Paolo Moretti’s research while affiliated with Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (66)


Network models. (a) In a system of s hierarchical levels, N=L2(Lz+1)\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$N = L^2 (L_z+1)$$\end{document}, nodes are distributed in a 3D cubic lattice of lateral size L=2s\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$L=2^s$$\end{document} and thickness Lz=1+s\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$L_z=1+s$$\end{document}. The case of s=4\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$s=4$$\end{document} is shown. The boundaries at x=L\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$x=L$$\end{document} (shown in gray) and y=L\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$y=L$$\end{document} (not shown) are periodic. The nodes are connected by edges to form a fully connected cubic lattice; (b) horizontal (film-parallel) edges are recursively removed to form cuts which create a deterministic hierarchical cut pattern. The s-th hierarchical level comprises no cuts. For 0<i<s\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$0<i<s$$\end{document}, the i-th hierarchical level comprises 2s-i-1\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$2^{s-i-1}$$\end{document} cuts of height i in the x direction and an equal number in the y direction. The cases i=1\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$i=1$$\end{document}, i=2\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$i=2$$\end{document}, i=3\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$i=3$$\end{document} are shown in red, blue, green respectively. Periodic boundaries are introduced as additional highest-level cuts (pale green). (c) 3D view of the deterministic cut structure of (b). For clarity of representation, the two pale green boundary cuts are not shown. (d) A single realization of the hierarchical network model for s=4\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$s=4$$\end{document} obtained as a stochastic variant of (b). (e) Single realization of the hierarchical network model for s=6\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$s=6$$\end{document}, corresponding to L=64\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$L=64$$\end{document}, the smallest system size considered in this work. (f) Non-hierarchical variant of (e), where removed horizontal edges are randomly distributed throughout the system. Figure generated using matplotlib 3.8, https://matplotlib.org.
Simulation details. (a) Probability density functions of the failure thresholds used in this work. High heterogeneity: k=1.5\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$k=1.5$$\end{document} (dash-dotted lines). Low heterogeneity: k=4\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$k=4$$\end{document} (solid lines). Distributions with average t¯=10\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\bar{t}=10$$\end{document} (blue lines) describe situations where cohesive forces are much larger than adhesive forces. (b) Typical stress-strain curve under displacement control (thick black line), constructed by enveloping the stress-strain curve obtained from a quasi-static simulation (thin blue line). Figure generated using matplotlib 3.8, https://matplotlib.org.
Fracture profiles. (a) Fracture height profile h=h(x,y)\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$h=h(x,y)$$\end{document} for a non-hierarchical sample, L=256\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$L=256,$$\end{document}k=1.5\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$k=1.5$$\end{document}. (b,c) Probability density p(h) for non-hierarchical systems, k=1.5\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$k=1.5$$\end{document} and k=4\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$k=4$$\end{document} respectively. (d) Fracture height profile h=h(x,y)\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$h=h(x,y)$$\end{document} for a hierarchical sample, L=256\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$L=256$$\end{document}, k=1.5\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$k=1.5$$\end{document}. (e,f) Probability density p(h) for hierarchical systems, k=1.5\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$k=1.5$$\end{document} and k=4\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$k=4$$\end{document} respectively. Figure generated using matplotlib 3.8, https://matplotlib.org.
Fracture strength. Peak stress and specific work of failure for varying notch sizes a. Top: k=4\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$k=4$$\end{document} (small fluctuations in local strength), (a) m=1\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$m=1$$\end{document} (comparable cohesive and adhesive forces), (b) m=10\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$m=10$$\end{document} (large cohesive forces, weak interface). Bottom: k=1.5\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$k=1.5$$\end{document} (large fluctuations in local strength), (c) m=1\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$m=1$$\end{document} (comparable cohesive and adhesive forces), (d) m=10\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$m=10$$\end{document} (large cohesive forces, weak interface). Figure generated using matplotlib 3.8, https://matplotlib.org.
Multiscaling analysis of crack surfaces. (a) Non-hierarchical system, k=1.5\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$k=1.5$$\end{document}. (b) Hierarchical system, k=1.5\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$k=1.5$$\end{document}. (c) Non-hierarchical system, k=4\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$k=4$$\end{document}. (d) Hierarchical system, k=4\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$k=4$$\end{document}. Integer values of q between 1 and 9 are shown (from darker to brighter symbols). Insets show estimates of the local values of the exponent Hq\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$H_q$$\end{document}. Systems of size L=256\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$L=256$$\end{document} and thickness Lz=9\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$L_z=9$$\end{document} are considered. Figure generated using matplotlib 3.8, https://matplotlib.org.

