Patricio Melillanca's scientific contributions
What is this page?
This page lists the scientific contributions of an author, who either does not have a ResearchGate profile, or has not yet added these contributions to their profile.
It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.
If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.
If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.
It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.
If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.
If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.
Publications (2)
Purpose
The authors use media research and crowdsourced mapping to document how the first wave of the pandemic (April–August 2020) affected the Mapuche, focussing on seven categories of events: territorial control, spiritual defence, food sovereignty, traditional health practices, political violence, territorial needs and solidarity, and extractivi...
In this report we explain the methodology and initial findings of the project ‘Mapeando el Coronavirus en Wallmapu’, a crowdsourced mapping project that aims to monitor and analyze the impact of the pandemic in Wallmapu, recording community health and solidarities initiatives, and instances of political violence and extractivist activities.
Citations
... The participatory mapping tradition understands this process as a means to support positive social change, legitimising knowledge by historically marginalised groups (Elwood, 2006). At its best, this approach can help to subvert the God trick of disaster science by contributing to historicise and politicise knowledge about disasters (Carraro et al., 2022), diffracting official risk maps through indigenous knowledge (Camacho and Matus, 2021) and providing a much needed "trusted ground" for dialogue collaboration between actors (Gaillard and Mercer, 2013). In practice, however, the emphasis of participatory mapping exercises tends to be less on questioning or reframing existing knowledge, and more on tangible results. ...
![[object Object]](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/875209884176390-1585677705331_Q64/Valentina-Carraro-2.jpg)
![[object Object]](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/11431281180685706-1691676326183_Q64/Sarah-Kelly-24.jpg)
![[object Object]](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/1007762750332928-1617280771160_Q64/Jose-Luis-Vargas.jpg)
![[object Object]](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/1074562083069952-1633206973345_Q64/Jose-Valdes-Negroni.jpg)
