Shoji Fukamachi’s research while affiliated with Japan Women's University and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (59)


Figure 1. Diagram of the experimental setup. Medaka was placed in a small case with water, and a webcam connected to a PC was fixed directly above it at a certain height. We launched the Image Project of Teachable Machine and photographed the fish from the dorsal side. The images were used for training a model, and the model was tested in an identical setup by showing the fish individually to the AI through the webcam. The results of the tests were quantified according to the identification score defined in Table 1.
Figure 2. Individual identification of four medaka in Experiment 1. (a) Examples of the images of four medaka (Fish #1-4 in Group 0), which were actually used for training a model. The black bottom of the case reflected the image of the webcam, which were not necessarily identical among the images and might disturb the machine learning process. The brightness, contrast, and focus of these images seemed not to be uniform. (b) The procedure and results of the machine learning. The training and testing progressed in 13 steps (see Results for details). Numbers indicate the number of images used for each training, and colors indicate the result (the identification score) in each testing.
Figure 3. Cont.
Figure 5. The procedure and results of machine learning in Experiment 3. Numbers indicate the number of images used for each training, and colors indicate the result (the identification score) in each testing.
Figure 6. Individual identification of four medaka in Experiment 4. (a) The procedure and results of machine learning. Numbers indicate the number of images used for each training, and colors indicate the result (the identification score) in each testing. Note that the identification scores rarely reached five points, indicating that the AI trained with biased orientations could not identify fish in different orientations. (b) Learning curves in Groups 6, 10, and 14 produced by Teachable Machine. (c) Measuring the body orientation in the images used for the machine learning. Regardless of whether the body was straight (left) or curved (right), we drew a line (red) perpendicular to the line connecting the eyes (blue) and measured the angle of the red line (green). (d) Quantification of the orientation bias. The body angles in all the learned images (as exemplified in (c)) are categorized and shown as percentages. Machine learning was successful in Groups 6 and 10 (Figures 3b), but

+2

Individual Identification of Medaka, a Small Freshwater Fish, from the Dorsal Side Using Artificial Intelligence
  • Article
  • Full-text available

June 2024

·

33 Reads

Hydrobiology

Mai Osada

·

·

·

[...]

·

Shoji Fukamachi

Individual identification is an important ability for humans and perhaps also for non-human animals to lead social lives. It is also desirable for laboratory experiments to keep records of each animal while rearing them in mass. However, the specific body parts or the acceptable visual angles that enable individual identification are mostly unknown for non-human animals. In this study, we investigated whether artificial intelligence (AI) could distinguish individual medaka, a model animal for biological, agrarian, ecological, and ethological studies, based on the dorsal view. Using Teachable Machine, we took photographs of adult fish (n = 4) and used the images for machine learning. To our surprise, the AI could perfectly identify the four individuals in a total of 11 independent experiments, and the identification was valid for up to 10 days. The AI could also distinguish eight individuals, although machine learning required more time and effort. These results clearly demonstrate that the dorsal appearances of this small spot-/stripe-less fish are polymorphic enough for individual identification. Whether these clues can be applied to laboratory experiments where individual identification would be beneficial is an intriguing theme for future research.

Download

Behavioral photosensitivity of multi-color-blind medaka: enhanced response under ultraviolet light in the absence of short-wavelength-sensitive opsins

December 2023

·

24 Reads

·

1 Citation

BMC Neuroscience

Background The behavioral photosensitivity of animals could be quantified via the optomotor response (OMR), for example, and the luminous efficiency function (the range of visible light) should largely rely on the repertoire and expression of light-absorbing proteins in the retina, i.e., the opsins. In fact, the OMR under red light was suppressed in medaka lacking the red (long-wavelength sensitive [LWS]) opsin. Results We investigated the ultraviolet (UV)- or blue-light sensitivity of medaka lacking the violet (short-wavelength sensitive 1 [SWS1]) and blue (SWS2) opsins. The sws1/sws2 double or sws1/sws2/lws triple mutants were as viable as the wild type. The remaining green (rhodopsin 2 [RH2]) or red opsins were not upregulated. Interestingly, the OMR of the double or triple mutants was equivalent or even increased under UV or blue light (λ = 350, 365, or 450 nm), which demonstrated that the rotating stripes (i.e., changes in luminance) could fully be recognized under UV light using RH2 alone. The OMR test using dichromatic stripes projected onto an RGB display consistently showed that the presence or absence of SWS1 and SWS2 did not affect the equiluminant conditions. Conclusions RH2 and LWS, but not SWS1 and SWS2, should predominantly contribute to the postreceptoral processes leading to the OMR or, possibly, to luminance detection in general, as the medium-wavelength-sensitive and LWS cones, but not the SWS cones, are responsible for luminance detection in humans.