+3

Tuning load redistribution and damage near heterogeneous interfaces
  • Article
  • Full-text available

November 2024

·

22 Reads

·

Paolo Moretti

·

We investigate interface failure of model materials representing architected thin films in contact with heterogeneous substrates. We find that, while systems with statistically isotropic distributions of impurities derive their fracture strength from the ability to develop rough detachment fronts, materials with hierarchical microstructures confine failure near a prescribed surface, where crack growth is arrested and crack surface correlations are suppressed. We develop a theory of network Green’s functions for the systems at hand, and we find that the ability of hierarchical microstructures to control failure mode and locations comes at no performance cost in terms of peak stress and specific work of failure and derives from the quenched local anistotropy of the elastic interaction kernel.

Download

Tuning load redistribution and damage near heterogeneous interfaces

May 2024

·

63 Reads

We investigate interface failure of model materials representing architected thin films in contact with heterogeneous substrates. We find that, while systems with statistically isotropic distributions of impurities derive their fracture strength from the ability to develop rough detachment fronts, materials with hierarchical microstructures confine failure near a prescribed surface, where crack growth is arrested and crack surface correlations are suppressed. We develop a theory of network Green's functions for the systems at hand, and we find that the ability of hierarchical microstructures to control failure mode and locations comes at no performance cost in terms of peak stress and specific work of failure and derives from the quenched local anistotropy of the elastic interaction kernel.


Top: iterative “top-down” construction of a deterministic hierarchical beam network: a beam network is divided by load-parallel cuts (removal of vertically adjacent cross links) into four highest-level modules. These form two groups of two modules loaded in series, connected by a system spanning connector (the row of cross links shown in red); next, each of the four modules is again divided into four lower-level modules plus a module-spanning lateral connector, etc.; Bottom: Network variants as discussed in the text: Deterministic Hierarchical Beam Network (DHBN), Stochastic Hierarchical Beam Network (SHBN) and Random Beam Network (RBN).
Creep strain versus normalized time curves for structures of size L=512\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$L=512$$\end{document}; left: deterministic hierarchical beam network (DHBN): (a) un-notched, (c) notch length = 0.2L, (e) notch length = 0.4L; right: random beam network (RBN): (b) un-notched, (d) notch length = 0.2L, (f) notch length = 0.4L; each plot shows results of 20 simulated samples, the blue lines represent the average creep strain curves; for each crack length, the applied stress amounts to 80% of the mean RBN failure stress at the respective crack length: (σ/⟨σf⟩)\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$(\sigma /\langle \sigma _{\textrm{f}}\rangle )$$\end{document} = 0.04, 0.06, 0.16 for a=0.4L,0.2L,0\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$a = 0.4L, 0.2L, 0$$\end{document} respectively; for other parameters, see text.
Cumulative distribution of creep failure time for different structures of size L=512\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$L=512$$\end{document}, deterministic hierarchical beam network (DHBN) and random beam network (RBN): (a) un-notched, (b) notch length = 0.2L, (c) notch length = 0.4L; The constant applied stress on both DHBN and RBN is 80%\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$80\%$$\end{document} of the peak stresses of RBN for each crack length, which corresponds to creep stresses in units of the mean beam failure stress ⟨σB⟩\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\langle \sigma _{B}\rangle $$\end{document} of 0.04, 0.06 and 0.16 for systems with crack lengths a=0.4L,a=0.2L\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$a= 0.4L, a= 0.2L$$\end{document}, and a=0\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$a=0$$\end{document}, respectively. Each plot represents the results of 20 simulations. For other parameters, see text.
Axial strain ϵyy\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\epsilon _{yy}$$\end{document} map, left: deterministic hierarchical beam network (DHBN), right: random beam network (RBN) structures of size L=512\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$L=512$$\end{document}-during creep steady state step at 0.5 failure time tc\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$t_{c}$$\end{document} in a creep simulation; The constant applied stress on both DHBN and RBN is 80% of the peak stress of RBN which is 0.06 in unit of mean beam failure stress ⟨σB⟩\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\langle \sigma _{B}\rangle $$\end{document} for systems having 0.2L precrack length. The precrack is marked in gray, for other parameters, see text.
Avalanche size distributions (probability vs. number of broken beams) during the different stages of the creep curve.
Creep failure of hierarchical materials

