Nikolay Sirakov’s research while affiliated with Bulgarian Academy of Sciences and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (44)


Location of the cave and the excavated area
a. Map with location of Bacho Kiro Cave, and the mentioned Temnata and Kozarnika caves (T. Tsanova); b. The cave entrance in 1938 (R. Popov and D. Garrod excavation); c. The entrance of Bacho Kiro Cave today (V. Aldeias); d. Site plan and excavation grid showing previous excavations and excavated areas from 2015 to 2021 (V. Aldeias, modified T. Tsanova); e. View to the excavation sectors (Sh. McPherron); f. Niche 1 with location of layers I and J (Sh. McPherron); g. The Main Sector initial stratigraphic section in 2015 with indicated layers and the corresponding layers from 1971–1975 excavations (T. Tsanova).
Stratigraphy and lithics plot in Niche 1, Bacho Kiro Cave
Top: Picture of the stratigraphic section (East) (T. Tsanova); Middle: Plot of the lithics per layer (T. Tsanova & Z. Rezek); Down: 2019 excavations in sq. A8, DD7, and DD8 with the distinctive dark-gray sediments of Layer I (3D model N. Zahariev in Sirakov, Tsanova, Hublin 2019).
Map of Bulgaria with the location of Bacho Kiro Cave and raw material sources of the silicites found in the IUP layers
Size of the circle correspond to the proportion found in the IUP layers from BK; In the legend dots correspond to the known formation with silicites (white dots: sources not exploited; black dots: sources exploited) author V. Delvigne.
Raw material types distribution in the techno-typological groups in the IUP layers in Bacho Kiro Cave, excavation 2015–2021
Cores and products in the IUP layers, from Bacho Kiro Cave, excavation 2015–2021
Bipolar cores (1, 3, 5, 8–9, 11) and bipolar products (2, 4, 6, 7, 10, 12–14). Note Nr 9 is a bipolar core on previous endscraper on blade. Note for Nr 18 and 19 an arrow indicates the debitage direction of the previous surfaces while the last removals (redébitage or reflaking, reshaping are drawn with ripples), (Pictures T. Tsanova, drawings T. Tsanova and I. Krumov).

+20

Curated character of the Initial Upper Palaeolithic lithic artefact assemblages in Bacho Kiro Cave (Bulgaria)
  • Article
  • Full-text available

September 2024

·

418 Reads

·

2 Citations

·

·

Svoboda Sirakova

·

[...]

·

Nikolay Sirakov

The dispersal of Homo sapiens across Eurasia during MIS 3 in the Late Pleistocene is marked by technological shifts and other behavioral changes, known in the archaeological record under the term of Initial Upper Paleolithic (IUP). Bacho Kiro Cave in north Bulgaria, re-excavated by us from 2015 to 2021, is one of the reference sites for this phenomenon. The newly excavated lithic assemblages dated by radiocarbon between 45,040 and 43,280 cal BP and attributed to Homo sapiens encompass more than two thousand lithic artifacts. The lithics, primarily from Layer N1-I, exist amid diverse fauna remains, human fossils, pierced animal teeth pendants, and sediment with high organic content. This article focuses on the technological aspects of the IUP lithics, covering raw material origin and use-life, blank production, on-site knapping activities, re-flaking of lithic implements, and the state of retouched lithic components. We apply petrography for the identification of silicites and other used stones. We employ chaîne opératoire and reduction sequence approaches to profile the lithics techno-typologically and explore the lithic economy, particularly blade production methods, knapping techniques, and artifact curation. Raw material analysis reveals Lower Cretaceous flints from Ludogorie and Upper Cretaceous flints from the Danube region, up to 190 km and 130 km, respectively, from Bacho Kiro Cave, indicating long-distance mobility and finished products transport. Imported lithic implements, were a result of unidirectional and bidirectional non-Levallois laminar technology, likely of volumetric concept. Systematic on-anvil techniques (bipolar knapping) and tool segmentation indicate re-flaking and reshaping of lithic implements, reflecting on-site curation and multifaceted lithic economy. A limited comparison with other IUP sites reveals certain shared features and also regional variations. Bacho Kiro Cave significantly contributes to understanding the technological and behavioral evolution of early Homo sapiens in western Eurasia.

