Pablo Buitron de la Vega’s research while affiliated with Boston Medical Center and other places

Background: Primary care after pregnancy is recommended, especially for individuals with recent adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs, such as preeclampsia or gestational diabetes), who are at increased risk for future heart disease. Health-related social needs (HRSNs) are recognized barriers to care, yet their pregnancy-related prevalence and associations with care are unknown. We sought to (1) describe the pregnancy-related prevalence of HRSNs, and (2) assess associations between pregnancy-related HRSNs and subsequent linkage to primary care. Methods: We analyzed electronic health record data for individuals with prenatal care and delivery (2018-2021) at our urban safety-net hospital. HRSNs were assessed via a routine screener, and we summarized individual responses during pregnancy through 6 weeks post partum as: any positive, all negative, or never screened. Postpartum linkage to primary care was defined as a completed primary care visit after 6 weeks through 1 year post partum. We analyzed the prevalence of HRSNs and their associations with linkage to primary care, using adjusted log-linked binomial regression models. In stratified models we assessed for effect modification by APO history and other variables. Results: Of 4941 individuals in our sample, 53% identified as Black non-Hispanic and 21% as Hispanic, 68% were publicly insured, and 93% completed ≥1 HRSN screening. Nearly 1 in 4 screened positive for any HRSN, most often food insecurity (14%) or housing instability (12%), and 53% linked to primary care. Compared with those who screened negative for all HRSNs (n=3491), linkage to primary care was similar among those who screened positive for any HRSNs (n=1079; adjusted risk ratio, aRR 1.04, 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.98-1.10) and lower among those never screened (n=371; aRR 0.77, 95% CI: 0.68-0.86). We found no evidence of effect modification by APO history, race/ethnicity, insurance, language, or Covid-19 pandemic exposure. Conclusions: In this diverse postpartum sample, we identified a 24% prevalence of pregnancy-related HRSNs and 53% subsequent linkage to primary care. Linkage to primary care was not associated with HRSN screening result (positive versus negative) but was significantly negatively associated with being missed by HRSN screening. Further research is needed to better understand HRSN screening practices and who is missed by screening, and to identify modifiable barriers to postpartum primary care especially after APOs.

Background The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic accelerated the use of telehealth. However, this also exacerbated health care disparities for vulnerable populations. Objectives This study aimed to explore the feasibility and effectiveness of a medical student-led initiative to identify and address gaps in patient access to digital health resources in adult primary care clinics at an academic safety-net hospital. Methods Medical students used an online HIPAA-compliant resource directory to screen for digital needs, connect patients with resources, and track outcome metrics. Through a series of Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles, the program grew to offer services such as information and registration for subsidized internet and phone services via the Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) and Lifeline, assistance setting up and utilizing MyChart (an online patient portal for access to electronic health records), orientation to telehealth applications, and connection to community-based digital literacy training. Results Between November 2021 and March 2023, the program received 608 assistance requests. The most successful intervention was MyChart help, resulting in 83% of those seeking assistance successfully signing up for MyChart accounts and 79% feeling comfortable navigating the portal. However, subsidized internet support, digital literacy training, and telehealth orientation had less favorable outcomes. The PDSA cycles highlighted numerous challenges such as inadequate patient outreach, time-consuming training, limited in-person support, and unequal language assistance. To overcome these barriers, the program evolved to utilize clinic space for outreach, increase flier distribution, standardize training, and enhance integration of multilingual resources. Conclusion This study is, to the best of our knowledge, the first time a medical student-led initiative addresses the digital divide with a multipronged approach. We outline a system that can be implemented in other outpatient settings to increase patients' digital literacy and promote health equity, while also engaging students in important aspects of nonclinical patient care.

e18601 Background: Patients with lung cancer experiencing housing insecurity are known to have longer time to biopsy, more missed appointments, and other delays in treatment as compared to their peers with stable housing. Methods: A single-institution retrospective chart review was performed at our safety-net academic institution. Patients with a new diagnosis of primary lung cancer from January 2015 through December 2020 who responded to the housing insecurity screening tool were included. Patients who screened positive received a print-out of housing resources or referral to a patient navigator. All characteristics except molecular testing were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression with housing status as the dependent variable. Molecular testing was analyzed separately via a Chi-Square test of independence given molecular testing was indicated for only a subset of patients. Results: Of the 423 patients, 264 (62%) reported housing insecurity. Compared to patients with stable housing, patients with housing insecurity received molecular testing when indicated at comparable rates, had similar time from first biopsy to initiation of treatment, and had similar insurance status (Table 1). Patients with stable housing were more likely to be White (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.09 -2.50). Conclusions: Although existing data shows patients with housing insecurity experience delays in treatment, our findings suggest that provision of equitable access to care with targeted interventions to reduce housing insecurity may help reduce such disparities, which often affect minoritized racial groups disproportionately. [Table: see text]

