Sabrina Cochrane’s research while affiliated with University of Colorado Boulder and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (20)


The observation platforms during (a) CLARIFY: the FAAM BAe-146; (b) ORACLES: the NASA P3; and (c) LASIC: ARM Mobile Facility no. 1. (d) The location of the ARM Mobile Facility no. 1 on Nasa Road, Ascension Island. This photograph was taken looking approximately north-north-east, showing the site exposed to the prevailing south-westerly winds.
Flight tracks for science flights (transit and ferry flights omitted; © Google Earth 2021) from CLARIFY 2017 (FAAM BAe-146); ORACLES 2016 (NASA P3 and ER-2), 2017 (P3) and 2018 (P3); and AEROCLO-SA (Falcon20).
(a) Flight tracks for both the FAAM BAe-146 and NASA P3 flights with the intercomparison flight segment marked (green box), overlaid on Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) corrected-reflectance (true colour) imagery from 18 August 2017 (the imagery was obtained from NASA Worldview). (b) Flight vertical cross sections as a function of longitude for the intercomparison segment for FAAM BAe-146 and NASA P3, which commenced at 5.8 km. Run names are indicated (see Table 2), along with horizontal bands which mark out the vertically elevated pollution plume (yellow) and boundary layer (light orange).
Vertical profiles of data from FAAM BAe-146 and NASA P3 for intercomparison “runPRO” descent from 5.8 km to 300 m. Horizontal bands mark out the vertically elevated pollution plume (yellow) and boundary layer (light orange). (a) Temperature; (b) water vapour mixing ratio; (c) RH; (d) CO; (e) NA from PCASP, with BCn from FAAM SP2; (f) optical extinction, σEP, from FAAM CRDS and NASA PSAP+nephelometer; (g) optical absorption, σAP, from FAAM PAS and NASA PSAP; (h) optical scattering, σSP, from FAAM CRDS-PAS and NASA nephelometer. The legend in panel (b) applies to panels (a)–(e). The legend in panel (f) applies only to panels (f)–(h) for wavelengths of 470 nm (blue) and 660 nm (red).
Correlations from various flight segments (Table 2) between temperatures for (a) FAAM BAe-146 and LASIC ARM site and (b) FAAM BAe-146 and NASA P3 and for humidity vmr for (c) FAAM BAe-146 and LASIC ARM site and (d) FAAM BAe-146 and NASA P3. In panel (b) the data points are coloured by altitude. In panel (d) the instruments are given a different colour for clarity.

+7

Intercomparison of airborne and surface-based measurements during the CLARIFY, ORACLES and LASIC field experiments
  • Article
  • Full-text available

November 2022

·

151 Reads

·

13 Citations

Paul A. Barrett

·

Steven J. Abel

·

·

[...]

·

Jianhao Zhang

Data are presented from intercomparisons between two research aircraft, the FAAM BAe-146 and the NASA Lockheed P3, and between the BAe-146 and the surface-based DOE (Department of Energy) ARM (Atmospheric Radiation Measurement) Mobile Facility at Ascension Island (8∘ S, 14.5∘ W; a remote island in the mid-Atlantic). These took place from 17 August to 5 September 2017, during the African biomass burning (BB) season. The primary motivation was to give confidence in the use of data from multiple platforms with which to evaluate numerical climate models. The three platforms were involved in the CLouds–Aerosol–Radiation Interaction and Forcing for Year 2017 (CLARIFY-2017), ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS (ORACLES), and Layered Atlantic Smoke and Interactions with Clouds (LASIC) field experiments. Comparisons from flight segments on 6 d where the BAe-146 flew alongside the ARM facility on Ascension Island are presented, along with comparisons from the wing-tip-to-wing-tip flight of the P3 and BAe-146 on 18 August 2017. The intercomparison flight sampled a relatively clean atmosphere overlying a moderately polluted boundary layer, while the six fly-bys of the ARM site sampled both clean and polluted conditions 2–4 km upwind. We compare and validate characterisations of aerosol physical, chemical and optical properties as well as atmospheric radiation and cloud microphysics between platforms. We assess the performance of measurement instrumentation in the field, under conditions where sampling conditions are not as tightly controlled as in laboratory measurements where calibrations are performed. Solar radiation measurements compared well enough to permit radiative closure studies. Optical absorption coefficient measurements from all three platforms were within uncertainty limits, although absolute magnitudes were too low (<10 Mm-1) to fully support a comparison of the absorption Ångström exponents. Aerosol optical absorption measurements from airborne platforms were more comparable than aircraft-to-ground observations. Scattering coefficient observations compared adequately between airborne platforms, but agreement with ground-based measurements was worse, potentially caused by small differences in sampling conditions or actual aerosol population differences over land. Chemical composition measurements followed a similar pattern, with better comparisons between the airborne platforms. Thermodynamics, aerosol and cloud microphysical properties generally agreed given uncertainties.

