CRISPR–Cas9-induced genome edits confirmed by Sanger sequencing.
Source data
Gene edits are detected in the progeny of wild-type scions grafted on Cas9 × gNIA1 rootstocks
a, Screening for NIA1 gene-edited grafted plants offspring and phenotyping for nia1 homozygous mutants generated by mobile CRISPR–Cas9. Homozygotic nia1 mutants were phenotypically screened from 14-day-old seedlings grown on NH4-limited plates and submitted to PCR assays. Scale bar, 5 mm. b, Genomic PCR to detect NIA1 edits in the wild-type scion progeny. Edited NIA1 PCR amplicons are marked by stars. All samples were harvested from 10-day-old seedlings grown on NH4-limited plates. Each replicate is a pool of ~70 to ~100 seedlings (Supplementary Table 1). Cas9 and Kan transcript RT–qPCRs were used to confirm that the progeny was transgene-free. c, Transgene-free genome edits confirmed by Sanger sequencing. d, Editing efficiency analysis of Cas9-TLS/gRNA-TLS constructs in the progeny of grafted plants (Supplementary Table 1). Asterisk indicates the number of homozygotes identified in 1,000 seedlings.
Source data
Cas9- and gNIA1-TLS2 fusion constructs are mobile and functional in B. rapa/Arabidopsis grafted plants
a, Appearance of grafted plants (20 and 40 days after grafting) grown on MS medium and treated with 5 μM estradiol. Red arrows indicate the graft junction. b, RT–PCR detection (45 PCR cycles) of Cas9 and gNIA1 transcripts in rootstock, and grafted wild-type tissues samples from silique, flower, leaf, and stem from one independent replicate (the other three replicates are presented in Extended Data Fig. 3) was analyzed. Stars, RT–PCR Cas9-TLS and gNIA1-TLS amplicons detected in B. rapa wild-type scion samples. Kan and Hyg transcripts serve as contamination controls. Note that transcript absence was confirmed by 50 PCR cycles. c, RT–qPCR detection of mobile Cas9-TLS transcripts in scion tissues and in grafted rootstock (Root). y-axis, mean 2−ΔΔct\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$2^{-\Delta\Delta c_t}$$\end{document} values; log10 scale. Each value represents the mean of three independent biological replicates presented as black dots on the bar. Note that every 2−ΔΔct\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$2^{-\Delta\Delta c_t}$$\end{document} value below the dashed line represents technical background as measured with wild-type scion samples grafted onto wild-type rootstocks with no Cas9 transcript present. Significance was calculated using Student’s t-test (two tails); P values indicated by a, b and c: a,b = 3.48073 × 10⁻⁸; b,c = 2.29801 × 10⁻⁷; a,c = 3.43932 × 10⁻⁸. d, Genomic PCR to detect NIA1 edited fragments in siliques and flowers. Samples were from the same plant material as analyzed in b,c. e, Mobile CRISPR–Cas9-induced genome edits confirmed by Sanger sequencing.
Source data
Heritable transgene-free genome editing in plants by grafting of wild-type shoots to transgenic donor rootstocks

January 2023

·

586 Reads

·

143 Citations

Nature Biotechnology

Generation of stable gene-edited plant lines using clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)–CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) requires a lengthy process of outcrossing to eliminate CRISPR–Cas9-associated sequences and produce transgene-free lines. We have addressed this issue by designing fusions of Cas9 and guide RNA transcripts to tRNA-like sequence motifs that move RNAs from transgenic rootstocks to grafted wild-type shoots (scions) and achieve heritable gene editing, as demonstrated in wild-type Arabidopsis thaliana and Brassica rapa . The graft-mobile gene editing system enables the production of transgene-free offspring in one generation without the need for transgene elimination, culture recovery and selection, or use of viral editing vectors. We anticipate that using graft-mobile editing systems for transgene-free plant production may be applied to a wide range of breeding programs and crop plants.


Non-cell-autonomous HSC70.1 chaperone displays homeostatic feed-back regulation by binding its own mRNA

May 2022

·

9 Reads

Heat shock proteins of the HSC70/HSP70 family are evolutionarily conserved chaperones that are involved in protein folding, protein transport and RNA binding. Arabidopsis HSC70 chaperones are thought to act as housekeeping chaperones and as such are involved in many growth-related pathways. Whether Arabidopsis HSC70 binds RNA and its function has remained an open question. Here, we show that the HSC70.1 chaperone binds its own mRNA via its C-terminal Short Variable Region (SVR) and inhibits its own translation. We propose that this negative protein-transcript feedback loop may establish an on-demand chaperone pool that allows for a rapid response to stress. Furthermore, we show that the SVR encoding RNA region is necessary for HSC70 . 1 transcript mobility to distant tissues and that HSC70 . 1 transcript and not protein mobility is required to rescue root growth and flowering time of hsc70 mutants. In summary, it seems that the Arabidopsis HSC70.1 chaperone can form a complex with its own transcript to regulate its translation and that both protein and transcript can act in a non-cell-autonomous manner maintaining chaperone homestasis between tissues.

Citations (2)


... Grafted plants are excellent model systems to study these mobile signals (Thomas and Frank 2019). Recently, graft-mobile signaling has earned significant interest due to the finding that CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) and guide RNAs can be deployed into the scion from transgenic rootstocks in Arabidopsis (Yang et al. 2023). Numerous types of genetic information have been reported to pass across the graft junction from nucleic acids, proteins, extrachromosomal circular DNAs, and even whole organelles (Haroldsen et al. 2012;Hertle et al. 2021;Yang et al. 2015;Zhang et al. 2024). ...

Reference:

Here comes the sun: integration of light, temperature, and auxin during herbaceous plant grafting
Heritable transgene-free genome editing in plants by grafting of wild-type shoots to transgenic donor rootstocks

Nature Biotechnology

... RNA binding quantification of plant leaf extracts was made with extracts from agroinfiltrated N. benthamiana leaves transiently expressing MP JSBWMV :GFP or free GFP for 3 to 4 days. Leaf extracts were prepared as described previously with minor modifications [33,34]. In addition to leaf extract, MP JSBWMV :GFP purified from E. coli BL21 + RIPL was used in MST. ...

Noncell‐autonomous HSC70.1 chaperone displays homeostatic feedback regulation by binding its own mRNA