Shayla Roberts’s research while affiliated with University of Central Florida and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


The four stages of the grounded theory.
Steps in building a grounded theory (Lehmann 2001; Fernandez et al. 2002, p. 114).
The core categories and subcategories.
Cont.
Platforms used in the technology-supported peer-feedback research.
A Meta-Synthesis of Technology-Supported Peer Feedback in ESL/EFL Writing Classes Research: A Replication of Chen’s Study
  • Article
  • Full-text available

April 2023

·

125 Reads

·

15 Citations

Sophie Cuocci

·

·

Iram Khan

·

Shayla Roberts

Research on the efficiency of technology-supported peer feedback activities in the ESL/EFL writing classroom has led to contradictory results. Some studies claim that it improves learners’ motivation and attitudes toward writing while others mention technical difficulties or a lack of training as drawbacks affecting learners’ experiences and thus learning. This ongoing debate calls for a meta-synthesis of studies published between 2011 and 2022. Replicating Chen’s study, the authors identified 20 primary studies and analyzed them under the lens of Glaser and Strauss’s grounded theory constant comparison method. The findings revealed that students’ preferences, capabilities, and attitudes regarding the features of the technology used in classes; the contextual factors, suitable online platforms, and training on the provision of proper feedback; and the use of the selected technologies can determine the extent to which implementing technology-supported peer feedback activities would be successful.

Download

Citations (1)


... In the rapidly evolving landscape of digital technology integration, technology-enhanced peer feedback has gained significant traction. This evolution has spurred exploration into diverse tools, including Word, blogs, and wikis, revealing notable benefits such as reduced stress levels (Cuocci et al., 2023), increased participation (Fitze, 2006), improved critical thinking skills (Barahona et al., 2023) and more candid feedback (Li et al., 2020). Notably, the integration of technology has empowered students as active participants in the feedback process (Warschauer et al., 1996) and can lead to better feedback and writing quality (Ware & Warschauer, 2006). ...

Reference:

Promoting draft revision motivation and quality through technology-enhanced peer feedback workshops
A Meta-Synthesis of Technology-Supported Peer Feedback in ESL/EFL Writing Classes Research: A Replication of Chen’s Study