Robert Montés-Micó’s research while affiliated with University of Valencia and other places

Background To compare the accuracy of intraoperative wavefront aberrometry using the ORA VLynk system with different biometry-based formulas in short and long eyes after cataract surgery. Methods This prospective study considered 48 eyes with axial lengths of <22.1 mm and 48 eyes with axial lengths of >25.0 mm. All eyes were implanted with the monofocal AcrySof IQ IOL, the power being determined using the ORA VLynk. The postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) at 3 months was compared to that predicted preoperatively using the SRK/T, Hoffer Q, Haigis, Holladay 2, Barrett Universal II, and Barrett True K formulas and intraoperatively using the ORA VLynk. Mean numerical and absolute errors and the percentage of eyes within ±0.50 D/1.00 D of their target were obtained. Results For long eyes, the mean absolute error values were 0.35, 0.52, 0.34, 0.30, 0.29, 0.27, and 0.24D for SRK/T, Hoffer Q, Haigis, Holladay 2, Barrett Universal II, Barrett True K, and ORA VLynk, respectively (p < 0.001). These values were 0.55, 0.45, 0.49, 0.40, 0.44, 0.44 and 0.50 D for short eyes, respectively (p < 0.001). The proportions of long eyes within ±0.50 D of the target were 77.08, 50, 75, 85.42, 83.33, 79.17, and 87.50%, respectively; and 50, 66.67, 60.42, 66.67, 60.42, 60.42, and 58.33%, respectively, for short eyes. Conclusion The ORA VLynk performs better than all biometry-based formulas in long eyes and, in short eyes, it is as effective as SRK/T, Haigis, Barrett Universal II, and Barrett true K, with the Hoffer Q and Holladay 2 being the most accurate; however, the differences between the calculation methods were small. Clinical trial registration Identifier DRKS000028106.

Background To assess corneal epithelial-thickness (ET) mapping resulting from spectral-domain-optical-coherence-tomography (SD-OCT) by analysing its repeatability and reproducibility and its utility for screening corneal-refractive-surgery (CRS) candidates. Methods ET was measured in 25-sectors by two-operators. Intra-subject-standard-deviation, coefficient-of-repeatability (CoR) and coefficient-of-variability (CoV) were calculated to evaluate repeatability. Reproducibility was evaluated using a Bland–Altman analysis. Scheimpflug-tomography, refraction, visual acuity, and patient history were used to make a decision on eligibility for CRS. After this decision, the surgeon was shown the patient’s ET map and was asked to reconsider his analysis. The percentage of screenings that changed after evaluating the ET maps was determined. Results Forty-three eyes with normal corneas (CRS-group) and 21 eyes not suitable for CRS (non-CRS-group) were studied. For the CRS-group, CoR ranged from 2.03 (central) to 19.73 μm (outer-inferonasal), with the central-sector showing the highest repeatability (CoV: 1.53–1.80%). For the non-CRS-group, CoR ranged from 3.82 (central-middle-superonasal) to 13.42 μm (middle-inferotemporal), with the inner-superonasal-sector showing the highest repeatability (CoV: 2.86–4.46%). There was no statistically significant difference between operators (p > 0.01). In the CRS-group, the outcomes showed a narrow 95% limits-of-agreement (LoA) for the central-and inner-nasal-sectors (about 4 μm), and wider for the inner-superior, outer-superotemporal and outer-inferonasal (about 10–14 μm). In the non-CRS-group, they were for the outer superonasal (about 4 μm), and for the middle-inferotemporal and outer-temporal (about 10 μm), respectively. Candidacy for CRS changed in 7.82% of patients after evaluation of the ET maps, with all of them screened-out. Conclusion The SD-OCT provided repeatable and reproducible corneal ET measurements and may alter candidacy for CRS. Clinical trial registration German Clinical Trials Register: https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00032797, identifier: DRKS00032797.