An Attempt to Identify the Medaka Receptor for Somatolactin Alpha Using a Reverse Genetics Approach

March 2023

·

54 Reads

Genes

Somatolactin alpha (SLα) is a fish-specific hormone involved in body color regulation. The growth hormone (GH) is another hormone that is expressed in all vertebrates and promotes growth. These peptide hormones act by binding to receptors (SLα receptor (SLR) and GH receptor (GHR)); however, the relationships between these ligands and their receptors vary among species. Here, we first performed phylogenetic tree reconstruction by collecting the amino-acid sequences classified as SLR, GHR, or GHR-like from bony fish. Second, we impaired SLR or GHR functions in medaka (Oryzias sakaizumii) using CRISPR/Cas9. Lastly, we analyzed SLR and GHR mutants for phenotypes to deduce their functions. Phylogenetic tree reconstruction was performed using a total of 222 amino-acid sequences from 136 species, which revealed that many GHRa and GHRb are vaguely termed as GHR or GHR-like, while showing no orthologous/paralogous relationships. SLR and GHR mutants were successfully established for phenotyping. SLR mutants exhibited premature lethality after hatching, indicating an essential role for SLR in normal growth. GHR mutations did not affect viability, body length, or body color. These results provide no evidence that either SLR or GHR functions as a receptor for SLα; rather, phylogenetically and functionally, they seem to be receptors for GH, although their (subfunctionalized) roles warrant further investigation.


Retinal Cone Mosaic in sws1-Mutant Medaka (Oryzias latipes), A Teleost

October 2022

·

190 Reads

·

2 Citations

Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science

Purpose: Ablation of short single cones (SSCs) expressing short-wavelength-sensitive opsin (SWS1) is well analyzed in the field of regenerative retinal cells. In contrast with ablation studies, the phenomena caused by the complete deletion of SWS1 are less well-understood. To assess the effects of SWS1 deficiency on retinal structure, we established and analyzed sws1-mutant medaka. Methods: To visualize SWS1, a monoclonal anti-SWS1 antibody and transgenic reporter fish (Tg(sws1:mem-egfp)) were generated. We also developed a CRISPR/Cas-driven sws1-mutant line. Retinal structure of sws1 mutant was visualized using anti-SWS1, 1D4, and ZPR1 antibodies and coumarin derivatives and compared with wild type, Tg(sws1:mem-egfp), and another opsin (lws) mutant. Results: Our rat monoclonal antibody specifically recognized medaka SWS1. Sws1 mutant retained regularly arranged cone mosaic as lws mutant and its SSCs had neither SWS1 nor long wavelength sensitive opsin. Depletion of sws1 did not affect the expression of long wavelength sensitive opsin, and vice versa. ZPR1 antibody recognized arrestin spread throughout double cones and long single cones in wild-type, transgenic, and sws1-mutant lines. Conclusions: Comparative observation of sws1-mutant and wild-type retinas revealed that ZPR1 negativity is not a marker for SSCs with SWS1, but SSCs themselves. Loss of functional sws1 did not cause retinal degeneration, indicating that sws1 is not essential for cone mosaic development in medaka. Our two fish lines, one with visualized SWS1 and the other lacking functional SWS1, offer an opportunity to study neural network synapsing with SSCs and to clarify the role of SWS1 in vision.


