Rik Lander’s research while affiliated with University of the West of England, Bristol and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Poster for I am Echoborg events used in this study
Audience post‐its: ‘How do you feel about artificial intelligence?’ taken before Performance B on 22 October 2020
Questioning 'what makes us human': How audiences react to an artificial intelligence-driven show
  • Article
  • Full-text available

May 2021

·

50 Reads

·

6 Citations

·

Rik Lander

·

Phil D. Hall

I am Echoborg is promoted as 'a show created afresh each time by the audience in conversation with an artificial intelligence (AI)'. The show demonstrates how AI in a creative and performance context can raise questions about the technology's ethical use for persuasion and compliance, and how humans can reclaim agency. This audience study focuses on a consecutive three-night run in Bristol, UK in October 2019. The different outcomes of each show illustrate the unpredictability of audience interactions with conversational AI and how the collective dynamic of audience members shapes each performance. This study analyses (1) how I am Echoborg facilitates audience cocreation in a live performance context, (2) the show's capacity to provoke nuanced understandings of the potential for AI and (3) the ability for intelligent technology to facilitate social interaction and group collaboration. This audience study demonstrates how the show inspires debate beyond binary conclusions (i.e. AI as good or bad) and how audiences can understand potential creative uses of AI, including as a tool for cocreating entertainment with (not just for) them.

Download

Citations (1)


... Views specifically towards AI among learners vary, from some individuals being optimistic to others holding negative views. Negative perceptions of AI's impact on humans and society are well documented (Eagle et al., 2021;Ghotbi et al., 2022;Mertala et al., 2022;Oh et al., 2017). Some have general or vague fears about AI (Antonenko and Abramowitz, 2023;Lindner & Berges, 2020); yet there is also a sense of optimism and promise for addressing problems or benefiting society at large (Antonenko and Abramowitz, 2023;Teng et al., 2022). ...

Reference:

AI Advocates and Cautious Critics: How AI Attitudes, AI Interest, Use of AI, and AI Literacy Build University Students' AI Self-Efficacy
Questioning 'what makes us human': How audiences react to an artificial intelligence-driven show