Sandra Cook's research while affiliated with Wayne State University and other places
What is this page?
This page lists the scientific contributions of an author, who either does not have a ResearchGate profile, or has not yet added these contributions to their profile.
It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.
If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.
If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.
It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.
If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.
If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.
Publications (4)
Reports an error in the original article by R. Bharucha-Reid et al ( Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology , 1995, Vol 3 [3], 280–286). Rachel Kaufmann was inadvertently misspelled. (The following abstract of this article originally appeared in record 1996-92908-001 .) This study summarized information on 162 workers who completed urine scre...
Reports an error in the original article by R. Bharucha-Reid et al ( Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology , 1995, Vol 3 [3], 280–286). Rachel Kaufmann was inadvertently misspelled. (The following abstract of this article originally appeared in record 1996-92908-001 .) This study summarized information on 162 workers who completed urine scre...
Investigated the relationships between employee use of illicit drugs, perceptions of and reactions to the work environment, and employee absenteeism and tardiness above and beyond that accounted for by demographic and work reaction variables. 162 employees in a large work organization completed demographic and background information and assessments...
This study summarized information on 162 workers who completed urine screen and self-report concerning drug use. It is the first to compare self-report of drug use in the workplace with a urine screen in which individual participant (nonaggregate) data were used. The findings indicate that agreement between the 2 methods of drug detection, although...
Citations
... A number of studies have found that analysis of biological samples may provide more accurate data than self-reports on alcohol and drug use during the last days or months [15][16][17]. However, drug testing cannot reveal alcohol and drug using habits and consequences of such use, so a combination of drug testing and questionnaires or interviews provides more data than using a single method alone [18][19][20][21]. ...
![[object Object]](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/279057397764097-1443543876068_Q64/Betsy-Foxman.jpg)
... Originally viewed as an intoxicant used only by deviant members of society, cannabis is now the most widely used illegal substance in the United States, Canada, and Europe (Beck & Legleye, 2008;Frone, 2006;Hajizadeh, 2016); this popularity translates into millions of employees who consume cannabis. Given such a state of affairs, it should be of little surprise that organizations spend billions of dollars each year (Frone, 2006;Normand et al., 1990) addressing what many believe is a problem (Bass et al., 1996;Harris, 2004;Lyons et al., 2016). Whereas some might believe steps taken by governments and organizations to screen and/or prevent cannabis use are supported by empirical evidence, "such commentary is often based on speculation, vested interests, and pseudo-science rather than on objective interpretation of all available scientific data" (Frone, 2008a, p. 519). ...
... A number of studies have found that analysis of biological samples may provide more accurate data than self-reports on alcohol and drug use during the last days or months151617. However, drug testing cannot reveal alcohol and drug using habits and consequences of such use, so a combination of drug testing and questionnaires or interviews provides more data than using a single method alone18192021. The aims of this study were: (i) to examine the use of alcohol and drugs using a combination of self-report through questionnaires and testing of oral fluid (mixed saliva), and (ii) self-reported sickness absence and reduced efficiency or hangover at work due to such use among employees in eight business areas in Norway, and across gender. ...