Validation of the three-chamber strategy for studying mate choice in medaka

November 2021

·

83 Reads

·

1 Citation

The three-chamber experiment, in which one test animal can choose between two animals placed in physically inaccessible compartments, is a widely adopted strategy for studying sexual preference in animals. Medaka, a small freshwater teleost, is an emerging model for dissecting the neurological/physiological mechanisms underlying mate choice for which intriguing findings have been accumulating. The three-chamber strategy has rarely been adopted in this species; therefore, here we investigated its validity using medaka colour variants that mate assortatively. First, a total of 551 movies, in which a test male and two choice females interacted for 30 min under a free-swimming condition, were manually analysed. The sexual preference of the males, calculated as a courtship ratio, was highly consistent between human observers (r > 0.96), supporting the objectivity of this manual-counting strategy. Second, we tested two types of three-chamber apparatuses, in which choice fish were presented in either a face-to-face or side-by-side location. Test fish (regardless of sex) spent most of the time associating with choice fish in the compartments. However, their sexual preference, calculated as an association ratio, was poorly reproduced when the locations of the choice fish were swapped. Third, the sexual preferences of males quantified using the manual-counting and either of the three-chamber strategies did not correlate (r = 0.147 or 0.297). Hence, we concluded that, even for individuals of a species like medaka, which spawn every day, sexual preference could not be reliably evaluated using the three-chamber strategy. Optimization of the protocol may solve this problem; however, the explanation for the observation that animals that are ready for spawning persist with never-accessible mating partners must be reconsidered.


Fish species in this work. (a) Phylogenetic relationships of fish. A tree was created based on previous works [26–28]. (b) Visual sensitivity of fish. The absorption spectra of visual pigments (upper row) and electrophysiological and behavioural response (lower row) of fish are summarized. A horizontal axis shows the wavelength of light. The absorption spectrum of SWS1 is depicted in violet, SWS2 in blue, RH2 in green, LWS in red and RH1 in black. A bar indicates the longest wavelength that has provoked a fish response; phototaxis (green), ERG (orange), OMR (blue) and electrophysiological response at the optic nerve and cardiac conditioned response (black). The longest wavelengths to which fish responded in this work are shown as magenta bars. Guppy has one additional LWS pigment with unknown absorption spectrum. Guppy LWS-1 is LWS-1/180Ser. Mbuna has one LWS pigment with unknown absorption spectrum. All the chromophores are A1, but those of goldfish are A2. The original references on which this figure is based are given in electronic supplementary material, table S1.
Ambient light and monochromatic light in this work. Intensity and spectra of light were measured using a spectroradiometer. (a) Intensity and spectrum of ambient light. (b–d) Spectra of monochromatic light used in the OMR assay. We performed behavioural assays under the light of 700, 720, 750, 780, 800, 810, 820, 830, 840, 850, 860, 880, 900, 950 and 1000 nm. At all points, the spectra were measured every 1 nm and are shown differently coloured. Spectra of light used in OMR assays of cavefish and tilapia (b), the first round (c) and the second round (d) are illustrated.
Behavioural response of Nile tilapia and Mexican cavefish under the light from 720 to 860 nm. Behavioural tests were conducted using Nile tilapia and Mexican cavefish. In all figures, the horizontal axis indicates the wavelength. The OMR was quantified using the four parameters (refer to ‘§2.2’ for details of the four parameters). (a) Delay, (b) Duration, (c) Angular velocity and (d) Distance. Values represent means. Error bars are s.e.
Behavioural response of medaka, goldfish, zebrafish, guppy, three-spined stickleback and mbuna in the first-round OMR assay. Behavioural tests were conducted using six fish species. In all figures, the horizontal axis indicates the wavelength. The OMR was quantified using the four parameters. (a) Delay, (b) Duration, (c) Angular velocity and (d) Distance. Values represent means. Error bars are s.e. We summarized the graphs according to fish species in electronic supplementary material, figure S1.
Behavioural response of medaka, goldfish, zebrafish, guppy, three-spined stickleback and mbuna in the second-round OMR assay. Behavioural tests were conducted using six fish species. In all figures, the horizontal axis indicates the wavelength. The OMR was quantified by the four parameters. (a) Delay, (b) Duration, (c) Angular velocity and (d) Distance. Values represent means. Error bars are s.e. We summarized the graphs according to fish species in electronic supplementary material, figure S2.
Behavioural red-light sensitivity in fish according to the optomotor response

