... Over the past decades, evidence has begun to accumulate suggesting that the trade-off between female employment and childbearing, too, has weakened and, to some extent, reversed in many countries (Doepke et al. 2023). This tendency can essentially be attributed to five causes: (a) increasingly effective family policies (for a survey, see Olivetti & Petrongolo 2017), in particular in the areas of public childcare (Bauernschuster et al. 2016, d'Albis et al. 2017, family leave (Lalive & Zweimüller 2009, Raute 2019, taxation (Bick & Fuchs-Schündeln 2018), and benefit schemes (Riphahn & Wiynck 2017, González & Trommlerová 2023; (b) technological enhancements that relax the trade-off among childbearing, child-rearing, and employment, including improved birth control (oral contraceptives, abortions) (Goldin & Katz 2002, Ananat et al. 2009) and reproductive health (Albanesi & Olivetti 2016) that have helped to reconcile planned parenthood and career from the middle of the twentieth century, methods of fertility treatment (Sommer 2016, de la Croix & Pommeret 2021) that help to delay parenthood and thereby mitigate the child penalty, and technological progress in respect to household production (Greenwood et al. 2005); (c) fathers assuming a stronger role in childcare, which, through a more balanced time allocation within the household, relaxes the trade-off in employment at the household level (e.g., Feyrer et al. 2008, de Laat & Sevilla-Sanz 2011, Fanelli & Profeta 2021; (d) more agreement on fertility choices within couple bargaining (Testa et al. 2014, Doepke & Kindermann 2019; and (e) changes in social norms, as Section 2.5 discusses in greater detail. ...