Download

Figure 4 Vertical profiles of data from FAAM BAe-146 and NASA P3 for intercomparison "runPRO" descent from 5.8 km to 300 m for (a) temperature, (b) water vapour mixing ratio, (c) RH, (d) CO, (e) NA from PCASP, and (f) σEP from FAAM EXSCALABAR CRDS and NASA PSAP+Nephelometer for wavelengths of 470 nm (blue) and 660 nm (red). The legend on panel (b) applies to panels 1580
Figure 8 Optical absorption coefficient as a function of wavelength for boundary layer leg runBL_2 (Table 2). Observations are shown as mean (symbols) and standard deviation (error bars) for FAAM EXSCALABAR PAS and NASA PSAP data, along with FAAM TAP data. Interpolated values of σAP are shown which use ÅEP from observations for FAAM and NASA except for FAAM at wavelengths longer than 515 nm which uses the CLARIFY campaign mean value of ÅEP (514:660) = 0.88 from Taylor et al. (2020). (b) ÅEP as function of pairs of mean wavelengths for runBL_1 (filled symbols) and runBL_2 (hollow symbols). The range of 1600
Intercomparison of airborne and surface-based measurements during the CLARIFY, ORACLES and LASIC field experiments

March 2022

·

85 Reads

·

5 Citations

Data are presented from intercomparisons between two research aircraft, the FAAM BAe-146 and the NASA Lockheed P3, and between the BAe-146 and the surface-based DOE (Department of Energy) ARM (Atmospheric Radiation Monitoring) Mobile Facility at Ascension Island (8 S, 14.5W, a remote island in the mid-Atlantic). These took place from 17 August to 5 September 2017, during the African biomass burning season. The primary motivation was to give confidence in the use of data from multiple platforms with which to evaluate numerical climate models. The three platforms were involved in the CLouds-Aerosol-Radiation Interaction and Forcing for Year 2017 (CLARIFY-2017), ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS (ORACLES), and Layered Atlantic Smoke and Interactions with Clouds (LASIC) field experiments. Comparisons from flight segments on six days where the BAe-146 flew alongside the ARM facility on Ascension Island are presented, along with comparisons from wing-tip to wing-tip flight of the P3 and BAe-146 on 18th August 2017. The intercomparison flight sampled a relatively clean atmosphere overlying a moderately polluted boundary layer, while the 6 fly-bys of the ARM site sampled both clean and polluted conditions 2–4 km upwind. We compare and validate characterisations of aerosol physical, chemical, and optical properties, atmospheric radiation, and cloud microphysics between platforms. We assess the performance of measurement instrumentation in the field, under conditions where sampling conditions are not tightly controlled as in laboratory measurements where calibrations are performed. Solar radiation measurements compared well between airborne platforms. Optical absorption coefficient measurements compared well across all three platforms, even though absolute magnitudes were often low (


Biomass burning aerosol heating rates from the ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS) 2016 and 2017 experiments

