Ryan Phillips’s research while affiliated with Mayo Clinic - Rochester and other places

129 Background: Few studies have explored the use of focal therapies to address select sites of resistant disease in men receiving 177-Lu-PSMA-617 for metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Our institutional practice is to offer SBRT for patients with up to 5 sites of oligoprogression or non-responding lesions while undergoing 177Lu-PSMA-617 (every 6 weeks for 6 cycles total). This is determined by PSMA or choline PET imaging during the course of 177Lu-PSMA-617. Herein, we evaluated the safety of adding target SBRT during treatment with 177Lu-PSMA-617. Methods: This retrospective single institution analysis was conducted via systematic chart review to evaluate for adverse events during or after treatment. Grading of treatment-related adverse events was conducted using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 5.0 (CTCAE v5). Results: Thirty-one patients receiving 177Lu-PSMA-617 with 51 sites of oligoprogressive or non-responding metastatic disease were treated with SBRT. The median number of sites treated was 1 (range 1-4). Most patients received SBRT immediately after cycle 6 (32%) or after cycle 3 or 4 (42%). Bone was the most commonly treated site of disease (90%) with the majority (54%) of bone sites being spine or sacrum, followed by lymph nodes (10%). Ultimately, 84% of patients completed all 6 cycles of 177Lu-PSMA-617 (range 4-6). The median follow-up time was 19.1 months (IQR 15.5-22.4) after 177Lu-PSMA-617 therapy start. A total of 2 patients experienced a pathologic fracture within the SBRT treatment field that could possibly be related to radiotherapy. One patient experienced a grade 2 neuropathy which may have been related to radiation therapy. Other potential adverse events are listed (Table). Conclusions: Our data demonstrates a low rate of significant toxicity with the use SBRT during treatment with 177Lu-PSMA-617. Further study is indicated to determine the oncologic efficacy and potential late side effects of this treatment strategy. Adverse events. Event All Grades Grade > 3 Any Adverse Event 104 2 Anemia 29 (94%) 0 Low Platelets 11 (35.5%) 1 (3.2%) Any Pathologic Fracture 7 (22.5%) 1 (3.2%) Possible SBRT-related Pathologic Fracture 2 (6.5%) 1 (3.2%) Bone Pain Flare 3 (9.6%) 0 Neuropathy 1 (3.2%) 0

424 Background: Advances in prostate cancer (PC) care have led to a 98% 10-year survival rate. Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) is the primary method of follow-up after definitive radiotherapy (RT), with benign PSA ‘bounce’ occurring in up to 30% of patients, causing uncertainty and anxiety. Distinguishing between PSA bounce and biochemical recurrence (BCR) remains challenging. The Phoenix Criteria is the standard definition of BCR since 2006, defined as PSA nadir + 2 ng/dl, but does not consider patient specific information. Our study aims to explore factors associated with bounce and BCR and develop a predictive tool to differentiate between these two events. Methods: PC patients who received RT at our institution between 2006 and 2022 were identified, including only patients with a PSA increase during follow-up. Exclusion criteria included palliative RT, prostatectomy, or insufficient follow-up information. Patients’ clinical data was collected, and PSA increase was classified as bounce or BCR. Variables were compared using Kruskal Wallis or Chi-square. Multivariate logistic regression was performed in the subset of patients with absolute PSA value >2 (n= 581). Results: Of 1783 patients reviewed due to PSA rise after treatment, 694 met the inclusion criteria. There were 213 (30.7%) with PSA bounce and 481 (69.3%) with recurrence. Prior to meeting the Phoenix Criteria, 20 (4.2%) had biopsy-proven recurrence and 18 (3.7%) imaging-proven recurrence. The median delta PSA was 0.8 ng/mL for bounce vs 5 ng/mL for recurrence (p<0.001). The median time from treatment to event was 14.4 months for bounce vs 45.3 months for BCR (p<0.001). Recurrence was significantly associated (p<0.001) with older age at diagnosis, N1 stage, higher risk category, Gleason score, and higher baseline PSA. In the subgroup of patients without ADT, recurrence was associated with a lower median first PSA post-RT (1.9 vs. 2.4, p=0.046) and a lower median nadir before event (0.6 vs. 1.8, p<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression achieved an accuracy of 0.94, with a sensitivity of 0.83, specificity of 0.98, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.97. Conclusions: Our results highlight significant differences in clinical factors between bounce and recurrence in post-RT patients. The multivariate logistic regression differentiated the events with 94% accuracy for patients with a rising PSA value >2 subgroup. We highlight the possible improvement that could be accomplished by personalizing a PSA threshold for recurrence versus the Phoenix definition. This tool offers patients and providers a highly specific tool to differentiate between PSA recurrence and bounce, and may reduce stress and unnecessary testing, or help diagnosis recurrence faster. Next steps include prospective validation of the model to assess the impact on clinical practice costs, patient experience, and cancer outcomes.

