Sal Murano's scientific contributions
What is this page?
This page lists the scientific contributions of an author, who either does not have a ResearchGate profile, or has not yet added these contributions to their profile.
It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.
If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.
If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.
It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.
If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.
If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.
Publications (5)
Citations
... Results were compared in terms of reverberation times to establish the effect of the source type on the room response and assess the feasibility of substituting source types with alternatives when necessary, or simply when more practical to do so (also see [10,11]). Considering the measured data it can be deduced that the majority of the test rooms produced a primarily diffuse sound field for the higher frequency range, with the partial exception of room 10. Table 4 shows the standard deviation for the T 30 and EDT variation among the four source configurations as an average over all receiver positions in a room. ...
... Results were compared in terms of reverberation times to establish the effect of the source type on the room response and assess the feasibility of substituting source types with alternatives when necessary, or simply when more practical to do so (also see [10,11]). Considering the measured data it can be deduced that the majority of the test rooms produced a primarily diffuse sound field for the higher frequency range, with the partial exception of room 10. Table 4 shows the standard deviation for the T 30 and EDT variation among the four source configurations as an average over all receiver positions in a room. ...
... In contrast, the digital simulations allow acoustic predictions in all points of a space; however, the calculations cannot take into consideration the phonemes, along with the nonstationary sound source that represents a voice [36], which leads to a simplification and optimization of the results compared to the measurements [37,38]. In addition, the listening tests to which the students were subjected may be limited to the selection of the adopted criteria [39,40]. ...