January 2022

·

174 Reads

·

12 Citations

Aerosol heating due to shortwave absorption has implications for local atmospheric stability and regional dynamics. The derivation of heating rate profiles from space-based observations is challenging because it requires the vertical profile of relevant properties such as the aerosol extinction coefficient and single-scattering albedo (SSA). In the southeastern Atlantic, this challenge is amplified by the presence of stratocumulus clouds below the biomass burning plume advected from Africa, since the cloud properties affect the magnitude of the aerosol heating aloft, which may in turn lead to changes in the cloud properties and life cycle. The combination of spaceborne lidar data with passive imagers shows promise for future derivations of heating rate profiles and curtains, but new algorithms require careful testing with data from aircraft experiments where measurements of radiation, aerosol, and cloud parameters are better colocated and readily available. In this study, we derive heating rate profiles and vertical cross sections (curtains) from aircraft measurements during the NASA ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS (ORACLES) project in the southeastern Atlantic. Spectrally resolved irradiance measurements and the derived column absorption allow for the separation of total heating rates into aerosol and gas (primarily water vapor) absorption. The nine cases we analyzed capture some of the co-variability of heating rate profiles and their primary drivers, leading to the development of a new concept: the heating rate efficiency (HRE; the heating rate per unit aerosol extinction). HRE, which accounts for the overall aerosol loading as well as vertical distribution of the aerosol layer, varies little with altitude as opposed to the standard heating rate. The large case-to-case variability for ORACLES is significantly reduced after converting from heating rate to HRE, allowing us to quantify its dependence on SSA, cloud albedo, and solar zenith angle.


Figure 4. 2016 (blue) and 2017 (red) vertical heating rate profiles for (a) total (b) aerosol and (c) water vapor calculated from the spiral cases with valid aerosol SSA and g retrievals. Dashed lines indicate the bottom altitude for each profile.
Figure 5. The case-average contributions to the total heating rate (column-averaged) from the nine spiral profiles mentioned in Table 1. The heating rate contribution of the category labeled "Other" is primarily gas (ozone, oxygen, and carbon dioxide) absorption.
Figure 6. Heating rate curtains calculated using HSRL-2 measured extinction for the 20170813 radiation wall (shown here in separate plots: North (right) and South (left)). Peak heating of ~5 K/day occurs between 2 and 3 km. The underlying albedo is significantly higher on the left plot than the right (i.e. further south); 0.55 compared to 0.19 at 532 nm contributing to higher aerosol heating rates. Missing results between -7.25 and -8.15 are due to in-cloud sampling that replaced above-cloud albedo measurements and serve as the break point between North and South ends of the wall.
Figure 7. Mean vertical profiles for total (black) and aerosol (gray) heating rates across the radiation walls for 5 cases (a, b, c, d, e, calculated from HSRL-2 extinction profiles and SSFR/4STAR SSA and g values. The red error bars represent the variability due to changing extinction, while the dashed lines represent the variability due to changing albedo across the wall. The horizontal solid line indicates cloud top height. f) Average aerosol heating rate profiles across the 20160924 radiation wall calculated from ORACLES versus the ALADIN climate model.
Figure 8. a) Aerosol heating rate as a function of AOD at 550 nm. Column-averaged values from each spiral case are shown as colored points labeled by their 550 nm albedo value. The black dashed line indicates RTM calculations using mean SSA (0.83, 550 nm) and albedo (0.6, 550 nm) from all cases, and a range of AOD spectra (ranging from 0 to 1.4 at 550 nm). b) Water vapor heating rate as a function of the water vapor path. The grey dashed line is a simple linear fit to highlight the dependence. Cases are labeled by the 550 nm SSA value.
Biomass Burning Aerosol Heating Rates from the ORACLES 2016 and 2017 Experiments

June 2021

·

74 Reads

·

1 Citation

Aerosol heating due to shortwave absorption has implications for local atmospheric stability and regional dynamics. The derivation of heating rate profiles from space-based observations is challenging because it requires the vertical profile of relevant properties such as the aerosol extinction coefficient and single scattering albedo (SSA). In the southeast Atlantic, this challenge is amplified by the presence of stratocumulus clouds below the biomass burning plume advected from Africa, since the cloud properties affect the magnitude of the aerosol heating aloft, which may in turn lead to changes in the cloud properties and life cycle. The combination of spaceborne lidar data with passive imagers shows promise for future derivations of heating rate profiles and curtains, but new algorithms require careful testing with data from aircraft experiments where measurements of radiation, aerosol and cloud parameters are better collocated and readily available. In this study, we derive heating rate profiles and curtains from aircraft measurements during the NASA ObseRvations of CLouds above Aerosols and their intEractionS (ORACLES) project in the southeastern Atlantic. Spectrally resolved irradiance measurements and the derived column absorption allow for the separation of total heating rates into aerosol and gas (primarily water vapor) absorption. The nine cases we analyzed capture some of the co-variability of heating rate profiles and their primary drivers, leading to the development of a new concept: The Heating Rate Efficiency (HRE; the heating rate per unit aerosol extinction). The HRE, which accounts for the overall aerosol loading as well as vertical distribution of the aerosol layer, varies little with altitude as opposed to the standard heating rate. The large case-to-case variability for ORACLES is significantly reduced after converting from heating rate to HRE, allowing us to quantify its dependence on SSA, cloud albedo, and solar zenith angle.