Download


Identifying the unidentified fauna enhances insights into hominin subsistence strategies during the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic transition

August 2023

·

466 Reads

·

11 Citations

Understanding Palaeolithic hominin subsistence strategies requires the comprehensive taxonomic identification of faunal remains. The high fragmentation of Late Pleistocene faunal assemblages often prevents proper taxonomic identification based on bone morphology. It has been assumed that the morphologically unidentifiable component of the faunal assemblage would reflect the taxonomic abundances of the morphologically identified portion. In this study, we analyse three faunal datasets covering the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic transition (MUPT) at Bacho Kiro Cave (Bulgaria) and Les Cottés and La Ferrassie (France) with the application of collagen type I peptide mass fingerprinting (ZooMS). Our results emphasise that the fragmented component of Palaeolithic bone assemblages can differ significantly from the morphologically identifiable component. We obtain contrasting identification rates between taxa resulting in an overrepresentation of morphologically identified reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) and an underrepresentation of aurochs/bison (Bos/Bison) and horse/European ass (Equus) at Les Cottés and La Ferrassie. Together with an increase in the relative diversity of the faunal composition, these results have implications for the interpretation of subsistence strategies during a period of possible interaction between Neanderthals and Homo sapiens in Europe. Furthermore, shifts in faunal community composition and in carnivore activity suggest a change in the interaction between humans and carnivores across the MUPT and indicate a possible difference in site use between Neanderthals and Homo sapiens. The combined use of traditional and biomolecular methods allows (zoo)archaeologists to tackle some of the methodological limits commonly faced during the morphological assessment of Palaeolithic bone assemblages.


Overview of the non-destructive DNA extraction method
a, Workflow of the gradual, non-destructive DNA extraction method using sodium phosphate buffer at elevated temperatures. b, Four 3D surface texture measurements (1–4) indicated on the outline of a tooth used for testing (SP6649) before and after non-destructive DNA extraction showing no substantial surface alterations. c, Photographs of DCP1 before and after cleaning and non-destructive DNA extraction.
Number and taxonomic composition of mammalian and human mtDNA fragments recovered from six artefacts during stepwise, non-destructive DNA extraction
DNA fractions are denoted S (attached sediment), P (sediment pellet recovered during water wash), and 21, 37, 60 and 90 (three incubations in phosphate buffer at the indicated temperatures in °C). Low library preparation efficiencies indicate reduced DNA recovery due to the co-extraction of inhibitory substances. Assignments to ‘ancient’ and ‘other’ taxa were performed independently for each family based on the significance of evidence for cytosine deamination. The bottom right chart shows the number of deaminated hominin mtDNA fragments recovered in each fraction after hominin-specific mtDNA capture (only positive fractions). Bov, Bovidae; Can, Canidae; Cer, Cervidae; Ele, Elephantidae; Equ, Equidae; Fel, Felidae; Hom, Hominidae; Hya, Hyaenidae; Oth, other; Mur, Muridae; Mus, Mustelidae; Rhi, Rhinocerotidae; Spa, Spalacidae; Sui, Suidae; Urs, Ursidae.
Ancient human mtDNA and nuclear DNA isolated from DCP1
a, The position of DCP1 in a Bayesian tree reconstructed from modern31,32 and ancient³³ human mtDNA sequences (see Supplementary Information 5 for the full tree). Nodes are labelled with the corresponding posterior probabilities, and the x axis represents years from the present. Identified haplogroups are outlined by the bars on the right. rCRS, revised Cambridge reference sequence. b, X–autosome proportion in DCP1 (using all and deaminated molecules only) in comparison to data from six other ancient hominin individuals34,35. Circles correspond to the calculated values of the ratios for the number of X to (X + autosomal) fragments for each individual (n (of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)) = 20,526, 3,734, 124,862, 85,901, 34,756, 41,632, 34,677 and 72,992 SNPs for each calculation, as ordered on the x axis). The error bars represent 95% binomial CIs of the measurement in each individual. c, Principal component (PC) analysis of non-African modern human genomes³⁶ (grey) with ancient human genomes (coloured) projected on top. DCP1 was analysed twice, using all data versus deaminated fragments only. AG3, Afontova Gora 3; ANA, ancient Native Americans; MA1, Mal’ta 1; Russia_HG, Russian hunter–gatherers; UKY001, Ust Kyakhta; WSHG, West Siberian hunter–gatherers.
Ancient human DNA recovered from a Palaeolithic pendant

