Philipp Diefenthaler’s research while affiliated with University of Augsburg and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (12)


Using Gap Analysis to Support Feedback Loops for Enterprise Architecture Management
  • Book

November 2018

·

25 Reads

·

1 Citation

Philipp Diefenthaler

·


Interactive Transformation Path Generation Using Business Support Maps

June 2015

·

32 Reads

Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

Enterprise architecture (EA) management supports transformation path planning to facilitate the change from the current to the target architecture. We create parts of these transformation paths automatically using the information from current and target business support maps. Restrictions on the business support maps, i.e. areas which shall remain stable and which shall be transformed, are modeled by an enterprise architect to allow for a goal oriented transformation path generation. The transformation paths serve as project proposals for the project portfolio management. Necessary changes to the EA are prioritized and estimated. Our solution uses a graph transformation based approach to allow for an interactive creation of possible transformation paths. The transformation paths are the state transitions of a graph transition system, which we create from an EA model. We weigh the effort of each transformation according cost, time and risk.



Unternehmensarchitekturen mit Semantischen Technologien

October 2014

·

31 Reads

·

3 Citations

HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik

Jens Ortmann

·

Philipp Diefenthaler

·

·

[...]

·

Wir präsentieren eine Lösung für das Business-IT-Alignment in Unternehmen, um eine solide Informationsbasis für fundierte und sichere Entscheidungen aufzubauen. Die Grundlage dazu findet sich in einer semantischen Unternehmensarchitektur, einem ganzheitlichen, formalen Modell der zentralen Artefakte eines Unternehmens und ihrer Beziehungen. Semantic Enterprise Architecture Management setzt semantische Technologien ein, um Unternehmensarchitekturen formal zu modellieren, vorhandene Datenquellen direkt darin zu integrieren und auf dieser Basis komplexe Analysen oder auch die automatisierte Planung von Veränderungen in IT-Landschaften zu unterstützen. Der Einsatz semantischer Technologien reduziert den Aufwand für den Aufbau einer Unternehmensarchitektur und gewährleistet gleichzeitig die Aktualität und Konsistenz der bereitgestellten Informationen. Die Formalisierung der Unternehmensarchitektur macht die dort vorliegenden Informationen auch für neuartige intelligente Werkzeuge nutzbar.


From Gaps to Transformation Paths in Enterprise Architecture Planning

July 2014

·

38 Reads

·

2 Citations

Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

Planning changes in an enterprise and its supporting IT can be supported by enterprise architecture (EA) models. The planned changes result in gaps which can be derived by a gap analysis. But, knowing the gaps is not enough. Also important is to know in which sequence gaps are to be closed for transformation path planning. In this paper we show how gaps are identified and reused for detailing a model of the target architecture. Based on this refinement further gaps become visible. Furthermore, we describe how it is possible to create with a transformation model and an action repository transformation paths towards a desired and detailed target architecture. Afterwards, we give a use case example and propose a technical realization of the solution.



Planning Support for Enterprise Changes

November 2013

·

19 Reads

·

5 Citations

Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

Enterprises have to react to changes with an increasing speed in order to stay competitive. Many approaches support the modeling of enterprise architectures but lack an evolution of enterprise architectures through demonstrating a transformation path from one architecture state to another. Enterprises know their strategic goals and are able to model them, but are not supported towards achieving these goals in terms of developing their architecture. We want to improve the current manual creation of the transformation paths in enterprise architecture planning by providing possible and sound sequences of actions as part of a roadmap from the current to a desired target architecture. Therefore, we present a solution that supports the enterprise architect with proposals for a transformation path from the current to the target state considering dependencies to be taken into account during the enterprise transformation.


Semantic enterprise architecture management

January 2013

·

92 Reads

·

28 Citations

Enterprise architecture management (EAM) provides information about an enterprise and its information systems landscape for thorough analysis. Semantic technologies allow for integrating data sets from various relevant information sources within enterprises in a so-called EA repository, which serves as a comprehensive formal information base for EAM. We call this approach Semantic Enterprise Architecture Management, SEAM for short. We show how SEAM uses semantic technologies to bridge the heterogeneity between various data sets relevant for EAM, such as The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF) models, Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN) business process models and Service-oriented Architecture (SOA) models. Query answering and reasoning enable detailed analysis and consistency checks on the SEAM repository in order to discover complex dependencies and implicit knowledge.