August 2021

·

207 Reads

·

11 Citations

Various procedures have been adopted to investigate spectral sensitivity of animals, e.g. absorption spectra of visual pigments, electroretinography, optokinetic response, optomotor response (OMR) and phototaxis. The use of these techniques has led to various conclusions about animal vision. However, visual sensitivity should be evaluated consistently for a reliable comparison. In this study, we retrieved behavioural data of several fish species using a single OMR procedure and compared their sensitivities to near-infrared light. Besides cavefish that lack eyes, some species were not appropriate for the OMR test because they either stayed still or changed swimming direction frequently. Eight of 13 fish species tested were OMR positive. Detailed analyses using medaka, goldfish, zebrafish, guppy, stickleback and cichlid revealed that all the fish were sensitive to light at a wavelength greater than or equal to 750 nm, where the threshold wavelengths varied from 750 to 880 nm. Fish opsin repertoire affected the perception of red light. By contrast, the copy number of long-wavelength-sensitive ( LWS ) genes did not necessarily improve red-light sensitivity. While the duplication of LWS and other cone opsin genes that has occurred extensively during fish evolution might not aid increasing spectral sensitivity, it may provide some other advantageous ophthalmic function, such as enhanced spectral discrimination.


Changes in a Cone Opsin Repertoire Affect Color-Dependent Social Behavior in Medaka but Not Behavioral Photosensitivity

August 2020

·

155 Reads

·

15 Citations

Common ancestors of vertebrates had four types of cone opsins: short-wavelength sensitive 1 (SWS1), SWS2, rhodopsin 2 (RH2), and long-wavelength sensitive (LWS) types. Whereas fish and birds retain all the types, mammals have lost two of them (SWS2 and RH2) possibly because of their nocturnal lifestyle during the Mesozoic Era. Considering that the loss of cone opsin types causes so-called color blindness in humans (e.g., protanopia), the ability to discriminate color by trichromatic humans could be lower than that in potentially tetrachromatic birds and fish. Behavioral studies using color-blind (cone opsin-knockout) animals would be helpful to address such questions, but it is only recently that the genome-editing technologies have opened up this pathway. Using medaka as a model, we introduced frameshift mutations in SWS2 (SWS2a and/or SWS2b) after detailed characterization of the loci in silico, which unveiled the existence of a GC–AG intron and non-optic expressed-sequence-tags (ESTs) that include SWS2a in part. Transcripts from the mutated SWS2 loci are commonly reduced, suggesting that the SWS2a/b-double mutants could produce, if any, severely truncated (likely dysfunctional) SWS2s in small amounts. The mutants exhibited weakened body color preferences during mate choice. However, the optomotor response (OMR) test under monochromatic light revealed that the mutants had no defect in spectral sensitivity, even at the absorbance maxima (λmax) of SWS2s. Evolutionary diversification of cone opsins has often been discussed in relation to adaptation to dominating light in habitats (i.e., changes in the repertoire or λmax are for increasing sensitivity to the dominating light). However, the present results seem to provide empirical evidence showing that acquiring or losing a type of cone opsin (or changes in λmax) need not substantially affect photopic or mesopic sensitivity. Other points of view, such as color discrimination of species-specific mates/preys/predators against habitat-specific backgrounds, may be necessary to understand why cone opsin repertories are so various among animals.