May 2023

·

1,178 Reads

·

31 Citations

Nature

Artefacts made from stones, bones and teeth are fundamental to our understanding of human subsistence strategies, behaviour and culture in the Pleistocene. Although these resources are plentiful, it is impossible to associate artefacts to specific human individuals¹ who can be morphologically or genetically characterized, unless they are found within burials, which are rare in this time period. Thus, our ability to discern the societal roles of Pleistocene individuals based on their biological sex or genetic ancestry is limited2–5. Here we report the development of a non-destructive method for the gradual release of DNA trapped in ancient bone and tooth artefacts. Application of the method to an Upper Palaeolithic deer tooth pendant from Denisova Cave, Russia, resulted in the recovery of ancient human and deer mitochondrial genomes, which allowed us to estimate the age of the pendant at approximately 19,000–25,000 years. Nuclear DNA analysis identifies the presumed maker or wearer of the pendant as a female individual with strong genetic affinities to a group of Ancient North Eurasian individuals who lived around the same time but were previously found only further east in Siberia. Our work redefines how cultural and genetic records can be linked in prehistoric archaeology.



The last 30,000 to 700,000 years ago: Unravelling the timing of human settlement for the Palaeolithic site of Kozarnika

September 2022

·

195 Reads

·

3 Citations

Quaternary Science Reviews

Kozarnika cave is a renowned prehistoric site in the Balkans, which contributes significantly to our understanding of the human past due to its rich assemblages associated with the Lower to Upper Palaeolithic. Various dating methods have been employed to unravel the timing of human occupations in Kozarnika. Radiocarbon dating was used to unfold the time frame for the Kozarnikian lithic tradition uncovered in the Upper Palaeolithic sequence of the cave, and palaeomagnetic dating assigned the Brunhes–Matuyama reversal to the layer beneath the Lower Palaeolithic assemblages. In this study, we employed luminescence-dating methods, including a body of different signals to date sediment layers from the top to the bottom of the sequence covering the period of ca 30 to 700 ka. Our investigations revealed that the Kozarnikian tradition in layers 5a-c falls between 30 and 35 ka. Following that, we suggest that the Middle Palaeolithic period initiated between 250 and 309 ka and lasted until 40–53 ka. More importantly, we have updated the age of the Neanderthal radius discovered in the Mousterian assemblages to 201 ± 17 ka. Our dating resulted in a period of ca 300–700 ka for the Lower Palaeolithic assemblages in the cave. Although this age range fits perfectly with the palaeomagnetic boundary <780 ka established for Kozarnika, the possibility of reaching the threshold of luminescence dating cannot be ruled out. Thus, at this stage, this age range may represent the minimum age for the Lower Palaeolithic.


