Na Liu’s research while affiliated with Shandong University and other places

Objective To explore the association between frailty and medication adherence by modeling medication beliefs (i.e., necessity and concerns) as mediators among community-dwelling older patients. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted among 780 Chinese older patients. Frailty, medication adherence and medication beliefs were assessed using the Comprehensive Frailty Assessment Instrument (CFAI), the 4-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-4) and the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire-Specific (BMQ-Specific), respectively. The PROCESS SPSS Macro version 2.16.3, model 4 was used to test the significance of the indirect effects. Results Frailty was associated with high medication necessity (β = 0.091, p = 0.011) and high medication concerns (β = 0.297, p < 0.001). Medication adherence was positively associated with medication necessity (β = 0.129, p = 0.001), and negatively associated with medication concerns (β = -0.203, p < 0.001). Medication necessity and medication concerns attenuated the total effect of frailty on medication adherence by -13.6% and 70.3%, respectively Conclusion High medication concerns among frail older patients inhibit their medication adherence, which cannot be offset by the positive effect of their high medication necessity on medication adherence. Practice implications Interventions should target medication beliefs among frail older patients, particularly medication concerns, to efficiently improve their medication adherence.

The objective was to examine the feasibility, reliability and validity of the Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI) among Chinese community-dwelling older adults. Of the 1230 participants, 1202 (97.7%) completed all items on the GFI. The internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach's α = 0.64), and the test-retest reliability within a 7-15-day interval was good (ICC = 0.87). The GFI showed good diagnostic accuracy in the identification of frailty with reference to the frailty index (AUC = 0.84), and the optimal frailty cut-point was 3. Convergent validity was supported by significant correlations between each domain of the GFI and the corresponding alternative measurement(s). Higher proportions of frailty (GFI ≥ 3) were found in those who were older, female, less-educated, lived alone, and had 2 or more chronic diseases than in their counterparts, supporting its known-group discriminant validity. The Chinese GFI has good feasibility, acceptable reliability and satisfactory validity among community-dwelling older adults.

Background: Chronic pain (CP) is prevalent among older adults in many Western countries and its prevalence, factors, and self-reported or objective measured health impacts have been well documented. However, there is limited information on these aspects among Chinese community-dwelling older adults. Aims: Our aim was to assess the prevalence of CP and identify its associated factors as well as health impacts among older adults in China. Design: Cross-sectional design. Settings: Community settings. Participants/subjects: A total of 1219 community-dwelling adults aged 60 years or older. Methods: Data on CP, sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidity, cognitive function, and physical activity, as well as self-reported outcomes (functional disability, depression, quality of sleep, and undernutrition) and objective measured physical function, were obtained. Results: Among 1,219 participants, 41.1% reported CP, of whom 16.6% experienced moderate to severe pain. The risk of CP was higher among older women with comorbidity and with depression and lower among older adults with higher educational level as well as with adequate physical activity. CP had significant associations with inadequate physical activity, functional disability, depression, poorer quality of sleep, and undernutrition, as well as worsening physical performance, poorer standing balance, and chair stands. Conclusions: CP is a common problem among Chinese community-dwelling older adults, particularly among the most vulnerable subgroups, and has substantial impacts on self-reported functional disability, depression, poor quality of sleep, and undernutrition, as well as objective measured physical function. Therefore it is relevant for older adults to develop effective CP management programs.

Pain and frailty are both prevalent and have severe health impacts among older adults. We conducted a cross-sectional observational study to examine the association between pain and frailty, and depression as a mediator and its interaction with pain on frailty among 1788 Chinese community-dwelling older adults. Physical frailty, pain intensity and depressive symptoms were assessed using the Frailty Phenotype, the revised Faces Pain Scale (FPS-R), and the 5-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-5), respectively. We found that both pain (OR = 1.61; 95% CI: 1.32, 1.97) and depressive symptoms (OR = 4.67; 95% CI: 3.36, 6.50) were positively associated with physical frailty (OR = 1.61; 95% CI: 1.32, 1.97), and depressive symptoms were associated with pain (OR = 1.94; 95% CI: 1.15, 3.39), attenuating the association between pain and physical frailty by 56.1%. Furthermore, older adults with both pain and depressive symptoms (OR = 8.13; 95% CI: 5.27, 12.53) had a higher risk of physical frailty than, those with pain (OR = 1.41; 95% CI: 1.14, 1.76) or depressive symptoms (OR = 3.63; 95% CI: 2.25, 5.85) alone. The relative excess risk of interaction (RERI), the attributable proportion due to interaction (AP) and the synergy index (S) were 4.08, 0.50, and 2.34, respectively. These findings suggest that the positive association of pain with frailty is persistent and partially mediated by depression, and comorbid depression and pain has an additive interaction on physical frailty. It has an implication of multidisciplinary care for frail older adults with pain.

