Nick W. Ruktanonchai’s research while affiliated with Virginia Tech and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (46)


Metapopulations, the inflationary effect, and consequences for public health
  • Article

November 2024

·

12 Reads

The American Naturalist

Nicholas Kortessis

·

·

Andrew Gonzalez

·

[...]

·

Robert D. Holt

Outbreak potential of each county, using mobility patterns from before the COVID-19 pandemic began, the first 9 months of the pandemic (March–December 2020), and January–February 2021, after many interventions had been lifted. Top shows the number of people infected if an outbreak begins in each county, bottom shows the number of counties with at least 10 infected people if the outbreak begins in each county.
Outbreak potential of four target counties, measured as number of counties with at least one case after 50 days of simulation on average. Columns separate simulations by the mobility patterns used, and rows separate simulations by the starting county (highlighted in blue in each map).
Average number of infections after 50 days, when an outbreak begins in either an urban or rural county, using the mobility patterns of each month.
Heatmap of Virginia counties and cities associated with their change in mobility when comparing each season to the average of September 2019 to February 2020. Counties and cities with an increase in mobility are denoted by a shade of red while counties and cities with a decrease in mobility are denoted by a shade of blue. Shades of red and blue appear darker when values are further from one.
Overall numbers of trips outside of the county, by urban and rural counties throughout Virginia for months after March 2020. Baseline mobility was measured as the average monthly number of trips for August 2019 to February 2019.
Exploring infectious disease spread as a function of seasonal and pandemic-induced changes in human mobility
  • Article
  • Full-text available

August 2024

·

22 Reads

Introduction Community-level changes in population mobility can dramatically change the trajectory of any directly-transmitted infectious disease, by modifying where and between whom contact occurs. This was highlighted throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, where community response and nonpharmaceutical interventions changed the trajectory of SARS-CoV-2 spread, sometimes in unpredictable ways. Population-level changes in mobility also occur seasonally and during other significant events, such as hurricanes or earthquakes. To effectively predict the spread of future emerging directly-transmitted diseases, we should better understand how the spatial spread of infectious disease changes seasonally, and when communities are actively responding to local disease outbreaks and travel restrictions. Methods Here, we use population mobility data from Virginia spanning Aug 2019-March 2023 to simulate the spread of a hypothetical directly-transmitted disease under the population mobility patterns from various months. By comparing the spread of disease based on where the outbreak begins and the mobility patterns used, we determine the highest-risk areas and periods, and elucidate how seasonal and pandemic-era mobility patterns could change the trajectory of disease transmission. Results and discussion Through this analysis, we determine that while urban areas were at highest risk pre-pandemic, the heterogeneous nature of community response induced by SARS-CoV-2 cases meant that when outbreaks were occurring across Virginia, rural areas became relatively higher risk. Further, the months of September and January led to counties with large student populations to become particularly at risk, as population flows in and out of these counties were greatly increased with students returning to school.

Download


Neglected consequences of spatio-temporal heterogeneity and dispersal: Metapopulations, the inflationary effect, and real-world consequences for public health

November 2023

·

37 Reads

The metapopulation perspective is an important conceptual framework in ecology, biogeography, and evolutionary ecology. Metapopulations are spatially distributed populations linked by dispersal. Both metapopulation models and their community and ecosystem level analogues, metacommunity and meta-ecosystem models, tend to be more stable regionally than locally and display an enhancement in abundance because of the interplay of spatio-temporal heterogeneity and dispersal (an effect that has been called the "inflationary effect"). We highlight the essential role of spatio-temporal heterogeneity in metapopulation biology, sketch empirical demonstrations of the inflationary effect, and provide a mechanistic interpretation of how the inflationary effect arises and impacts population growth and abundance. The spread of infectious disease is used to illustrate how this effect, emerging from the interplay of spatiotemporal variability and dispersal, can have serious real-world consequences. Namely, failure to recognize the full possible effects of spatio-temporal heterogeneity likely enhanced the spread of COVID-19, and a comparable lack of understanding of emergent population processes at large scales may hamper the control and eradication of other infectious diseases. We finish by noting how the effects of spatio-temporal heterogeneity, including the inflationary effect, have implicitly played roles in many traditional themes in the history of ecology. The inflationary effect is implicit in processes explored in subdisciplines as far ranging as natural enemy-victim dynamics, species coexistence, and conservation biology. Seriously confronting the complexity of spatiotemporal heterogeneity has the potential to push many of these subdisciplines forward.


