Ronald J. Litwin’s research while affiliated with United States Geological Survey and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (45)


Figure 1. Location of the Chesapeake Bay impact structure in the subsurface of the Virginia Coastal Plain, USA, modifi ed from Horton et al. (2009b). The Watkins School (W), Langley (L), and Bayside (B) cores are the main focus of this report. Data from the Cape Charles (C), Eyreville (E), and Exmore (Ex) cores also were used. Other previously studied core holes include Newport News Park (NN), North (N), Windmill Point (WP), and Kiptopeke (K).
Figure 3. Interpreted seismic profi le showing the transition from the brim to the moat of the central crater in the Chesapeake Bay impact structure, modifi ed from Powars et al. (2009, their fi gure 2A); twt-two-way traveltime.
Figure 7. Mineralogic composition of core samples from the Watkins School core as determined by semiquantitative X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. Data are from Table 1.
Figure 8. Geologic column for the Langley core. In the Exmore Formation, some clasts derived from the Potomac Formation are marked with arrows that distinguish upright from overturned orientations. See Figure 5 for an explanation of the symbols. Unit PPF-parautochthonous Potomac Formation. T.D.-total depth.
Figure 9. Mineralogic composition of Langley core samples as determined by semiquantitative X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. Data are from Table 2. See Figure 7 for legend. Unit PPF-parautochthonous Potomac Formation.

+4

Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure—Development of “Brim” Sedimentation in a Multilayered Marine Target
  • Chapter
  • Full-text available

January 2018

·

320 Reads

·

4 Citations

Henning Dypvik

·

Gregory S. Gohn

·

·

[...]

·

Ronald J. Litwin
Download



Synthesis on Quaternary aeolian research in the unglaciated eastern United States

June 2015

·

130 Reads

·

25 Citations

Aeolian Research

Late-middle and late Pleistocene, and Holocene, inland aeolian sand and loess blanket >90,000 km2 of the unglaciated eastern United States of America (USA). Deposits are most extensive in the Lower Mississippi Valley (LMV) and Atlantic Coastal Plain (ACP), areas presently lacking significant aeolian activity. They provide evidence of paleoclimate intervals when wind erosion and deposition were dominant land-altering processes. This study synthesizes available data for aeolian sand deposits in the LMV, the Eastern Gulf Coastal Plain (EGCP) and the ACP, and loess deposits in the Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain (MACP). Data indicate: (a) the most recent major aeolian activity occurred in response to and coincident with growth and decay of the Laurentide Ice Sheet (LIS); (b) by ∼40 ka, aeolian processes greatly influenced landscape evolution in all three regions; (c) aeolian activity peaked in OIS2; (d) OIS3 and OIS2 aeolian records are in regional agreement with paleoecological records; and (e) limited aeolian activity occurred in the Holocene (EGCP and ACP). Paleoclimate and atmospheric-circulation models (PCMs/ACMs) for the last glacial maximum (LGM) show westerly winter winds for the unglaciated eastern USA, but do not resolve documented W and SW winds in the SEACP and WNW and N winds in the MACP. The minimum areal extent of aeolian deposits in the EGCP and ACP is ∼10,000 km2. For the LMV, it is >80,000 km2. Based on these estimates, published PCMs/ACMs likely underrepresent the areal extent of LGM aeolian activity, as well as the extent and complexity of climatic changes during this interval.


