Shimeng Guo’s research while affiliated with Chinese Academy of Sciences and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (40)


Structural insights into the agonist activity of the nonpeptide modulator JR14a on C3aR
  • Article
  • Full-text available

January 2025

·

45 Reads

Cell Discovery

Ping Luo

·

Wenwen Xin

·

Shimeng Guo

·

[...]

·

Download

Fig. 1 AVP stimulates insulin secretion from mouse islets but not INS-1E cells. (A) Insulin secretion from isolated mouse islets (10 islets/well in 48-well plate, incubated in 1 mL KRBB with 16.8 mM glucose) stimulated by various concentrations of AVP for 2 h. (B) Dose-response of SSR149415 on AVP (1 nM)-induced calcium signal in HEK293 cells stably expressing V1bR. (C) Insulin secretion from isolated mouse islets in the presence of AVP (1 nM) and various concentrations of SSR149415. (D) Insulin secretion from isolated mouse islets stimulated by 100 nM GLP-1 or AVP for 2 h. (E) Insulin secretion from INS-1E cells (5 × 10 4 cells/well in 96-well plate, incubated in 100 μL KRBB with 16.8 mM glucose) stimulated by 100 nM GLP-1 or AVP for 1 h. (F) Insulin secretion from MIN6 cells (2 × 10 4 cells/well in 96-well plate, incubated in 100 μL KRBB with 16.8 mM glucose) stimulated by 100 nM GLP-1 or AVP for 1 h. Data are means ± SEM (3 technical replicates). **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, versus DMSO control. # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01, ### P < 0.001, versus AVP alone
Fig. 3 Glucagon secreted from α cells by AVP stimulation may facilitate insulin secretion. (A) Glucagon secretion from isolated mouse islets (10 islets/ well in 48-well plate, incubated in 1 mL KRBB with 16.8 mM glucose) stimulated by various concentrations of AVP for 2 h. (B) Glucagon secretion from isolated mouse islets in the presence of AVP (1 nM) and various concentrations of SSR149415 for 2 h. (C and D) Glucagon (C) and insulin (D) secretion from isolated mouse islets stimulated by AVP (100 nM) in both low (2.8 mM) and high (16.8 mM) glucose conditions. (E) Insulin secretion from isolated mouse islets stimulated by glucagon (100 nM) in both low (2.8 mM) and high (16.8 mM) glucose condition. (F) Glucagon secretion from αTC1-9 cells (5 × 10 4 cells/well in 96-well plate, incubated in 100 μL KRBB with 16.8 mM glucose) stimulated by 100 nM GIP or AVP for 1 h. (G and H) Glucagon (G) and insulin (H) secretion from the co-cultured INS-1E and αTC1-9 cells (both 2.5 × 10 4 cells/well in 96-well plate, incubated in 100 μL KRBB with 16.8 mM glucose) stimulated by 100 nM GLP-1, GIP or AVP for 1 h. Data are means ± SEM (3 technical replicates). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, versus DMSO control. ## P < 0.01, ### P < 0.001, versus AVP alone
V1bR enhances glucose-stimulated insulin secretion by paracrine production of glucagon which activates GLP-1 receptor

August 2024

·

36 Reads

·

1 Citation

Cell & Bioscience

Background Arginine vasopressin (AVP) has been reported to regulate insulin secretion and glucose homeostasis in the body. Previous study has shown that AVP and its receptor V1bR modulate insulin secretion via the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. AVP has also been shown to enhance insulin secretion in islets, but the exact mechanism remains unclear. Results In our study, we unexpectedly discovered that AVP could only stimulates insulin secretion from islets, but not β cells, and AVP-induced insulin secretion could be blocked by V1bR selective antagonist. Single-cell transcriptome analysis identified that V1bR is only expressed by the α cells. Further studies indicated that activation of the V1bR stimulates the α cells to secrete glucagon, which then promotes glucose-dependent insulin secretion from β cells in a paracrine way by activating GLP-1R but not GCGR on these cells. Conclusions Our study revealed a crosstalk between α and β cells initiated by AVP/V1bR and mediated by glucagon/GLP-1R, providing a mechanism to develop new glucose-controlling therapies targeting V1bR.