An overview of the ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS) project: aerosol–cloud–radiation interactions in the southeast Atlantic basin

February 2021

·

431 Reads

·

192 Citations

Southern Africa produces almost a third of the Earth's biomass burning (BB) aerosol particles, yet the fate of these particles and their influence on regional and global climate is poorly understood. ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS) is a 5-year NASA EVS-2 (Earth Venture Suborbital-2) investigation with three intensive observation periods designed to study key atmospheric processes that determine the climate impacts of these aerosols. During the Southern Hemisphere winter and spring (June–October), aerosol particles reaching 3–5 km in altitude are transported westward over the southeast Atlantic, where they interact with one of the largest subtropical stratocumulus (Sc) cloud decks in the world. The representation of these interactions in climate models remains highly uncertain in part due to a scarcity of observational constraints on aerosol and cloud properties, as well as due to the parameterized treatment of physical processes. Three ORACLES deployments by the NASA P-3 aircraft in September 2016, August 2017, and October 2018 (totaling ∼350 science flight hours), augmented by the deployment of the NASA ER-2 aircraft for remote sensing in September 2016 (totaling ∼100 science flight hours), were intended to help fill this observational gap. ORACLES focuses on three fundamental science themes centered on the climate effects of African BB aerosols: (a) direct aerosol radiative effects, (b) effects of aerosol absorption on atmospheric circulation and clouds, and (c) aerosol–cloud microphysical interactions. This paper summarizes the ORACLES science objectives, describes the project implementation, provides an overview of the flights and measurements in each deployment, and highlights the integrative modeling efforts from cloud to global scales to address science objectives. Significant new findings on the vertical structure of BB aerosol physical and chemical properties, chemical aging, cloud condensation nuclei, rain and precipitation statistics, and aerosol indirect effects are emphasized, but their detailed descriptions are the subject of separate publications. The main purpose of this paper is to familiarize the broader scientific community with the ORACLES project and the dataset it produced.


Empirically derived parameterizations of the direct aerosol radiative effect based on ORACLES aircraft observations

January 2021

·

112 Reads

·

8 Citations

In this paper, we use observations from the NASA ORACLES (ObseRvations of CLouds above Aerosols and their intEractionS) aircraft campaign to develop a framework by way of two parameterizations that establishes regionally representative relationships between aerosol-cloud properties and their radiative effects. These relationships rely on new spectral aerosol property retrievals of the single scattering albedo (SSA) and asymmetry parameter (ASY). The retrievals capture the natural variability of the study region as sampled, and both were found to be fairly narrowly constrained (SSA: 0.83 ± 0.03 in the mid-visible, 532 nm; ASY: 0.54 ± 0.06 at 532 nm). The spectral retrievals are well suited for calculating the direct aerosol radiative effect (DARE) since SSA and ASY are tied directly to the irradiance measured in the presence of aerosols – one of the inputs to the spectral DARE. The framework allows for entire campaigns to be generalized into a set of parameterizations. For a range of solar zenith angles, it links the broadband DARE to the mid-visible aerosol optical depth (AOD) and the albedo (α) of the underlying scene (either clouds or clear sky) by way of the first parameterization: P(AOD, α). For ORACLES, the majority of the case-to-case variability of the broadband DARE is attributable to the dependence on the two driving parameters of P(AOD, α). A second, extended, parameterization PX(AOD, α, SSA) explains even more of the case-to-case variability by introducing the mid-visible SSA as a third parameter. These parameterizations establish a direct link from two or three mid-visible (narrowband) parameters to the broadband DARE, implicitly accounting for the underlying spectral dependencies of its drivers. They circumvent some of the assumptions when calculating DARE from satellite products or in a modeling context. For example, the DARE dependence on aerosol microphysical properties is not explicit in P or PX because the asymmetry parameter varies too little from case to case to translate into appreciable DARE variability. While these particular DARE parameterizations only represent the ORACLES data, they raise the prospect of generalizing the framework to other regions.