382 Background: The natural history of biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) is heterogeneous, with most patients not progressing to metastasis. Determining the impact and optimal timing of salvage radiation therapy (SRT) remains challenging, particularly in the absence of prospective randomized trials with a surveillance control arm. Our objective isto quantify the oncologic benefit of SRT among men with BCR after RP. Methods: Patients who underwent RP at Mayo Clinic between 1990 and 2017 and developed BCR (PSA≥0.20ng/mL) were included. Patients treated with SRT were compared to those managed with surveillance using risk-set matching with time-dependent propensity scores, accounting for covariates at BCR and post-BCR. The primary outcome was metastases, analyzed via Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models. The number needed to treat (NNT) with SRT to prevent progression was calculated using regression outputs at 5 and 15 years post-BCR. Interaction analyses identified factors modifying SRT’s effect on metastasis. Results: Of 6,881 patients with BCR, 2,109 received SRT. At a median follow-up of 10.2 years, 1,147 patients with BCR developed metastases. After 1:1 matching, SRT was associated with lower metastasis risk than surveillance at 5 years (12.7% vs 19.3%, p<0.0001) and 15 years (28.6% vs. 31.5%, p<0.001). SRT was independently associated with decreased metastasis risk (HR 0.75, 95%CI 0.63–0.90, p=0.002) on multivariable analysis, translating to NNT of 23 and 15 at 5 and 15 years, respectively (Table). Additionally, we noted a significant interaction between PSA at SRT and the association of SRT with metastasis (p-interaction=0.02), such that the reduction in metastatic progression with SRT vs. surveillance was restricted to the cohort of patients who received SRT for PSA>0.40ng/mL (HR 0.66, 95%CI 0.54–0.80, p<0.001). Conclusions: Most patients with BCR post-RP do not develop metastases. Indeed, the NNT with SRT to reduce metastasis versus surveillance indicates a generally indolent disease course. Further, the lack of a significant association of SRT with reduction of metastases in patients with a PSA≤0.40ng/mL underscores the importance of careful patient selection when considering early SRT. Our data establish the rationale for a randomized trial comparing early SRT versus surveillance for appropriately selected patients with BCR after RP. Hazard ratios of SRT after matching by propensity scores, and number needed to treat for systemic progression, prostate cancer specific mortality and overall mortality. DiseaseOutcome Hazard Ratio(95% CI) P value Number Needed to Treat* (95% CI) 5 years 15 years Systemic progression 0.75(0.63 – 0.90) 0.002 23(17 – 41) 15(11 – 27) Prostate cancer mortality 0.81 (0.64 – 1.03) 0.086 103(62 – 494) 26(15 – 124) Overall mortality 0.79 (0.70 – 0.89) 0.0001 38(29 – 62) 12(9 – 20) *Number needed to treat (NNT) calculated using regression based absolute differences in event free survival between salvage radiation therapy (SRT) and observation.

