N. Lugaz’s research while affiliated with University of New Hampshire and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (107)


Snapshots of the four events from AR 13664 (associated with CME 1, CME 2, CME 4, and CME 5) from SDO/AIA 1600 Å and 94 Å filtergrams, (a)–(d) imaging the flare ribbons in the chromosphere and (e)–(h) the hot flaring corona (at a temperature of ∼ ${\sim} $7 MK). All images are differentially rotated to 8 May 2024, 05:00 UT. The white arrows in panels (a) and (d) highlight forward J‐shaped flare ribbons.
Solar proxies to derive magnetic helicity. (a)–(b) AR 13664 in the southern hemisphere observed in the AIA 171 Å filter, with the arrow in panel (a) showing the overlying coronal loops, and the arrow in panel (b) showing the flare arcades. (c) Filament in northern hemisphere as observed in Hα $\mathrm{H}\alpha $ by GONG, Cerro Tololo observatory. (d) Dimming region (arrows 1 and 2) and skew of post‐eruptive arcades (arrow 3) as seen in the AIA 171 Å filter. The snapshots are overlaid with HMI magnetograms saturated at ± $\pm $100 G (a)–(b) and ± $\pm $300 G (c)–(d). Red colors indicate positive polarity, blue colors negative polarity.
Interplanetary evolution of the five CMEs that caused the superstorm on 10–11 May 2024. (a)–(d) LASCO/C2 and C3 observations of the five halo CMEs with white arrows indicating the different fronts, (e) fronts of the different CMEs tracked in STEREO‐A/HI1 running differences highlighted in the corresponding Jplot cut around the ecliptic.
Snapshot of the ELEvo model at 10 May 2024, 16:00 UT. Left: A view of the heliosphere from above with the different spacecraft positions of STEREO‐A (red), Solar Orbiter (SolO; orange), Parker Solar Probe (PSP; black), BepiColombo (Bepi; blue), and L1 (green) displayed in Heliocentric Earth Equatorial (HEEQ) coordinates. The propagation of the five different CMEs is shown, assuming an elliptical front, with the shaded areas indicating the ±1σ $\pm 1\sigma $ uncertainties of the arrival time. Right: In situ speed and magnetic field data from ACE in real‐time, and STEREO‐A real‐time beacon data. The colored vertical lines indicate the predicted arrival times at L1 and STEREO‐A as issued by ELEvo, where the color‐coding corresponds to the one in Figure 3. The dots in the first panel correspond to the predicted arrival velocities at L1, with the error bars indicating the ±1σ $\pm 1\sigma $ uncertainty. Input parameters for the CMEs are taken from DONKI (CCMC).
In situ measurements of the complex CME‐CME interactions at L1 and STEREO‐A. (a) The magnetic field vector observed in real‐time by STEREO‐A/IMPACT, located at 12.6° ${}^{\circ}$ longitude west of Earth, with identified magnetic obstacles indicated as shaded regions and named M1, M2, M4, and M5. The first shock arrival time (10 May 2024 14:03 UT) is marked as a dashed line. (b) NOAA real‐time solar wind magnetic field vector, provided by the magnetometer ACE/MAG. Identified magnetic obstacles are named M1–M6 and indicated by the corresponding shaded regions. The start times for each CME are given as dashed lines. (c) Plasma speed measured by ACE/SWEPAM. (d) Observations of the plasma proton temperature Tp ${T}_{p}$ observed by the ACE/SWEPAM instrument. Enhancements of Tp ${T}_{p}$ that we link to the individual CME arrivals are marked as vertical dashed lines named S1 for the initial shock, and then D2–D5 for discontinuities that mark the CME start times. (e) Solar wind plasma proton density Np ${N}_{p}$, and (f) plasma β $\beta $, ratio of plasma to magnetic pressure, both from ACE/SWEPAM.

+2

First Observations of a Geomagnetic Superstorm With a Sub‐L1 Monitor
  • Article
  • Full-text available

March 2025

·

44 Reads

·

1 Citation

E. Weiler

·

C. Möstl

·

·

[...]

·

Forecasting the geomagnetic effects of solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) is currently an unsolved problem. CMEs, responsible for the largest values of the north‐south component of the interplanetary magnetic field, are the key driver of intense and extreme geomagnetic activity. Observations of southward interplanetary magnetic fields are currently only accessible directly through in situ measurements by spacecraft in the solar wind. On 10–12 May 2024, the strongest geomagnetic storm since 2003 took place, caused by five interacting CMEs. We clarify the relationship between the CMEs, their solar source regions, and the resulting signatures at the Sun–Earth L1 point observed by the ACE spacecraft at 1.00 AU. The STEREO‐A spacecraft was situated at 0.956 AU and 12.6° {}^{\circ} west of Earth during the event, serving as a fortuitous sub‐L1 monitor providing interplanetary magnetic field measurements of the solar wind. We demonstrate an extension of the prediction lead time, as the shock was observed 2.57 hr earlier at STEREO‐A than at L1, consistent with the measured shock speed at L1, 710 kms−1 s1\,{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}, and the radial distance of 0.043 AU. By deriving the geomagnetic indices based on the STEREO‐A beacon data, we show that the strength of the geomagnetic storm would have been decently forecasted, with the modeled minimum SYM‐H=−478.5 =478.5\,=-\,478.5 nT, underestimating the observed minimum by only 8%. Our study sets an unprecedented benchmark for future mission design using upstream monitoring for space weather prediction.

