Nicholas G. Hatsopoulos’s research while affiliated with University of Chicago and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (14)


Functional and neuroanatomical landmarks surrounding the implant sites of each participant’s recording arrays. (a). During presurgical functional neuroimaging scans, participants performed attempted hand grasping movement of the right hand (top row). Minimally thresholded hand activity is visualized on each participant’s cortical surface (z-threshold 3.1; bottom row). Further, the location of each participant’s recordings arrays, approximate coordinates of the anatomical hand knob (visualized as an omega (Ω) symbol) and the center of gravity of hand functional activity (visualized as an asterisk) are overlaid on their functional hand activity. A 25.0 mm black bar is provided as a scaling reference. (b) Distances (mm) were computed between the center of each recording array to the center of gravity (CoG) of hand activity (left) and the anatomical hand knob (right).
Somatotopy mapping task and tuning significance determination: (a) Participants were asked to perform or attempt to perform four movements of the arm and hand as illustrated. (b) Each trial consisted of a 2 s Baseline phase in which participants prepared for the next movement, a 3 s Movement phase in which the movement was performed and held as soon as the corresponding word appeared on the screen, and a 3 s Rest phase in which the movement was released. (c) For each session, neural activity recorded on each electrode was z-scored and averaged across trials of the same movement type and reduced to the top principal component via PCA (PC1, unitless). The time of the maximum value of this component was used as center of the movement period (tM) for that movement type. (d) Across all trials of a given movement type, the total spike count recorded during the last 0.5 s of the Baseline phase was compared to the total spike count recorded during a 0.5 s period centered around tM using a one-sample t-test on the difference to determine tuning significance for each channel. (e) Each channel was analyzed separately for tuning significance across different movement types. Depth of modulation for each channel is indicated by the color scale for an example session from P4’s lateral array shown here. Each square represented a single electrode on the 10 × 10 array. Dots indicate channels found to be significantly modulated to a particular movement type.
Somatotopic gradient in movement tuning across arrays: (a) for each participant and each array, the number of channels significantly tuned to a movement type was divided by the total number of channels on that array significantly modulated to any movement to obtain the proportions presented here. Each point represents a single experimental session (five sessions per participant). (b) For each session, a Naïve Bayes classifier was trained to classify movement type from neural activity in the Movement phase period (centered on tM) using leave-one-out cross validation across trials. Classification results on the held-out trial were concatenated for each session, and results were combined for all sessions to produce the confusion matrices presented here. 400 trials are included in each confusion matrix.
Virtual arm and hand decoding: (a) Participants were asked to observe a 3D object pursuit grasp-and-carry task and follow along with imagined movements of the arm. (b) An indirect OLE decoder was trained on neural activity during the reach and carry phases of the task using leave-one-out cross validation across trials to predict X, Y, and Z velocities. Decoder performance for translational velocity was quantified as the average of the squares of the correlations between actual and predicted X, Y, and Z velocities for each session. (c) The same decoder was trained separately on neural activity from the grasp and release phases of the task using leave-one-out cross validation across trials to predict grasp velocities. Decoder performance was quantified as the squared correlation between actual and predicted grasp velocities for each session. For (b) and (c), black diamonds represent outliers. Bolded, horizontal black bars indicate significant differences on the Friedman test, and the brackets below represent post-hoc pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank test. *p < 0.05, Friedman test. *p < 0.0167, Wilcoxon signed-rank test after correction for multiple comparisons.
Cursor control decoding: (a) participants were asked to observe a 2D cursor center-out click-and-drag task and follow along with reaching imagery during translation and imagined grasping movements during the click and release phases of the task. (b) The same indirect OLE decoder from figure 4 was trained on neural activity during the translation phases of the task using leave-one-out cross validation across trials to predict X and Y velocities. Decoder performance was quantified as the average of the squared correlations between actual and predicted X and Y velocities for each session. (c) A hidden Markov model discrete click classification decoder was trained on neural activity during the entire task using leave-one-out cross validation on all click-unclick epochs. Decoder performance was quantified as the proportion of timepoints for which the decoder correctly predicted a clicked or unclicked state for each session. Horizontal dashed line indicates chance accuracy (50%). (d) Participants were asked to observe a 2D cursor center-out click-and-drag task and follow along with imagined movements of the wrist (flexion, extension, abduction, adduction) as opposed to movements of the entire arm during the reach and center phases of the task. The same indirect OLE decoder was trained on neural activity during the reach and carry phases of the task using leave-one-out cross validation across trials to predict X and Y velocities. Decoder performance was quantified as the average of the squared correlations between actual and predicted X and Y velocities for each session. For (b), (c), and (d), black diamonds represent outliers. Bolded, horizontal black bars represent Friedman test results, and the brackets below represent post-hoc pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank test. *p < 0.05, Friedman test. *p < 0.0167, Wilcoxon signed-rank test after correction for multiple comparisons.
Motor somatotopy impacts imagery strategy success in human intracortical brain–computer interfaces
  • Article
  • Full-text available

