Pablo Garcia’s research while affiliated with Aarhus University and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (2)


Fig. 2. Experimental setup for all tests and instruments. Setup B was used for water and VOCs interferences.
Fig. 3. Effect of absolute water concentration measured with the CRDS on (a) NH 3 after applying the correction provided by Martin et al. (2016), (b) N 2 O, and (c) CH 4 under laboratory conditions at room temperature. Horizontal and vertical error bars represent the standard deviation of water and the target gas, respectively. *Test 3 is measured with G2509_2 instead of G2509 used in tests 1 and 2.
Fig. 4. a) Effect of NH 3 on a fixed N 2 O concentration of 1, 2, and 4 ppm measured by model G2509. Vertical error bars represent the standard deviation divided by the maximum N 2 O concentration; horizontal error bars represent the NH 3 standard deviation. Effect of NH 3 on background levels of b) CH 4 and c) N 2 O. Vertical error bars represent the standard deviation of CH 4 and N 2 O. Horizontal error bars represent the standard deviation of NH 3 .
Fig. 5. Interferences of a) diacetyl, b) butanone, c) methanol, d) 1-propanol, e) ethanol, and f) acetaldehyde on CH 4 , N 2 O, and NH 3 . Vertical and horizontal error bars are the standard deviation of the target gas and the tested VOC respectively.
Water vapor interference test summary. Water concentration is given in per- centage molar fraction (as measured by the CRDS) and in relative humidity assuming pressure of 1 atm and temperature of 23 • C.
Investigation of non-target gas interferences on a multi-gas cavity ring-down spectrometer
  • Article
  • Full-text available

April 2024

·

67 Reads

·

4 Citations

Atmospheric Environment X

Pablo García

·

·

·

Emissions from agriculture are a worldwide problem as it is the major anthropogenic source of ammonia,methane, and nitrous oxide. Several efforts have been made to mitigate emissions. To achieve this, reliable measuring techniques are necessary to quantify the impact of the emissions. Different techniques relying on different principles are available. Generally, these techniques demonstrate good agreement on their measurements but there is a lack of studies that thoroughly investigate cross-interferences. In this work, three different models of Cavity Ring-Down Spectrometers measuring ammonia, nitrous oxide, and methane were tested in parallel for potential biases due to interference from ammonia, water vapor, and twelve volatile organic compounds commonly present in agricultural environments. Our results showed a small negative bias with increasing humidity on nitrous oxide and minor interferences of ammonia on nitrous oxide and methane. None of the tested volatile organic compounds interfered with ammonia, methane, or nitrous oxide measurements. Overall, concentration measurements of ammonia, nitrous oxide, and methane with cavity ring-down spectrometry have proven reliable under typical agricultural conditions. Minor interferences were only observed under exceptional conditions.

Download

Figure 1. Positions of the lines measurement system (line 1 and line 2) and the 3D ultrasonic anemometer (ultrasonic) in the full-scale slurry tank: (a) Cattle 1, (b) Cattle 2, (c) Pig 1, and (d) Pig 2 during the five measurement periods (before acidification (BA) and after acidification (AA1−4)).
Full-Scale Investigation of Methane and Ammonia Mitigation by Early Single-Dose Slurry Storage Acidification

December 2022

·

84 Reads

·

27 Citations

ACS Agricultural Science & Technology

·

Pablo Garcia

·

·

[...]

·

The effects of early acidification with sulfuric acid of animal slurry in concrete storage tanks to pH 5 on methane and ammonia emissions have been investigated on two cattle and two pig slurry storage tanks in full scale. The tanks’ up- and down-wind concentrations were measured online by cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS). The inverse-dispersion method (IDM), using a backward Lagrangian stochastic (bLS) model, was used to determine the emission rates. The results show that CH4 emissions after single-dose acidification of slurry tanks in the early summer were reduced by 95 ± 14% and 95% ± 6% for cattle and pig manure, respectively, compared to the emissions measured before acidification. The reductions occurred even though pH increased during the storage with and without addition of fresh slurry. After acidification, NH3 emissions were comparable to or lower than when a natural crust was present. A supplementary experiment on small-scale slurry containers was conducted to investigate the pH development when fresh slurry was added to the acidified slurry. The influence of pH development on the long-term emission dynamics of methane is discussed by comparing the large-scale and small-scale studies. The study presents the first full-scale documentation that slurry acidification is a promising technology for mitigation of methane from slurry storage.

Citations (2)


... The up-and downwind concentrations were measured with CRDS instruments (model G2509, Picarro Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). The CRDS (model G2509) instrument has been used with the bLS model to determine agricultural emissions from liquid manure storage (Lemes, Garcia, Nyord, Feilberg, & Kamp, 2022) and proven to be a reliable instrument in agricultural environments (Garcia, Støckler, Feilberg, & Kamp, 2024). The downwind concentration was measured with a Table 1 Characteristics of the pure litter material and the stockpiled broiler litter at the beginning and end of the experiment. ...

Reference:

Covering reduces emissions of ammonia, methane, and nitrous oxide from stockpiled broiler litter
Investigation of non-target gas interferences on a multi-gas cavity ring-down spectrometer

Atmospheric Environment X

... Some sources consider acidification of slurry during storage more feasible than acidification in housing, probably because of infrastructure requirements (Larsson, 2018;Saue and Tamm, 2018). Lowering the pH of slurry during storage outside the animal housing could reduce NH 3 emissions by 58-99% and 72-99% from pig and cattle slurry respectively (El Bied et al., 2023;Fuchs et al., 2021;Lemes et al., 2022;Liu et al., 2023;Pereira et al., 2022;Spiehs and Woodbury, 2024;Wang et al., 2021). Similarly, inhibition of methanogens by slurry acidification during storage could reduce CH 4 emissions by 70-99% and 89-95% from pig and cattle slurry respectively (Ambrose et al., 2023a;Cong et al., 2023a;Dalby et al., 2022;Im et al., 2020Im et al., , 2021. ...

Full-Scale Investigation of Methane and Ammonia Mitigation by Early Single-Dose Slurry Storage Acidification

ACS Agricultural Science & Technology