Figure 1. The medaka LWSa and LWSb loci. (a) Orthologous comparison between O. latipes (the Hd-rR inbred strain) and O. sakaizumii (the HNI inbred strain). Outputs of the mVISTA program using genomic sequences covering the LWSa and LWSb loci are shown at the top and bottom. The two bold black horizontal lines in the middle represent the genomic sequences, and boxes show the positions of exons: light blue, UTR; purple, coding region. Dotted lines indicate relatively large insertions/deletions. The positions of the microRNA (miR-726) gene, which is co-expressed with LWSa 24 , are shown by arrows. The regions highlighted in yellow and green were used for paralogous comparison in (b). (b) Paralogous comparison of LWSa and LWSb in O. latipes. The mVISTA outputs are shown at the top and bottom. The coding region, the 5′/3′ UTRs, a part of the 5′-upstream region, and the 2nd-5th introns are highly conserved. In spite of the conservation, the CNR-B and CNR-C sequences are shown to be dispensable for expressing LWSa 13 .
Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationships between the LWS genes of O. latipes and O. sakaizumii. (a) The 5′ part which might not undergo gene conversion (nucleotide positions 1-163), (b) the 3′ part which underwent gene conversion (297-1,071), or (c) the entire coding region (1-1,071) were used for the phylogenetic reconstruction by the maximum likelihood method (see Methods for details). Branch supports were shown as bootstrap values in 100 replications. The relationships focused in this study were highlighted by yellow boxes. The position of tilapia fluctuates for unknown reasons, but that of O. melastigma remains stable as an appropriate outgroup of medaka.
Figure 5. Optomotor response (OMR) of the lws a:b mutant under monochromatic red light. The lws a:b mutants (n = 6) were individually tested for OMR at every 10 nm in λ = 720-750 nm and 800-850 nm (light-grey bars). Dark-grey bars indicate the wild type (n = 5) 31. Mean and standard error of the mean are shown. An asterisk indicates a significant difference between the wild type and mutant (P < 0.05; Student's t test without correction). Different letters in the bars (a-d in the wild type and w-z in the mutant) indicate a significant difference according to a one-way ANOVA and the Tukey post hoc HSD test (P < 0.05). The OMR was evaluated by three parameters: (a) the average time (s) when fish started OMR (delay), (b) the average period (%) fish continued the OMR (duration), and (c) the total distance of swimming (round) towards the direction of the rotating stripes (distance). The fish occasionally showed no interest in the rotating stripes, which leads to values supporting low OMR (e.g., at λ = 730 nm of the lws a:b mutants). However, such low OMR could be recovered at longer wavelength (e.g., λ = 810 nm), indicating that the low OMR was because of not decreased photosensitivity but decreased interests in the rotating stripes.
The lwsa:b mutant with a single LWS. (a) Structures of the LWSa and LWSb loci in the wild type (top) and the hybrid LWSa:b locus in the lwsa:b mutant (bottom). Black and white boxes indicate the coding region and 5′/3′ UTRs, respectively. The target sites of the gRNA exist in the 2nd exons, and the genomic region in-between (~7 kb) was deleted in the lwsa:b mutant (dotted lines). Arrowheads show approximate positions of the primers used for genotyping of F2 siblings: white, LWSa-specific forward; black, LWSb-specific forward; grey, LWSb-specific reverse (see the Methods for their sequences). (b) Genotyping of F2 siblings (#1~9) obtained by intercrossing heterozygous F1s. Three genotypes (i.e., wild type, heterozygote, and homozygote) could be distinguished by genomic PCR using two pairs of three primers (see the arrowheads in (a) for their positions). The white–grey pair amplifies a product (~0.6 kb) from the hybrid LWSa:b gene, whereas the black–grey pair amplifies a product from the wild-type LWSb. Thus, No. 1–5 and No. 7 are heterozygous, No. 6 and No. 8 are wild type, and No. 9 is homozygous. A full image of this gel is available as Supplementary Fig. S1. (c) The missense substitution in LWSa:b. The original sequences of LWSa and LWSb are shown at the top with translated amino acids. Black letters show the target sequence of the gRNA⁶. The sequence of LWSa:b is shown at the bottom. The substituted nucleotide (T > A) and amino acid (Y > N) are highlighted. (d) Comparison of LWSs among vertebrates. Amino-acid sequences were collected from the GenBank database and aligned. MWSs of human and mouse are paralogues of LWS. Amino acids identical to those of the medaka LWSa (top) are shown by dots. The substituted amino acid in LWSa:b is highlighted.
Expression of the LWS genes in the eyes of adult medaka. (a) Semi-quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR. Results of two fish from each genotype (wild type, LWSa:b heterozygote, LWSa:b homozygote, and lws+2a+5b mutant²⁵) are shown as representatives. The number of PCR cycles was 24 (the amplification was stopped before plateau; see Supplementary Fig. S2 for results of stepwise PCR) in both LWS and β-actin (Actb). Whereas the reduction in the lws+2a+5b mutants, which has double frameshift mutations on LWSa and LWSb²⁵, is apparent, expression in the lwsa:b mutants is equivalent to that in the wild type, despite the copy-number difference. (b) Direct sequencing of the reverse transcriptase PCR products. All the 14 nucleotide substitutions among the LWS genes (i.e., 13 substitutions between LWSa and LWSb [Table 1] and the missense substitution in LWSa:b [Fig. 3c]) are summarized at the top. The numbers indicate the positions of nucleotides from the translation-initiation site. Electropherograms at five sites (arrows) are shown as representatives. Note that (1) signals from LWSb are generally higher than those from LWSa in the wild type; (2) the homozygote expresses only LWSa:b; and (3) using the missense substitution at the position 382 as a border, signals from LWSa in the heterozygote are stronger or weaker than those in the wild type at the upstream or downstream region, respectively.
Evolutionary history of the medaka long-wavelength sensitive genes and effects of artificial regression by gene loss on behavioural photosensitivity