February 2024

·

135 Reads

Creep failure of hierarchical materials is investigated by simulation of beam network models. Such models are idealizations of hierarchical fibrous materials where bundles of load-carrying fibers are held together by multi-level (hierarchical) cross-links. Failure of individual beams is assumed to be governed by stress-assisted thermal activation over local barriers, and beam stresses are computed by solving the global balance equations of linear and angular momentum across the network. Disorder is mimicked by a statistical distribution of barrier heights. Both initially intact samples and samples containing side notches of various length are considered. Samples with hierarchical cross-link patterns are simulated alongside reference samples where cross-links are placed randomly without hierarchical organization. The results demonstrate that hierarchical patterning may strongly increase creep strain and creep lifetime while reducing the lifetime variation. This is due to the fact that hierarchical patterning induces a failure mode that differs significantly from the standard scenario of failure by nucleation and growth of a critical crack. Characterization of this failure mode demonstrates good agreement between the present simulations and experimental findings on hierarchically patterned paper sheets.


Failure Precursors and Failure Mechanisms in Hierarchically Patterned Paper Sheets in Tensile and Creep Loading

August 2023

·

53 Reads

·

6 Citations

Physical Review Applied

·

·

·

[...]

·

Quasibrittle materials endowed with (statistically) self-similar hierarchical microstructures show distinct failure patterns that deviate from the standard scenario of damage accumulation followed by crack nucleation and growth. Here we study the failure of paper sheets with hierarchical slice patterns as well as nonhierarchical and unpatterned reference samples, considering both uncracked samples and samples containing a macroscopic crack. Failure is studied under displacement-controlled tensile loading as well as under creep conditions. Acoustic emission records and surface strain patterns are recorded alongside stress-strain and creep curves. The measurements demonstrate that hierarchical patterning efficiently mitigates against strain localization and crack propagation. In tensile loading, this results in a significantly increased residual strength of cracked samples. Under creep conditions, for a given range of lifetimes, hierarchically patterned samples are found to sustain larger creep strains at higher stress levels; their creep curves show unusual behavior characterized by multiple creep rate minima due to the repeated arrest of emergent localization bands.


Enhanced fault tolerance in biomimetic hierarchical materials: A simulation study

May 2023

·

32 Reads

·

5 Citations

Physical Review Materials

Hierarchical microstructures are often invoked to explain the high resilience and fracture toughness of biological materials such as bone and nacre. Biomimetic material models inspired by such hierarchical biomaterials face the obvious challenge of capturing their inherent multiscale complexity, both in experiments and in simulations. To study the influence of hierarchical microstructure on fracture properties, we propose a large-scale three-dimensional hierarchical beam-element simulation framework, in which we generalize the constitutive framework of Timoshenko beam elasticity and maximum distortion energy theory failure criteria to the complex case of hierarchical networks of up to six self-similar hierarchical levels, consisting of approximately 5 million elements. We perform a statistical study of stress-strain relationships and fracture surface morphologies and conclude that hierarchical systems are capable of arresting crack propagation, an ability that reduces their sensitivity to preexisting damage and enhances their fault tolerance compared to reference fibrous materials without microstructural hierarchy.


Failure precursors and failure mechanisms in hierarchically patterned paper sheets in tensile and creep loading

March 2023

·

37 Reads

Quasi-brittle materials endowed with (statistically) self-similar hierarcical microstructures show distinct failure patterns that deviate from the standard scenario of damage accumulation followed by crack nucleation-and-growth. Here we study the failure of paper sheets with hierarchical slice patterns as well as non-hierarchical and unpatterned reference samples, considering both uncracked samples and samples containing a macroscopic crack. Failure is studied under displacement-controlled tensile loading as well as under creep conditions. Acoustic emission records and surface strain patterns are recorded alongside stress-strain and creep curves. The measurements demonstrate that hierarchical patterning efficiently mitigates against strain localization and crack propagation. In tensile loading, this results in a significantly increased residual strength of cracked samples. Under creep conditions, for a given range of lifetimes hierarchically patterned samples are found to sustain larger creep strains at higher stress levels; their creep curves show unusual behavior characterized by multiple creep rate minima due to the repeated arrest of emergent localization bands.


Predicting creep failure by machine learning - which features matter?

