Quan Zhou’s research while affiliated with Sun Yat-sen University and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Locations of the test supraglacial lakes. (A) Locations of test Lakes 1 to 5. The red polygons represent the areas of the supraglacial lakes. The blue box shows the coverage of the ArcticDEM strip data we used. The background is a Landsat-8 OLI image acquired on 2021 July 15. (B) Locations of test Lake 6. The background is a Sentinel-2 MSI image acquired on 2019 June 17. (C) Location of test Lake 7. The background is a Landsat-8 OLI image acquired on 2021 August 2. (D) Enlargement of the 7 test lakes. The background is a true color image acquired from either Landsat-8 or Sentinel-2 (Table S2). The orange lines show the ICESat-2 ground tracks that pass through each lake.
Flowchart of supraglacial lake depth estimation and comparisons between different methods.
Example results for each step of the improved ALD algorithm. (A) Raw photons. The black box indicates the frozen part of the lake. (B) Results after initial filtering (DRAGANN). (C) Results after photon separation at the bottom and surface. (D) Further filtering results for surface photons. (E) Further denoising of bottom photons. The black dots are the contours of the lake bottom before refraction correction. The red box indicates where the edge of the lake needs to be connected. (F) True color image of an example lake and the ICESat-2 track location.
Results of lake depth estimation from Landsat-8 L1 data and in comparison with refraction-corrected ICESat-2 lake bottom data in one dimension for (A) Lake 1, (B) Lake 2, (C) Lake 5, and (D) Lake 7.
Results of lake depth estimation from Sentinel-2 L1C data and in comparison with refraction-corrected ICESat-2 lake bottom data in one dimension for (A) Lake 1, (B) Lake 2, (C) Lake 3, (D) Lake 4, (E) Lake 5, and (F) Lake 6.

+6

Supraglacial Lake Depth Retrieval from ICESat-2 and Multispectral Imagery Datasets
  • Article
  • Full-text available

February 2025

·

130 Reads

Quan Zhou

·

·

Wanxin Xiao

·

[...]

·

Supraglacial lakes play an important role in the surface mass balance of ice sheets. With global warming, supraglacial lakes may become more extensive on ice sheet surfaces than they currently are. Therefore, accurate estimation of the volume of supraglacial lakes is important for characterizing their impact on ice sheets. In this study, we present a machine learning-based method for estimating the depth of supraglacial lakes through the combination of ICESat-2 ATL03 data with multispectral imagery. We tested this method via Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 imagery and evaluated the accuracy of the algorithm on 7 test lakes on the Greenland Ice Sheet. Our results show that machine learning-based algorithms achieve better accuracy than traditional regression or physics-based methods do, especially for deeper lakes. The best accuracy was achieved when extreme gradient boosting was applied to a Sentinel-2 L1C image, with root mean square error, mean absolute error, and median absolute error values of 0.54 m, 0.43 m, and 0.36 m, respectively. Furthermore, we evaluated the effects of atmospheric corrections of multispectral imagery in the retrieval of supraglacial lake depth. On the basis of our results, we recommend the direct use of top-of-atmosphere reflectance products in mapping supraglacial lake bathymetry because of the low performance of atmospheric corrections for water and snow/ice in both the Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 datasets. This study is expected to provide a more efficient method for estimating the depth of supraglacial lakes and laying the foundation for accurately quantifying meltwater volumes over large surface areas in subsequent studies.

Download