March 2025

·

11 Reads

N G Kunigk

·

·

C Gontier

·

[...]

·

Objective: The notion of a somatotopically organized motor cortex, with movements of different body parts being controlled by spatially distinct areas of cortex, is well known. However, recent studies have challenged this notion and suggested a more distributed representation of movement control. This shift in perspective has significant implications, particularly when considering the implantation location of electrode arrays for intracortical brain–computer interfaces (iBCIs). We sought to evaluate whether the location of neural recordings from the precentral gyrus, and thus the underlying somatotopy, has any impact on the imagery strategies that can enable successful iBCI control. Approach: Three individuals with a spinal cord injury were enrolled in an ongoing clinical trial of an iBCI. Participants had two intracortical microelectrode arrays implanted in the arm and/or hand areas of the precentral gyrus based on presurgical functional imaging. Neural data were recorded while participants attempted to perform movements of the hand, wrist, elbow, and shoulder. Main results: We found that electrode arrays that were located more medially recorded significantly more activity during attempted proximal arm movements (elbow, shoulder) than did lateral arrays, which captured more activity related to attempted distal arm movements (hand, wrist). We also evaluated the relative contribution from the two arrays implanted in each participant to decoding accuracy during calibration of an iBCI decoder for translation and grasping tasks. For both task types, imagery strategy (e.g. reaching vs wrist movements) had a significant impact on the relative contributions of each array to decoding. Overall, we found some evidence of broad tuning to arm and hand movements; however, there was a clear bias in the amount of information accessible about each movement type in spatially distinct areas of cortex. Significance: These results demonstrate that classical concepts of somatotopy can have real consequences for iBCI use, and highlight the importance of considering somatotopy when planning iBCI implantation.

Download

Experimental setup. (a) In the VR experimental condition, the participant wears a virtual reality headset where the field of view moves to match their head movements to interact with the environment. (b) In the TV experimental condition, the participant looks at a fixed view on a screen. Inset displays coordinate system used in the MuJoCo virtual environment.
Online decoder training paradigm. To test decoder generalizability with participant C1, for a given experimental session, we fully trained separate decoders in the TV environment and VR environment and then alternated testing both decoders in both environments. The starting environment was balanced across sessions.
Performance metrics for VR versus TV experimental conditions. (a) Failure rates for participants C1 and P4 during the reach and transport phases. Data collected during the same experimental session are connected via a dotted line. (b) completion times, and (c) normalized path length from the reach (left column) or transport (right column) phases. Black lines indicate median values. Path length is plotted on a log scale. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, chi-squared test for failure rates, Wilcoxon rank-sum test for completion times and path length.
Neural tuning across conditions. Shift in preferred direction angle for (a) participant C1 and (b) participant P4. Within condition quantifies changes in tuning within the same environment pooled across VR and TV. Across condition describes changes in tuning between the VR and TV environments. The shuffle condition is a comparison of changes in across condition tuning where the recording channel numbers have been shuffled. Individual points are a singular channel (279 channels for participant C1, 336 channels for participant P4). Black lines indicate median values. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, K–S test.
Decoder comparison performance metrics. (a) Failure rates during online decoder comparison testing for reach and transport phases. Yellow indicates performance when using the decoder trained in the VR environment. Blue indicates performance when using the decoder trained in the TV environment. Solid lines indicate experimental testing sessions where training started in the TV environment. Dashed lines indicate experimental testing sessions where training started in the VR environment. (b) Completion times, and (c) normalized path length during online decoder comparison testing for the reach (left column) or transport (right column) phases for sessions where training started in the VR environment. Black lines indicate median values. This task was only completed by C1. Path length is plotted on a log scale. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, chi-squared test for failure rates, Wilcoxon rank-sum test for completion times and path length.
How different immersive environments affect intracortical brain computer interfaces

February 2025

·

23 Reads

Objective. As brain–computer interface (BCI) research advances, many new applications are being developed. Tasks can be performed in different virtual environments, and whether a BCI user can switch environments seamlessly will influence the ultimate utility of a clinical device. Approach. Here we investigate the importance of the immersiveness of the virtual environment used to train BCI decoders on the resulting decoder and its generalizability between environments. Two participants who had intracortical electrodes implanted in their precentral gyrus used a BCI to control a virtual arm, both viewed immersively through virtual reality goggles and at a distance on a flat television monitor. Main results. Each participant performed better with a decoder trained and tested in the environment they had used the most prior to the study, one for each environment type. The neural tuning to the desired movement was minimally influenced by the immersiveness of the environment. Finally, in further testing with one of the participants, we found that decoders trained in one environment generalized well to the other environment, but the order in which the environments were experienced within a session mattered. Significance. Overall, experience with an environment was more influential on performance than the immersiveness of the environment, but BCI performance generalized well after accounting for experience. Clinical Trial: NCT01894802


Figure 4 Evolution of representation (in)stability, topography and strength. Results were obtained from 8-direction center-out reaches, but only showing four diagonal directions (45º, 135º, 225º and 315º, from a to d) for clarity. Those reach directions were noted in the insets of the figures in the first row. The first row shows the instability and stability of representation from
Figure 6 Non-negative factorization revealed common factors of representation dynamics among different reach direction. a. Tensor arrangement before decomposition. Three dimensions were reach direction, a merged time component, and a merged muscle & electrode component. b. Weights of the reach direction dimension, respectively for each of the four factors. c. Weights of the time dimension, respectively for each of the four factors.
Spatial Evolution of Information Dynamics in the Primary Motor Cortex During Reach

December 2022

·

48 Reads

The primary motor cortex (M1) is known to be spatially organized in terms of muscles and body parts, notwithstanding some overlap. However, the classical view is largely static, neglecting potential representational changes on a fast time scale. To address potential representational dynamics, we probed the mutual information between M1 signals recorded across the cortical sheet and electromyography (EMG) activity from a set of muscles while a macaque monkey performed planar reaches. Here, we demonstrated that the spatial organization of the M1 encoding was in fact quite dynamic throughout the course of a reaching movement such that a given cortical site maximally encoded different muscles at different times. Despite these rapid representational changes, a proximal-to-distal gradient of the upper limb representation was preserved particularly close to movement onset. Representation was most stable close to movement onset, with characteristic topographic maps, possibly serving functional needs. This study bridges the important gap between flexible motor encoding and static motor maps, emphasizing the importance of considering space and time together in motor representation studies.



