Rahman Soori’s research while affiliated with University of Tehran and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Top left: Biceps brachii normalized force–length curve and operating length for Preacher (PREA; shoulder flexed 50°) and Bayesian (BAYE; shoulder extended 50°) biceps curls during the 10°–140° range of motion. These were obtained using OpenSim Arm26 model (Holzbaur et al. 2005), considering biceps brachii as a single unit (sum of short and long heads) while maintaining relative contributions of each head to the length and active force and using muscle–tendon default parameters. Top right: Resistance profiles (relative torque to elbow angle) of the trained exercises. Bottom left and right: Example of how PREA (top) and BAYE (bottom) exercises were conducted during testing and training sessions. Note the same hand‐pulley distance at the start of the exercises and the same arm‐cable angles between exercises at the start and end of the range of motion. Estimated peak torques (arm‐cable angle: 90°) were at 61.5° elbow flexion.
Progression in training load during Preacher (PREA) and Bayesian (BAYE) curl conditions. The horizontal lines are mean and 95% CIs. No difference was detected between groups (comparison of slopes; p = 0.252).
Individual percentage changes from pre‐ to post‐training in muscle thickness (MT) of biceps brachii (BB) and brachialis (Br) for more proximal (55%), middle (65%), and more distal (75%) regions after Preacher (PREA) and Bayesian (BAYE) biceps curls. The horizontal lines are mean and 95% CIs. All measures increased pre‐ to post‐training, but no significant difference was detected between regions or conditions (p values = 0.205–0.662).
Comparison Between Shoulder Flexed and Extended Positions in Elbow Flexion Resistance Training on Regional Hypertrophy and Maximum Strength: Preacher versus Bayesian Cable Curls
  • Article
  • Full-text available

March 2025

·

2,473 Reads

·

·

·

[...]

·

Rahman Soori

In the present study, the effects of resistance training on regional hypertrophy and maximum strength of the elbow flexor muscles were compared between elbow flexion exercises performed with different shoulder joint angles (∼50° of flexion vs. extension) while matched for resistance profiles. In a within‐subject design, 15 young men (25.6 ± 2.1 y; 77.3 ± 6.8 kg; 175.1 ± 5.7 cm) underwent a resistance training program twice a week for 10 weeks (3–5 sets, 8–12RM), and their arms were dominant‐side balanced, randomly assigned to one of the two conditions according to elbow flexion exercises: unilateral cable curl with shoulder flexed (Preacher curl; PREA) or unilateral cable curl with shoulder extended (Bayesian curl; BAYE). B‐mode ultrasound imaging was used to measure changes in muscle thickness of the biceps brachii and brachialis at proximal, mid, and distal arm regions, and one‐repetition maximum tests were completed in each respective trained exercise before and after training. Both conditions showed significant increases in muscle thickness (p < 0.05) with no significant differences between them (p > 0.05) across the biceps brachii proximal, mid, and distal regions (relative change [Hedges' g effect size]; PREA: 6%[0.51], 7%[0.49], 7%[0.53]; BAYE: 9%[0.73], 9%[0.62], 9%[0.62]) and brachialis (PREA: 10%[0.72]; BAYE: 8%[0.65]). Similarly, significant improvements in maximum strength were observed (p < 0.05), with equivalent results between conditions (PREA: 28%[0.85], BAYE: 37%[1.22]; equivalence testing, p‐values = 0.061, 0.637). In conclusion, the shoulder joint angle does not seem to affect muscle hypertrophy and maximum strength gains after different elbow flexion exercises matched for resistance profiles.

Download