Purpose Patients with unmet health-related social needs (HRSNs) often experience poor health outcomes and have high levels of healthcare utilization. We describe a program where dually trained pharmacy liaison–patient navigators (PL-PNs) screen for and address HRSNs while providing medication management services to patients with high levels of acute care utilization in a Medicaid Accountable Care Organization. We are unaware of prior studies that have described this PL-PN role. Methods We analyzed case management spreadsheets for the 2 PL-PNs who staffed the program to identify the HRSNs that patients faced and the ways PL-PNs addressed them. We administered surveys, including an 8-item client satisfaction questionnaire (CSQ-8), to characterize patient perceptions of the program. Results Initially, 182 patients (86.6% English speaking, 80.2% from a marginalized racial or ethnic group, and 63.2% with a significant medical comorbidity) were enrolled in the program. Non–English-speaking patients were more likely to receive the minimum intervention dose (completion of an HRSN screener). Case management spreadsheet data (available for 160 patients who engaged with the program) indicated that 71% of participants faced at least one HRSN, most often food insecurity (30%), lack of transportation (21%), difficulty paying for utilities (19%), and housing insecurity (19%). Forty-three participants (27%) completed the survey with an average CSQ-8 score of 27.9, indicating high levels of satisfaction with the program. Survey participants reported receiving medication management services, social needs referrals, health-system navigation assistance, and social support. Conclusion Integration of pharmacy medication adherence and patient navigation services is a promising approach to streamline the HRSN screening and referral process at an urban safety-net hospital.

Objective: Social risk screening is recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics, but this practice is underutilized in NICUs. To address this gap in social care, we aimed to increase rates of: (1) systematic social risk screening and (2) connection with community resources, each to ≥50% over a 14-month period. Methods: We conducted a quality improvement initiative from November 2020 to January 2022. We adapted a screening tool and used Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles to integrate screening and referral to resources into clinical workflow. Primary outcome measures included the percentage of (1) families screened and (2) connection with resources. We examined screening by maternal race/ethnicity and primary language. Process measures were (1) time from admission to screening and (2) percentage of referrals provided to families reporting unmet needs and requesting assistance. We used statistical process control to assess change over time and χ2 tests to compare screening by race/ethnicity and language. Results: The rates of systematic screening increased from 0% to 49%. Among 103 families screened, 84% had ≥1, and 64% had ≥2 unmet needs, with a total of 221 needs reported. Education, employment, transportation, and food were the most common needs. Screening rates did not vary by race/ethnicity or language. Among families requesting assistance, 98% received referrals. The iterative improvement of a written resource guide and community partnerships led to increased rates of connection with resources from 21% to 52%. Conclusion: Leveraging existing staff, our social risk screening and referral intervention built the capacity to address the high burden of unmet needs among NICU families.

Objective: The emergency department (ED) is an opportune venue to screen for unmet social needs and connect patients with social services. This quality improvement study incorporates both qualitative and quantitative data to examine unmet social needs among ED patients and program implementation. Methods: From September 2020 to December 2021, an urban safety-net hospital adult ED implemented a social needs screening and referral program. Trained emergency staff screened eligible patients for 5 social needs (housing, food, transportation, utilities, employment), giving resource guides to patients who screened positive (THRIVE+). We collected screening data from the electronic health record, conducted semi-structured interviews with THRIVE+ patients and clinical staff, and directly observed discharge interactions. Results: Emergency staff screened 58.5% of eligible patients for social risk. Of the screened patients, 27.0% reported at least 1 unmet social need. Of those, 74.8% requested assistance. Screened patients reported housing insecurity (16.3%) as the most prevalent unmet social need followed by food insecurity (13.3%) and unemployment (8.7%). Among interviewed patients, 57.1% recalled being screened, but only 24.5% recalled receiving resource guides. Patients who received guides reported little success connecting with resources and supported universal guide dissemination. Staff expressed preference for warm handoff to social services. Of 13 observed discharge interactions, clinical staff only discussed guides with 2 patients, with no positive endorsement of the guides in any observed interactions. Conclusions: An ED social needs screening program can be moderately feasible and accepted. We identified housing as the most prevalent need. Significant gaps exist between screening and referral, with few patients receiving resources. Further training and workflow optimization are underway.