Figure 4: (a) Joint distribution of coordinates θ A and θ B inferred from the data shown in Fig. 2.b. (b) Distribution of coordinates η A and η B inferred from the data shown in Fig. 2.d. η A and η B are assumed to be independent. (c) Phase diagram of the model with homogeneous and constant external inputs, shown as a function of the parameters j A s , j B s , modulating the two symmetric terms in the couplings (see equation 1). Different curves correspond to bifurcation lines for different values of the parameter j a , modulating the asymmetric term in the couplings. The area underneath each line (gray) corresponds to the homogeneous phase; the area beyond each line (white) corresponds to the marginal phase, where the network exhibit a narrowly localized activity pattern even in absence of external tuned inputs.
Figure 7: (a) Dynamics of the order parameters r 0 , r A , r B computed from data (thin line; shaded area: ± SEM of the population) and numerical simulations (thick line) of the dynamics of a finite-size network model with additive noise. The couplings parameters of the network correspond to the scenario of Fig. 6, panel d: they are above, but close to, the bifurcation line. (b) Percentage of variance of the preparatory (blue) and movement-related (red) activity from simulations explained by the first 11 principal components calculated from preparatory (top) and movement-related (bottom) trial-averaged activity. (c) The alignment index quantifies the degree of orthogonality between two subspaces. Top: alignment index between the preparatory and movement-related activities computed from data, compared to the randomized test (random alignment index, distribution in light gray and average in dark grey). Bottom: alignment index computed from simulations, for 100 subsets of 140 neurons each, sampled uniformly at random from the larger network we simulated; the gray histogram shows the average random alignment index for all subsets. (d) Pairwise correlation of the trial-averaged activity from simulations during movement preparation (blue) and execution (red) of pairs of neurons as a function of the difference in their preferred directions ∆θ A (top) and ∆θ B (bottom).
Interplay between external inputs and recurrent dynamics during movement preparation and execution in a network model of motor cortex

February 2022

·

19 Reads

·

2 Citations

The primary motor cortex has been shown to coordinate movement preparation and execution through computations in approximately orthogonal subspaces. The underlying network mechanisms, and in particular the roles played by external and recurrent connectivity, are central open questions that need to be answered to understand the neural substrates of motor control. We develop a recurrent neural network model that recapitulates the temporal evolution of single-unit activity recorded from M1 of a macaque monkey during an instructed delayed-reach task. We explore the hypothesis that the observed dynamics of neural covariation with the direction of motion emerges from a synaptic connectivity structure that depends on the preferred directions of neurons in both preparatory and movement-related epochs. We constrain the strength both of synaptic connectivity and of external input parameters by using the data as well as an external input minimization cost. Our analysis suggests that the observed patterns of covariance are shaped by external inputs that are tuned to neurons' preferred directions during movement preparation, and they are dominated by strong direction-specific recurrent connectivity during movement execution, in agreement with recent experimental findings on the relationship between motor-cortical and motor-thalamic activity, both before and during movement execution. We also demonstrate that the manner in which single-neuron tuning properties rearrange over time can explain the level of orthogonality of preparatory and movement-related subspaces. We predict that the level of orthogonality is small enough to prevent premature movement initiation during movement preparation; however, it is not zero, which allows the network to encode a stable direction of motion at the population level without direction-specific external inputs during movement execution.


Longevity and reliability of chronic unit recordings using the Utah, intracortical multi-electrode arrays

December 2021

·

92 Reads

·

37 Citations

Objective. Microelectrode arrays are standard tools for conducting chronic electrophysiological experiments, allowing researchers to simultaneously record from large numbers of neurons. Specifically, Utah electrode arrays (UEAs) have been utilized by scientists in many species, including rodents, rhesus macaques, marmosets, and human participants. The field of clinical human brain-computer interfaces currently relies on the UEA as a number of research groups have clearance from the United States Federal Drug Administration (FDA) for this device through the investigational device exemption pathway. Despite its widespread usage in systems neuroscience, few studies have comprehensively evaluated the reliability and signal quality of the Utah array over long periods of time in a large dataset. Approach. We collected and analyzed over 6000 recorded datasets from various cortical areas spanning almost nine years of experiments, totaling 17 rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) and 2 human subjects, and 55 separate microelectrode Utah arrays. The scale of this dataset allowed us to evaluate the average life of these arrays, based primarily on the signal-to-noise ratio of each electrode over time. Main results. Using implants in primary motor, premotor, prefrontal, and somatosensory cortices, we found that the average lifespan of available recordings from UEAs was 622 days, although we provide several examples of these UEAs lasting over 1000 days and one up to 9 years; human implants were also shown to last longer than non-human primate implants. We also found that electrode length did not affect longevity and quality, but iridium oxide metallization on the electrode tip exhibited superior yield as compared to platinum metallization. Significance. Understanding longevity and reliability of microelectrode array recordings allows researchers to set expectations and plan experiments accordingly and maximize the amount of high-quality data gathered. Our results suggest that one can expect chronic unit recordings to last at least two years, with the possibility for arrays to last the better part of a decade.