Background Swept-source optical coherence tomography–based (SS-OCT) biometers have been used in different clinical studies with the aim of assessing the accuracy of the technique, specifically in eyes with dense cataracts. Our objective is to evaluate the axial length acquisition success rates and agreement of two SS-OCT biometers when measuring axial length and biometric parameters in eyes with dense cataracts. Methods 46 eyes (46 patients) with dense cataracts (LOCS III grade ≥ 4) were measured 3 consecutive times using the Eyestar 900 and Argos SS-OCT biometers. Keratometry (K1, flat and K2, steep), central corneal thickness (CCT), white-to-white (WTW), anterior-chamber-depth (ACD), lens-thickness (LT), and axial length were measured using both biometers. The percentage acquisition success rate and a Bland–Altman analysis to determine the agreement between the biometers were calculated. Corrected and uncorrected distance visual acuity, subjective refraction, and axial length (to assess preoperative axial length accuracy) were measured 1-month post-cataract surgery. Results The mean LOCS III score was 4.37 ± 0.68. The acquisition success rates for both biometers was 100%. There were statistically significant differences between the two SS-OCT biometers for all parameters evaluated (p < 0.05). The mean differences for K1, K2, CCT, WTW, ACD, LT and axial length were 0.106 D, 0.128 D, −6.347 μm, −0.054 mm, 0.095 mm, 0.110 mm, and −0.036 mm, respectively. The mean pre- and post-surgery axial length difference was −0.036 mm for the Eyestar 900 and −0.020 mm for the Argos. This difference was ≤ 0.1 mm in 97.82% of eyes with the Eyestar 900 and in 100% of eyes with the Argos. Conclusion SS-OCT biometry successfully measures axial length in dense cataracts. The differences between biometers in some parameters may have a clinically significant impact but should be judged individually. The pre- and post-surgery axial length differences for each biometer can be considered clinically negligible and should not affect the IOL power calculation.

Purpose To determine the impact of optotype choice on the determination of defocus curve in cataract patients implanted with presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens (IOL). Setting Oftalvist Alicante, Alicante, Spain. Design Observational case-control study Methods Patients implanted with Asqelio Trifocal IOL (AST Products, Inc., Billerica, MA, USA) participated in this study. Uncorrected and distance corrected visual acuity and subjective refraction were determined. Monocular defocus curves were obtained 6 months after surgery with the CTS system using either ETDRS or Landolt C charts under photopic conditions (85 cd/m ² ), and range of vergence from +2.00D to -5.00D in 0.50D steps. Results A total of 49 patients were enrolled in the study, 24 in the EDTRS group (7 male, 17 female) and 25 in the Landolt C group (5 male, 20 female). Non-significant differences were found between patients conforming both groups, except for preoperative intraocular pressure and white-to-white distance. All patients were within ±1.00D from intended refraction after surgery. 75% of patients in the EDTRS group and 84% in the Landolt C group were within ±0.50D. Average difference between the groups across vergences provided by the defocus curve was 0.12±0.05 logMAR units, significant for all vergences (p<0.05). Differences in VA were significant for distance, intermediate and near between both groups, except for uncorrected distance VA. Conclusion Defocus curves created using Landolt C charts yield significantly lower through-focus outcomes than those created with standard EDTRS charts. This should be taken into account when comparing the performance of presbyopia-correcting systems accross studies where recognition charts might have been used due to patient characteristics.

