Philip A. E. Brey’s research while affiliated with University of Twente and other places

... (i) cause new inequalities, by providing individuals and groups with superior abilities not possessed by others; (ii) exacerbate existing social inequalities and engender new ones, by creating new social identities and challenging or reifying existing conceptions of identity, including what is considered "normal" or typical, unusual or deviant; and/or (iii) put pressure on unenhanced persons to enhance themselves (2022, p. 837) To address these related concerns, Erden and Brey (2022) assert that no work or educational requirement should directly or indirectly require or make reference to an enhancement. They recommend that "human enhancements that are internal to the body or are irreversible should not be specifically developed for workplace or education applications … [such as through] normalizing human enhancement for employment prospects, career progression and development, or education, and thus creating undesirable social pressure for it to be used." ...

Reference:

Moral equality and reprogenetic autonomy in the genomic era