Rui Nunes’s scientific contributions

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


A Journey Through Philosophy and Medicine: From Aristotle to Evidence-Based Decisions
  • Article
  • Full-text available

December 2024

·

49 Reads

·

1 Citation

·

Marcio Henrique de Jesus Oliveira

·

Maria Catarina Nunes Sampaio

·

[...]

·

Rui Nunes

The evolution of medical reasoning is deeply intertwined with philosophical thought, beginning with Aristotle’s foundational work in deductive logic. Aristotle’s principles significantly influenced early medical practice, shaping the works of Galen and Avicenna, who made empirical observations that expanded clinical knowledge. During the Enlightenment, both inductive reasoning, as advocated by Francis Bacon, and deductive methods, as stressed by René Descartes, significantly advanced medical reasoning. These approaches proved insufficient when it came to handling uncertainty and variability in medical outcomes. Nineteenth-century figures like William Osler advanced a probabilistic understanding of medicine. Karl Popper’s 20th-century hypothetico-deductive method, which introduced the concept of falsifiability and transformed scientific inquiry into a rigorous process of hypothesis testing, is a fundamental aspect of evidence-based medicine (EBM). EBM emerged as the dominant paradigm, combining empirical research, clinical expertise, and statistical inference to guide medical decisions. Looking forward, Bayesian reasoning offers a further refinement in medical reasoning. By incorporating prior knowledge and continuously updating probabilities with new evidence, Bayesianism addresses the limitations of frequentist methods and offers a more dynamic and adaptable framework for clinical decision making. As medical reasoning evolves, understanding this philosophical lineage is essential to navigating the future of patient care, where evidence must be both rigorously tested and individually tailored.

Download

Citations (1)


... True Positives (TP), which are successfully expected positives; True Negatives (TN), which are correctly predicted negatives; False Positives (FP), which are incorrectly predicted positives (Type I error); and False Negatives (FN), which are incorrectly predicted negatives (Type II error). [66]. ...

Reference:

A Comprehensive Review of Advances in Tongue Image Classification Techniques for Diabetes Identification
A Journey Through Philosophy and Medicine: From Aristotle to Evidence-Based Decisions