Norman E. Lane’s research while affiliated with Brown University and other places

Simulator sickness (SS) in high-fidelity visual simulators is a byproduct of modem simulation technology. Although it involves symptoms similar to those of motion-induced sickness (MS), SS tends to be less severe, to be of lower incidence, and to originate from elements of visual display and visuo-vestibular interaction atypical of conditions that induce MS. Most studies of SS to date index severity with some variant of the Pensacola Motion Sickness Questionnaire (MSQ). The MSQ has several deficiencies as an instrument for measuring SS. Some symptoms included in the scoring of MS are irrelevant for SS, and several are misleading. Also, the configural approach of the MSQ is not readily adaptable to computer administration and scoring. This article describes the development of a Simulator Sickness Questiomaire (SSQ), derived from the MSQ using a series of factor analyses, and illustrates its use in monitoring simulator performance with data from a computerized SSQ survey of 3,691 simulator hops. The database used for development included more than 1,100 MSQs, representing data from 10 Navy simulators. The SSQ provides straightforward computer or manual scoring, increased power to identify "problem" simulators, and improved diagnostic capability.

Flight simulators are examples of virtual environment (VE) systems that often give rise to a form of discomfort resembling classical motion sickness. The major difference between simulator sickness and other forms of motion sickness is that the former exhibits more oculomotor-related symptoms and far less actual vomiting. VEs of the future are likely to include more compellingly realistic visual display systems, and these systems can also be expected to produce adverse symptoms. The implications of simulator sickness for future uses of VEs include adverse consequences for users' safety and health, user acceptance, training effectiveness, and overall system performance. Based on data from a factor analysis of over 1000 Navy and Marine Corps pilot simulation exposures, a new scoring procedure for simulator sickness has recently been developed (Lane & Kennedy, 1988; Kennedy, Lane, Berbaum, & Lilienthal, 1992). The factor analytic scoring key provides subscales for oculomotor stress (eyestrain), nausea, and disorientation. Simulators are being examined in terms of these factor profiles to identify causes of simulator sickness. This approach could also be used in evaluating motion sickness-like symptomatology that occurs in connection with the use of VEs. This paper describes the use of the multifactor scoring of the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) in diagnosing sources of simulator sickness in individual simulators. Reanalysis by this new methodology was employed to standardize existing simulator sickness survey data and to determine whether relationships existed that were missed by the more traditional scoring approaches.

Assessment of cognitive and motor performance of bone marrow transplant patients prior to, during, and following intensive toxic chemoradiotherapy may provide an important adjunct to measures of physiological and medical status. The present study is an attempt to assess whether, as side-effects, these aggressive treatments result in cognitive performance deficits, and if so, whether such changes recover posttreatment. Measurement of cognitive ability in this situation presents special problems not encountered with one-time tests intended for healthy adults. Such tests must be sensitive to changes within a single individual, which emphasizes the crucial importance of high reliability, stability across repeated-measures, and resistance to confounding factors such as motivation and fatigue. The present research makes use of a microbased portable test battery developed to have reliable and sensitive tests which were adapted to study the special requirements of transplant patients who may suffer cognitive deficits as a result of treatment. The results showed slight but significant changes in neuropsychological capacity when compared to baseline levels and controls, particularly near the beginning of treatment. The sensitivity of the battery in detecting such subtle temporary changes is discussed in terms of past research showing effects of other stressors, such as stimulated high altitude and ingestion of alcohol, on these measures.

The Preflight Adaptation Trainer (PAT) is intended to reduce or alleviate space adaptation syndrome by providing opportunities for portions of that adaptation to occur under normal gravity conditions prior to space flight. Since the adaptation aspects of the PAT objectives involve modification not only of the behavior of the trainee, but also of sensiomotor skills which underly the behavioral generation, the defining of training objectives of the PAT utilizes four mechanisms: familiarization, demonstration, training and adaptation. These mechanisms serve as structural reference points for evaluation, drive the content and organization of the training procedures, and help to define the roles of the PAT instructors and operators. It was determined that three psychomotor properties are most critical for PAT evaluation: reliability; sensitivity; and relevance. It is cause for concern that the number of measures available to examine PAT effects exceed those that can be properly studied with the available sample sizes; special attention will be required in selection of the candidate measure set. The issues in PAT use and application within a training system context are addressed through linking the three training related mechanisms of familiarization, demonstration and training to the fourth mechanism, adaptation.

This manual describes the characteristics of and provides user information for the Essex Corporation computer based automated performance test system (APTS). The batter provides integrated software for a menu of 30 performance test tapping a wide variety of human cognitive and motor functions, implemented on a portable computer system suitable for use in both laboratory and field settings for studying the effects of toxic agents and other stressor conditions. From this menu, subsets of tests can be selected using a configuration program to provide a more specialized battery appropriate to the requirements of a particular application. Information on test stability, reliability and factor content is given to assist in decisions about battery composition. The APTS battery is a consolidation of two independently developed batteries. It contains those 19 of the 25 tests in the UTC-PAB (Unified Tri- Service Cognitive Performance Assessment Battery) that were suitable for implementation on a laptop portable computer intended for field use. It also contains 11 of the tests from the APTS battery developed By Essex for NASA and NSF. The APTS tests have a somewhat longer and more detailed development history, and serve to some extent as anchor or reference points for similar or equivalent PAB tests. Within the combined battery, both sets of tests are implemented through the same menu structure and can be mixed and matched as desired for a given application.

Improved assessment of operational performance is critical for studies of selection, training and human engineering as well as those examining the performance effects of environmental changes, chemicals or other stressors imposed by military duties. The present discussion focuses on what we consider to be the major problem with such enterprises – the lack of sensitivity of operational measures because of poor reliability. The well-documented impact of low field measure reliability includes the inability to demonstrate differences resulting from experimental treatments and the chronic underrepresentation of validity in predictive studies. This paper describes a general methodology for using specially-developed performance batteries as surrogates for real-world performances, in particular for determining whether such performance may be disrupted by environmental or chemical agents. The logical and metric rationale of surrogate measurement is presented, and the advantages and disadvantages are discussed and compared to alternative approaches (job samples, synthetic tasks, etc.).

A number of ongoing analyses and surveys are directed toward the development of a computerized data base on the capabilities and availability of CBI technologies in the Department of Defense. The process of providing such a data base goes far beyond the computerized storage of casually compiled data. This paper identifies and discusses two critical issues developed from a CBI research and development analysis in support of the CBI data base design. The first issue addresses the importance of specific attention to the characteristics and requirements of potential users both of CBI technology and of the data base. The second is concerned with the need for a well-conceived classification schema for description of the features of CBI systems in the form of data storage and retrieval cues. A preliminary schema is presented, and the impact of the two issues on the design and functioning of the data base is examined.

A need exists for an automated performance test system to study the effects of various treatments which are of interest to the aerospace medical community, i.e., the effects of drugs and environmental stress. The ethics and pragmatics of such assessment demand that repeated measures in small groups of subjects be the customary research paradigm. Test stability, reliability-efficiency and factor structure take on extreme significance; in a program of study by the U.S. Navy, 80 percent of 150 tests failed to meet minimum metric requirements. The best is being programmed on a portable microprocessor and administered along with tests in their original formats in order to examine their metric properties in the computerized mode. Twenty subjects have been tested over four replications on a 6.0 minute computerized battery (six tests) and which compared with five paper and pencil marker tests. All tests achieved stability within the four test sessions, reliability-efficiencies were high (r greater than .707 for three minutes testing), and the computerized tests were largely comparable to the paper and pencil version from which they were derived. This computerized performance test system is portable, inexpensive and rugged.