Fig. 2 Intramolecular interactions of the TA. a The TA-binding pocket in PAR1. b-f Detailed interactions between the TA and the transmembrane core of PAR1. Side chains of residues are displayed in sticks. Hydrogen bonds are depicted as red dashed lines, the salt bridge is depicted as a orange dashed line. g Effects of mutations of residues in the binding pocket on Gα q -Gγ dissociation induced by the synthesized TA peptide. ΔpEC 50 represents the difference between pEC 50 values of the mutant PAR1 receptor and the wild-type (WT) receptor. Data are presented as means ± SEM of more than three independent experiments performed in technical triplicate. NS, P ≥ 0.05, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 and ****P < 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA followed by Fisher's LSD multiple comparisons test compared with WT PAR1. h Comparison between the efficacy of PAR1 signaling activated by thrombin and the synthesized TA peptide. The efficacy is defined as the range between the maximal response (E max ) and the vehicle baseline (no agonist). Data are presented as means ± SEM of more than three independent experiments performed in technical triplicate. NS, P ≥ 0.05, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 and ****P < 0.0001 by two-way ANOVA. A detailed statistical evaluation is provided in Supplementary information, Fig. S4 and Tables S3, S4.
Fig. 3 Activation mechanism of PAR1. a Superposition of the TA-bound PAR1 structure (teal) with the inactive PAR1 structure (gray) (PDB: 3VW7 10 ). b Comparison of the binding pocket of the TA and the antagonist vorapaxar in PAR1. c Conformational changes of Y95N N-term and Y350 7.32 induced by F43 TA-02 upon TA binding. d The rearrangement of local residues in the backbone of TMD in TA-bound PAR1 compared to the inactive structure shows the cascade changes of residues H336 6.58 , Y337 6.59 , Y353 7.35 , F271 5.39 , Y183 3.33 , F182 3.32 , M186 3.36 , and I190 3.40 . e The "K-R-K" motif involved in activation signal transmission of PAR1. The "K-R-K" motif consists of K135 2.37 , R200 3.50 , and K307 6.29 of PAR1. f Sequence alignment of residues involved in the activation of PAR family receptors. g Mutations of F182 3.32 , Y183 3.33 , M186 3.36 , F271 5.39 , H336 6.58 , Y337 6.59 , and Y353 7.35 in PAR1 decreased the activation potency induced by the TA peptide. Data represent the means ± SEM from three biologically independent experiments performed in triplicate. A detailed statistical evaluation is provided in Supplementary information, Table S5.
Fig. 4 G protein selectivity mediated by ICLs of PAR1. a Structural superposition of the TA-PAR1-G q and TA-PAR1-G i complexes. b Differences in the interactions between ICL3 with Gα q and Gα i . c Effects of mutations in ICL3 on Gα q -Gγ and Gα i -Gγ dissociation induced by the synthesized TA peptide. d, e The positioning of PAR1 ICL2 within the hydrophobic cavities of Gα q (d) and Gα i (e), respectively. The light yellow color indicates hydrophobicity. f Effects of mutations in ICL2 on Gα q -Gγ and Gα i -Gγ dissociation induced by the synthesized TA peptide. A detailed statistical evaluation is provided in Supplementary information, Tables S6 and S7.
Structural basis of tethered agonism and G protein coupling of protease-activated receptors

July 2024

·

86 Reads

·

2 Citations

Cell Research

Protease-activated receptors (PARs) are a unique group within the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily, orchestrating cellular responses to extracellular proteases via enzymatic cleavage, which triggers intracellular signaling pathways. Protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1) is a key member of this family and is recognized as a critical pharmacological target for managing thrombotic disorders. In this study, we present cryo-electron microscopy structures of PAR1 in its activated state, induced by its natural tethered agonist (TA), in complex with two distinct downstream proteins, the G q and G i heterotrimers, respectively. The TA peptide is positioned within a surface pocket, prompting PAR1 activation through notable conformational shifts. Contrary to the typical receptor activation that involves the outward movement of transmembrane helix 6 (TM6), PAR1 activation is characterized by the simultaneous downward shift of TM6 and TM7, coupled with the rotation of a group of aromatic residues. This results in the displacement of an intracellular anion, creating space for downstream G protein binding. Our findings delineate the TA recognition pattern and highlight a distinct role of the second extracellular loop in forming β-sheets with TA within the PAR family, a feature not observed in other TA-activated receptors. Moreover, the nuanced differences in the interactions between intracellular loops 2/3 and the Gα subunit of different G proteins are crucial for determining the specificity of G protein coupling. These insights contribute to our understanding of the ligand binding and activation mechanisms of PARs, illuminating the basis for PAR1’s versatility in G protein coupling.