Figure 1. Aerial photos of Dyke Marsh, within George Washington Memorial Parkway. All were taken at approximately low tide conditions. (A) 1938 photo of marsh showing its historical “pre-mining” configuration. By 1940 deep-water access had been dredged from the Potomac River’s main channel to the promontory (the approximate initiation of shoreface mining; Litwin et al. 2013, their Appendix 1F). By 1949 the promontory and its wetland forest were mined out (Litwin et al. 2013, their Figure 3). A white line showing the 1902 marsh boundary is overlain on this photo for comparison, to illustrate “pre-mining” landform stability at the marsh. Tidal creeks (mouths) are numbered north to south; the original positions of those creek mouths are shown in all four photos. Black boxes indicate first dredge barges (mining) along periphery of Dyke Marsh. Black arrows indicate direction of Potomac River flow (southward). (B) 1959 photo showing the initial mining-out of the promontory that formed the southern shoreline of tidal creek #4, Hog Island Gut. The locality of the first samples ever analyzed (1963) to estimate marsh age is starred, along tidal creek #2. This is the marsh configuration that existed when the NPS was first delegated oversight of this wetland by Congress. (C) 1987 photo showing marsh conditions about one decade after commercial dredging ended at the marsh. The tidal creek networks are mostly mined out. Black boxes indicate several land areas that disappeared since 1987. (D) 2006 photo showing continued erosion along its southern and western shorelines (Hog Island Gut and its tributaries are now eroding the marsh. The four island remnants of the once-intact wetland also are aggressively eroding away. Figure modified from Litwin et al. 2013. 
Figure 2. Photo-based acreage estimates of Dyke Marsh (1976–2009), showing marsh size versus time. Note that marsh loss rate is nonlinear. Two equally valid numerically modeled solutions (sce- narios 1 and 2) suggest that, without NPS land management remediation, acreage loss rates will increase and lead to the demise of this wetland by 2035 at the latest. Figure from Litwin et al. 2013. 
Figure 3. Westward shoreline erosion rates at Dyke Marsh, based on median values measured along 25 fixed reference stations for each of four analyzed time intervals after mining ceased (1976–1987, 1987–2002, 2002–2006, and 2006–2009), with comparison to naturally sustainable “pre-mining” shoreline (1937–1938). This quantifies the increasing erosion of the face of the marsh by northbound storms tracking up the Potomac River valley. Figure from Litwin et al. 2013. 
Interagency Partnership to Assess and Restore a Degraded Urban Riverine Wetland: Dyke Marsh Wildlife Preserve, Virginia

January 2014

·

244 Reads

Parks Stewardship Forum

Introduction The narrow-leaved cattail wetland (Hopfensperger and Engelhardt 2007) known as Dyke Marsh formally became a land holding of George Washington Memorial Parkway (GWMP, a unit of the national park system) in 1959, along with a congressional directive to honor a newly-let 30-year commercial sand and gravel dredge-mining lease at the site (Litwin et al. 2013; Figure 1). Dredging continued until 1974 when Public Law 93-251 called for the National Park Service and the United States Army Corps of Engineers to "implement resto-ration of the historical and ecological values of Dyke Marsh." By that time, about 83 acres of the marsh remained, and no congressional funding accompanied the passage of the law to effect any immediate conservation or restoration. Decades of dredge mining had severely al-tered the surface area of Dyke Marsh, the extent of its tidal creek system, and the shallow river bottom of the Potomac River abutting the marsh. Further, mining destabilized the marsh, causing persistent erosion, shoreline retreat, and tidal channel widening after mining ceased (Litwin et al. 2013). Erosion has continued unchecked until the present; approximately 50 acres of the original marsh are now estimated to remain (Figure 2). The specific cause of per-sistent erosion had been unknown prior to this collaborative study (Litwin et al. 2013) but previously was assumed to be due to flooding by the Potomac River. GWMP needed to (1) quantify the magnitude of acreage loss, (2) determine the most significant causal agents of marsh erosion, and (3) understand the initial environmental conditions in place prior to dredging, in order to comply with Public Law 93-251 and re-store Dyke Marsh to a more naturally sustainable geological and biological system. In 2009, the National Park Service (NPS) entered into partnership with the US Geological Survey (USGS) to investigate the causes and rates of unabated marsh erosion; the results of that part-The George Wright Forum, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 116–128 (2014). © 2014 The George Wright Society. All rights reserved. (No copyright is claimed for previously published material reprinted herein.) ISSN 0732-4715. Please direct all permissions requests to info@georgewright.org.


Fig. 1 Aerial photographs illustrating the devolution of the study site from 1938 to 2006, and its pre-mining (1-A), mining (1-B), and postmining phases (1-C, 1-D). a Aerial photo of the marsh in 1938, showing its historic~stable configuration. Note the forested promontory south of the marsh and the outflow of its four main tidal creeks (numbered). The outline of the 1902 map boundary (Appendix 1D) is superimposed on the 1938 image, to show the general stability in marsh size and configuration prior to mining. Offshore dredges can be seen mining the shallow riverbottom (black boxes). The white arrow at tidal creek #4 shows its historic outflow direction, which opposes the primary flow direction of the Potomac River (black arrow). b Aerial photo of the marsh in 1959, showing its configuration at the time of NPS acquisition. Note the forested promontory south of the marsh is gone, and the outflow of tidal creeks #3 and #4 has changed. The outflow of creek
Fig. 8 Physical indicators of flood erosion versus wave erosion. a Flood erosion catches and collects debris on the upflow side of standing barriers (trees, etc.; feature #1). The long axis of that debris accumulates perpendicular to the direction of stream flow. Erosion scour occurs on the downflow side of standing barriers (features labeled #2). b Flooding creates ovate bar forms that taper downflow. The coarser bedload clasts accumulate on the upflow side of the bars. Clast size diminishes on the bar surface in a downflow direction (feature #1). Shoreline profile in plan view is broadly sinuous (feature #2). Shoreline erosion channeling is created during overbank flow conditions, and incises parallel to the main streamflow direction (feature #3). c Cross section view of transect XY on bar. Larger clasts are stacked against
Fig. 11 Comparison of northbound wind events (>20 mph, and between 150° and 180° azimuths) to annual erosion at the marsh. Comparison of average annual duration of northbound wind events from passing cyclonic storms versus annual erosion rates at Dyke Marsh (1976-2006)
Accelerator mass spectrometry 14 C age results, Dyke Marsh, northern Virginia (this study)
Rates and Probable Causes of Freshwater Tidal Marsh Failure, Potomac River Estuary, Northern Virginia, USA