COVID-19 outbreaks and interventions in China during zero-COVID policy under Pre-Delta, Delta, and Omicron periods
a Daily new cases reported during the 131 outbreaks in mainland China, from April, 2020 to May, 2021. The green arrows mark the predominant strains within each stage of the pandemic. b Estimated instantaneous reproduction number (Rt\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${R}_{t}$$\end{document}) for each outbreak, aligned with the start date of each outbreak. The solid blue line illustrates the estimated overall Rt\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${R}_{t}$$\end{document} for 131 outbreaks, while the blue shaded area indicated its 95% confidence interval (95%CI). c Heat map of mean intensity level of interventions for different variants and geographic regions of China. The color bar on the left side of the heat map represents the variant of each outbreak, green for Pre-Delta period, brown for Delta period and blue for Omicron period. The x axis shows the abbreviations of non-pharmaceutical measures, including stay-at-home order (SO), business premises closure (BPC), public transportation closure (PTC), gathering restriction (GR), workplace closure (WC), school closure (SC), medicine management (MM), mass screening (MS), facial masking (FM) and contact tracing (CT). We divided the 10 NPIs into four categories: social distancing measures (SD), polymerase chain reaction screening (PCR), contact tracing (CT), and facial masking (FM). The color bar above the heat map represents the category to which each individual measure belongs.
The relative effects of interventions in containing different SARS-CoV-2 variants
a The overall effects were estimated by the coefficient of each individual NPI in Bayesian inference models. Reductions in Rt\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${R}_{t}$$\end{document} were shown as mean, 50%, and 95% prediction intervals. PCR screening showed the joint effect of mass screening and medicine management (generic antipyretics, not specific drugs for COVID-19). Social distancing measures represented the joint effect of stay-at-home order, business premises closure, public transportation closure, gathering restriction, workplace closure, and school closure. b Infections simulated by Intervention-SEIR-Vaccination (ISEIRV) model under all real-world NPIs (curves in brown) or in counterfactual scenarios where social distancing measures (SD), facial mask (FM), contact tracing (CT), PCR screening (PCR), or all NPIs were not implemented, respectively. Mean and 95% confidence intervals (CI, shaded areas) are presented. The brown dashed lines are the total population of cities with outbreaks of each variant. The gap between the simulated curve without each NPI and the red curve represents the effect of each removed NPI in containing the spread. The wider the gap, the higher the effect of NPIs. c The ratio of the area under the cumulative infection curve for the corresponding scenario (with one NPI removed) to the area under the baseline scenario curve (with all NPIs removed). The closer it gets to 100% indicates the more effective the removed NPI is for the respective variant.
The relative reduction of infections of emerging pathogens under different scenarios of transmissibility, interventions, and population sizes
Relative reduction of mean infections is the daily mean infections for each scenario, relative to the baseline counterfactual scenario without any interventions. A value closer to 1 (red) indicates fewer infections for a scenario, corresponding to a more effective implementation of NPIs. The values show simulated transmission under different R0\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${R}_{0}$$\end{document} values and latent periods in large cities (LC, over 10 million residents), medium cities (MC, 5–10 million residents) and small cities (SC, 0–5 million residents). In each small heatmap, the x axis is the start day of NPI implementation for each outbreak and the y axis is the intensity of NPI. The results shown here are the independent effect of social distancing measures (SD), contact tracing (CT), facial masks (FM), and PCR screening (PCR), respectively, meaning that if one NPI was in place, all other interventions were not implemented.
Effectiveness of combined interventions in cities with different population sizes and transmission scenarios
The x axis represents the mean value of the total number of infections in the corresponding size of cities, while the y axis represents the mean value of the durations in the corresponding size of cities. The rings of each combination represent the start day of NPI implementation for each outbreak (innermost ring), social distancing intensity (middle ring), and contact tracing intensity (outer ring), respectively. The green, red, and blue colors correspond to large cities (LC), medium cities (MC), and small cities (SC). We considered each combination to be effective when it is valid for more than three cities in parallel. We assumed a 50% probability that an individual wears a mask when in contact with an infected person during outbreaks, considering feasibility and generalizability to the other countries/areas. The simulation results of other scenarios are available in supplementary (See Supplementary Figs. 16–38).
Schematic flowchart of data and models for this study
A prior on the basic reproduction number R0,v\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${R}_{0,v}$$\end{document} was used for each outbreak, with a hyperprior varying by SARS-CoV-2 lineages (see Supplementary Table 5). Then, we estimated the instantaneous reproduction number (Rt\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${R}_{{{{{{\rm{t}}}}}}}$$\end{document}) based on the observed daily new cases. By comparing observed Rt\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${R}_{{{{{{\rm{t}}}}}}}$$\end{document} with R0,v\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${R}_{0,v}$$\end{document} in a Bayesian inference model, we estimated the coefficients of variables to assess their effects on curbing COVID-19. Ten NPIs were divided into four categories: social distancing measures (yellow), polymerase chain reaction screening (red), contact tracing (green), and facial masking (blue). Finally, an Infectious-Intervention-SEIR-Vaccination (ISEIRV) model was built to simulate the timing and intensity of NPI implementation and elimination strategies under diverse transmission scenarios. The prior information for parameter estimation within the ISEIRV model was informed by the effectiveness of each NPI category.
Effects of public-health measures for zeroing out different SARS-CoV-2 variants