Figure 4. Recording neural population activity simultaneously with upper limb kinematics during foraging.
Chronic wireless neural population recordings with common marmosets

February 2021

·

114 Reads

Marmosets are an increasingly important model system for neuroscience in part due to genetic tractability and enhanced cortical accessibility, due to a lissencephalic neocortex. However, many of the techniques generally employed to record neural activity in primates inhibit the expression of natural behaviors in marmosets precluding neurophysiological insights. To address this challenge, we developed methods for recording neural population activity in unrestrained marmosets across multiple ethological behaviors, multiple brain states, and over multiple years. Notably, our flexible methodological design allows for replacing electrode arrays and removal of implants providing alternative experimental endpoints. We validate the method by recording sensorimotor cortical population activity in freely moving marmosets across their natural behavioral repertoire and during sleep. HIGHLIGHTS – Simultaneous and chronic wireless neural population recordings in multiple freely moving marmosets – Neural recording approach enables studies of natural repertoire of behaviors and sleep – Methyl-methacrylate free surgical approach designed to promote biocompatibility and longitudinal success of the implant – Modular headstage configuration requires minimal daily animal handling for daily neural recordings – Alternative experimental endpoints: implant removal, healing, and electrode array replacement


A platform for semi-automated voluntary training of common marmosets for behavioral neuroscience

March 2020

·

47 Reads

·

19 Citations

Journal of Neurophysiology

Generally behavioral neuroscience studies of the common marmoset employ adaptations of well-established training methods used with macaque monkeys. However, in many cases these approaches do not readily generalize to marmosets indicating a need for alternatives. Here we present the development of one such alternate: a platform for semiautomated, voluntary in-home cage behavioral training that allows for the study of naturalistic behaviors. We describe the design and production of a modular behavioral training apparatus using CAD software and digital fabrication. We demonstrate that this apparatus permits voluntary behavioral training and data collection throughout the marmoset’s waking hours with little experimenter intervention. Furthermore, we demonstrate the use of this apparatus to reconstruct the kinematics of the marmoset’s upper limb movement during natural foraging behavior. NEW & NOTEWORTHY The study of marmosets in neuroscience has grown rapidly and presents unique challenges. We address those challenges with an innovative platform for semiautomated, voluntary training that allows marmosets to train throughout their waking hours with minimal experimenter intervention. We describe the use of this platform to capture upper limb kinematics during foraging and to expand the opportunities for behavioral training beyond the limits of traditional training sessions. This flexible platform can easily incorporate other tasks.