Daytime aerosol optical depth above low-level clouds is similar to that in adjacent clear skies at the same heights: airborne observation above the southeast Atlantic

October 2020

·

56 Reads

·

13 Citations

To help satellite retrieval of aerosols and studies of their radiative effects, we demonstrate that daytime aerosol optical depth over low-level clouds is similar to that in neighboring clear skies at the same heights. Based on recent airborne lidar and sun photometer observations above the southeast Atlantic, the mean aerosol optical depth (AOD) difference at 532 nm is between 0 and -0.01, when comparing the cloudy and clear sides, each up to 20 km wide, of cloud edges. The difference is not statistically significant according to a paired t test. Systematic differences in the wavelength dependence of AOD and in situ single scattering albedo are also minuscule. These results hold regardless of the vertical distance between cloud top and aerosol layer bottom. AOD aggregated over ∼2∘ grid boxes for each of September 2016, August 2017 and October 2018 also shows little correlation with the presence of low-level clouds. We posit that a satellite retrieval artifact is entirely responsible for a previous finding of generally smaller AOD over clouds (Chung et al., 2016), at least for the region and time of our study. Our results also suggest that the same values can be assumed for the intensive properties of free-tropospheric biomass-burning aerosol regardless of whether clouds are present below.


Figure B1. Mie calculations of (a) g and b) SSA compared to SSFR/4STAR retrieved values. The black dots show the asymmetry parameter spectrum (left) and SSA spectrum (right) as retrieved from SSFR/4STAR; the blue dot-dash line shows a fine-mode aerosol (r=0.13 micron) with real index of refraction of 1.6, and imaginary index of refraction ranging from 0.05 (380nm) to 0 (2micron); the orange dot-dash line shows a coarse-mode aerosol (r=1.3 micron) with real index of refraction of 1.6, and imaginary index of refraction ranging from 0.015 (380nm) to 0.003 (600nm) [Wagner et al., 2012]; The black line shows a mix of coarse/fine aerosol (0.02:2 optical thickness ratio).
Figure B2. Retrieved values of a) SSA and b) g compared AERONET measured values at nearby land sites.
Figure C1. An example of one spiral case with the different in situ averages along with the SSFR retrieved SSA for a) 450 nm b) 530 nm and c) 660 nm. The colored points show the in situ data as measured throughout the profile.
Figure D1. Residual plot of directly calculated DARE (RTM output) and predicted BB DARE values using í µí° í µí°ƒí µí°€í µí°‘í µí°„ at a fixed SZA
Empirically-Derived Parameterizations of the Direct Aerosol Radiative Effect based on ORACLES Aircraft Observations

June 2020

·

80 Reads

·

4 Citations

This work establishes an observationally-driven link from mid-visible aerosol optical depth (AOD) and other scene parameters to broadband shortwave irradiance (and by extension, the direct aerosol radiative effect, DARE), based on observations from the 2016 and 2017 field campaigns of ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS). Specifically, this is done by two parameterizations, one spanned by the mid-visible AOD and scene albedo below the aerosol layer, and another one with a third input, the mid-visible aerosol single scattering albedo (SSA). These parameterizations build on the earlier concept of radiative forcing efficiency, which describes the dependence of DARE on the AOD, and extend it to make the dependence on the other two scene parameters explicit. The parameterizations are founded on 9 cases from the campaigns, for which we retrieve the spectral aerosol properties of SSA and asymmetry parameter (g) directly from the radiative fluxes, based on the method presented in Cochrane et al. (2019). These properties are used as the basis of the parameterizations, capturing the natural variability of the study region as sampled. The majority of the case-to-case variability within the ORACLES DARE dataset is attributable to the dependence on AOD and scene albedo. This is captured by the first parameterization, which is advantageous when satellite retrievals provide only limited information such as AOD and scene albedo. However, the second parameterization explains even more of the case-to-case variability by introducing the mid-visible SSA as third parameter. For both parameterizations, we provide the necessary coefficients, uncertainties, and code required for the user to reconstruct the parameterization for their use.