August 2023

·

391 Reads

·

8 Citations

Targeted public health interventions for an emerging epidemic are essential for preventing pandemics. During 2020-2022, China invested significant efforts in strict zero-COVID measures to contain outbreaks of varying scales caused by different SARS-CoV-2 variants. Based on a multi-year empirical dataset containing 131 outbreaks observed in China from April 2020 to May 2022 and simulated scenarios, we ranked the relative intervention effectiveness by their reduction in instantaneous reproduction number. We found that, overall, social distancing measures (38% reduction, 95% prediction interval 31-45%), face masks (30%, 17-42%) and close contact tracing (28%, 24-31%) were most effective. Contact tracing was crucial in containing outbreaks during the initial phases, while social distancing measures became increasingly prominent as the spread persisted. In addition, infections with higher transmissibility and a shorter latent period posed more challenges for these measures. Our findings provide quantitative evidence on the effects of public-health measures for zeroing out emerging contagions in different contexts.


Fig. 1. Spatiotemporal heterogeneity of intra-and inter-city mobility recovery in 313 Chinese cities in 2021. a, Changes of intracity mobility, outflow, and inflow in 2021. The recovery degrees of inflow/outflow are not presented for the Chunyun period and its following week (i.e., 28 January -14 March 2021). Daily new COVID-19 cases include laboratory-confirmed cases and asymptomatic infections reported by the 313 studied cities. b, Spatiotemporal heterogeneity in recovery trajectories between cities. The map shows the geographical locations of cities and their pre-pandemic relative intracity mobility and outflow intensity on 16 January 2019, provided by the Baidu location-based service. Both intensities were classed into five levels by the Natural Break method in ArcGIS 10.6. The changes in mobility across space and time are demonstrated by taking the daily recovery trajectories of four cities, i.e., Chengdu, Harbin, Zhengzhou, and Beijing, in 2021.
Fig. 6. Comparison of SRs under compound disasters and epidemics in cities with different socio-economic conditions. a, The changes of the maximum SRs in low-GDP cities, compared with those in high-GDP cities. b, The changes of the maximum SRs in dense cities compared with those in sparse cities. All comparisons were made while considering the same low incidence rate (1.1 cases per million people).
List of data used in this study.
Combined and delayed impacts of epidemics and extreme weather on urban mobility recovery

