Sheena K. Aurora’s research while affiliated with University of Washington and other places

Objective The diagnostic performance of the Amyloid Probability Score 2 (APS2) - the algorithmic result of the PrecivityAD2™ blood test - was originally trained and validated in two cohorts of cognitively impaired (CI) individuals. Using an independent cohort to evaluate blood test reliability, we conducted an external diagnostic accuracy assessment of the validated APS2 cut point as it is currently applied in clinical practice. Methods Plasma biomarker ratios Aβ42/40 and p-tau217/np-tau217 (expressed as %p-tau217) were quantified and incorporated into the APS2 algorithm in samples obtained from 192 Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative participants with CI (70% mild cognitive impairment / 30% dementia). APS2 diagnostic performance was determined using amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) as the reference standard. Plasma biomarkers were quantified in a CLIA-certified, CAP-accredited laboratory (C2N Diagnostics, St. Louis, MO) using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Results APS2 values were significantly higher in the 56% of CI participants with a positive amyloid PET scan. Concordance with amyloid PET was high (AUC-ROC 0.95 (95%CI): 0.93– 0.98); 54% of participants had a positive APS2. The previously validated APS2 cut point yielded an overall accuracy of 91% (95%CI: 86-94%), sensitivity 90% (95%CI: 83-94%) and specificity 92% (95%CI: 84-96%). Interpretation The PrecivityAD2 blood test’s APS2 identified brain amyloid pathology with accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity ≥ 90% in this intended use population. This external validation reaffirms the diagnostic robustness of this blood biomarker test and supports its use as a confirmatory test, consistent with published expert recommendations, for assessment of presence or absence of brain amyloid pathology in symptomatic patients.

Background Chronic migraine (CM) is a highly disabling form of migraine in which patients have ≥ 15 headache days per month, of which at least 8 have the features of migraine. Galcanezumab is a monoclonal antibody to calcitonin gene-related peptide which is approved for the preventive treatment of migraine. Ability to convert patients from chronic migraine frequency to episodic migraine (EM) frequency is a clinically relevant and desirable outcome when prescribing preventive treatments to patients with CM. Methods Patients aged 18–65 years with an ICHD-3β diagnosis of CM were randomized 2:1:1 to receive monthly injections of placebo (N = 558), galcanezumab 120 mg with a 240-mg loading dose (N = 278), or galcanezumab 240 mg (N = 277) during a 3-month double-blind period of the phase 3 REGAIN trial. Patients could subsequently enter a 9-month open-label extension in which they received galcanezumab 120 mg or 240 mg/month per investigator’s discretion. In this post-hoc analysis, we assessed the percentages of patients who shifted to EM (< 8 migraine headache days or < 15 headache days/month), low frequency EM (LFEM; <8 migraine headache days/month), and very low frequency EM (VLFEM; <4 migraine headache days/month) for at least 3 consecutive months. Double-blind percentage comparisons versus placebo represent modeled estimates from raw rates. Results At baseline, patients had a mean of 19.4 migraine headache days per month (SD = 4.5) and 21.4 headache days per month (SD = 4.1). During the 3-month double-blind treatment period, a greater percentage of galcanezumab-treated patients shifted to EM frequency and maintained it across all 3 months (31.5%) than did placebo-treated patients (19.8%, p < 0.001). Among galcanezumab-treated patients across the entire 12-month trial, 65.1% shifted from CM to EM frequency, with 44.2% shifting to LFEM and 21.5% shifting to VLFEM for ≥ 3 consecutive months. Proportions of patients shifting from CM to EM frequency for ≥ 3 consecutive months and until last patient visit were: 55.0% to EM; 33.4% to LFEM; 13.9% to VLFEM. Conclusion These results suggest that galcanezumab helped a majority of patients convert from chronic to episodic migraine frequency over the course of this 12-month study. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02614261, first registered November 25, 2015.

Objective To report the cardiovascular (CV) safety of dihydroergotamine mesylate (DHE) administered by precision olfactory delivery (INP104) from two clinical trials. Background Although the absolute risk is low, migraine is associated with an increased risk of CV events. DHE is a highly effective acute treatment for migraine, but due to its theoretical risk of promoting arterial vasoconstriction, DHE is contraindicated in patients with CV disease or an unfavorable risk factor profile. The INP104 is a novel drug‐device combination product approved for acute treatment of migraine that delivers DHE to the upper nasal space using precision olfactory delivery (POD®). Methods The STOP 101 was a Phase 1 open‐label study that assessed the safety, tolerability, and bioavailability of INP104 1.45 mg, intravenous DHE 1.0 mg, and MIGRANAL (nasal DHE) 2.0 mg in healthy participants. The STOP 301 was a pivotal Phase 3, open‐label study that assessed the safety, tolerability, and exploratory efficacy of INP104 1.45 mg over 24 and 52 weeks in patients with migraine. In both studies, active or a history of CV disease, as well as significant CV risk factors, were exclusion criteria. Results In STOP 101, 36 participants received one or more doses of investigational product. Treatment with intravenous DHE, but not INP104 or nasal DHE, resulted in clinically relevant changes from baseline in systolic blood pressure (BP; 11.4 mmHg, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.9–15.0) and diastolic BP (13.3 mmHg, 95% CI 9.4–17.1) at 5 min post‐dose, persisting up to 30 min post‐dose for systolic BP (6.3 mmHg; 95% CI 3.0–9.5) and diastolic BP (7.9 mmHg, 95% CI 3.9–11.9). None of the treatments produced any clinically meaningful electrocardiogram (ECG) changes. In STOP 301, 354 patients received one or more doses of INP104. Over 24 weeks, five patients (1.4%) experienced a non‐serious, vascular treatment‐emergent adverse event (TEAE). Minimal changes were observed for BP and ECG parameters over 24 or 52 weeks. Off‐protocol concomitant use of triptans and other ergot derivatives did not result in any TEAEs. Conclusion In two separate studies, INP104 demonstrated a favorable CV safety profile when used in a study population without CV‐related contraindications.