Figure 2. Different objects give rise to different hand pre-shaping kinematics. (A) Trajectories of three joints as an animal grasps two different objects over the course of a session. Each trace represents kinematics during a single trial. Faded circles indicate joint angles 750 ms prior to maximum aperture and darkened triangles indicate joint angles 750 ms after maximum aperture. (B) The joint angles from (A), plotted for the 35 objects, with different object-specific trajectories indicated with different colors. Each colored trace is averaged across all presentations of that object. Shading indicates ±1 S.E.M. across trials. (C) Time-varying object classification on the basis of the posture of the hand, assessed across all sessions and averaged across monkeys. Error bars indicate ±1 S.E.M. across monkeys. Black dashed line indicates chance performance. See Figure S2 for corresponding variety in neural responses.
Figure 3. Performance of the generalized linear model (GLM). (A) Measured (colored) and predicted (black) perievent time histograms (PETHs) for a single neuron in area 3a. Each plot depicts the PETH associated with a different object. The pseudo-R 2 of the GLM fit to this neuron is 0.34. Vertical bars indicate ±1 S.E.M. across trials. (B) Cumulative distribution of pseudo-R 2 values across neurons from each area. Neurons are pooled across sessions and across different monkeys. The black dashed line indicates a pseudo-R 2 cut-off of 0.05, which is used in subsequent analyses of response field (RF) structure. In area 2, the pseudo-R 2 values of 36 out of 44 total units (81.8%) exceed this criterion; in area 3a, 32 of 39 (82.1%); and in M1, 167 of 219 (76.3%). Importantly, the average goodness-of-fit is comparable to that reported for M1 neurons during reaching (Table S1).
Figure 4. Response field size for somatosensory and motor cortical neurons. (A) Comparisons of each neuron's best single-joint pseudo-R 2 (abscissa) against the corresponding multi-joint pseudo-R 2 . Multi-joint models yield considerably better predictions than do single-joint models, achieving roughly doubled levels of goodness-of-fit. Dashed line indicates the unity slope. (B) For each weight vector, , defining a neuron's response field (RF), we calculate the contribution of each joint to the squared norm of . The minimum number of joints (dotted vertical line) required to account for 90% of that norm (dashed horizontal line) is taken to be the set of joints defining that neuron's RF. (C) Average number of joints in a neuron's RF for each area. Only neurons with pseudo-R 2 > 0.05 are considered. There are no differences across areas: Roughly eight joints define the typical RF from each area. Individual points denote joint counts for the response fields of individual neurons. Vertical lines indicate ±1 S.E.M. across neurons. Such distributions of joint counts are unlikely to emerge from neurons that only track or control a single joint (Figure S3A).
Figure 7. Preferential encoding of joint postures in somatosensory and motor cortex. (A) Peri-event time histograms from Figure 3A (top row), shown with hand postures (middle row) or movements (bottom row) along the respective dimension most aligned with the neuron's firing rate. Best dimensions for postures and movements are fit using separate generalized linear models (GLMs), one using only postural predictors, and one using only movement ones. Being along separate axes, the posture and movement traces are not directly derived from one another. Qualitatively, both the posture and velocity axes account for the second, larger response transient occurring at maximum aperture, but the postural axis better captures the first response transient prior to maximum aperture and sustained activity following maximum aperture. (B) The fraction of unique deviance explained (FUDE) by postural kinematics (posture) and movement kinematics (movement). Each point represents a single neuron. That the points all fall well below the unity line (dashed line) suggests that postures, rather than movements, are preferentially encoded by these neurons. Note that this does not hold for M1 during reaching movements (Figure S4). See Figure S5 for further verification of the postureencoding result, particularly in light of previous reports on preferential coding along movement axes in M1 during grasp (Saleh et al., 2010).
FIGURES
Postural Representations of the Hand in Primate Sensorimotor Cortex

March 2019

·

206 Reads

·

5 Citations

Dexterous hand control requires not only a sophisticated motor system but also a sensory system to provide tactile and proprioceptive feedback. To date, the study of the neural basis of proprioception in cortex has focused primarily on reaching movements, at the expense of hand-specific behaviors such as grasp. To fill this gap, we record both the time-varying hand kinematics and the neural activity evoked in somatosensory and motor cortices as monkeys grasp a variety of different objects. We find that neurons in somatosensory cortex, as well as in motor cortex, preferentially track postures of multi-joint combinations spanning the entire hand. This contrasts with neural responses during reaching movements, which preferentially track movement kinematics of the arm rather than its postural configuration. These results suggest different representations of arm and hand movements likely adapted to suit the different functional roles of these two effectors.


Movement Decomposition in the Primary Motor Cortex

April 2018

·

370 Reads

·

33 Citations

Cerebral Cortex

A complex action can be described as the composition of a set of elementary movements. While both kinematic and dynamic elements have been proposed to compose complex actions, the structure of movement decomposition and its neural representation remain unknown. Here, we examined movement decomposition by modeling the temporal dynamics of neural populations in the primary motor cortex of macaque monkeys performing forelimb reaching movements. Using a hidden Markov model, we found that global transitions in the neural population activity are associated with a consistent segmentation of the behavioral output into acceleration and deceleration epochs with directional selectivity. Single cells exhibited modulation of firing rates between the kinematic epochs, with abrupt changes in spiking activity timed with the identified transitions. These results reveal distinct encoding of acceleration and deceleration phases at the level of M1, and point to a specific pattern of movement decomposition that arises from the underlying neural activity. A similar approach can be used to probe the structure of movement decomposition in different brain regions, possibly controlling different temporal scales, to reveal the hierarchical structure of movement composition.