August 2023

·

397 Reads

·

6 Citations

Sustainable Cities and Society

The ever-increasing pandemic and natural disasters might spatial-temporal overlap to trigger compound disasters that disrupt urban life, including human movements. In this study, we proposed a framework for data-driven analyses on mobility resilience to uncover the compound effects of COVID-19 and extreme weather events on mobility recovery across cities with varied socioeconomic contexts. The concept of suppression risk (SR) is introduced to quantify the relative risk of mobility being reduced below the pre-pandemic baseline when certain variables deviate from their normal values. By analysing daily mobility data within and between 313 Chinese cities, we consistently observed that the highest SR under outbreaks occurred at high temperatures and abnormal precipitation levels, regardless of the type of travel, incidences, and time. Specifically, extremely high temperatures (at 35°C) increased SR during outbreaks by 12.5%-120% but shortened the time for mobility recovery. Increased rainfall (at 20mm/day) added SRs by 12.5%-300%, with delayed effects reflected in cross-city movements. These compound impacts, with varying lagged responses, were aggravated in cities with high population density and low GDP levels. Our findings provide quantitative evidence to inform the design of preparedness and response strategies for enhancing urban resilience in the face of future pandemics and compound disasters.


Assessing spread risk of COVID-19 within and beyond China in early 2020

August 2022

·

82 Reads

·

19 Citations

Data Science and Management

A novel coronavirus emerged in Wuhan in late 2019 and has caused the COVID-19 pandemic announced by the World Health Organization on March 12, 2020. This study was originally conducted in January 2020 to estimate the potential risk and geographic range of COVID-19 spread within and beyond China at the early stage of the pandemic. A series of connectivity and risk analyses based on domestic and international travel networks were conducted using historical aggregated mobile phone data and air passenger itinerary data. We found that the cordon sanitaire of Wuhan was likely to have occurred during the latter stages of peak population numbers leaving the city, with travellers departing into neighbouring cities and other megacities in China. We estimated that 59,912 air passengers, of which 834 (95% uncertainty interval: 478–1349) had COVID-19 infection, travelled from Wuhan to 382 cities outside of mainland China during the two weeks prior to the city’s lockdown. Most of these destinations were located in Asia, but major hubs in Europe, the US and Australia were also prominent, with a strong correlation seen between the predicted risks of importation and the number of imported cases found. Given the limited understanding of emerging infectious diseases in the very early stages of outbreaks, our approaches and findings in assessing travel patterns and risk of transmission can help guide public health preparedness and intervention design for new COVID-19 waves caused by variants of concern and future pandemics to effectively limit transmission beyond its initial extent.