Objective Two phase 3 galcanezumab trials were conducted in Europe and North America to analyze the reduction of weekly cluster headache (CH) attack frequency in populations with episodic and chronic CH. The current study aims to illustrate prospectively recorded baseline clinical data from these trials and to identify possible predictors of response. Methods Patients (aged 18–65 years) met The International Classification of Headache Disorders 3rd edition-beta criteria for CH. Attacks were evaluated using an electronic headache diary for 7-day (episodic) or 14-day (chronic) eligibility assessments before patients were randomized 1:1 to monthly subcutaneous galcanezumab 300 mg or placebo. Results Data were collected from 106 patients with episodic and 237 with chronic CH. Overall, the mean age [standard deviation] was 45.4 [11.0] years; patients were predominantly White (84.5%), male (75.8%), and European (77.6%). Patients with episodic CH reported 17.5 [10.0] attacks/week; patients with chronic CH reported 18.8 [10.2] attacks/week. The average pain severity score (range 0–4) was 2.5 [0.7] for episodic CH and 2.7 [0.7] for chronic CH. Higher attack frequency was a possible predictor of response to galcanezumab; potential negative predictors of response were greater attack severity and duration. Conclusion This large dataset of patients with CH provides reliable systematically and prospectively collected information on disease characteristics. The analysis in episodic CH underscores potential predictors of response worth considering for future CH trial design. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov, identifiers: NCT02397473 and NCT02438826.

Introduction Dihydroergotamine mesylate (DHE) is an established effective acute therapy for migraine and is often characterized by its broad receptor pharmacology. Knowledge of DHE pharmacology largely comes from studies employing older methodologies. Objective To assess DHE receptor activity using high-throughput methods to screen for functional ß-arrestin activity at G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs). Methods Functional receptor activities of DHE and sumatriptan succinate (both 10 μM) were screened against 168 GPCRs using the gpcrMAX assay. Agonist and antagonist effects were considered significant if receptor activity was >30% or inhibited by >50%, respectively. Radiolabeled ligand binding assays were performed for DHE (0.01–300 nM for 5-HT3 and 4E; 0.3–10,000 nM for 5-HT1B, α-adrenergic2B [i.e., α2B-adrenoceptor], D2, and D5) to assess specific binding to select receptors. Results DHE (10 μM) exhibited agonist activity at α-adrenergic2B, CXC chemokine receptor 7 (CXCR7), dopamine (D)2/5, and 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)1A/1B/2A/2C/5A receptors and antagonist activity at α-adrenergic1B/2A/2C (i.e., α1B/2A/2C-adrenoceptors), calcitonin receptor–receptor activity modifying protein 2 (CTR-RAMP2) or amylin 2 (AMY2), D1/3/4/5, and 5-HT1F receptors. Sumatriptan succinate (10 μM) exhibited agonist activity at the 5-HT1B/1E/1F/5A receptors. DHE demonstrated a half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 149 nM at the 5-HT1F receptor and a half-maximal effective concentration (EC50) of 6 μM at the CXCR7 receptor. DHE did not bind to the 5-HT3 receptor at concentrations up to 300 nM and bound poorly to 5-HT4E and D5 receptors (IC50 of 230 and 370 nM, respectively). DHE bound strongly to the D2, 5-HT1B, and α-adrenergic2B receptors (IC50 of 0.47, 0.58, and 2.8 nM, respectively). Conclusion By using a high-throughput β-arrestin recruitment assay, this study confirmed the broad receptor profile of DHE and provided an update on DHE receptor pharmacology as it relates to migraine.