Initial Upper Paleolithic bone technology and personal ornaments at Bacho Kiro Cave (Bulgaria)

May 2022

·

495 Reads

·

22 Citations

Journal of Human Evolution

The expansion of Homo sapiens and our interaction with local environments, including the replacement or absorption of local populations, is a key component in understanding the evolution of our species. Of special interest are artifacts made from hard animal tissues from layers at Bacho Kiro Cave (Bulgaria) that have been attributed to the Initial Upper Paleolithic. The Initial Upper Paleolithic is characterized by Levallois-like blade technologies that can co-occur with bone tools and ornaments and likely represents the dispersal of H. sapiens into several regions throughout Eurasia starting by 45 ka or possibly earlier. Osseous artifacts from the Initial Upper Paleolithic are important components of this record and have the potential to contribute to our understanding of group interactions and population movements. Here, we present a zooarchaeological, technological, and functional analysis of the diverse and sizable osseous artifact collection from Bacho Kiro Cave. Animal raw material sources are consistent with taxa found within the faunal assemblage including cervids, large bovids, and cave bears. A variety of bone tool morphologies, both formal and informal, indicate a diverse technological approach for conducting various on-site activities, many of which were focused on the processing of animal skins, likely for cold weather clothing. Technological flexibility is also evident in the manufacture of personal ornaments, which were made primarily from carnivore teeth, especially cave bear, though herbivore teeth and small beads are also represented. The osseous artifacts from Bacho Kiro Cave provide a series of insights into the bone technology and indirectly on the social aspects of these humans in southeast Europe, and when placed within the broader Initial Upper Paleolithic context, both regional and shared behaviors are evidently indicating widespread innovation and complexity. This is especially significant given the location and chronology of the site in the context of H. sapiens dispersals.


Figure 2. Distribution of the peak forces applied during the EEM of each sampling cut area (in yellow) and control area (in red) for each bone specimen. The reference peak force measurements (eraser on paper) is shown in grey. The insert in the top right is an example of how peak forces were acquired from force data. The mean peak force (red line) for each surface area consists of the maximum force values (red markers) for each eraser and bone contact during the 2 min of the EEM event. Dashed lines equal to + 1 and − 1 SD.
Figure 3. Micrographs of the control area of CC7-379 using automated digital microscopy (ZEISS, Smartzoom 5), (a) before the use of EEM, (b) after the use of EEM. The white arrow highlights the orientation of the microstriations which follow the orientation of the erasing movement. In addition, we note the removal of surface residues, visible in particular in the top-left corner as the removal of dark-stained regions (white dashed line).
Figure 5. Bone surface microtopography of the specimen CC7-379, before (left) and after (right) EEM, using confocal disc-scanning microscopy. 3D surface models (a,b,e,f) and 2D intensity micrographs (c,d,g,h) of control (a-d) and cut areas (e-h). Orientation of eraser movements are indicated by the black arrows. Depth of the bone microtopography is color-coded with blue indicating the lowest valleys and white the highest peaks. We note the generation of microstriations after the use of EEM with some examples indicated by white arrows. We note the presence of a residue in the middle of the bone surface (a) which has been removed with the use of EEM (b) and is potentially related to the formation of the deeper traces located near its initial position.
Description of the experimental workflow. The location of ROIs (cut and control) was defined on each bone specimen included in the study. The macro- and microscopic surface topography of the bone surface of each area was visually inspected using photos by digital microscopy (ZEISS, Smartzoom 5) and measurements by confocal disc-scanning microscopy (μsurf mobile, Nanofocus AG) before and after EEM. Cut and control areas were sampled using EEM while the downward force applied during sampling was measured via an instrumented stage. Each sample collected was analysed through peptide mass fingerprinting (n = 12). Animal silhouette is not to scale and derives from http://phylopic.org.
Matched before and after EEM pairwise scatterplot for each ISO 25178 surface texture parameter measured in this study (Sa, Spc, Sha and Smrk1). Lines represent equivalent parameter values after and before EEM. Each specimen is represented by different symbols, cut areas are in yellow and control areas are in red. 2D depictions of low and high values for each surface texture parameter are indicated on each plot.
The effect of eraser sampling for proteomic analysis on Palaeolithic bone surface microtopography