Importance: Patients with unmet health-related social needs are at high risk for preventable health care utilization. Prior interventions to identify health-related social needs and provide navigation services with community resources have not taken place in pharmacy settings. Objective: To evaluate an enhancement of pharmacy care to reduce hospital admissions and emergency department (ED) visits among primary care patients in a Medicaid accountable care organization (ACO). Design, setting, and participants: This nonrandomized controlled trial was conducted from May 1, 2019, through March 4, 2021, with 1 year of follow-up. Study allocation was determined by odd or even medical record number. The study was performed at a general internal medicine practice at a large safety-net hospital in Boston, Massachusetts. Patients who qualified for the hospital's pharmacy care program (aged 18-64 years and within the third to tenth percentile for health care utilization and cost among Medicaid ACO membership) who attended a visit with a primary care clinician were eligible. Of 770 eligible patients, 577 were approached, 127 declined, and 86 could not be contacted. Interventions: Patients in the control group received usual pharmacy care focused on medication adherence. Patients in the intervention group received enhanced pharmacy care with an additional focus on identification of and intervention for health-related social needs. The intervention took place for 1 year. Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was inpatient hospital admissions and ED visits (composite outcome) in the 12 months after enrollment during the intervention period. Results: Among 364 allocated patients (mean [SD] age, 50.1 [10.1] years; 216 women [59.3%]), 35 were Hispanic of any race (9.6%) and 214 were non-Hispanic Black (58.8%). All participants were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. In analyses controlling for baseline hospital admissions and ED visits the year prior to enrollment, the enhanced pharmacy care group was not associated with the odds of having any hospital admission or ED visit (adjusted odds ratio, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.23-1.62]; P = .32) among all patients and was not associated with the visit rates among those with any visit (adjusted rate ratio, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.71-1.22]; P = .62) relative to the usual pharmacy care group in the year following enrollment. Conclusions and relevance: The findings of this nonrandomized controlled trial suggest that inpatient and ED utilization among Medicaid ACO members at a safety-net hospital was not significantly different between groups at 1-year follow-up. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03919084.

The fifth annual summer research summit organized by the Center of Excellence (COE) in Health Equity, Training and Research, Baylor College of Medicine (BCM), was held on May 17, 2022. The theme of this year’s summit was ‘Academic-Community Partnerships: Change Agents for Advancing Health Equity.’ Given the ongoing pandemic, the summit was conducted virtually through digital platforms. This program was intended for both BCM and external audiences interested in advancing health equity, diversity, and inclusion in healthcare among healthcare providers and trainees, biomedical scientists, social workers, nurses, and individuals involved in talent acquisition and development, such as hiring managers (HR professionals), supervisors, college and hospital affiliate leadership and administrators, as well as diversity and inclusion excellence practitioners. We had attendees from all regions of the United States as well as from Saudi Arabia. The content in this Book of Abstracts encapsulates a summary of the research efforts by the BCM COE scholars (which includes post-baccalaureate students, medical students, clinical fellows, and junior faculty from BCM) as well as the external summit participants. The range of topics in this year’s summit was quite diverse, encompassing disparities in relation to maternal and child health (MCH), immigrant health, cancers, vaccination uptakes, and COVID-19 infections. Various solutions were ardently presented to address these disparities, including community engagement and partnerships, improvement in health literacy, and the development of novel technologies and therapeutics. With this summit, BCM continues to build on its long history of educational outreach initiatives to promote diversity in medicine by focusing on programs aimed at increasing the number of diverse and highly qualified medical professionals ready to introduce effective and innovative approaches to reduce or eliminate health disparities. These programs will improve information resources, clinical education, curricula, research, and cultural competence as they relate to minority health issues and social determinants of health. The year’s summit was a great success! Copyright © 2022 Dongarwar et al. Published by Global Health and Education Projects, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY 4.0.