December 2022

·

77 Reads

·

8 Citations

Forces in Mechanics

Spatial and temporal features are studied with respect to their predictive value for failure time prediction in subcritical failure with machine learning (ML). Data are generated from simulations of a novel, brittle random fuse model (RFM), as well as elasto-plastic finite element simulations (FEM) of a stochastic plasticity model with damage, both models considering stochastic thermally activated damage/failure processes in disordered materials. Fuse networks are generated with hierarchical and nonhierarchical architectures. Random forests - a specific ML algorithm - allow us to measure the feature importance through a feature’s average error reduction. RFM simulation data are found to become more predictable with increasing system size and temperature. Increasing the load or the scatter in local materials properties has the opposite effect. Damage accumulation in these models proceeds in stochastic avalanches, and statistical signatures such as avalanche rate or magnitude have been discussed in the literature as predictors of incipient failure. However, in the present study such features proved of no measurable use to the ML models, which mostly rely on global or local strain for prediction. This suggests the strain as viable quantity to monitor in future experimental studies as it is accessible via digital image correlation.


Hierarchical Slice Patterns Inhibit Crack Propagation in Brittle Sheets

October 2022

·

52 Reads

·

8 Citations

Physical Review Applied

By introducing hierarchical patterns of load-parallel cuts into axially loaded brittle sheets, the resistance to propagation of mode-I cracks is very significantly enhanced. We demonstrate this effect by simulation of two-dimensional beam network models and experimentally by testing paper and polystyrene (PS) sheets that are sliced with a laser cutter to induce load-perpendicular hierarchical cut patterns. Samples endowed with nonhierarchical reference patterns of the same cut density and nonsliced sheets are considered for comparison. We demonstrate that hierarchical slicing can increase failure load, apparent fracture toughness, and work of fracture of notched paper and PS sheets by factors between 2 and 10.


Predicting Creep Failure by Machine Learning -- Which Features Matter?

August 2022

·

181 Reads

Spatial and temporal features are studied with respect to their predictive value for failure time prediction in subcritical failure with machine learning (ML). Data are generated from simulations of a novel, brittle random fuse model (RFM), as well as elasto-plastic finite element simulations (FEM) of a stochastic plasticity model with damage, both models considering stochastic thermally activated damage/failure processes in disordered materials. Fuse networks are generated with hierarchical and nonhierarchical architectures. Random forests - a specific ML algorithm - allow us to measure the feature importance through a feature's average error reduction. RFM simulation data are found to become more predictable with increasing system size and temperature. Increasing the load or the scatter in local materials properties has the opposite effect. Damage accumulation in these models proceeds in stochastic avalanches, and statistical signatures such as avalanche rate or magnitude have been discussed in the literature as predictors of incipient failure. However, in the present study such features proved of no measurable use to the ML models, which mostly rely on global or local strain for prediction. This suggests the strain as viable quantity to monitor in future experimental studies as it is accessible via digital image correlation.


Figure 5: Typical damage growth patterns, from the system's peak load (top) to global failure (bottom); left column: DHBL, right column: RBL.
Enhanced fault-tolerance in biomimetic hierarchical materials -- a simulation study

July 2022

·

51 Reads

Hierarchical microstructures are often invoked to explain the high resilience and fracture toughness of biological materials such as bone and nacre. Biomimetic material models inspired by those structural arrangements face the obvious challenge of capturing their inherent multi-scale complexity, both in experiments and in simulations. To study the influence of hierarchical microstructural patterns in fracture behavior, we propose a large scale three-dimensional hierarchical beam-element simulation framework, where we generalize the constitutive behavior of Timoshenko beam elasticity and Maximum Distortion Energy Theory failure criteria to the complex case of hierarchical networks of approximately 5 million elements. We perform a statistical study of stress-strain relationships and fracture surface mophologies, and conclude that hierarchical systems are capable of arresting crack propagation, an ability that reduces their sensitivity to pre-existing damage and enhances their fault tolerance compared to reference generic fibrous materials.


Citations (42)


... Such hierarchical microstructures are inspired by certain examples of flaw-tolerant protein-based biological materials, such as collagen and spider silk, where fibrous patterns repeat across scales in a self-similar fashion 7, 10-16 . Numerical and experimental results confirm the idea that hierarchical patterning efficiently mitigates against stress/strain concentrations at crack tips, effectively arresting propagation and promoting a diffuse mode of failure that is insensitive to the existence of even large flaws 17,18 and that has been recently associated with the formation of multifractal fracture surfaces 19,20 . ...