Topoisomerase Inhibitors and PIM1 Kinase Inhibitors Improve Gene Editing Efficiency Mediated by CRISPR-Cas9 and Homology-Directed Repair

June 2024

·

9 Reads

Molecules

The CRISPR-Cas9 system has emerged as the most prevalent gene editing technology due to its simplicity, high efficiency, and low cost. However, the homology-directed repair (HDR)-mediated gene knock-in in this system suffers from low efficiency, which limits its application in animal model preparation, gene therapy, and agricultural genetic improvement. Here, we report the design and optimization of a simple and efficient reporter-based assay to visualize and quantify HDR efficiency. Through random screening of a small molecule compound library, two groups of compounds, including the topoisomerase inhibitors and PIM1 kinase inhibitors, have been identified to promote HDR. Two representative compounds, etoposide and quercetagetin, also significantly enhance the efficiency of CRISPR-Cas9 and HDR-mediated gene knock-in in mouse embryos. Our study not only provides an assay to screen compounds that may facilitate HDR but also identifies useful tool compounds to facilitate the construction of genetically modified animal models with the CRISPR-Cas9 system.


Fig. 1 The cryo-EM structure of the 26RFa-QRFPR-G q -scFv16 complex. a, b The orthogonal views of the density map (a) and the model (b) of the 26RFa-QRFPR-G q -scFv16 complex are shown. The components of the complex are colored as indicated.
Fig. 2 The unique assembly between the extracellular region of QRFPR and the N-terminus of 26RFa. a The architecture of the extracellular region of QRFRP bound to the N-terminus of 26RFa. NT, N-terminus. b Effects of mutations of the extracellular region of QRFPR on the potency of 26RFa-induced calcium mobilization. pEC 50 values are shown as means ± SEM from three independent experiments performed in triplicate. ***P < 0.001. NA not activated. All data were analyzed by two-sided, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey's test. c Structure comparison of the extracellular region of QRFPR with those of other class A peptide-activated GPCRs. The orientation of ECL2 in QRFPR relative to other class A GPCRs is depicted by a black arrow. GPRP gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (PDB: 7W40), GALR2 galanin receptor 2 (PDB: 7WQ4), CCK A R cholecystokinin A receptor (PDB: 7EZH), C5AR1 complement component 5a receptor 1 (PDB: 7Y65), BDKRB2 bradykinin receptor B2 (PDB: 7F2O).
Fig. 3 Recognition of the C-terminal heptapeptide of 26RFa by the transmembrane binding pocket of QRFPR. a The binding pose of 26RFa on QRFPR. The heptapeptide at the C-terminus of 26RFa occupies the transmembrane binding pocket of QRFPR. b, c Detail interactions between Phe22-Ser23-Phe24 (b) and Arg25-Phe26-amide segment (c) of 26RFa with residues of the transmembrane binding pocket in QRFPR. d Effects of mutations in the transmembrane binding pocket of QRFRP on the potency of 26RFa-mediated calcium mobilization. pEC 50 values are shown as means ± SEM from three independent experiments performed in triplicate. ***P < 0.001. NA not activated. All data were analyzed by two-sided, one-way ANOVA with Tukey's test.
Fig. 4 Comparison of recognition modes of peptide RF-amide segment by QRFPR and RY-amide segment by NPYRs. a Sequence alignment of 26RFa, NPY, and PP. The N-terminal sequence of NPY and PP are omitted. These peptides show similar RF-amide and RY-amide segments at their extreme C-terminus. b Sequence alignment of residues surrounding Arg25-Phe26-amide segment of 26RFa in QRFPR and cognate residues in NPY 1 R, NPY 2 R, and NPY 4 R. c Structural superposition of 26RFa in QRFPR, NPY in NPY 1 R/NPY 2 R (PDBs: 7X9A and 7X9B), and PP in NPY 4 R (PDB: 7X9C). d-f 2D representation of key interactions between the RF-amide segment in 26RFa (d), RY-amide in NPY (e) and PP (f), and their specific receptors. Hydrogen bonds and salt bridges are depicted as blue and red dashed lines, respectively. For residues presented in a, b and d-f, the light purple, blue, red, and green colors indicate polar, basic, acidic, and hydrophobic residues, respectively.
Fig. 5 Comparison of recognition of RF-amide segment of RF-amide peptides by their specific receptors. a Sequence alignment of RF-amide peptides, which shares a conserved C-terminal RF-amide segment. b Sequence alignment of RF-amide-interacting residues across RF-amide peptide receptors. The light purple, blue, red, and green colors indicate polar, basic, acidic, and hydrophobic residues, respectively. c-g Effects of mutation in the RF-amide binding pocket on calcium mobilization. 26RFa/QRFPR (c); NPVF/NPFF 1 R (d); NPFF/NPFF 2 R (e); PrRP/PrRPR (f); KP-10/KISS1R (g).
Structural basis for recognition of 26RFa by the pyroglutamylated RFamide peptide receptor