Purpose To evaluate the repeatability of a new swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) based biometer to measure anterior segment parameters, and to assess the agreement with three other imaging devices based on different measurements principles. Setting Unit of Eye and Vision, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden. Design Prospective, comparative case series Methods 3 consecutive measuremetns were obtained in unoperated eyes with the Eyestar900 (SS-OCT), Lenstar 900, MS-39, and Sirius. The following anterior segment parameters were evaluated: central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal diameter (CD), aqueous depth (AQD), and corneal power metrics. The repeatability limit (Rlim), coefficient of variation (CoV), and a repeated measures Bland-Altman analysis were performed. Results 74 eyes of 74 participants were measured. The Rlims for CCT, CD, and AQD were lower than 10μm, 0.3mm, and 0.10mm for all devices, respectively. The corresponding CoVs for these parameters never exceeded 1.2%. The Rlim for the corneal power metrics never exceeded 0.60D for any of the instruments. Lenstar showed the best agreement with the MS-39 to measure CCT, CD, and AQD (limit of agreement interval, LoA: 15.54μm, 0.55mm, and 0.16mm, respectively). The mean difference for keratometry parameters was lower than 0.3D for all device comparisons, and the LoA interval ranged between 0.52D to 1.21D. Conclusions The repeatability for measuring anterior segment parameters was good, and the agreement among all the instuments was good for CD and AQD measurements. However, for CCT and keratometer parameters, the instruments cannot be used interchangeably due to large LoA interval.

Background: To evaluate the axial length acquisition success rates and agreement between various biometric parameters obtained with different biometers in dense cataracts. Methods: Fifty-one eyes were measured using Anterion®, Argos® and IOLMaster® 700 swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) biometers, a Pentacam® AXL partial coherence interferometry (PCI) biometer, and an OcuScan® RxP ultrasound biometer. We measured keratometry (K1, flattest keratometry and K2, steepest keratometry), white-to-white (WTW), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT) and axial length. Cataracts were classified according to the Lens Opacities Classification System III grading system, the dysfunctional lens index (DLI) and Pentacam® nucleus staging (PNS) metrics. Percentage of acquisition success rate and a Bland-Altman analysis for the agreement between biometers were calculated. Results: The mean LOCS III score was 3.63 ± 0.92, the mean DLI was 2.95 ± 1.30 and the mean PNS was 2.36 ± 1.20. The acquisition success rates for the Anterion®, Argos®, IOLMaster® 700, Pentacam® AXL and OcuScan® RxP biometers were 94.12%, 100%, 98.04%, 60.78% and 100%, respectively. There were significant differences in the success rates between biometers (P = 0.014). There were statistically significant differences between biometers for all parameters evaluated (P < 0.05). The range of the limit of agreement (LoA) for all comparisons of K1 and K2 were > 1.00 D. The LoA for WTW ranged from 0.095 to 1.050 mm. The LoA for ACD and LT ranged from 0.307 to 0.114 mm and from 0.378 to 0.108 mm, respectively. The LoA for axial length ranged from 0.129 to 2.378 mm. Conclusions: Among optical biometers, those based on SS-OCT technology are more successful at measuring axial length in eyes with dense cataracts. Trial registration: The study was registered with the National Institutes of Health (clinical trial identifier NCT05239715, http://www. Clinicaltrials: gov ).

Background To evaluate the repeatability of a fully automated swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) and its agreement with an optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR) for several biometric parameters. Methods In this study, 74 eyes of 74 patients were measured using the Eyestar 900 SS-OCT and Lenstar LS 900 OLCR. Flat keratometry (K1) and steep keratometry (K2), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and axial length (AL) were measured three times with each device. The repeatability was analyzed with the intrasubject standard deviation, coefficient of variability (CoV), and coefficient of repeatability (CoR) for each instrument. The agreement between the instruments was evaluated with Bland-Altman analysis. Results K1, K2 and CCT CoV values were < 0.2%, < 0.4% and < 0.55%, respectively. Higher CoV values were found for ACD and LT ranging from 0.56% to 1.74%. The lowest CoV values were found for the AL measurements (0.03% and 0.06% for the Eyestar 900 and the Lenstar LS 900, respectively). AL measurements provided the highest repeatability, measured with both CoV and CoR values, and the CCT was the parameter with the lowest repeatability. The CCT and LT measurements were statistically significant between the two biometers ( P < 0.001). The interval of the limits of agreement was < 0.6 D for K1 and K2, 15.78 µm for CCT, 0.21 mm for ACD, 0.34 mm for LT, and 0.08 mm for AL. Conclusions Both biometers provide repeatable measurements for the different parameters analyzed and can be used interchangeably.