December 2013

·

56 Reads

·

11 Citations

Wetlands

Dyke Marsh, a distal tidal marsh along the Potomac River estuary, is diminishing rapidly in areal extent. This study documents Dyke Marsh erosion rates from the early-1860s to the present during pre-mining, mining, and post-mining phases. From the late-1930s to the mid-1970s, Dyke Marsh and the adjacent shallow riverbottom were mined for gravel, resulting in a ~55 % initial loss of area. Marsh loss continued during the post-mining phase (1976–2012). Causes of post-mining loss were unknown, but were thought to include Potomac River flooding. Post-mining areal-erosion rates increased from 0.138 ha yr−1 (~0.37 ac yr−1) to 0.516 ha yr−1 (~1.67 ac yr−1), and shoreline-erosion rates increased from 0.76 m yr−1 (~2.5 ft yr−1) to 2.60 m yr−1 (~8.5 ft yr−1). Results suggest the accelerating post-mining erosion reflects a process-driven feedback loop, enabled by the marsh's severely-altered geomorphic and hydrologic baseline system; the primary post-mining degradation process is wave-induced erosion from northbound cyclonic storms. Dyke Marsh erosion rates are now comparable to, or exceed, rates for proximal coastal marshes in the same region. Persistent and accelerated erosion of marshland long after cessation of mining illustrates the long-term, and potentially devastating, effects that temporally-restricted, anthropogenic destabilization can have on estuarine marsh systems.


100,000-year-long terrestrial record of millennial-scale linkage between eastern North American mid-latitude paleovegetation shifts and Greenland ice-core oxygen isotope trends

September 2013

·

46 Reads

·

19 Citations

Quaternary Research

We document frequent, rapid, strong, millennial-scale paleovegetation shifts throughout the late Pleistocene, within a 100,000+ yr interval (~ 115–15 ka) of terrestrial sediments from the mid-Atlantic Region (MAR) of North America. High-resolution analyses of fossil pollen from one core locality revealed a continuously shifting sequence of thermally dependent forest assemblages, ranging between two endmembers: subtropical oak-tupelo-bald cypress-gum forest and high boreal spruce-pine forest. Sedimentary textural evidence indicates fluvial, paludal, and loess deposition, and paleosol formation, representing sequential freshwater to subaerial environments in which this record was deposited. Its total age–depth model, based on radiocarbon and optically stimulated luminescence ages, ranges from terrestrial oxygen isotope stages (OIS) 6 to 1. The particular core sub-interval presented here is correlative in trend and timing to that portion of the oxygen isotope sequence common among several Greenland ice cores: interstades GI2 to GI24 (≈ OIS2–5 d). This site thus provides the first evidence for an essentially complete series of ‘Dansgaard–Oeschger’ climate events in the MAR. These data reveal that the ~ 100,000 yr preceding the Late Glacial and Holocene in the MAR of North America were characterized by frequently and dynamically changing climate states, and by vegetation shifts that closely tracked the Greenland paleoclimate sequence.



Inside the crater, outside the crater: Stratigraphic details of the margin of the Chesapeake Bay impact structure, Virginia, USA