Reference:

Tuning load redistribution and damage near heterogeneous interfaces
Failure Precursors and Failure Mechanisms in Hierarchically Patterned Paper Sheets in Tensile and Creep Loading
  • Citing Article
  • August 2023

Physical Review Applied

... fracture surfaces with multiscaling properties. The same is true for hierarchical 3D bulk systems 20 . A conclusive multiscaling analysis of systems displaying both thin film geometries and hierarchical microstructures is still lacking. ...

Enhanced fault tolerance in biomimetic hierarchical materials: A simulation study
  • Citing Article
  • May 2023

Physical Review Materials

... Creep is one of many time-dependent phenomena that have effects on the mechanical behavior of viscoelastic material [1] and integrity of artificial structures, such as deflection in columns, reduction in stiffness, buckling failure, growth of crack fronts in concrete, and applications in pressure vessels for aerospace vehicles [2], nuclear reactors [3] and failure predictions [4]. ...

Predicting creep failure by machine learning - which features matter?
  • Citing Article
  • December 2022

Forces in Mechanics

... Such hierarchical microstructures are inspired by certain examples of flaw-tolerant protein-based biological materials, such as collagen and spider silk, where fibrous patterns repeat across scales in a self-similar fashion 7, 10-16 . Numerical and experimental results confirm the idea that hierarchical patterning efficiently mitigates against stress/strain concentrations at crack tips, effectively arresting propagation and promoting a diffuse mode of failure that is insensitive to the existence of even large flaws 17,18 and that has been recently associated with the formation of multifractal fracture surfaces 19,20 . ...

Hierarchical Slice Patterns Inhibit Crack Propagation in Brittle Sheets
  • Citing Article
  • October 2022

Physical Review Applied

... Similarly to other centrality measures, 7,[22][23][24] can be used to identify bottlenecks for transport through networks of current, heat, and stress. 34 The aforementioned problem of continuity clearly presents itself when considering a common situation of nodes for intersections with small θ angles, where the struts can also be curved. Such intersections can be represented by one, two, or even more nodes (Figure 1c-e), ...

Edge betweenness centrality as a failure predictor in network models of structurally disordered materials

... Edge removal introduces cuts (or gaps) in the system, parallel to either the xz or the yz planes, spanning the whole system in the xy plane, and displaying the whole range of heights from 1 to Lz − 1. In a preliminary step, a cut pattern is implemented following the deterministic method first introduced by Esfandiary et al. 22 (Fig. 1b-c). Then, this deterministic hierarchical pattern is used to build an ensemble of stochastic hierarchical structures by randomly reassigning the position of each gap in the xy plane ( Fig. 1d-e). ...

Statistical aspects of interface adhesion and detachment of hierarchically patterned structures

Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment

... 7,8 In addition, recent studies have found that the modules of brain functional networks are hierarchically organized with small modules nested in large modules. 9,10 This hierarchical structure contributes to increased robustness, adaptivity, evolvability, and functional diversity in the brain. 11,12 However, the organizing principles of integrating small modules into large modules in the hierarchical modular structure of brain networks remain unclear. ...

Persistence of hierarchical network organization and emergent topologies in models of functional connectivity

Neurocomputing

... The local mechanical material response is simulated here using the Random Fuse Model (RFM) 36 . While more sophisticated approaches exist, where a full description of edges as Timoshenko beams is used and Maximum Distortion Energy arguments are put forward to develop rules for single-beam failure 19,20 , simpler scalar models such the RFM become relevant in large-scale statistical studies like ours, where the computational cost of beam simulations would be significant. ...

Beam network model for fracture of materials with hierarchical microstructure

International Journal of Fracture

... One of such physical metaphors is the use of tight-binding Hamiltonians (TBHs) to study network properties. Although such physical model comes from the study of electronic properties of molecules and solids [11], it is used in network theory without the necessity of considering that electrons are really moving through the nodes and edges of the network [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. For instance, Sade et al [12] studied the spectral statistics of complex networks and relate them via a TBH with features of the Anderson metal insulator transition for a wide range of different networks. ...

Anomalous Lifshitz dimension in hierarchical networks of brain connectivity

Physical Review Research

... Similar discrete dynamics on graphs have been explored in the context of spin glasses [16], cellular automata [17], and excitation spreading [18]. Technically, the threshold dynamics from Refs. ...

Link-usage asymmetry and collective patterns emerging from rich-club organization of complex networks

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences