Rachel Waters’s research while affiliated with University of Oxford and other places

Although survival of children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia has improved greatly in the past two decades, the outcome of those who relapse has remained static. We investigated the outcome of children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia who relapsed on present therapeutic regimens. This open-label randomised trial was undertaken in 22 centres in the UK and Ireland and nine in Australia and New Zealand. Patients aged 1-18 years with first relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia were stratified into high-risk, intermediate-risk, and standard-risk groups on the basis of duration of first complete remission, site of relapse, and immunophenotype. All patients were allocated to receive either idarubicin or mitoxantrone in induction by stratified concealed randomisation. Neither patients nor those giving interventions were masked. After three blocks of therapy, all high-risk group patients and those from the intermediate group with postinduction high minimal residual disease (≥10(-4) cells) received an allogenic stem-cell transplant. Standard-risk and intermediate-risk patients with postinduction low minimal residual disease (<10(-4) cells) continued chemotherapy. The primary outcome was progression-free survival and the method of analysis was intention-to-treat. Randomisation was stopped in December, 2007 because of differences in progression-free and overall survival between the two groups. This trial is registered, reference number ISCRTN45724312. Of 239 registered patients, 216 were randomly assigned to either idarubicin (109 analysed) or mitoxantrone (103 analysed). Estimated 3-year progression-free survival was 35·9% (95% CI 25·9-45·9) in the idarubicin group versus 64·6% (54·2-73·2) in the mitoxantrone group (p=0·0004), and 3-year overall survival was 45·2% (34·5-55·3) versus 69·0% (58·5-77·3; p=0·004). Differences in progression-free survival between groups were mainly related to a decrease in disease events (progression, second relapse, disease-related deaths; HR 0·56, 0·34-0·92, p=0·007) rather than an increase in adverse treatment effects (treatment death, second malignancy; HR 0·52, 0·24-1·11, p=0·11). As compared with idarubicin, mitoxantrone conferred a significant benefit in progression-free and overall survival in children with relapsed acute lymphobastic leukaemia, a potentially useful clinical finding that warrants further investigation. Cancer Research UK, Leukaemia and Lymphoma Research, Cancer Council NSW, and Sporting Chance Cancer Foundation.

3390 Poster Board III-278 Introduction While the outcome of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has steadily improved, the prognosis for those who relapse (rALL) remains poor. Partly this has been due to the lack of a standardised approach to children with rALL. The international collaborative trial ALLR3 stratified patients into standard (SR), intermediate (IR) and high risk (HR) groups based on the time from first diagnosis to relapse, site of relapse and immunophenotype. All patients received 3 blocks of therapy, with a minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment at the end of blocks 1 and 3. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) was offered to all HR and those IR who had a MRD of ≥10-4 at week 5. In children in whom MRD was unavailable, allo-SCT was offered to those who relapsed within 24 months of stopping therapy. All other patients continued on chemotherapy for 24 months. A day 1 and 2 randomisation was performed between mitoxantrone and idarubicin. Results 239 patients were enlisted, of whom 216 were randomised and 109 idarubicin and 103 mitoxantrone patients are analysable. There were non-significant differences between the groups with regards to time to relapse, site of relapse and cytogenetic subtypes.108 (51%) were in CR2 at a median follow up of 36 months (range 1-70) and Progression Free Survival (PFS) at 3 years was 50.3% (95% CI 42.9%, 57.3%). Forty four percent of idarubicin and 40% of mitoxantrone patients had disease levels of ≥10-4 at week 5 (p=0.90) at the end of block 1. The PFS at 3 years for those who received idarubicin was 35.9% (25.9%, 45.9%) and mitoxantrone 64.6% (54.2%, 73.2%) (p=0.0004). Adjusted for differences in risk group, country, age, gender and cytogenetic subtype, this difference continues to be significant (p=0.003). Overall mitoxantrone was better tolerated and less toxic than idarubicin. A competing risks model showed that the difference between the two drugs is primarily related to disease control (p=0.02), rather than toxicity of treatment (p=0.09). In the patients who were transplanted, 35% and 5% of patients who received idarubicin (n = 48) or mitoxantrone (n = 44) respectively have relapsed. Based on the intention to treat analyses, there were non significant differences in patients treated without an allo-SCT in both arms. IR patients who were transplanted did worse (p = 0.01) in the idarubicin group but had comparable results in the mitoxantrone group to those who received chemotherapy. As a result the randomisation in ALLR3 has now been closed, though the study continues to accrue to better answer the MRD stratification question. Conclusions Mitoxantrone is a well tolerated and highly effective drug for the treatment of children with rALL. While MRD at week 5 failed to predict the differences in outcome for the two randomised groups, it identified that children in the IR group with <10-4 could be treated without an allo-SCT. Disclosures Off Label Use: Although Idarubicin and Mitoxantrone have been shown to be effective in ALL, they are not licensed for use in children in the UK. .