December 2021

·

371 Reads

·

12 Citations

Bone surface modifications are crucial for understanding human subsistence and dietary behaviour, and can inform about the techniques employed in the production and use of bone tools. Permission to destructively sample such unique artefacts is not always granted. The recent development of non-destructive proteomic extraction techniques has provided some alternatives for the analysis of rare and culturally significant artefacts, including bone tools and personal ornaments. The Eraser Extraction Method (EEM), first developed for ZooMS analysis of parchment, has recently been applied to bone and ivory specimens. To test the potential impact of the EEM on ancient bone surfaces, we analyse six anthropogenically modified Palaeolithic bone specimens from Bacho Kiro Cave (Bulgaria) through a controlled sampling experiment using qualitative and 3D quantitative microscopy. Although the overall bone topography is generally preserved, our findings demonstrate a slight flattening of the microtopography alongside the formation of micro-striations associated with the use of the eraser for all bone specimens. Such modifications are similar to ancient use-wear traces. We therefore consider the EEM a destructive sampling approach for Palaeolithic bone surfaces. Together with low ZooMS success rates in some of the reported studies, the EEM might not be a suitable approach to taxonomically identify Pleistocene bone specimens.


Subsistence behavior during the Initial Upper Paleolithic in Europe: Site use, dietary practice, and carnivore exploitation at Bacho Kiro Cave (Bulgaria)

October 2021

·

397 Reads

·

23 Citations

Journal of Human Evolution

The behavioral dynamics underlying the expansion of Homo sapiens into Europe remains a crucial topic in human evolution. Owing to poor bone preservation, past studies have strongly focused on the Initial Upper Paleolithic (IUP) stone tool record. Recent excavations and extensive radiocarbon dating at Bacho Kiro Cave (Bulgaria) pushed back the arrival of IUP H. sapiens into Europe to ca. 45,000 years ago. This site has exceptional bone preservation, and we present the study of 7431 faunal remains from across two IUP layers (I and J) and one Middle Paleolithic layer (K). We identified a shift in site use and occupation intensity through time, marked by increased find density and human modifications in Layer I. Alongside a decrease in carnivore presence and seasonality data demonstrating human presence in all seasons, this indicates a more frequent or prolonged occupation of the site by IUP groups. Contrarily, the dietary focus across the IUP and Middle Paleolithic layers is similar, centered on the exploitation of species from a range of habitats including Bos/Bison, Cervidae, Equidae, and Caprinae. While body parts of large her-bivores were selectively transported into the site, the bear remains suggest that these animals died in the cave itself. A distinct aspect of the IUP occupation is an increase in carnivore remains with human modifications, including these cave bears but also smaller taxa (e.g., Canis lupus, Vulpes vulpes). This can be correlated with their exploitation for pendants, and potentially for skins and furs. At a broader scale, we identified similarities in subsistence behavior across IUP sites in Europe and western Asia. It appears that the first IUP occupations were less intense with find densities and human modifications increasing in succeeding IUP layers. Moreover, the exploitation of small game appears to be limited across IUP sites, while carnivore exploitation seems a recurrent strategy.


The last 30,000 to 600,000 years ago: unravelling the timing of human settlement for the Palaeolithic site of Kozarnika

September 2021

·

137 Reads

Kozarnika cave is a renowned prehistoric site in the Balkans. It contributes significantly to our understanding of the human past due to its rich assemblages associated with the Lower to Upper Palaeolithic periods. The cave was first mentioned in the prehistoric survey carried out before 1933. Years after, in 1996, the site was excavated systematically by Bulgarian-French researchers [1]. ▶ Various chronological dating methods have been employed alongside the excavation to unravel the timing of humans’ occupation in Kozarnika. ▶ This study presents our contribution of employing luminescence-dating methods (OSL, IRSL, pIRIR, VSL, IR-RF) to unravel the reliable timeframes for several geological units and archaeological assemblages. A vast body of techniques has been put together, enabling us to date sediment samples containing the assemblages attributed earlier to the Upper, Middle, and Lower Palaeolithic periods [2,3]. ▶ Our results show that the inhabitants of Kozarnika occupied that region from ca 30 to 600 ka, showing general accordance with the previous dating.