Overview of the data context in 31 countries from 1 August 2020 to 25 October 2021
a Daily confirmed cases (outside the circle) and documented vaccination rates (inside the circle). b The stringency index of ‘lockdown’ style NPIs (shallow blue lines) and the documented vaccination rate (shallow red lines) across 31 countries. The documented vaccination rate refers to the proportion of the total population who were fully vaccinated in each country. The corresponding curves (thick blue and red lines) were fitted by the locally weighted smoothing method using national data, representing overall NPIs and vaccination rate in Europe (including Israel). c Daily proportion of infections caused by SARS-CoV-2 and its variants, and (d) daily proportion of different COVID-19 vaccine products used, where the values of each indicator within each day add up to 1. c, d share the same right colour legend.
The effects of NPIs and vaccination on reducing COVID-19 transmission in Europe over time
The overall monthly effects of interventions on reducing R0,t across 31 countries from 1 August 2020 to 25 October 2021 are presented with mean and 95% CI, which was pooled from national level to regional level using meta-analysis. The total effect of NPIs presented here is the effect of NPIs alone plus their interaction effect with vaccination, and the total effect of vaccination shown is the impact of vaccination alone plus its interaction effect with NPIs. In the bottom panel, the light blue area between R0,t (instantaneous basic reproduction number) and Rt (instantaneous reproduction number [solid line]) illustrates the observed reduction of COVID-19 transmissibility. R0,t are presented with mean (dash line) and 95% CI (grey area). Periods in which Alpha and Delta variants were dominant (>50%) are also shown by pink lines and relevant text.
The interaction effect of NPIs and vaccination on reducing COVID-19 transmission in populations across 31 countries
a The effects attributed to NPIs (raincloud plots in blue) and vaccination (boxplots in pink) under different practical vaccination rates. The raincloud plot visualises the intensity of stringency index (points) and the probability density of its effect. The boxplot presents the median and interquartile range. The stacked bar chart in the bottom illustrates the composition of COVID-19 variants under various vaccination levels from 1 August 2020 to 25 October 2021. The numbers of independent samples for boxplot from left (0–10% practical vaccination rate) to right (70–80% practical vaccination rate) are n = 4434, 962, 807, 900, 838, 1086, 497, and 187, respectively. b The effects of vaccines under different vaccination rates and stringency of NPIs. The effect of different practical vaccination rates within each NPI stringency group was assessed by one-way ANOVA (**p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001). P-values are produced by two sided Wilcoxon test. The numbers of total independent samples form left (20< stringency index < = 30) to right (80< stringency index < = 90) are n = 466, 1334, 2173, 2055, 1805, 1387, and 459, respectively. c The respective effects attributed to NPIs (in blue) and vaccination (in red), and the interaction effect between NPIs and vaccination (in yellow) over time across 31 countries. d The comparison of vaccination effects with/without the interaction with NPIs.
The possible relaxation of NPIs or the requirement of extra stringency to contain COVID-19 across countries
a Under the scenario of vaccination and COVID-19 transmission by 25 October 2021, required changes of NPI stringency index to contain COVID-19 (Rt<1\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${R}_{t} < 1$$\end{document}). The negative change means the degree of NPI relaxation, compared to the stringency on 25 October 2021. b The comparison between the estimated requirement of changes in NPI stringency index presented in (a) and the output of the openness risk (from 0 to 1) - an indicator modified from the OxCGRT’s approach²⁵. A higher openness risk ( > 0.5) means an increasing likelihood of COVID-19 resurgence, and vice versa. Countries in Group 1 (increasing NPI stringency) and Group 2 (relaxing NPIs) mean that they have consistent findings between two indicators. Groups 3 and 4 mean that the two indicators have conflicting results and extra evidence might be needed.
Overview of models using bottom-up approaches
Orange nodes represent the observed data. Blue nodes represent the pseudo variables generated by the observed data. For each country, we put a prior on R0 with hyperprior varying by country, where the prior mean was setted as the highest Rt before 1 December 2020, see Supplementary Information A2. Then, R0,t representing the intrinsic transmissibility was estimated by Model 1. By comparing observed Rt with R0,t in Model 2, we estimated coefficients of variables to assess respective effects attributed to various interventions and factors on curbing COVID-19 for each country by month. A variable, represented by the residual Δ, was used to characterise the impact of other unknown factors on Rt in addition to practical vaccination rate, NPIs and air temperature. Finally, the overall effect of NPIs and vaccination in the European region was evaluated in Model 3 by pooling the national effects across countries through meta-analysis with the random-effect model.
Untangling the changing impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions and vaccination on European COVID-19 trajectories