Citations (7)


... Although recent developments have explored improving the biocompatibility and chronicity of iBCI implants such as by coating flexible MEAs in gelatin [143], silk [144] or maltose [145], this has yet to be demonstrated in living human subjects apart from neurotrophic electrodes. Notwithstanding neuronal injury and toxicity, recording quality degrades over time due to positional shifts of the implant within the brain tissue [138,146], with subsequent failure when the entire device dislodges entirely. This necessitates thorough patient follow-up and possible surgeries in the future to re-embed the recording device. ...

Reference:

The state-of-the-art of invasive brain-computer interfaces in humans: a systematic review and individual patient meta-analysis
Longevity and reliability of chronic unit recordings using the Utah, intracortical multi-electrode arrays

... In fact, there is a substantial scientific literature where the fields of neuroscience, cognitive science, and experimental psychology intersect and from which autonomous, cage-based, computerized, testing and training protocols have emerged. Such protocols have the capacity to conduct cognitive assessments of and provide cognitive enrichment to NHPs simultaneously [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. NHPs, who possess a rich set of cognitive abilities, often encounter only simple intellectual challenges in captivity. ...

A platform for semi-automated voluntary training of common marmosets for behavioral neuroscience
  • Citing Article
  • March 2020

Journal of Neurophysiology

... Dr. Sliman Bensmaia presented a poster to study the extent to which such dynamics are also present during grasping movements but failed to find strong signatures of rotational dynamics. This suggests that low-dimensional rotational dynamics might not be a universal task-invariant signature of M1 activity (Goodman et al. 2019). Dr. Brian Dekleva presented an analysis of neural population dynamics in tasks involving grasping and contrasted the relation between dynamics during reaching while grasping (transport of objects), which appeared to change depending on the task demands/constraints. ...

Postural Representations of the Hand in Primate Sensorimotor Cortex

... Directional tuning during reaching has been shown to be non-stationary [6][7][8][9][10][11], as tuning functions can change in a subset of neurons during a reach, especially as the movement begins. Recent work [12,13] shows that while these tuning functions may change episodically during the reach, they are stable within each episode. Motor cortical neurons usually have one or two modulation episodes during a reach [12], although we and others [7,8] have found examples of neurons with three. ...

Movement Decomposition in the Primary Motor Cortex
  • Citing Article
  • April 2018

Cerebral Cortex

... Neurons in the brain are embedded within rich network structures [63,64] that affect the correlation patterns of neural dynamics [65][66][67][68]. Therefore, a mechanistic understanding of neural timescales may require the context of interactions within a network. ...

Nonmonotonic spatial structure of interneuronal correlations in prefrontal microcircuits

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

... The cortical descending output is transmitted to spinal motor neurons through direct cortico-motor neuronal connections and polysynaptic connections via spinal interneurons, ultimately culminating in the execution of limb movements. Despite extensive research correlating MCx activity with various motor-related physical parameters, the exact signals encoded by MCx remain elusive (6,7). Although recent advances in analyzing the neural dynamics of MCx successfully explain the transition from motor preparation to execution, the question of how the dynamic state of MCx population evolves to drive muscle activity remains unanswered (8)(9)(10)(11). ...

Perspectives on classical controversies about the motor cortex
  • Citing Article
  • June 2017

Journal of Neurophysiology

... Furthermore, (Chaplin et al., 2017) have shown that marmosets' MT is 4-5 times smaller than in macaques and that their cerebral cortex contains few sulci, with most visual areas like MT fully exposed on the outer cortical surface. Despite the difference in scale, they possess similar structures and areas found in macaques and humans (Walker et al., 2017). Thus, we increased the RoR to a maximum of 20% for input 1, to 6%, 8%, and 10% for input 2, and to a maximum of 20% for inputs 7 and 8, assuming faster build-up activity. ...

The Marmoset as a Model System for Studying Voluntary Motor Control: Studying Motor Control with Marmosets
  • Citing Article
  • October 2016

Developmental Neurobiology