January 2015
·
21 Reads
·
3 Citations
Perspectives in Public Health
This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.
January 2015
·
21 Reads
·
3 Citations
Perspectives in Public Health
November 2013
·
101 Reads
·
15 Citations
Mental Health Review Journal
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to establish that social determinants are vital contributing factors to mental health difficulties and that, similar to physical health, mental health follows a social gradient. Despite this acknowledgement, there is a rhetoric/reality gap found in social determinants of mental health (SDMH). It will be argued in this paper that this rhetoric/reality gap is located on a number of levels, including theoretical, methodological, practical, political and policy based, which are proposed here to be interrelated. Design/methodology/approach – The approach is a conceptual analysis of the rhetoric/reality gap found in SDMH using a critical perspective. It draws on a wide variety of theories in order to provide an analysis of the issues outlined. Findings – The paper's central finding is that there is a dissonance between the dominant ontological, epistemological and methodological, or axiomatic, focus in contemporary mental health theory and practice and SDMH. This dissonance has led to a form of “analysis paralysis” on all levels, and the initiatives required to tackle SDMH have been marginalised in favour of a narrow interpretation of evidence-based research and its accompanying ideology centring on the individual, which has established itself as a primary position on what constitutes valid knowledge to the detriment of other views. Originality/value – The paper offers a critical perspective on an area of SDMH which is often alluded to but never explicitly explored, and questions the underlying assumptions inherent to mental health theory and practice. The paper's value is that it draws attention to this particular dilemma on a wider scale, including on a political and policy-based level, which is often neglected in mental health theory, and it makes some recommendations on how to move forward.
... The growing research in how social inequalities, in such areas as housing, employment, health care, resources, money, education, and power, contribute to disparities in health have pointed to how a person's environment can affect their well-being (Hess et al., 2014;Larsson, 2015). The World Health Organization (WHO) explained that mental distress needs to be more understood in terms of how social injustices and how general deprivation of resources effect emotional, intellectual, and spiritual health rather than focusing primarily on an individual's pathology (Friedli, 2009;Hess et al., 2014). ...
January 2015
Perspectives in Public Health
... More critical approaches to understanding mental health have highlighted the importance of context, including personal histories, relationships, cultural and political systems, and the policies that result [21,45]. Following this rationale, more critical understandings of mental health view people's distress and crisis as significantly impacted by complex, immensely challenging living conditions, and social injustices [21,46], including the social determinants of health [18,19,[47][48][49]. The social determinants of health refer to the 'quantity and quality of a variety of resources that a society makes available to its members' [50] (p. 2) and acknowledge that factors such as income, employment, housing, working conditions, food security, social isolation, racialization, and gender, among others, intersect and significantly impact people's mental health and wellbeing [17,48,50]. ...
November 2013
Mental Health Review Journal