140 Background: In the phase II EXTEND iADT omPC basket, MDT+iADT improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs iADT. Here we present the primary results of the EXTEND cADT omPC basket. We further report a pre-specified combined analysis with updated results from the iADT basket and examine the effects of MDT on immunity. Methods: Patients with 1 to 5 omPC metastases were randomized 1:1 to MDT+cADT vs cADT (NCT03599765). MDT consisted of definitive local therapy. cADT consisted of ADT +/- second-generation anti-androgens. The primary endpoint was per-protocol PFS, defined by biochemical criteria (Prostate Cancer Working Group 3), radiologic measures (RECIST v1.1), clinical progression, or death. 87 patients were needed to show superiority at a one-sided P of 0.10 by log-rank test. CDR3 regions in rearranged T cell receptor (TCR) β-chains from pre- and post-enrollment peripheral blood were sequenced with immunoSEQ (Adaptive Biotech). TCR repertoire modulation was defined as having TCR expansion plus contraction using a false-discovery-corrected betabinomial model. TCR sequencing from the ORIOLE trial (NCT02680587) was assessed for external validation. Results: From 2018 to 2022, 87 randomized patients were treated per protocol (MDT+cADT: 45; cADT: 42). 39% had castrate resistant omPC. MDT was definitive radiotherapy in all cases. With median follow-up of 31 mo, median PFS was 47 mo after MDT+cADT vs 22 mo after cADT (HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.23 to 1.08; one-sided P = 0.036). In the combined analysis (N=174) with median follow-up of 42 mo, MDT+ADT improved PFS (HR 0.45; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.69; P < 0.001), radiologic PFS (HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.40 to 0.97; P = 0.038), and castration-resistance free-survival (HR 0.40; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.82; P = 0.013). MDT+ADT had higher odds of TCR repertoire modulation vs ADT (55% vs 15%, P < 0.001). This finding was validated in the ORIOLE trial (MDT: 57% vs observation: 19%, P = 0.03). Among the subset of patients with extreme responses, random forest modeling of 37 clinical/immune variables identified TCR repertoire modulation as the variable with highest importance; further, MDT+ADT induced TCR repertoire modulation in all patients with favorable responses (i.e. PFS > 4 years) and none with unfavorable responses (i.e. PFS < 1 year). Among all patients randomized to MDT+ADT, TCR repertoire modulation was associated with longer PFS (HR 0.21; 95% CI 0.06 to 0.76; P = 0.02). Conclusions: MDT+cADT met the PFS primary endpoint of the phase II EXTEND trial, warranting phase III testing. From the combined analysis, MDT+ADT may also improve longer term outcomes including radiologic PFS and castration-resistance-free survival. Improved outcomes may result from MDT-induced immunomodulation, with implications for future trial design. Clinical trial information: NCT03599765 .

Background: The trajectory of metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer varies based on disease presentation and biology. While proteomic profiling studies of primary prostate tissue have linked protein expression with metastatic progression and prognosis, few studies have explored biological changes after treatment and their associations with response. Therefore, we conducted proteomic profiling of patients with oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (omCSPC) treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) or observation in the ORIOLE phase 2 randomized clinical trial (RCT). Methods Plasma from omCSPC patients in the ORIOLE trial was collected at baseline (day 1), day 90, and day 180. Protein abundance was quantified using the Olink Explore Assay. Differential expression from baseline to day 90 or 180 in each treatment arm was analyzed using a 2-sided t-test with Benjamini-Hochberg correction. Changes in protein expression at day 90 and 180 were compared with a Pearson correlation. Pathway enrichment was performed via gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) using Reactome, KEGG, and Hallmark gene sets. Associations with progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. Results In total, 1,472 proteins were assayed across 130 samples from 46 patients over 3 time points. Significant changes in expression post-SABR were noted at day 90 and 180 compared to baseline (using adjusted p-value cutoff of 0.05). At day 90, four proteins (FCRL1, CD22, TCL1A, FCER2) were downregulated; at day 180, only FCRL1, a Fc receptor-like gene family preferentially expressed in B cells, remained downregulated. No significant expression changes were found in the observation arm. Differential expression of proteins during follow-up were associated with PFS. In particular, LTO1, a maturation factor of ABCE1 important for ribosomal biogenesis and translation, was overexpressed at both day 90 and 180 post-SABR, and overexpression was associated with improved PFS at day 90 (median 24.5 mo vs 6 mo; p=0.017) and day 180 (median 33 mo vs 6 mo; p=0.043). These associations were absent in the observation arm. For proteins differentially expressed in the SABR arm at day 90, several signaling pathways were significantly enriched for patients with prolonged PFS, including positive enrichment of unfolded protein response (UPR) (p=0.008) and IL-4/IL-13 (p=0.009). At 180 days, several pathways were enriched for patients with prolonged PFS including negative enrichment of CTLA4 inhibitory signaling (p=0.005) and CD28 co-stimulation (p=0.008). Conclusion Proteomic analysis in omCSPC patients from the ORIOLE trial reveals significant expression changes at days 90 and 180 after SABR. B-cell signaling proteins were selectively downregulated in the SABR arm, and pathways associated with protein translation and immune response were enriched post-SABR for patients with prolonged PFS. Further research will explore connections to genomic and transcriptomic changes, with additional validation needed. Citation Format: Jarey H. Wang, Amol Shetty, Yang Song, Noura Radwan, Soha Bazyar, Xiaolei Shi, Theodore L. DeWeese, Daniel Y. Song, Ryan M. Phillips, Matthew P. Deek, Philip Sutera, Ana P. Kiess, Phuoc T. Tran. Proteomic profiling of oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Translating Targeted Therapies in Combination with Radiotherapy; 2025 Jan 26-29; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2025;31(2_Suppl):Abstract nr B031.

Purpose Two randomized clinical trials (STOMP and ORIOLE) demonstrated that stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) can prolong androgen-deprivation therapy–free survival or progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metachronous oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (omCSPC). Although most patients with omCSPC have a more modest delay in progression, a small subset achieves a durable response following SABR. We investigated the prognostic and predictive value of circulating prostate-specific membrane antigen-positive (PSMA+) extracellular vesicles (EV) and PSA in a biomarker correlative study using blood samples from three independent patient cohorts. Experimental Design Plasma samples from 46 patients with omCSPC on the ORIOLE trial and 127 patients with omCSPC on the STOMP trial protocol treated with SABR were included in the study. Pre-SABR PSMA+EV levels (EV/mL) were measured by nanoscale flow cytometry. Kaplan–Meier curves and logistic regression models were used to determine the association of PSMA+EV and PSA levels with clinical outcomes. Results In the pooled cohorts, the median biochemical PFS were 26.1 and 15.0 months (P = 0.005), and the median radiographic PFS were 36.0 and 25.0 months (P = 0.003) for PSMA+EV-low and -high groups, respectively. The combination of pre-SABR low levels of both PSMA+EV and PSA was associated with a lower risk of radiographic progression (HR, 0.34, 95% confidence interval, 0.18–0.58; P = 0.0002). In the ORIOLE cohort, which included both an SABR arm and an observation arm, low PSMA+EV was predictive of benefit from SABR (P = 0.012). Conclusions PSMA+EV is a novel prognostic and predictive biomarker of radiographically occult tumor burden in omCSPC. PSMA+EV may inform clinical decisions about identifying patients who will achieve a durable benefit from consolidative SABR alone.

Purpose Two randomized clinical trials (STOMP and ORIOLE) demonstrated that stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) can prolong ADT-free survival or progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metachronous oligometastatic prostate cancer (omCSPC) patients. While most omCSPC patients have a more modest delay in progression, a small subset achieves a durable response following SABR. We investigated the prognostic and predictive value of circulating PSMA-positive extracellular vesicles (PSMA ⁺ EV) and prostate specific antigen (PSA) in a biomarker correlative study using blood samples from three independent patient cohorts. Methods Plasma samples from 46 patients on the ORIOLE trial and 127 patietns on the STOMP trial protocol with omCSPC patients treated with SABR. Pre-SABR PSMA ⁺ EV levels (EVs/ml) were measured by nanoscale flow cytometry. Kaplan-Meier curves and logistic regression models were used to determine the association of PSMA ⁺ EV and PSA levels with clinical outcomes. Results In the pooled cohorts, median bPFS were 26.1 and 15.0 months (p=0.005) and median rPFS were 36.0 and 25.0 months (p=0.003) for PSMA ⁺ EV low and high groups, respectively. The combination of pre-SABR low levels of both PSMA ⁺ EV and PSA was associated with lower risk of radiographic progression (HR=0.34, 95% CI: 0.18-0.58, p=0.0002). In the ORIOLE cohort, which included both a SABR arm and an observation arm, low PSMA ⁺ EV was predictive of benefit from SABR (p=0.012). Conclusions PSMA ⁺ EV is a novel prognostic and predictive biomarker of radiographically occult tumor burden in omCSPC. PSMA+EV may inform clinical decisions regarding which patients achieve a durable benefit from consolidative SABR alone.