February 2019

·

174 Reads

·

7 Citations

Tandem gene duplication has led to an expansion of cone-opsin repertoires in many fish, but the resulting functional advantages have only been conjectured without empirical demonstration. Medaka (Oryzias latipes and O. sakaizumii) have eight (two red, three green, two blue, and one violet) cone opsin genes. Absorbance maxima (λmax) of the proteins vary from 356 nm to 562 nm, but those of the red opsins (long-wavelength sensitive; LWS) are nearly identical, obscuring the necessity of their coexistence. Here, we compared the LWSa and LWSb loci of these sister species and found that the gene duplication occurred long before the latipes–sakaizumii speciation (4–18 million years ago), and the high sequence similarity between the paralogues is the result of at least two events of gene conversion. These repetitive gene conversions would indicate the importance for medaka of retaining two identical LWSs in the genome. However, a newly established medaka mutant with a single LWS showed no defect in LWS expression or behavioural red-light sensitivity, demonstrating functional redundancy of the paralogs. Thus, as with many other genes after whole-genome duplication, the redundant LWS might be on the way to being lost from the current cone opsin repertoire. Thus, non-allelic gene conversion may temporarily provide an easier and more frequent solution than gene loss for reducing genetic diversity, which should be considered when assessing history of gene evolution by phylogenetic analyses.




Citations (39)


... Remarkably, sudden light habitat changes resulted in rapid shifts within a few days (Fuller & Claricoates, 2011). Evidence suggests that long-wavelength sensitivity is associated with motion detection (Krauss & Neumeyer, 2003;Mizoguchi et al., 2023;Schaerer & Neumeyer, 1996). Thus, increased lws expression in killifish exposed to tea-stained waters could maintain or enhance the ability to detect motion in a turbid environment. ...

Reference:

Coral reef fish visual adaptations to a changing world
Behavioral photosensitivity of multi-color-blind medaka: enhanced response under ultraviolet light in the absence of short-wavelength-sensitive opsins

BMC Neuroscience

... We recently established another color-blind strain lacking SWS1 (λ max = 356 nm; [24]). Unlike the SWS1-KO rainbow trout [22], the medaka sws1 mutant was fully viable and retained the ordinary square-mosaic distribution of cones in the retina. ...

Retinal Cone Mosaic in sws1-Mutant Medaka (Oryzias latipes), A Teleost

Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science

... Their genomes are identical, with the exception of the transgene in Actb-SLα:GFP, which expresses a hormone (somatolactin alpha [SLα]) and Renilla green fluorescent protein (GFP) ectopically. Our previous experiments repeatedly demonstrated that these color variants mate assortatively; i.e., males strongly prefer females of the same strain [27][28][29][30]. ...

