May 2025
·
2 Reads
Combustion and Flame
This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.
May 2025
·
2 Reads
Combustion and Flame
April 2025
·
3 Reads
Combustion and Flame
March 2025
March 2025
·
2 Reads
March 2025
·
12 Reads
March 2025
March 2025
March 2025
March 2025
March 2025
... However, achieving sub-micron resolutions in three-dimensions becomes computationally demanding and next-to-infeasible on very large computational domains. Therefore, to keep the computations feasible while ensuring adequate resolution across the induction zone, we shift to the shock-frame of reference (SFR) [11,12]. For an in-depth analysis on the equivalence of the shock and lab-frames of reference and the correctness of the shock-frame, readers are referred to our other AIAA SciTech 2025 paper focused on this aspect [11]. ...
January 2025
... Three droplet sizes of 5, 10, and 20 µm are chosen to investigate the effect of droplet diameter on the resultant detonation properties. The [52,53]. It will be shown below that the obtained detonation cell sizes are smaller than the channel height, even for the largest droplet size. ...
January 2024
Proceedings of the Combustion Institute
... Two-phase detonation physics involves the interaction of fuel droplets with detonation waves that are characterized by shocks of Mach number M ∼ 5. Shock impact is expected to cause catastrophic breakup and vaporization of fuel droplets, in large Weber number regimes (We > 1000) [1], where surface tension effects become negligible. Previous experimental investigations of shock-droplet interactions [2][3][4][5][6] have demonstrated that droplets impacted by sufficiently strong shocks undergo rapid flattening, followed by expansion and vaporization substantially faster than what would be predicted by the d 2 law; droplet vaporization time instead varies linearly with initial droplet diameter. The same behavior and linear relationship were confirmed for nanometer-sized droplets by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations [7]. ...
January 2024
Proceedings of the Combustion Institute
... Available KHRT parameters in published literature are primarily calibrated for either the primary atomization of a liquid column jet or diesel spray injection. Using these default parameters for detonation-droplet interactions yield droplet lifetimes that are two orders of magnitude smaller than what is observed in experiments [21][22][23]27]. The child droplets generated are significantly smaller than expected. ...
January 2024
... When the equivalent ratio is 0.3, the shock train begins to develop with the transverse expansion of the combustion flow field, and the local subsonic zone is confirmed. Emil Alunno et al. [55] studied and explored flame stability in the combustion chamber of a scramjet. It was found that when the equivalent ratio is between 0.97 and 1.22, the flame can be stabilized after ignition. ...
January 2024
... Many studies have been conducted on the secondary atomization (breakup) of droplets colliding with non-reacting shock waves [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. There are many similarities between shock-droplet and detonation-droplet interactions, but fundamental differences in the physics of detonation-droplet interactions require additional attention, especially for RDREs [16]. ...
January 2024
... The aforementioned studies primarily focus on the impact of droplet diameter on the speed and structure of detonation waves, lacking an exploration of droplet breakup dynamics. Research on droplet breakup dynamics can be found in the recent work of Salauddin et al. 42 They studied the breakup of droplets under the influence of shock waves and detonation waves, discovering that the breakup is significantly more extensive under detonation waves due to the intense gas dynamics and chemical kinetics involved. This study shows that droplet breakup characteristics induced by detonation waves differ significantly from those in non-reactive flows, highlighting the need for further in-depth research. ...
May 2023
Shock Waves
... 1 Detonations occur as a unique form of pressure-gain combustion that augments flow momentum and produces significant rises in stagnation pressure. 2 Detonation has a higher thermodynamic efficiency than existing isobaric combustion methods in aviation engines and is often applied to different forms of detonation engines. [3][4][5][6] Among them, pulse detonation engines (PDE) have been widely researched due to their mechanical simplicity and higher thrust-toweight ratio. ...
April 2023
... The value for volume-fraction is estimated based on the liquid fuel injection rate and is approximately 9 × 10 −5 . Even though realistic RDEs would employ liquid injectors which result in a wide distribution of droplets size and velocity [56], to fundamentally understand the effect of injected droplet size on mixing, vaporization, and detonation propagation, a monodisperse injection is considered here. The initialization procedure of the detonation wave in the periodic channel is carefully designed to minimize any numerical artifacts. ...
November 2022
Proceedings of the Combustion Institute
... In terms of terminology, we can distinguish two subcategories of deflagration regimes: the slow deflagration regime, which corresponds to front speeds s f < S CJ and the choked deflagration regime, which corresponds to front speeds s f > S CJ . 29 The latter is inherently unstable since its shock-flame complex is attracted toward DDT. According to Poludnenko et al., 30 in unconfined medium, S CJ could be approximated to S CJ ¼ a b =a, where a b is the sound speed in the burnt gases of an isobaric combustion, and a is the density ratio across the flame: a ¼ q f =q b (f : fresh reactants and b: burnt gases). ...
November 2022
Proceedings of the Combustion Institute