Citations (18)


... More to the east, during a similar time frame, the Initial Upper Paleolithic covers a vast geographic area, stretching from the Levant through central and eastern Europe to the Siberian Altai and northwest China (Kuhn & Zwyns, 2014;Li et al., 2020;Zwyns, 2021). Initial Upper Paleolithic assemblages are defined on a strict technological foundation focused on the production of blades from sub-volumetric reduction strategies and with a particular emphasis on convergent blanks resembling Levallois points detached through direct hard percussion (Kuhn, 2019;Škrdla, 2017;Tsanova, 2006, Tsanova et al., 2024. Broadly defined, the IUP exhibits significant variability in terms of blanks, formal tools, and reduction strategies (Zwyns et al., 2024). ...

Reference:

IUP Technological Signatures or Mousterian Variability? The Case of Riparo l'Oscurusciuto (Southern Italy)
Curated character of the Initial Upper Palaeolithic lithic artefact assemblages in Bacho Kiro Cave (Bulgaria)

... is often rushed, resulting in higher risks of error. Instead, the use of untargeted ZooMS studies (Ruebens et al. 2023;Sinet-Mathiot et al. 2023), and targeted ZooMS analyses of specific skeletal elements (Arenas-Sorriqueta et al. 2024 [this volume]), could be a more useful tool to clarify patterns of species diversity and abundance. ...

Identifying the unidentified fauna enhances insights into hominin subsistence strategies during the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic transition

... The recovery of sedimentary DNA from bulk sediment and indurated blocks (Massilani et al., 2022), in combination with ZooMs analysis of non-identifiable faunal fragments from Châtelperronian contexts, will undoubtedly continue to progress discussions concerning the makers and origins of this industry in the years to come. Additionally, the recent publication by one of us and collaborators of a method for the non-destructive extraction of ancient human DNA directly from Palaeolithic ornaments and tools made of bone or tooth opens a new door towards connecting discrete hominin individuals with discrete archaeological artefacts (Essel et al., 2023). Given the emerging picture of demographic complexity in this period (e.g. ...

Ancient human DNA recovered from a Palaeolithic pendant

Nature

... Middle Palaeolithic lithic assemblages combining Levallois, Quina or Kombewa debitage with bifacially shaped implements are also known from sites in neighbouring Ukraine (Stepanchuk and Sapozhnikov, 2010), Serbia (Mihailović et al., 2022;Ochando et al., 2024) and Bulgaria (Heydari et al., 2022). ...

The last 30,000 to 700,000 years ago: Unravelling the timing of human settlement for the Palaeolithic site of Kozarnika
  • Citing Article
  • September 2022

Quaternary Science Reviews

... Metamorphic and sedimentary rocks (e.g., rhyolite porphyric, rhyolite, quartzitic sandstone basalt, quartz, carbonated sandstone), likely of local origins, are represented in the technotypological categories by flakes, pebbles and debris, suggesting that they were used rather sporadically and reduced in place (Table 4, Fig 4). Sedimentary sandstone, such a psammite, is used in one case for bead manufacture of similar morphology as the pierced ivory beads [59]. In two other cases, it is very likely that psammite is in a stage of pre-shaping (Fig 4). ...

Initial Upper Paleolithic bone technology and personal ornaments at Bacho Kiro Cave (Bulgaria)
  • Citing Article
  • May 2022

Journal of Human Evolution

... As the study of ancient proteins is a fast growing field allowing for taxonomic identifications (Brandt and Mannering, 2021;Runge et al., 2021), establishing dietary practices (Hendy et al., 2018), and exploring phylogenetic relations (Chen et al., 2019) of ancient bone specimens we chose to focus on palaeoproteomics. Building on previous studies investigating different aspects of sampling methods for palaeoproteomics (Evans et al., 2023;Sinet-Mathiot et al., 2021), we compare five commercially available sampling approaches, two of which are followed by two different protein extraction procedures. Each resulting protein extract is analysed using both Zooarchaeology by Mass Spectrometry (ZooMS) (Buckley et al., 2009) and full proteome analysis using liquid-chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). ...

