Nga Do Thi Thuy’s research while affiliated with Oxford University Clinical Research Unit and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (3)


Fig. 2. Distribution of bacteria by hospitals and regions. Sum of each graph is 100%. Abbreviations: E. coli, Escherichia coli; P. aeruginosa, Pseudomonas aeruginosa; S. aureus, Staphylococcus aureus; S. pneumoniae, Streptococcus pneumoniae; H. influenzae, Haemophilus influenzae; E. faecium, Enterococcus faecium.
Fig. 3. Distribution of antibiotic consumption by hospitals and regions.
Fig. 4. Resistance rate, number of isolates and number of DDD/1000 patient-days per antibiotic group. For each bacteria-antibiotic combination, the resistant proportion was shown in bottom left figure; the number of isolates for each organism was in top left and the number of DDD/1000 patient-days of antibiotic group was in bottom right. The resistant proportion was calculated for 15 hospitals that provided antibiotic consumption data. DDD/1000 patient-days figure illustrates the amount of antibiotic used for all bacterial treatment, not for any specific bacteria. Untested or clinically irrelevant bacteria-antibiotic combinations were not shown.
Susceptibility results of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp. and Enterobacter spp. isolated in the VINARES project.
Susceptibility result of Acinetobacter spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Haemophilus influenzae isolated in the VINARES project.
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and antibiotic consumption results from 16 hospitals in Viet Nam: The VINARES project 2012–2013
  • Article
  • Full-text available

June 2019

·

424 Reads

·

37 Citations

Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance

·

Nga Do Thi Thuy

·

Ulf Rydell

·

[...]

·

Heiman F.L. Wertheim

Objective: To establish a hospital-based surveillance network with national coverage for antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and antibiotic consumption in Viet Nam. Methods: A 16-hospital network (Viet Nam Resistance: VINARES) was established and consisted of national and provincial-level hospitals across the country. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing results from routine clinical diagnostic specimens and antibiotic consumption data in Defined Daily Dose per 1000 bed days (DDD/1000 patient-days) were prospectively collected and analysed between October 2012 and September 2013. Results: Data from a total of 24 732 de-duplicated clinical isolates were reported. The most common bacteria were: Escherichia coli (4437 isolates, 18%), Klebsiella spp. (3290 isolates, 13%) and Acinetobacter spp. (2895 isolates, 12%). The hospital average antibiotic consumption was 918 DDD/1000 patient-days. Third-generation cephalosporins were the most frequently used antibiotic class (223 DDD/1000 patient-days, 24%), followed by fluoroquinolones (151 DDD/1000 patient-days, 16%) and second-generation cephalosporins (112 DDD/1000 patient-days, 12%). Proportions of antibiotic resistance were high: 1098/1580 (69%) Staphylococcus aureus isolates were methicillin-resistant (MRSA); 115/344 isolates (33%) and 90/358 (25%) Streptococcus pneumoniae had reduced susceptibility to penicillin and ceftriaxone, respectively. A total of 180/2977 (6%) E. coli and 242/1526 (16%) Klebsiella pneumoniae were resistant to imipenem, respectively; 602/1826 (33%) Pseudomonas aeruginosa were resistant to ceftazidime and 578/1765 (33%) to imipenem. Of Acinetobacter spp. 1495/2138 (70%) were resistant to carbapenems and 2/333 (1%) to colistin. Conclusions: These data are valuable in providing a baseline for AMR among common bacterial pathogens in Vietnamese hospitals and to assess the impact of interventions.

Download

Drivers and costs associated with antimicrobial resistance. Adapted: Holmes et al. [2] and McGowan [10]
Enumerating the economic cost of antimicrobial resistance per antibiotic consumed to inform the evaluation of interventions affecting their use

August 2018

·

715 Reads

·

246 Citations

Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control

Background Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a colossal threat to global health and incurs high economic costs to society. Economic evaluations of antimicrobials and interventions such as diagnostics and vaccines that affect their consumption rarely include the costs of AMR, resulting in sub-optimal policy recommendations. We estimate the economic cost of AMR per antibiotic consumed, stratified by drug class and national income level. Methods The model is comprised of three components: correlation coefficients between human antibiotic consumption and subsequent resistance; the economic costs of AMR for five key pathogens; and consumption data for antibiotic classes driving resistance in these organisms. These were used to calculate the economic cost of AMR per antibiotic consumed for different drug classes, using data from Thailand and the United States (US) to represent low/middle and high-income countries. Results The correlation coefficients between consumption of antibiotics that drive resistance in S. aureus, E. coli, K. pneumoniae, A. baumanii, and P. aeruginosa and resistance rates were 0.37, 0.27, 0.35, 0.45, and 0.52, respectively. The total economic cost of AMR due to resistance in these five pathogens was 0.5billionand0.5 billion and 2.9 billion in Thailand and the US, respectively. The cost of AMR associated with the consumption of one standard unit (SU) of antibiotics ranged from 0.1formacrolidesto0.1 for macrolides to 0.7 for quinolones, cephalosporins and broad-spectrum penicillins in the Thai context. In the US context, the cost of AMR per SU of antibiotic consumed ranged from 0.1forcarbapenemsto0.1 for carbapenems to 0.6 for quinolones, cephalosporins and broad spectrum penicillins. Conclusion The economic costs of AMR per antibiotic consumed were considerable, often exceeding their purchase cost. Differences between Thailand and the US were apparent, corresponding with variation in the overall burden of AMR and relative prevalence of different pathogens. Notwithstanding their limitations, use of these estimates in economic evaluations can make better-informed policy recommendations regarding interventions that affect antimicrobial consumption and those aimed specifically at reducing the burden of AMR. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13756-018-0384-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.


Citations (2)


... Between 2010 and 2020, we observed an increasing trend in the prevalence of MDR and resistance to empirical treatment drugs in the predominant BSI pathogens, including E. coli, K. pneumoniae and S. aureus. E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and MRSA identified from blood and cerebrospinal fluid 16,30 . In our study, more than 30% of E. coli isolates were resistant to 3 rd /4 th generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones, rendering these important drugs ineffective and leading to increased reliance on carbapenems. ...

Reference:

Changing epidemiology and antimicrobial susceptibility of bloodstream infections at a Vietnamese infectious diseases hospital (2010–2020)
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and antibiotic consumption results from 16 hospitals in Viet Nam: The VINARES project 2012–2013

Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance

... The results indicate that the majority of the papers (17) had an assessment score of 100%, for example, the high-cost burden and health consequences of AMR; the price to pay by Chandy et al. [12] and Penno et al. [13] [14]; and costeffectiveness analysis of typhoid conjugate vaccines in an outbreak setting: a modeling study [15], among others, suggesting a good fit for inclusion as per the JBI quality assessment tool. These were seconded by another set of 17 papers with a score of 88%, which include the healthcare costs of AMR in Lebanon [16], enumerating the economic cost of AMR per antibiotic consumed to inform the evaluation of interventions affecting their use [17], determining the ideal prevention strategy for multidrugresistant organisms in resource-limited countries [18], and pretreatment out-of-pocket expenses for presumptive multidrug-resistant tuberculosis patients [19]. Eight of the 62 papers had a minimum quality assessment score of 63%, including studies by Lester et al. [20], Zhen et al. [21], and Vallejo-Torres et al. [22]. ...

Enumerating the economic cost of antimicrobial resistance per antibiotic consumed to inform the evaluation of interventions affecting their use

Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control