June 2024

·

59 Reads

Cell Discovery

The neuropeptide 26RFa, a member of the RF-amide peptide family, activates the pyroglutamylated RF-amide peptide receptor (QRFPR), a class A GPCR. The 26RFa/QRFPR system plays critical roles in energy homeostasis, making QRFPR an attractive drug target for treating obesity, diabetes, and eating disorders. However, the lack of structural information has hindered our understanding of the peptide recognition and regulatory mechanism of QRFPR, impeding drug design efforts. In this study, we determined the cryo-EM structure of the G q -coupled QRFPR bound to 26RFa. The structure reveals a unique assembly mode of the extracellular region of the receptor and the N-terminus of the peptide, and elucidates the recognition mechanism of the C-terminal heptapeptide of 26RFa by the transmembrane binding pocket of QRFPR. The study also clarifies the similarities and distinctions in the binding pattern of the RF-amide moiety in five RF-amide peptides and the RY-amide segment in neuropeptide Y. These findings deepen our understanding of the RF-amide peptide recognition, aiding in the rational design of drugs targeting QRFPR and other RF-amide peptide receptors.




Cryo-EM structures of adenosine receptor A3AR bound to selective agonists

April 2024

·

77 Reads

·

15 Citations

The adenosine A3 receptor (A3AR), a key member of the G protein-coupled receptor family, is a promising therapeutic target for inflammatory and cancerous conditions. The selective A3AR agonists, CF101 and CF102, are clinically significant, yet their recognition mechanisms remained elusive. Here we report the cryogenic electron microscopy structures of the full-length human A3AR bound to CF101 and CF102 with heterotrimeric Gi protein in complex at 3.3-3.2 Å resolution. These agonists reside in the orthosteric pocket, forming conserved interactions via their adenine moieties, while their 3-iodobenzyl groups exhibit distinct orientations. Functional assays reveal the critical role of extracellular loop 3 in A3AR’s ligand selectivity and receptor activation. Key mutations, including His3.37, Ser5.42, and Ser6.52, in a unique sub-pocket of A3AR, significantly impact receptor activation. Comparative analysis with the inactive A2AAR structure highlights a conserved receptor activation mechanism. Our findings provide comprehensive insights into the molecular recognition and signaling of A3AR, paving the way for designing subtype-selective adenosine receptor ligands.



Citations (24)


... Vasopressin mRNA has been identified in the pancreas, and AVP was able to stimulate release of glucagon and insulin from the isolated pancreatic islets and from the in situ perfused pancreas [7,[150][151][152]. Recently, it has been shown that AVP enhances release of insulin by glucose in the pancreas via potentiation of paracrine production of glucagon, which subsequently activates GLP-1 receptors [153]. Experiments on mouse islets showed that AVP significantly amplifies glucose-induced insulin release [12]. ...

Reference:

Molecular Interaction Between Vasopressin and Insulin in Regulation of Metabolism: Impact on Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases
V1bR enhances glucose-stimulated insulin secretion by paracrine production of glucagon which activates GLP-1 receptor

Cell & Bioscience

... Structural biology approaches like crystallography and cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) have uncovered the functions of platelet membrane proteins by obtaining high-resolution structures of Gprotein coupled receptors, adhesion molecules, and other surface receptors. [8][9][10] They have also uncovered the binding sites and mechanisms of anti-platelet therapies. 11,12 However, to understand the impact of native environment, we need approaches beyond traditional structural biology. ...

Structural basis of tethered agonism and G protein coupling of protease-activated receptors

Cell Research

... 86 It is supposed to be responsible for the non-genomic signals of estrogens, 87 although recent data challenged this view. 88 GPER and FSHR are physiologically co-expressed in the ovary during the antral stage 89 GPCRs in the ovary, 21 one would argue that other membrane partners for gonadotropin receptors exist in the human testis as well. For instance, they could interact with GPER since its expression in the testis of both mouse and human has been widely documented. ...

