S. Leo’s research while affiliated with Ospedale Luigi Sacco and other places

Objective People with mental illness are overrepresented throughout the criminal justice system. In Italy, the Judicial Psychiatric Hospitals are now on the edge of their closure in favor of small-scale therapeutic facilities (REMS). Therefore, when patients end their duty for criminal behaviors, their clinical management moves back to the outpatient psychiatric centers. Elevated risks of rule-violating behavior are not equally shared across the spectrum of psychiatric disorders. To broaden the research in this area, we analyzed sociodemographic, clinical, and forensic variables of a group of psychiatric patients with a history of criminal behaviors, attending an outpatient psychiatric service in Milan, focusing on substance use disorder (SUD). Methods This is a cross-sectional single center study, conducted from 2020. Seventy-six subjects with a history of criminal behaviors aged 18 years or older and attending an outpatient psychiatric service were included. Demographic and clinical variables collected during clinical interviews with patients were retrospectively retrieved from patients’ medical records. Appropriate statistical analyses for categorical and continuous variables were conducted. ResultsData were available for 76 patients, 51.3% of them had lifetime SUD. Lifetime SUD was significantly more common in patients with long-acting injectable antipsychotics therapy, a history of more than 3 psychiatric hospitalizations, and a history of previous crimes, particularly economic crimes. Additionally, this last potential correlation was confirmed by logistic regression. Conclusions Data emerging from this survey provide new information about offenders with lifetime SUD attending an Italian mental health service. Our preliminary results should be confirmed in larger sample sizes.

IntroductionPeople with mental illness are overrepresented throughout the criminal justice system. In Italy, an ongoing process of deinstitutionalization has been enacted: the Judicial Psychiatric Hospitals are now on the edge of their closure in favor of small-scale therapeutic facilities (Residenze per l’Esecuzione delle Misure di Sicurezza - REMS). Law 81/2014 prescribes that a patient cannot stay in a REMS for a period longer than a prison sentence for the same index offense. Therefore, when patients end their duty for criminal behaviors, their clinical management moves back to outpatient psychiatric centers. Elevated risks of violent behavior are not equally shared across the spectrum of psychiatric disorders. In the past several years, multiple studies in the field of forensic psychiatry confirmed a close relationship between violent offenders and comorbid substance abuse. Objectives In order to broaden the research in this area, we analyzed sociodemographic, clinical and forensic variables of a group of psychiatric patients with a history of criminal behaviors, attending an outpatient psychiatric service in Milan, with a focus on substance abuse. Methods This is a cross-sectional single center study, conducted in 2020. Seventy-six subjects with a history of criminal behaviors aged 18 years or more and attending an outpatient psychiatric service were included. Demographic and clinical variables collected during clinical interviews with patients were retrospectively retrieved from patients’ medical records. Appropriate statistical analyses for categorical and continuous variables were conducted. ResultsData were available for 76 patients, 51,3% of them had lifetime substance abuse. Lifetime substance abuse was significantly more common in patients with long-acting injectable antipsychotics therapy, >3 psychiatric hospitalizations, history of previous crimes and economic crime (Table 1). Additionally, this last potential correlation was confirmed by logistic regression.Table 1.Lifetime substance abusers (N=39)Non-lifetime substance abusers (N=37)Proportion DifferenceP-value N%N% Depot administration Yes 11 (28,9%) 0 (0%) 28,9% 0,02 Hospitalizations Four or more 25 (64,1%) 5 (33,3%) 30,8% 0,04 Economic crime Yes 15 (40,5%) 1 (6,7%) 33,8% 0,02 Previous crimes Yes 17 (51,4%) 2 (13,3%) 38,1% 0,02 Conclusions Data emerging from this survey provide new information about offenders in an Italian mental health service with a focus on lifetime substance abuse in these patients. Our preliminary results should be confirmed in larger sample sizes. Disclosure of InterestNone Declared

Introduction Poor adherence to treatment is currently stated to be one of the causes of depression relapse and recurrence. Objectives Aim of the present study was to assess potential differences in terms of clinical and socio-demographic characteristics specifically related to adherence to treatment features, medical comorbidities, and substance abuse in a sample of patients diagnosed with Major Depression in an Italian psychiatric department. Methods Patients with a DSM-5 diagnosis of Unipolar or Bipolar Major Depressive Episode, of either gender or any age were recruited from the Psychiatry Department of Luigi Sacco University Hospital in Milan. Main clinical and socio-demographic variables were collected reviewing patients’ medical records. Moreover, adherence to psychopharmacological treatment was assessed using the Clinician Rating Scale (CRS; Kemp et al, 1996; 1998). Adherence was defined as ratings of > or =5 on the CRS. Descriptive and association analyzes were performed, setting the significance level at p<.05. Results 80 patients with a diagnosis of Unipolar Major depressive episode (48.9%) and Bipolar Major Depressive Episode (51.1%) were included. For the purposes of the study, the total sample was divided into two subgroups based on adherence to pharmacological treatment (A+ vs A-). Significantly higher rates of inpatients from psychiatric ward were A- compared to A+ patients (84.6% vs 48.1%, p=.011). A- patients were significantly more unemployed (57.9% vs 23.8%, p=.015), were mostly living in their family of origin (50% vs 21.4%, p=.027), and had fewer years of education compared to A+ subgroup (10.52±3.28 vs 12.2±3.1 years, p=.053). Higher rates of Bipolar Depression diagnosis and a prevalent manic polarity lifetime emerged in A- compared to the A+ group (73.1% vs 42.3%, p=.010; 30.8% vs 3%, p=.011, respectively). Moreover, A+ reported significantly higher rates of depressive prevalent polarity lifetime (72.7% vs 30.8%, p=.011). A- reported significantly higher rates of comorbidity with alcohol or other substance use disorders lifetime (46.2% vs 5.7%, p=.006) and almost one involuntary commitment lifetime (23.1% vs 11.1%, p=.013). Conclusions In our sample adherence to treatments showed significant differences in terms of clinical and socio-demographic characteristics. Low levels of adherence have been associated with higher hospitalization rates, involuntary commitments, greater comorbidity with alcohol or drugs. Our data therefore seem to suggest that less adherence leads to a worse disease course and a worse quality of life. It therefore appears useful to include an assessment of adherence in the clinical practice and implement interventions to improve therapeutic adherence and ensure a better quality of life. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Poor adherence to treatment is currently stated to be one of the causes of depression relapse and recurrence. The aim of the present study is to assess potential differences in terms of clinical and lifestyle features related to adherence to treatment in a sample of patients with unipolar and bipolar depression. Methods: One hundred and eight patients with a diagnosis of unipolar or bipolar depressive episode were recruited from January 2021 to October 2022. Adherence to psychopharmacological treatment was assessed using the clinician rating scale. Descriptive and association analyses were performed to compare subgroups based on adherence to treatment. Results: Lower levels of adherence to treatment were associated with fewer years of education, work impairment, manic prevalent polarity lifetime, and greater comorbidity with alcohol and drug abuse. The majority of patients with positive adherence did not report any hospitalization and involuntary commitment lifetime. Conclusions: Patients with a positive treatment adherence showed significant differences in terms of lifestyle and clinical features compared to non-adherent patients. Our results may help to identify patients more likely to have poor medication adherence, which seem to lead to a worse disease course and quality of life.