The effect of eraser sampling for proteomic analysis on Palaeolithic bone surface microtopography

... This absence contrasts with both the rich Early-early Middle Pleistocene Greek fossil mammal record, which has yielded several thousands of specimens ascribed to a large number of fossil mammal taxa (Koufos 2001), and the significant and rather continuous Late Miocene to Pliocene and late Middle Pleistocene to Holocene primate fossil record of Greece (Koufos 2006b;Galanidou 2004;Harvati et al. 2009). In our opinion, the apparent Early Pleistocene gap in the human fossil record of Mainland Greece can be ascribed to the interplay of taphonomic factors (see Tourloukis 2016) and inadequate fieldwork, especially given the evidence from the Kozarnika cave in Bulgaria (Guadelli et al. 2012), and the new early Paleolithic sites at Rodafnidia on Lesvos (Galanidou et al. 2013; and Marathousa 1, Megalopolis on the Peloponnese (Panagopoulou et al. 2015). ...

Earliest dispersals and migrations to Europe via the Balkans in Lower to Upper Palaeolithic: Evidence from Kozarnika Cave (Northern Bulgaria).
  • Citing Book
  • January 2021

... A cross the Paleolithic, humans and large carnivores (such as cave hyaenas and bears) repeatedly occupied the same caves and rock shelters (e.g., Brugal and Jaubert 1991;Daschek and Mester 2020;Hussain et al. 2022;Kindler 2012;Rossel and Blasco 2009;Smith 2015;Stiner 1994;Smith et al. 2021;Toniato et al. 2024;Zilio et al. 2021). While at some of these localities remnants of human activities dominate, elsewhere carnivores were the main accumulation agents through hibernation and/ or denning, and traces of human occupation are sparse (Airvaux et al. 2012;Discamps et al. , 2019Smith et al. 2024;Villa and Soressi 2000) or absent (Currant and Jacobi 2011;Jimenez et al. 2022;Schreve 2004). ...

Subsistence behavior during the Initial Upper Paleolithic in Europe: Site use, dietary practice, and carnivore exploitation at Bacho Kiro Cave (Bulgaria)
  • Citing Article
  • October 2021

Journal of Human Evolution

... However, certain types of drinking behaviours can impact δ 18 O, such as systematic consumption of certain highly buffered water sources (rivers or lakes), and can significantly attenuate the final signal recorded. The correlation employed by this work relies on recent data compilations (Pederzani et al., 2021b(Pederzani et al., , 2023. In the case of horses (Eq. ...

Subarctic climate for the earliest Homo sapiens in Europe
  • Citing Article
  • September 2021

Science Advances

... Horan et al., 2005;Zilhão et al., 2006;Banks et al., 2008;Sørensen, 2011;Black et al., 2015;Roberts and Bricher, 2018;Degioanni et al., 2019;Vaesen et al., 2019;Timmermann, 2020;Mylopotamitaki et al., 2024;Paquin et al., 2024). As one of the main corridors for initial human dispersal into western Eurasia (Sirakov et al., 2010;Garba et al., 2024), south-eastern Europe also represents a key area to better trace the spatio-temporal spread of modern humans (Fitzsimmons et al., 2013;Hublin et al., 2020), their biological and cultural interactions with the Neanderthals (Fu et al., 2015;Hajdinjak et al., 2021), and the biological turnover and climate change that ultimately resulted in the continent-wide demise of Neanderthals (Staubwasser et al., 2018). ...

Initial Upper Palaeolithic humans in Europe had recent Neanderthal ancestry

Nature