Aim: To cross-culturally adapt and validate the Comprehensive Frailty Assessment Instrument (CFAI) among Chinese community-dwelling older adults. Methods: The Chinese CFAI was developed through forward-backward translations. An urban sample of 1235 community-dwelling older adults received face-to-face interviews to examine the validity (construct validity and criterion validity) and reliability (internal consistency and test-retest reliability). Results: The Chinese CFAI achieved semantic and idiomatic equivalence, and showed acceptable reliability and an expected factor structure, except for the social support domain. The exploratory factor analysis extracted five factors explaining 53.8% of the total variance of frailty. The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the data fit well to the second-order factor theoretical model, with a root mean square error of approximation of 0.05, Tucker-Lewis Index of 0.93 and Comparative Fit Index of 0.95. The receiver operating characteristic analysis presented an acceptable criterion validity using the Rockwood Frailty Index as an external criterion (area under the curve 0.80), with balanced sensitivity (65.31%) and specificity (81.19%) at the optimal 39-point frailty cut-off of the CFAI. Conclusions: The Chinese CFAI has good validity and reliability as a practical frailty measure in Chinese community-dwelling older adults.

Objective: To cross-culturally adapt and test the FRAIL scale in Chinese community-dwelling older adults. Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: The Chinese FRAIL scale was generated by translation and back-translation. An urban sample of 1235 Chinese community-dwelling older adults was enrolled to test its psychometric properties, including convergent validity, criterion validity, known-group divergent validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Results: The Chinese FRAIL scale achieved semantic, idiomatic, and experiential equivalence. The convergent validity was confirmed by statistically significant kappa coefficients (0.209-0.401, P < .001) of each item with its corresponding alternative measurement, including the 7th item of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale, the Timed Up and Go test, 4-m walking speed, polypharmacy, and the Short-Form Mini Nutritional Assessment. Using the Fried frailty phenotype as an external criterion, the Chinese FRAIL scale showed satisfactory diagnostic accuracy for frailty (area under the curve = 0.91). The optimal cut-point for frailty was 2 (sensitivity: 86.96%, specificity: 85.64%). The Chinese FRAIL scale had fair agreement with the Fried frailty phenotype (kappa = 0.274, P < .001), and classified more participants into frailty (17.2%) than the Fried frailty phenotype (3.9%). More frail individuals were recognized by the Chinese FRAIL scale among older and female participants than their counterparts (P < .001), respectively. It had low internal consistency (Kuder-Richardson formula 20 = 0.485) and good test-retest reliability within a 7- to 15-day interval (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.708). Conclusions: The Chinese FRAIL scale presents acceptable validity and reliability and can apply to Chinese community-dwelling older adults.

Objective: To translate the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) into Chinese and assess its reliability and validity. Methods: A sample of 917 community-dwelling older people, aged ≥60 years, in a Chinese city was included between August 2015 and March 2016. Construct validity was assessed using alternative measures corresponding to the TFI items, including self-rated health status (SRH), unintentional weight loss, walking speed, timed-up-and-go tests (TUGT), making telephone calls, grip strength, exhaustion, Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ), Geriatric Depression scale (GDS-15), emotional role, Adaptability Partnership Growth Affection and Resolve scale (APGAR) and Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS). Fried's phenotype and frailty index were measured to evaluate criterion validity. Adverse health outcomes (ADL and IADL disability, healthcare utilization, GDS-15, SSRS) were used to assess predictive (concurrent) validity. Results: The internal consistency reliability was good (Cronbach's α=0.71). The test-retest reliability was strong (r=0.88). Kappa coefficients showed agreements between the TFI items and corresponding alternative measures. Alternative measures correlated as expected with the three domains of TFI, with an exclusion that alternative psychological measures had similar correlations with psychological and physical domains of the TFI. The Chinese TFI had excellent criterion validity with the AUCs regarding physical phenotype and frailty index of 0.87 and 0.86, respectively. The predictive (concurrent) validities of the adverse health outcomes and healthcare utilization were acceptable (AUCs: 0.65-0.83). Conclusions: The Chinese TFI has good validity and reliability as an integral instrument to measure frailty of older people living in the community in China.