Per-Håkan S. Ekberg’s research while affiliated with University of Wisconsin–Madison and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Test of an ordering hypothesis in risky decision making
  • Article

August 1980

·

13 Reads

·

77 Citations

Acta Psychologica

Lola L. Lopes

·

Per-Håkan S. Ekberg

A primed response time task was used to test the hypothesis that judgments in risky decision making involve an anchoring and adjustment procedure in which the amount to be won in a gamble serves as the anchor and is reduced in accord with the probability of winning. As predicted, the data revealed that priming with the amount to be won allowed faster choices between gambles and sure things than priming with the probability of winning. The experiment is discussed in terms of serial fractionation, which is a form of anchoring and adjustment that is equivalent to analog multiplication.

Citations (1)


... These studies have also provided discussions of the nature of the cognitive processes thought to underlie the AW model, arguing the process can bedressed in terms of serial fractionation, or anchoring-and-adjustment (Licthenstein & Slovic, 1971;Carlson, 1990;Lopes & Ekberg, 1980;Lopes, 1982;Ganzach, 1996;Schlottmann, 2001). Here, the general idea is that the amount to win serves as a natural anchor and people then adjust this amount downward in order to incorporate the aspect of the probability of the win. ...

Reference:

Integrating Probability-and Value Information in Judgment and Decision-Making under Risk Cognitive Processes, Competence, and Performance
Test of an ordering hypothesis in risky decision making
  • Citing Article
  • August 1980

Acta Psychologica