An overview of the ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS) project: aerosol-cloud-radiation interactions in the Southeast Atlantic basin

June 2020

·

562 Reads

·

29 Citations

Southern Africa produces almost a third of the Earth’s biomass burning (BB) aerosol particles, yet the fate of these particles and their influence on regional and global climate is poorly understood. ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS) is a five-year NASA EVS-2 (Earth Venture Suborbital-2) investigation with three Intensive Observation Periods designed to study key atmospheric processes that determine the climate impacts of these aerosols. During the Southern Hemisphere winter and spring (June-October), aerosol particles reaching 3–5 km in altitude are transported westward over the South-East Atlantic, where they interact with one of the largest subtropical stratocumulus subtropical stratocumulus (Sc) cloud decks in the world. The representation of these interactions in climate models remains highly uncertain in part due to a scarcity of observational constraints on aerosol and cloud properties, and due to the parameterized treatment of physical processes. Three ORACLES deployments by the NASA P-3 aircraft in September 2016, August 2017 and October 2018 (totaling ~350 science flight hours), augmented by the deployment of the NASA ER-2 aircraft for remote sensing in September 2016 (totaling ~100 science flight hours), were intended to help fill this observational gap. ORACLES focuses on three fundamental science questions centered on the climate effects of African BB aerosols: (a) direct aerosol radiative effects; (b) effects of aerosol absorption on atmospheric circulation and clouds; (c) aerosol-cloud microphysical interactions. This paper summarizes the ORACLES science objectives, describes the project implementation, provides an overview of the flights and measurements in each deployment, and highlights the integrative modeling efforts from cloud to global scales to address science objectives. Significant new findings on the vertical structure of BB aerosol physical and chemical properties, chemical aging, cloud condensation nuclei, rain and precipitation statistics, and aerosol indirect effects are emphasized, but their detailed descriptions are the subject of separate publications. The main purpose of this paper is to familiarize the broader scientific community with the ORACLES project and the data set it produced.


Citations (14)


... The CLARIFY campaign focused on examining the impacts of carbonaceous aerosol entrainment on the MBL and the microphysical and radiative properties of clouds. A data intercomparison between the LASIC and CLARIFY data sets was conducted to facilitate combined use and climate modeling (Barrett et al., 2022). Table S1 lists the instruments used in the analysis. ...

Reference:

New Particle Formation Events Over the Southeast Atlantic Coincide With the African Biomass Burning Season
Intercomparison of airborne and surface-based measurements during the CLARIFY, ORACLES and LASIC field experiments

... An undersized issue by UHSAS was detected, and a correction function was applied for ORACLES data 58 . During the campaigns, an intercomparison between ORACLES and CLARIFY aircraft observation was conducted on 18 August 2017 to ensure measurements from different aircraft were comparable 59 . Although the aerosol concentration was very low during the intercomparison flights, the CO observations showed fairly good agreement. ...

Intercomparison of airborne and surface-based measurements during the CLARIFY, ORACLES and LASIC field experiments

... These two seasons are very important as they are the most intense in terms of emissions from biomass burning in central Africa and also correspond to the development of monsoon in western Africa. This work follows numerous preliminary studies that have tested and largely evaluated the model over this specific region in terms of BBA vertical structure and transport Doherty et al., 2022), aerosol concentrations above low-level clouds Shinozuka et al., 2020;Redemann et al., 2021;Doherty et al., 2022), induced diabatic heating (Cochrane et al., 2022) and direct or semi-direct effect (SDE) radiative forcing . This study also takes advantage of recent improvements in the representation of optical properties, in particular for the solar absorption induced by BBA (Drugé et al., 2022). ...

Biomass burning aerosol heating rates from the ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS) 2016 and 2017 experiments

... Moreover, it is unknown to what extent the inclusion of less ideal cloudy scenes could contribute to systematic biases, as satellite data are rarely compared against independent datasets unaffected by optical issues common to passive remote sensing algorithms. Here, we endeavor to assess the performance of VIS/IR retrievals derived from the Spinning Enhanced Visible Infra-Red Imager (SEVIRI) on Meteosat 10 and 11 using airborne observations of warm clouds collected during the ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS campaign (ORACLES, Redemann et al., 2021). A specific focus is paid to the skills of SEVIRI retrievals in reproducing mesoscale cellular convection transitions between open and closed cell clouds, and the bias dependence of satellite cloud droplet effective radius and optical depth on cloud area coverage. ...

An overview of the ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS) project: aerosol–cloud–radiation interactions in the southeast Atlantic basin

... For nine cases (corresponding to those presented in Cochrane et al., 2021), we attribute the total heating of the layer to contributions from the aerosol, water vapor, and other atmospheric gases. We also examine the dependence of the aerosol heating rates and HRE on aerosol properties and cloud albedo -the same parameters that also modulate DARE . ...

Empirically derived parameterizations of the direct aerosol radiative effect based on ORACLES aircraft observations

... These two seasons are very important as they are the most intense in terms of emissions from biomass burning in central Africa and also correspond to the development of monsoon in western Africa. This work follows numerous preliminary studies that have tested and largely evaluated the model over this specific region in terms of BBA vertical structure and transport Doherty et al., 2022), aerosol concentrations above low-level clouds Shinozuka et al., 2020;Redemann et al., 2021;Doherty et al., 2022), induced diabatic heating (Cochrane et al., 2022) and direct or semi-direct effect (SDE) radiative forcing . This study also takes advantage of recent improvements in the representation of optical properties, in particular for the solar absorption induced by BBA (Drugé et al., 2022). ...

Daytime aerosol optical depth above low-level clouds is similar to that in adjacent clear skies at the same heights: airborne observation above the southeast Atlantic

... CLARIFY FT SSA values are similar to those measured from the FT during the ORACLES mission. It is also interesting to note that the radiometrically retrieved SSA from nine above-cloud flights performed during ORACLES in 2016 and 2017 (Cochrane et al., 2020;their Fig. 4), which do not depend on in situ measurements, yielded average SSAs of (0.85 ± 0.02), (0.83 ± 0.03) and (0.82 ± 0.04) at wavelengths of 380, 550 and 660 nm respectively for FT BBA. These values are also in good agreement with our FT SSAs within the expected variability. ...

Empirically-Derived Parameterizations of the Direct Aerosol Radiative Effect based on ORACLES Aircraft Observations

... Even though Africa is the largest source of global BB carbon emission, studies focusing on African BB emissions are recent and very limited (Eck et al., 2003;Flamant et al., 2018;Haywood et al., 2020;Redemann et al., 2020;Vakkari et al., 2014). Most of the global emission inventories available and used for Africa are based on emissions data from North America, Europe, and Asia (Bond et al., , 2007Klimont et al., 2009Klimont et al., , 2013Lamarque et al., 2010;Streets et al., 2004). ...

An overview of the ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols above CLouds and their intEractionS) project: aerosol-cloud-radiation interactions in the Southeast Atlantic basin

... Aerosols in the vicinity of clouds were found with the lidar backscatter and extinction coefficient enhanced resulted from humidification effects on aerosol properties (Rauber et al., 2013;Su et al., 2008;Tackett & Di Girolamo, 2009;Várnai & Marshak, 2015). In contrast, aerosol loading above low-level cloud top is posited to have no significant difference with adjacent clear sky over the Southeast Atlantic according to the ORACLES (ObseRvations of Aerosols above Clouds and their intEractionS) filed campaign data (Shinozuka et al., 2020). However, Chung et al., (2016) stated that aerosol optical depth (AOD or ) above low-level cloud is generally smaller than those in nearby clear sky globally as showed by the CALIPSO observations. ...

Daytime aerosol optical depth above low-level clouds is similar to that in adjacent clear skies at the same heights: airborne observation above the southeast Atlantic

... The complexity of aerosols and cloud behavior introduces a large source of uncertainty into aerosol radiative effects over the southeastern Atlantic (SEA) Zhang et al., 2016;Zuidema et al., 2016). These radiative effects are a product of both the smoke plume properties and the underlying cloud albedo in the SEA, wherein the latter is also influenced by microphysical aerosol-cloud interactions (Cochrane et al., 2019;Eck et al., 2013;Kaufman et al., 2003;Leahy et al., 2007;Magi et al., 2008;Waquet et al., 2013;Chand et al., 2009;Bond et al., 2013;Christensen et al., 2020;Adebiyi and Zuidema, 2018). ...

Above-cloud aerosol radiative effects based on ORACLES 2016 and ORACLES 2017 aircraft experiments