Purpose of review Historical evidence suggests a shared underlying etiology for migraine and gastrointestinal (GI) disorders that involves the gut-brain axis. Here we provide narrative review of recent literature on the gut-brain connection and migraine to emphasize the importance of tailoring treatment plans for patients with episodic migraine who experience GI comorbidities and symptoms. Recent findings Recent population-based studies report the prevalence of migraine and GI disorders as comorbidities as well as overlapping symptomology. American Headache Society (AHS) guidelines have integrated GI symptoms as part of migraine diagnostic criteria and recommend nonoral therapies for patients with GI symptoms or conditions. Nasal delivery is a recommended nonoral alternative; however, it is important to understand potential adverse events that may cause or worsen GI symptoms in some patients due to the site of drug deposition within the nasal cavity with some nasal therapies. Lastly, clinical perspectives emphasize the importance of identifying GI symptoms and comorbidities in patients with episodic migraine to best individualize migraine management. Summary Support for an association between the gut-brain axis and migraine continues to prevail in recent literature; however, the relationship remains complex and not well elucidated. The presence of GI comorbidities and symptoms must be carefully considered when making treatment decisions for patients with episodic migraine.

Background Dihydroergotamine (DHE), like triptans, is contraindicated in patients with ischemic heart disease or coronary vasospasm. Its true safety, tolerability, and efficacy in patients with cardiovascular risk without ischemic heart disease or coronary vasospasm remain unclear. Objectives To assess the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of repetitive intravenous DHE in patients with cardiovascular risk factors. Methods A single‐center, retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Jefferson Headache Center inpatient unit for refractory chronic migraine patients treated with our intravenous DHE protocol between January 1, 2019, and October 15, 2019. We evaluated tolerability and effectiveness outcomes based on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease 10‐year calculated risk scores, stratified into low (<5.0%) and elevated (≥5.0%) risk. Data were presented in mean ± standard deviation or median (25th percentile, 75th percentile) if non‐normally distributed. Results Among 347 patients (median age of 46 [36, 57], female n = 278 [80.1%]), who received inpatient intravenous DHE, 227 patients (age 53 [45, 60], female 81.1%) had calculable risk scores, 64 (28.2%) had elevated risk, and 38 (16.7%) had cardiology consultations. There were no clinically significant electrocardiogram abnormalities or cardiovascular adverse events. The median hospital length of stay was 6 (5, 7) days. Compared to the low‐risk group, those with elevated risk had higher nausea (31.3% vs. 14.1%, p = 0.008), but similar initial DHE dose (0.5 [0.25, 0.5] vs. 0.5 [0.25, 0.5], p = 0.009), lower final DHE dose (0.75 [0.5, 1] vs. 1 [0.75, 1] p < 0.001), and lower pain reduction after admission (−3.8 [2.1, 6] vs. −5 [3, 7] p = 0.037). Conclusion Patients receiving intravenous DHE by the Jefferson Headache Center inpatient headache protocol had significantly reduced pain severity at discharge. No clinically significant cardiac or electrocardiogram abnormalities were detected in patients with elevated (or low) atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk. Repetitive intravenous DHE used by our protocol was safe in refractory chronic migraine patients.

Chronic migraine (CM) is a neurological disease characterized by frequent migraine attacks that prevent affected individuals from performing daily activities of living, significantly diminish quality of life, and increase familial burden. Before onabotulinumtoxinA was approved for CM, there were few treatment options for these seriously disabled patients and none had regulatory approval. The terminology and recognition of CM evolved in parallel with the onabotulinumtoxinA clinical development program. Because there were no globally accepted classification criteria for CM when onabotulinumtoxinA was in development, the patient populations for the trials conducted by Allergan were determined by the Allergan migraine team in collaboration with headache scientists and clinicians. These trials and collaborations ultimately led to improvements in CM classifications. In 2010, onabotulinumtoxinA became the first medication and first biologic approved specifically to prevent headaches in patients with CM. Approval was based on 2 similarly designed phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical studies. Both studies showed significantly greater improvements in mean change from baseline in headache-day frequency in patients with CM receiving onabotulinumtoxinA compared with those receiving placebo. The safety and effectiveness of onabotulinumtoxinA have been established globally in >5000 patients with CM with or without medication overuse treated in clinical and observational studies. Benefits also include improvements in quality of life, fewer psychiatric comorbidities, and reduced healthcare resource utilization. Across studies, onabotulinumtoxinA was well tolerated; adverse events tended to be mild or moderate in severity and to decline over subsequent treatment cycles.

Migraine is a highly prevalent, disabling neurological disorder that is also associated with gastrointestinal symptoms, autonomic dysfunction and allodynia. Despite the availability of multiple acute agents for migraine, an unmet need remains for effective, well-tolerated drugs that are nonoral and noninvasive. Here, we provide a drug evaluation of INP104, a novel drug-device combination product of dihydroergotamine (DHE) mesylate - a molecule with a long history of efficacy familiar to headache specialists - which is delivered to the difficult-to-reach upper nasal space where it is rapidly and consistently absorbed via Precision Olfactory Delivery (POD®). In clinical trials, INP104 exhibited favorable pharmacokinetics, a well-tolerated safety profile, and rapid symptom relief, highlighting its potential as a suitable acute therapy for migraine.