September 2010

·

417 Reads

·

8 Citations

Geological Society of America Special Papers

Two cores at the outer margin of the Chesapeake Bay impact structure show significant structural and depositional variations that illuminate its history. Detailed stratigraphy of the Watkins School core reveals that this site is outside the disruption boundary of the crater with respect to its lower part (nonmarine Cretaceous Potomac Formation), but just inside the boundary with respect to its upper part (Exmore Formation and a succession of upper Eocene to Pleistocene postimpact deposits). The site of the U.S. Geological Survey-National Aeronautics and Space Administration Langley core, 6.4 km to the east, lies wholly within the annular trough of the crater. The Potomac Formation in the Watkins School core is not noticeably impact disrupted. The lower part of crater unit A in the Langley core represents stratigraphically lower, but similarly undeformed material. The Exmore Formation is only 7.8 m thick in the Watkins School core, but it is over 200 m thick in the Langley core, where it contains blocks up to 24 m in intersected diameter. The upper part of the Exmore Formation in the two cores is a polymict diamicton with a stratified zone at the top. The postimpact sedimentary units in the two cores have similar late Eocene and late Miocene depositional histories and contrasting Oligocene, early Miocene, and middle Miocene histories. A paleochannel of the James River removed Pliocene deposits at the Watkins School site, to be filled later with thick Pleistocene deposits. At the Langley site, a thick Pliocene and thinner Pleistocene record is preserved.



Citations (31)


... The Chesapeake Bay impact crater is a late Eocene (35.4 Ma), 85 km in diameter impact structure, which has been sampled by numerous drill cores and studied in great detail (e.g. Poag et al., 2004;Belkin and Horton, 2009;Gohn et al., 2009;Dypvik et al., 2018) (Figs. 8 and 9). The crater fill succession of the Chesapeake Bay Crater consists of large thicknesses of various mass flow deposits covering crushed basement and partly melted rocks, so-called suevites (Fig. 8). ...

Reference:

The Planetary Terrestrial Analogues Library (PTAL) – An exclusive lithological selection of possible martian earth analogues
Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure—Development of “Brim” Sedimentation in a Multilayered Marine Target
  • Citing Book
  • January 2018

... This megablock slump unit is overlain by the allogenic sediment clast breccia, which is suggested to great extent to be a resurge deposit due to returning seawater at this shallow-marine impact (e.g., Ormö et al., 2009). Thus, the ejecta was strongly reworked by the resurge and blended with rip-up material from the slump unit (Dypvik et al., 2018;Ormö et al., 2009). At the likewise shallow-marine, approximately 7 km wide, Wetumpka impact structure, the layer of seawater and sediments varied in thickness over the target area similar to CBIS (e.g., King Jr. et al., 2002. ...

Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure—Development of “Brim” Sedimentation in a Multilayered Marine Target

... Volcanism is considered a major driver of changes in plant communities and diversity during several key intervals during the Paleozoic and Mesozoic (e.g., Fielding et al., 2019;Mays et al., 2020;Wignall and Atkinson, 2020;Lindström, 2021;Lu et al., 2021a;Galasso et al., 2022;Marchetti et al., 2022;Zhang et al., 2022). Palynological material is widely distributed in sedimentary rocks and palynomorphs are easier to obtain in abundance than larger plant fossils (e.g., Litwin and Traverse, 1989;Wellman et al., 2003;Traverse, 2007;Wang et al., 2021). Based on the identification of the parent plants of palynological taxa and their adapted environments, palynological fossils have much potential for the reconstruction of paleo-vegetation and paleo-climatic features (e.g., Couper, 1958;Van Van Konijnenburg-Van Cittert, 1978;Du et al., 1982;Du, 1985;Balme, 1995;Wang et al., 1998Wang et al., , 2005Wellman et al., 2003;Traverse, 2007;Rostovtseva, 2011;Deng et al., 2017;Lu et al., 2021a;Zhang et al., 2022). ...

Basic guidelines for palynomorph extraction and preparation from sedimentary rocks
  • Citing Article
  • January 1989

The Paleontological Society Special Publications

... Ash (1980Ash ( , 1987 developed a Chinle Group plant megafossil biostratigraphy based on the record as it was known in the 1980s (Fig. 5). Since the review by Ash (1989a), various articles on Chinle plant megafossils have been published, mostly by Ash (e.g., 1999Ash (e.g., , 2001Ash (e.g., , 2005Ash (e.g., , 2006Ash and Litwin, 1996;Axsmith and Ash, 2006;Savidge and Ash, 2006;Watson and Ash, 2006) and a few by others (e.g., Lucas, 2006;Milner, 2006). I rely primarily on this published database for taxonomic identifications and to establish the biostratigraphic distribution of Chinle Group plant megafossils (Fig. 4). ...

Two new species of the pinnate microsporophyll Pramelreuthia from the upper Triassic of the southwestern United States
  • Citing Article
  • August 1996

American Journal of Botany

... These structural relationships demonstrate prolonged Early Cretaceous to Pliocene-early Pleistocene reactivation of older fault systems. Optically stimu-lated luminescence (OSL) dating (Pavich et al., 2006(Pavich et al., , 2009(Pavich et al., , 2010 of various Pleistocene terrace deposits bordering the relatively straight reach of the Potomac River between Fredericksburg and D.C., combined with the new 26 Al-10 Be method to date gravel, should make it possible to date the terrace gravels that were previously not dateable. This will provide the latest movement ages for some of the faults. ...