Structural and functional evidence that GPR30 is not a direct estrogen receptor
  • Citing Article
  • May 2024

Cell Research

... Regarding adenosine receptors, the A2AAR was a model GPCR for pioneering structural biology work (27) with various antagonist, agonist, and partial agonistbound structures available, including the receptor in inactive (28), intermediate (29,30), and fully active conformations (31). Structures of the A1AR, A2AAR, and A2BAR have revealed key principles of adenosine receptor activation and selectivity that have guided drug design efforts (32)(33)(34)(35)(36). Recent experimental structures of the A3AR have been determined with the ligands Piclidenoson and Namodenoson (37,38). However, crucially, these structures are relatively low resolution and important parts of the ligand, an N 6 -iodobenzyl group, were not adequately resolved in the structures. ...

Cryo-EM structures of adenosine receptor A3AR bound to selective agonists

... The development of effective TGR5 agonists has been hampered due to gastrointestinal side effects (Zhuo et al., 2024). For instance, INT-777 was found to activate TGR5; however, when tested in the first phases, it was discovered that it poses negative effects on the gastrointestinal tract (Guo et al., 2016). ...

Discovery of Betulinic Acid Derivatives as Gut-restricted TGR5 Agonists: Balancing the Potency and Physicochemical Properties
  • Citing Article
  • January 2024

Bioorganic Chemistry

... GPR35 is a poorly understood member of the GPCR superfamily that is attracting considerable interest as a therapeutic target in areas ranging from ulcerative colitis to digestive system cancers and neuropathic pain (4)(5)(6)(7)(8). Although officially an "orphan" receptor, meaning that its endogenous ligand(s) are uncertain or incompletely defined (9), GPR35 has a rich pharmacology of synthetic activators (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17). By contrast, antagonist/inverse agonist ligands are very limited in number and drug-like properties (7,11) and available compounds with such activity only display affinity at the human but not rodent orthologues (18). ...

Discovery of a novel GPR35 agonist with high and equipotent species potency for oral treatment of IBD
  • Citing Article
  • November 2023

Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry

... High-throughput screening (HTS) and structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies have been used to identify and optimize small-molecule GLP-1RAs, resulting in improved efficacy and selectivity, and reduced risk of off-target binding and cardiotoxicity. Danuglipron activates the receptor through specific amino acid interactions and improves the pharmacokinetic profile through optimization [8,9] . Chen et al. reported a novel class of 5,6-dihydro-1,2,4-triazine derivatives as potent GLP-1RAs with enhanced cAMP accumulation and drug-like properties, which significantly reduced blood glucose and food intake, providing a promising opportunity for the treatment of T2DM and obesity, providing durable efficacy [10,11] . ...

Discovery of Novel 5,6-Dihydro-1,2,4-triazine Derivatives as Efficacious Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists
  • Citing Article
  • June 2023

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

... Although many structures of the other adenosine receptors have been reported, the structure of A 3 R has remained enigmatic [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] . Consequently, it is still unclear how nonselective and selective agonists, including drugs and modified adenosine, activate A 3 R. Here, we perform modified nucleoside screening and discover that beside m 6 A, tRNA-derived i 6 A is also an A 3 R-selective agonist. ...

Structures of adenosine receptor A2BR bound to endogenous and synthetic agonists

Cell Discovery

... Nonetheless, the desired analgesic effects mediated by these receptors are often accompanied by severe adverse effects, underlining the necessity for extensive research to elucidate their mechanism of action. In recent years, diverse studies on the molecular characterization of the receptor and the effect of different agonists have been published, like several crystal and cryo-EM structures [18][19][20] , as well as other approaches like the expression of the receptor as water-soluble protein 21,22 . In this study, we introduce novel tools that facilitate the analysis of this receptor family. ...

Molecular recognition of morphine and fentanyl by the human μ-opioid receptor
  • Citing Article
  • November 2022

Cell

... 3) Recent evidence suggests that intestine-specific FXR antagonists exhibit remarkable metabolic improvements and slow the progression of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis. 29,30) However, none have been successful in clinical trials to date. We previously reported that the short-term administration of FLG249 in normal mice significantly decreased the expression levels of FXR target genes in the ileum, but not in the liver. ...

Discovery of Betulinic Acid Derivatives as Potent Intestinal Farnesoid X Receptor Antagonists to Ameliorate Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis
  • Citing Article
  • September 2022

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry