Ruth Barcan Marcus’s scientific contributions

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Moral Dilemmas and Consistency
  • Article

March 1980

·

32 Reads

·

288 Citations

The Journal of Philosophy

Ruth Barcan Marcus

This book is a collection of papers by Ruth Barcan Marcus, covering much ground in the development of her thought, and spanning from 1961 to 1990. Many of the papers deal with logical, semantic, metaphysical, and epistemological issues in intensional logic, and in particular, modalities. Some important themes that run through these papers are extensionality, the necessity of identity, the directly referential conception of proper names as “tags,” essentialism, substitutional quantification, and possibilia and possible worlds. What emerges from them is a robust defense of quantified modal logic in the light of a host of objections, particularly from Quine. Modalities also includes two papers on belief, which have consequences for epistemic logic and more widely for theories of rationality; two papers on ethical issues, which have consequences for deontic logic and practical reasoning; and finally, two papers on historical figures, Spinoza and Russell, dealing with the ontological proof of God's existence, and the nature of particularity, identity, and individuation, respectively.

Citations (1)


... Psychologists commonly examine deontological and utilitarian judgments by presenting human participants with moral dilemmas specifically designed to challenge and contrast these two principles, thereby revealing how each moral framework influences decision-making (Valdesolo and DeSteno, 2006;Marcus, 1980). The trolley problem is a classic example of such moral dilemmas, which requires participants to decide whether killing one individual to save another five lives is acceptable or not (Foot, 1967). ...

Reference:

What Counts Underlying LLMs' Moral Dilemma Judgments?
Moral Dilemmas and Consistency
  • Citing Article
  • March 1980

The Journal of Philosophy