Satoshi Miyata’s research while affiliated with Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Predictive value of the final model according to the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The analysis yielded an area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.87 for accuracy, 0.83 for sensitivity, and 0.74 for specificity, in comparison with AUC values of 0.76 and 0.86 for accuracy with PPI and PaP, respectively
Mortality rate calculations for each patient based on the hazard ratio (HR) of the final model (a) and classification of the patients into groups having scores of 0–2 points (I), 3–5 points (II), or ≧6 points (III) (b). The mortality rates of group I, group II, and group III were 0.0097 (95% CI 0.0065–0.0138), 0.0213 (0.0169–0.0265), and 0.0628 (0.0483–0.0804), respectively
Overall survival of different risk groups stratified by the final model. The Kaplan–Meier survival method and the log-rank test were used to characterize patients in different risk groups classified by the final model. There were significant differences between the overall survival rates of the low-, medium-, and high-risk groups (p < 0.001). The groups also exhibited distinct median survival time (MST, days, 95% CI) as shown in the insert. The cases of patients who were alive after180 days or could not be followed up were censored, and the data of patients with missing value(s) among the eight variables identified as the final model were excluded from the analysis
Prognostic model for patients with advanced cancer using a combination of routine blood test values
  • Article
  • Publisher preview available

August 2021

·

84 Reads

·

12 Citations

Supportive Care in Cancer

Taeko Miyagi

·

Satoshi Miyata

·

·

[...]

·

Akira Inoue

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to develop a simple prognostic model based on objective indicators alone, i.e., routine blood test data, without using any subjective variables such as patient’s symptoms and physician’s prediction.Methods The subjects of this retrospective study were patients at the palliative care unit of Tohoku University Hospital, Japan. Eligible patients were over 20 years old and had advanced cancer (n = 225). The model for predicting survival was developed based on Cox proportional hazards regression models for univariable and multivariable analyses of 20 items selected from routine blood test data. All the analyses were performed according to the TRIPOD statement (https://www.tripod-statement.org/).ResultsThe univariable and multivariable regression analyses identified total bilirubin, creatinine, urea/creatinine ratio, aspartate aminotransferase, albumin, total leukocyte count, differential lymphocyte count, and platelet/lymphocyte ratio as significant risk factors for mortality. Based on the hazard ratios, the area under the curve for the new risk model was 0.87 for accuracy, 0.83 for sensitivity, and 0.74 for specificity. Diagnostic accuracy was higher than provided by the Palliative Prognostic Score and the Palliative Prognostic Index. The Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated a survival significance of classifying patients according to their score into low-, medium-, and high-mortality risk groups having median survival times of 67 days, 34 days, and 11 days, respectively (p < 0.001).Conclusions We developed a simple and accurate prognostic model for predicting the survival of patients with advanced cancer based on routine blood test values alone that may be useful for appropriate advanced care planning in a palliative care setting.

View access options

Citations (1)


... The PPI has been validated in various cancer settings, such as hospices Subramaniam et al. 2013), palliative care units (Gerber et al. 2021;Miyagi et al. 2021), 2 Si Qi Yoong et al. ...

Reference:

Prognostic utility of Palliative Prognostic Index in advanced cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Prognostic model for patients with advanced cancer using a combination of routine blood test values

Supportive Care in Cancer