Validation of the three-chamber strategy for studying mate choice in medaka

... Other fish, including sharks, with poorly lit habitats also show a lower optokinetic gain 58 , a related phenomenon to whole body OMR. Although other fish species, such as medaka, goldfish, guppy, three-spined stickleback, mbuna, glowlight tetra, and bronze Corydoras, perform OMR behaviors 59 , DC and ZF offer experimental tractability to comprehensively map and ultimately understand evolutionary-driven behavioral diversity and the underlying neural circuitry. ...

Behavioural red-light sensitivity in fish according to the optomotor response

... Previous studies have indicated that variations in the expression and function of the sws2 gene significantly impact fish visual behavior and ecological adaptability. For instance, alterations in sws2 gene expression have been implicated in regulating fish coloration, visual behavior, and adaptability to environments [21][22][23]. Additionally, studies in half-smooth tongue sole (Cynoglossus semilaevis) and olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) have shown that the blue opsin gene sws2 affects the asymmetric development of coloration in flatfish by promoting the synthesis of retinoic acid [24]. ...

Changes in a Cone Opsin Repertoire Affect Color-Dependent Social Behavior in Medaka but Not Behavioral Photosensitivity

... Lws1 and lws2 in medaka (Oryzias latipes) were 98.9% similar and had basically identical absorbance maxima (Matsumoto et al. 2006). The medaka lws1/lws2 single mutant has no behavioral impairment in response to red light sensitivity, indicating functional redundancy across paralogous homologous genes (Harada et al. 2019). Both guppy (Poecilia reticulata) and bluefin killifish (Lucania goodei) have four lws genes with different λ max , and the four homologous lws genes of guppy have undergone evolutionary diversification (neofunctionalisation) (Kawamura et al. 2016), the four lws genes of Bluefin Killifish exhibited significant differences in expression levels (Chang et al. 2021). ...

Evolutionary history of the medaka long-wavelength sensitive genes and effects of artificial regression by gene loss on behavioural photosensitivity

... In contrast, the optomotor response (OMR) assay evaluates the behavioral locomotor response of animals stimulated by moving black and white stripe patterns. In those assays, visual functions such as spatial resolution or acuity and temporal resolution are evaluated by adjusting stripe width, the speed of stripe movement and the intensity of light exposure [16,[22][23][24][25][26]. OKR and OMR assays have been used in studies to explore the genetic and molecular mechanisms underlying retinal development [23], retinal degenerative disease [27], neural activities [28,29], as well as animal behavior [30] in various models. ...

A semi-automatic and quantitative method to evaluate behavioral photosensitivity in animals based on the optomotor response (OMR)

Biology Open

... The strain lacking LWS (LWSa and LWSb; λ max = 561 or 562 nm) did not exhibit the OMR under red light (λ ≥ 730 nm), whereas the wild-type (WT) counterpart did, up to λ = 830 nm [2,3]. The lws mutant also showed a reduced body-color preference during mate choice, possibly because of a decreased ability for color discrimination [23]. The strain lacking SWS2 (SWS2a and SWS2b; λ max = 439 or 405 nm) similarly exhibited a reduced body-color preference [5]. ...

Loss of red opsin genes relaxes sexual isolation between skin-colour variants of medaka
  • Citing Article
  • February 2018

Behavioural Processes

... Animals typically utilize different protein subtypes in the phototransduction pathway to mediate the activation, recovery, and adaptation of the cascade (Lamb and Hunt 2017). Recoverin (RCVRN) including rcvrn2 and rcvrn3, regulate rhodopsin kinases (RK)-mediated phosphorylation of activated opsin (Shimmura et al. 2017). The up-regulation ...

Dynamic plasticity in phototransduction regulates seasonal changes in color perception

... Their genomes are identical, with the exception of the transgene in Actb-SLα:GFP, which expresses a hormone (somatolactin alpha [SLα]) and Renilla green fluorescent protein (GFP) ectopically. Our previous experiments repeatedly demonstrated that these color variants mate assortatively; i.e., males strongly prefer females of the same strain [27][28][29][30]. ...

Establishment & maintenance of sexual preferences that cause a reproductive isolation between medaka strains in close association

Biology Open