June 2022

·

632 Reads

·

90 Citations

Non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) and vaccination are two fundamental approaches for mitigating the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. However, the real-world impact of NPIs versus vaccination, or a combination of both, on COVID-19 remains uncertain. To address this, we built a Bayesian inference model to assess the changing effect of NPIs and vaccination on reducing COVID-19 transmission, based on a large-scale dataset including epidemiological parameters, virus variants, vaccines, and climate factors in Europe from August 2020 to October 2021. We found that (1) the combined effect of NPIs and vaccination resulted in a 53% (95% confidence interval: 42–62%) reduction in reproduction number by October 2021, whereas NPIs and vaccination reduced the transmission by 35% and 38%, respectively; (2) compared with vaccination, the change of NPI effect was less sensitive to emerging variants; (3) the relative effect of NPIs declined 12% from May 2021 due to a lower stringency and the introduction of vaccination strategies. Our results demonstrate that NPIs were complementary to vaccination in an effort to reduce COVID-19 transmission, and the relaxation of NPIs might depend on vaccination rates, control targets, and vaccine effectiveness concerning extant and emerging variants. Non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) and COVID-19 vaccination have been implemented concurrently, making their relative effects difficult to measure. Here, the authors show that effects of NPIs reduced as vaccine coverage increased, but that NPIs could still be important in the context of more transmissible variants.


Global holiday datasets for understanding seasonal human mobility and population dynamics

January 2022

·

1,191 Reads

·

18 Citations

Scientific Data

Public and school holidays have important impacts on population mobility and dynamics across multiple spatial and temporal scales, subsequently affecting the transmission dynamics of infectious diseases and many socioeconomic activities. However, worldwide data on public and school holidays for understanding their changes across regions and years have not been assembled into a single, open-source and multitemporal dataset. To address this gap, an open access archive of data on public and school holidays in 2010–2019 across the globe at daily, weekly, and monthly timescales was constructed. Airline passenger volumes across 90 countries from 2010 to 2018 were also assembled to illustrate the usage of the holiday data for understanding the changing spatiotemporal patterns of population movements.


Citations (26)


... During the COVID-19 pandemic, governments worldwide implemented various control measures including NPIs and vaccinations to reduce disease transmission from 2021 to 2022. 47 Ge et al 47 revealed that China invested significant efforts in strict zero-COVID measures to contain outbreaks of varying scales caused by different SARS-CoV-2 variants. Based on the analysis of R 0 reduction resulting from relative intervention effectiveness, social distancing (38% reduction), face masks (30%), and close contact tracing (28%) were the most effective. ...

Reference:

A Regional-Scale Assessment-Based SARS-CoV-2 Variants Control Modeling with Implications for Infection Risk Characterization
Effects of public-health measures for zeroing out different SARS-CoV-2 variants

... There is a critical need to better understand and integrate human behavioral change into our models to better inform future population-tailored strategies. Previous works studied the resilience of mobility patterns following shocks, such as extreme weather events [23,24], epidemics [2,[25][26][27] or both [28]. Recent findings highlighted how demographic differences were associated to loss of adherence to repeated interventions [29,30] and to delayed recovery of baseline mobility patterns [26] jointly with local GDP and population density [28], whereas some aspects of individual level visitation patterns were never recovered [2], with different spatial and temporal impacts on urban and rural areas [27]. ...

Combined and delayed impacts of epidemics and extreme weather on urban mobility recovery

Sustainable Cities and Society

... Population information with high temporal and spatial resolution is essential for accurately assessing past developments and planning the future of human activities [1][2][3][4]. It has various applications in socio-economic, political, and environmental domains, such as analyzing health intervention coverage disparities, optimizing urban administrative boundaries, evaluating flooding risks, and providing postdisaster relief [5][6][7][8][9]. For example, population information with high temporal resolution can address the issue of Medicaid programs where outdated population counts and current vaccination counts result in inaccurate vaccination rates [10]. ...

Assessing spread risk of COVID-19 within and beyond China in early 2020

Data Science and Management

... For example, potential cross-immunity from exposure to other coronaviruses may be playing a role in reducing the severity of COVID-19 in African populations. In addition, the widespread use of insecticide-treated bed nets for malaria control may have also contributed to a lower incidence of COVID-19 in Africa [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. ...