Figure 1: Approach for creating a SEAM repository.
Figure 2: Excerpt of SEAM TOGAF 9 content metamodel Ontology.
Figure 2 can be represented in OWL 2 functionalstyle syntax (FSS). The following excerpt includes the relevant part of T-and A-Box, but omits the definition of object properties and object property assertions.
Figure 3: Excerpt of SEAM BPMN 2.0 Ontology.
Figure 4: Excerpt of SEAM SOA Ontology.
Semantic enterprise architecture management
  • Book
  • Full-text available

January 2013

·

242 Reads

·

1 Citation

Download

Citations (8)


... However, they have not recognized and defined a Gap of Changes as a pattern, repeatedly used used by different business roles for planning and implementation activities. (Diefenthaler and Bauer, 2013) have recognised a Gap of Changes and proposed a solution for "gap analysis using semantic web technologies on a highlevel current and target state of an enterprise architecture". The authors identify only the replacement relations between elements of two architectures, whereas also other relations exist between the elements of As-Is and To-Be architectures. ...

Reference:

Analytic Pattern and Tool for Analysis of a Gap of Changes in Enterprise Architectures
Gap Analysis in Enterprise Architecture using Semantic Web Technologies
  • Citing Book
  • January 2013

... The purpose of the gap analysis in the EA context is the determination of differences, respectively gaps, between two different architectural models [The18,DB14]. Thereby both models are described using the same schema and elements in the two models can be identified using names or IDs. Its goal is to identify newly added elements and elements that no longer exist. ...

From Gaps to Transformation Paths in Enterprise Architecture Planning
  • Citing Article
  • January 2014

... The IS change management and governance, according to the best practices, are defined in several standards. Enterprise architecture (EA) provides the basis for strategic level evaluation of the changes in IS [10], [11]. EA frameworks such as TOGAF provide general guidelines for EA change management. ...

Planning Support for Enterprise Changes
  • Citing Conference Paper
  • November 2013

Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

... EA Management is a discipline for managing architectural development across an organization, coordinating people to achieve and maintain IS, and improving business efficiency and effectiveness [11]. This includes constructing architectural models within large enterprises and complex information system landscapes containing many data sources with relevant information for a complete EA description, which may consist of business process models, software documentation, and service documentation, among others [12]. ...

Semantic enterprise architecture management
  • Citing Article
  • January 2013

... To support the enterprise architect in finding the successor relationships, we analyze the similarity of the elements in the current and target architecture. The automatic derivation of successor relationships for applications based on business support maps and suggestions for successor services is described by Diefenthaler and Bauer [26]. However, this approach is limited to architectures, where applications are localized in the cells of a business support map. ...

Gap analysis in enterprise architecture using semanticweb technologies
  • Citing Article
  • January 2013

... To enhance the applicability in different EAs the model is stored utilizing a generic meta model that represents the architecture as a stereotyped graph. The A2E and the utilized analyses are results of previous work [4,8]. For analysis execution A2E converts the analysis definitions into executable constructs. ...

From Gaps to Transformation Paths in Enterprise Architecture Planning
  • Citing Conference Paper
  • July 2014

Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

... The applied snowballing methodology resulted in a final set of 20 papers (Diefenthaler, 2016;Farwick et al., 2016;Fittkau et al., 2015;Hacks et al., 2016;Holm et al., 2014;Johnson et al.,2016;Kirschner and Roth, 2014;Möhring and Schmidt, 2015;Ortmann et al., 2014;Rosina, 2015;Roth, 2014;Roth and Matthes, 2014;Schmidt et al., 2014a;Schmidt et al., 2014b;Välja et al., 2016;Välja et al., 2015;Vanauer et al., 2015;Zimmermann et al., 2016;Zimmermann et al., 2017;Zimmermann et al., 2015). In this section, the content of these papers and the results of the classification are discussed. ...

Unternehmensarchitekturen mit Semantischen Technologien
  • Citing Article
  • October 2014

HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik