March 2025
·
61 Reads
This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.
March 2025
·
61 Reads
March 2025
·
64 Reads
EClinicalMedicine
Background Women experiencing co-occurring forms of intimate partner violence (IPV; ie, physical, sexual, and/or psychological) often face more severe psychological and health consequences than those experiencing a single form. However, research on IPV co-occurrence in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remains limited. This study examines the prevalence of IPV co-occurrence in LMICs and its education-based inequalities. Methods Data from the most recent Demographic and Health Surveys in 49 LMICs (2011–2023) were used. Our primary outcome was IPV co-occurrence, defined as a woman aged 15–49 ever experiencing any two or three forms of physical, sexual, or psychological IPV from her partner within the past year. We categorised IPV co-occurrence into four subtypes: co-occurrence of (1) physical and sexual IPV, (2) physical and psychological IPV, (3) sexual and psychological IPV, and (4) all three forms of IPV. We analysed the prevalence of IPV co-occurrence and its subtypes by women's education levels, calculating odds ratios to assess inequalities. Nonparametric restricted cubic splines were used to explore nonlinear relationships between education and IPV. Findings The study included a total of 344,661 women. The weighted prevalence of IPV co-occurrence varied widely across countries—from 2.4% in Armenia to 38.9% in Papua New Guinea. Overall, women with no education were most at risk, experiencing an adjusted prevalence of 14.3% (95% CI: 13.3–15.2), compared to 11.8% (95% CI: 10.8–12.9) among those with primary education, 9.9% (95% CI: 9.3–10.6) for secondary education, and 5.3% (95% CI: 4.5–6.2) for higher education. The prevalence of IPV co-occurrence involving sexual IPV was highest among women with primary education, with 4.1% (95% CI: 3.4–4.8) reporting concurrent physical and sexual violence, compared to 1.5% (95% CI: 1.1–1.9) to 3.7% (95% CI: 3.2–4.1) among other education levels. Interpretation IPV co-occurrence remains high, particularly among women with little or no education. Education-focused interventions are urgently needed to reduce IPV risk and its severe impact. However, the findings may be influenced by potential reporting biases and cross-country variability in IPV measurement methodologies, which may limit generalizability. Funding The 10.13039/501100001809China National Natural Science Foundation (Grant numbers 72203119) and The Research Fund, Vanke School of Public Health, 10.13039/501100004147Tsinghua University.