Untangling the changing impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions and vaccination on European COVID-19 trajectories

... To eliminate the short-term seasonal variation of population dynamics due to holidays (Charles-Edwards & Bell, 2015;Lai et al., 2022), we applied Seasonal-Trend decomposition using Loess (STL) to differentiate long-term trends from seasonal and remainder components of the high-frequency population dynamics data using the 'stl' function in R version 4.2.2. The STL method, proposed by Cleveland et al. (1990), is a filtering procedure for decomposing a time series into the following components: ...

Global holiday datasets for understanding seasonal human mobility and population dynamics

Scientific Data

... For instance, Santos et al. 12 observed very high levels of compliance in Portugal, while lower levels of compliance have been observed in other countries such as in Belgium throughout later stages of the pandemic 13 . Downing et al. 14 have shown that public compliance varies among NPIs, with the perceived effectiveness being a more important driver compared to one's fear of contracting As the availability of data increased throughout the pandemic, largescale modelling studies gathered increasingly solid evidence on the effectiveness of individual NPIs, with limiting large gatherings, school closings, internal movement restrictions being consistently identified as effective NPIs, along with facial masking [15][16][17] . Other large-scale studies suggest that combinations of less costly and less intrusive interventions can be equally effective as drastic ones, such as national lockdowns 18 . ...

Impacts of worldwide individual non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 transmission across waves and space

International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation

... The role of international air travel in the initial spread of SARS-CoV-2 and the subsequent introduction of new variants has been well documented during the COVID-19 pandemic (Khanh et al., 2020;Lodder and de Roda Husman, 2020;Murphy et al., 2020;Hu et al., 2020;Swadi et al., 2021;Toyokawa et al., 2022). This has led to the implementation of a range of non-pharmaceutical interventions to limit the spread of the virus in the airport terminal (e.g. ...

Risk of SARS-CoV-2 Transmission among Air Passengers in China

Clinical Infectious Diseases

... The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted people's social and behavioral lifestyles worldwide [1][2][3]. Indeed, people's routines were affected by government-imposed restrictions aimed at mitigating the virus spread, as well as by individual decision-making processes [4][5][6]. In both cases, adherence to non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) varied significantly across the population and it was shaped by several factors, including social, demographic, economic variables, and epidemiological conditions [5,[7][8][9]. ...

Practical geospatial and sociodemographic predictors of human mobility

... Lockdown procedures and canceled flights were common mitigations during the COVID-19 outbreak (Pearson, Colombo, Cecchini and Scarpetta, 2020;Lai, Ruktanonchai, Carioli, Ruktanonchai, Floyd, Prosper, Zhang, Du, Yang and Tatem, 2021), but movement restrictions during outbreaks have a much longer history: Roadblocks and airport checkpoints during the Ebola 2014 West Africa outbreak (Bausch and Rojek, 2016;Bardosh, Leach and Wilkinson, 2016), livestock movement restrictions during foot-and-mouth disease, rinderpest, or swine flu outbreaks (Tildesley, Brand, Brooks Pollock, Bradbury, Werkman and Keeling, 2019;Mourant et al., 2018;Dixon, Sun and Roberts, 2019;Ferdousi, Moon, Self and Scoglio, 2019), or temporarily closing live animal markets to reduce potential zoonotic infectious contacts (Yu, Wu, Cowling, Liao, Fang, Zhou, Wu, Zhou, Lau, Guo et al., 2014;Xiao, Newman, Buesching, Macdonald and Zhou, 2021). ...

Assessing the Effect of Global Travel and Contact Restrictions on Mitigating the COVID-19 Pandemic

Engineering

... Defining phases: Based on the timing of the COVID-19 pandemic published by WHO (WHO, 2022a) and previous studies (Carter et al., 2021;Ge et al., 2021), we divided the COVID-19 pandemic from 22 January 2020 to 9 March 2023, into four phases. (a) The first phase was the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in 128 countries, which was identified based on the previous studies (Carter et al., 2021;Ge et al., 2021). ...

Effects of worldwide interventions and vaccination on COVID-19 between waves and countries