Sea level history of Chesapeake Bay since 117ka based on OSL dating of estuarine sediments
  • Citing Article
  • January 2009

... These structural relationships demonstrate prolonged Early Cretaceous to Pliocene-early Pleistocene reactivation of older fault systems. Optically stimu-lated luminescence (OSL) dating (Pavich et al., 2006(Pavich et al., , 2009(Pavich et al., , 2010 of various Pleistocene terrace deposits bordering the relatively straight reach of the Potomac River between Fredericksburg and D.C., combined with the new 26 Al-10 Be method to date gravel, should make it possible to date the terrace gravels that were previously not dateable. This will provide the latest movement ages for some of the faults. ...

Significance of marine oxygen isotope stage OIS5a and OIS3 OSL dates from estuarine sediments flanking Chesapeake Bay
  • Citing Article
  • January 2010

... Effective temperatures were calculated for three sample ages (80 ka, 125 ka, and 210 ka) for two temperature histories (7 C and 10 C full glacial temperature reductions) using two model curves and two different temperature sensitivities (8% and 10% per C) for the leucine rate constant found in Table 3. For 7 C and 10 C full glacial temperature reductions, the effective temperature of a 125 ka sample is either 12.2 C or 10.9 C, respectively, compared with the current temperature of 16.5 C. (e.g., Aeschbach-Hertig et al., 2002;French et al., 2006French et al., , 2007French et al., , 2009Markewich et al., 2009;Smoot et al., 2009;Litwin et al., 2010;Bartlein et al., 2010) imply that LGM temperatures on the U.S. mid-Atlantic Coastal Plain were significantly influenced by the nearby upwind location of the Laurentide Ice Sheet, with permafrost effects being observed as far south as approximately 200 km north of the study area (w38 N latitude e see Fig. 1). Using modern permafrost distribution as an analogy (National Atlas of Canada, 1995), it seems reasonable to suggest that the extreme low temperatures in the mid-Atlantic region, w200 km north of our study area, were as cold as those found today at latitudes of 55 to even 60 N., where mean annual ground temperatures are between À2 C and þ2 C. Additionally, evidence of iceberg scour on the continental shelf south of our study area (Hill et al., 2008) implies substantial cooling of nearshore waters during recent glacial stages. ...

Hybla cores 7 and 8: an 80,000 year late Pleistocene climate record from the mid-Atlantic Coastal Plain of North America
  • Citing Article
  • January 2010

... Westgate & Pearce, 2017), or the record can be correlated unambiguously with a long continuous palaeovegetation record (e.g. Kershaw et al., 2007;Litwin et al., 1997;Singh et al., 1985;Torres et al., 2013), which is rarely achievable. ...

An 800,000-year pollen record from Owens Lake, California: Preliminary analyses
  • Citing Article
  • January 1997

Geological Society of America Special Papers

... Both in Europe and in North America, eolian sediment mobilization occurred within unglaciated regions beyond the margins of the last glacial ice sheets. In North America, dune fields and related eolian research are abundant within the unglaciated central and southern United States (Johnson et al., 2020;Mason et al., 2020), and along the eastern mid-latitudes of the Atlantic Coastal Plain (Markewich et al., 2015;Swezey, 2020). In Europe, eolian process were widespread under periglacial conditions, as inferred from the European 'sand belt' that extended from the Netherlands and Belgium in the west, across Germany, southern Denmark, and Poland, and into To date, no study of Pleistocene dune extant, beyond brief notes of observations, has been undertaken in southern New Jersey. ...

Synthesis on Quaternary aeolian research in the unglaciated eastern United States
  • Citing Article
  • June 2015

Aeolian Research

... Identifications of palynomorphs were completed using the primary literature for this region (e.g. Tschudy 1973aTschudy , b, 1975Frederiksen and Christopher 1978;Harrison and Litwin 1997;Frederiksen et al. 2001;Baghai-Riding et al. 2016 among others) and comparison with Upper Cretaceous reference materials housed at Morehead State University. Results were compared with the zonations suggested by Frederiksen et al. (1982Frederiksen et al. ( , 2001 for the New Madrid borehole and extreme eastern Georgia, respectively. ...

Palynomorph Biostratigraphy and Paleoecology of Upper Cretaceous Sediments from Four Cores from Screven and Burke Counties, Georgia

USGS professional paper