Purpose: To study vision related quality of life (VRQoL) before and after a massive cataract campaign in West Africa and the relationship with visual indicators. Methods: All the patients who received cataract surgery in Burkina Faso during a blindness prevention campaign were examined. VRQoL was assessed using a modified version of the WHO/PBD VF20. The questionnaire was changed to reflect the socioeconomic and local culture. Patients were interviewed by local interviewers before and three months after surgery. A quality of life related to vision index (QoL-RVI) was calculated. Results: A total of 305 patients underwent cataract extraction in at least one eye, of these, a total of 196 (64%) completed the study. Mean age was 61.97 ± 14.39 years. The majority of eyes had poor visual acuity (VA<20/200, log MAR: 1.0) preoperatively (88.70%) with a mean VA of logMAR 2.17 ± 0.70 (20/2000) which improved to 0.86 ± 0.64 LogMAR (20/150) 3 months after cataract surgery. QoL-RVI improved postoperatively in 90.2% of patients, did not change in 3.1% and was worse in 6.7%. Statistically significant differences were detected (Wilcoxon test p <0.05) for all items tested before and after surgeries. Correlations for the patients after operations showed that there was a statistically significant relation between a global estimated QoL-RVI and the VA previous to the surgery (-0.196 p=0.014), regarding the same index and the VA after the procedures (-0,35 p=0,00018). Conclusion: Cataract surgery increases the quality of life of patients living in a developing country such as Burkina Faso and the improvement correlates with the recovery of the visual acuity.

Introduction Ocular dimensions measurement is extremely important in cataract procedures and refractive surgery. The use of optical techniques for axial measurements has been developed in recent years. Areas covered The purpose was to summarize the outcomes reported when swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) optical biometry failed during axial length measurement. A peer-reviewed literature search was carried out to identify publications reporting clinical outcomes for cataractous eyes measured with SS-OCT optical biometers available on the market. A comprehensive analysis of the available data was performed, focusing on parameters such as the sample of eyes evaluated, failure rates, and specifically, the cataract type when the measurement was not possible. 27 studies were included in this review. In general, SS-OCT biometers lead to only small failure rates when measuring axial length (but in some cases up to 38.49%). In the few cases where the measurement was not possible, the cataract type of the eyes was mainly mature white or grade ≥ IV. SS-OCT optical biometers show good outcomes when measuring axial length in eyes with advanced cataracts. Expert opinion We believe that the use of SS-OCT technology may be considered the gold standard for measuring axial length in any type of cataract.

AIMS To study the vision related quality of life (VRQoL) before and after a mass cataract surgery campaign in a low-income country and to describe the impact of cataract surgery on quality of life (QOL). METHODS All the patients who had cataract surgery in Bobo-Dioulasso (Burkina Faso) during a campaign for the prevention blindness were examined. VRQoL was assessed using a modified version of the WHO/PBD VF20. The questionnaire was carried out before and three months after the surgery. A QOL related to vision index (QOL-RVI) was calculated from the scores obtained. RESULTS A total of 305 patients (56.1% male) underwent cataract extraction. Mean age was 61.97 ± 14.39 years. The majority of eyes (88.70%) had preoperatively poor visual acuity (CDVA<20/200). Three months after surgeries, good visual outcomes (VA ≥20/60) were achieved in 38.35% of eyes without correction and 68.7% with correction. At this time, QOL-RVI had improved postoperatively in 90.2% of patients, had not changed in 3.1% and was worse in 6.7%. Significant differences were detected (Wilcoxon test p <0.05) for all items tested before and after surgeries. Correlations for the patients after operations showed that there was a significant relation between a global estimated QOL-RVI and the UCVA previous to the surgery (ρ -0.196 p=0.014), regarding the same index and the BCVA after the procedures (ρ -0.35 p=0.00018). CONCLUSIONS Cataract surgery increases the quality of life of patients living in low-income countries such as Burkina Faso and the improvement correlates with the recovery of the visual acuity.