Download

Figure 3. Left panels: comparison of the temporal and spatial profiles when the CME is at 50, 100, 150 and 200 R e . These profiles are normalized; see main text for more details. The right panel shows the difference between the temporal and spatial profiles as a function of distance. Details are in Section 3.1.
Exploring the Impact of the Aging Effect on Inferred Properties of Solar Coronal Mass Ejections

April 2024

·

28 Reads

·

6 Citations

The Astrophysical Journal Letters

In situ measurements of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) when they pass over an interplanetary probe are one of the main ways we directly measure their properties. However, such in situ profiles are subject to several observational constraints that are still poorly understood. This work aims at quantifying one of them, namely, the aging effect, using a CME simulated with a three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamical code. The synthetic in situ profile and the instantaneous profile of the magnetic field strength differ more from each other when taken close to the Sun than far from it. Moreover, out of three properties we compute in this study (i.e., size, distortion parameter, and expansion speed), only the expansion speed shows a dependence of the aging as a function of distance. It is also the property that is the most impacted by the aging effect as it can amount to more than 100 km s ⁻¹ for CMEs observed closer than 0.15 au. This work calls for caution when deducing the expansion speed from CME profiles when they still are that close to the Sun since the aging effect can significantly impact the derived properties.


Discrepancies in the Properties of a Coronal Mass Ejection on Scales of 0.03 au as Revealed by Simultaneous Measurements at Solar Orbiter and Wind: The 2021 November 3–5 Event

February 2024

·

171 Reads

·

24 Citations

The Astrophysical Journal

Simultaneous in situ measurements of coronal mass ejections (CMEs), including both plasma and magnetic field, by two spacecraft in radial alignment have been extremely rare. Here, we report on one such CME measured by Solar Orbiter (SolO) and Wind on 2021 November 3–5, while the spacecraft were radially separated by a heliocentric distance of 0.13 au and angularly by only 2.2°. We focus on the magnetic cloud (MC) part of the CME. We find notable changes in the R and N magnetic field components and in the speed profiles inside the MC between SolO and Wind. We observe a greater speed at the spacecraft farther away from the Sun without any clear compression signatures. Since the spacecraft are close to each other and computing fast magnetosonic wave speed inside the MC, we rule out temporal evolution as the reason for the observed differences, suggesting that spatial variations over 2.2° of the MC structure are at the heart of the observed discrepancies. Moreover, using shock properties at SolO, we forecast an arrival time 2 hr 30 minutes too late for a shock that is just 5 hr 31 minutes away from Wind. Predicting the north–south component of the magnetic field at Wind from SolO measurements leads to a relative error of 55%. These results show that even angular separations as low as 2.2° (or 0.03 au in arc length) between spacecraft can have a large impact on the observed CME properties, which raises the issue of the resolutions of current CME models, potentially affecting our forecasting capabilities.


Fig. 1. Locations of SolO, STA, and Earth relative to Sun in ecliptic plane in heliocentric Earth ecliptic (HEE) coordinate system. The straight lines indicate the FOVs of STA HI1 (red) and HI2 (yellow), and the solid arrow shows the longitude of the CME propagation direction obtained from the GCS model.
Fig. 5. J-map image combining running-difference images of COR2, HI1, and HI2 along the central horizontal line. The horizontal pink line indicates the elongation of SolO converted using Eq. (1), and the three vertical pink lines correspond to the shock and magnetic ejecta boundaries identified at SolO(see main text for more details). The two bottom panels show the running difference (left) and base difference with the base time at 00:08 UT on March 11 (right) overlaid with the selected data points (the four colors are consistent with the colors of R1 to R4 as shown in the top panel of this figure) at 07:28 UT on March 11 in HI1 FOV.
Combining STEREO heliospheric imagers and Solar Orbiter to investigate the evolution of the 2022 March 10 CME

November 2023

·

100 Reads

·

4 Citations

Astronomy and Astrophysics

Context. Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) are large-scale structures of magnetized plasma that erupt from the corona into interplanetary space. The launch of Solar Orbiter (SolO) in 2020 enables in situ measurements of CMEs in the innermost heliosphere, at such distances where CMEs can be observed remotely within the inner field of view of heliospheric imagers (HIs). It thus provides the opportunity for investigations into the correspondence of the CME substructures measured in situ and observed remotely. We studied a CME that started on 2022 March 10 and was measured in situ by SolO at ∼0.44 au. Aims. Combining remote observations of CMEs from wide-angle imagers and in situ measurements in the innermost heliosphere allows us to compare CME properties derived through both techniques, validate the estimates, and better understand CME evolution, specifically the size and radial expansion, within 0.5 au. Methods. We compared the evolution of different CME substructures observed in images from the HIs on board the Ahead Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory (STEREO-A) and the CME signatures measured in situ by SolO. The CME is found to possess a density enhancement at its rear edge in both remote and in situ observations, which validates the use of the signature of density enhancement following the CMEs to accurately identify the CME rear edge. We also estimated and compared the radial size and radial expansion speed of different substructures in both observations. Results. The evolution of the CME front and rear edges in remote images is consistent with the in situ CME measurements. The radial expansion (i.e., radial size and radial expansion speed) of the whole CME structure consisting of the magnetic ejecta and the sheath is consistent with the in situ estimates obtained at the same time from SolO. However, we do not find such consistencies for the magnetic ejecta region inside the CME because it is difficult to identify the magnetic ejecta edges in the remote images.


Figure 2. Mean magnetic field (in nT) of the ME as a function of the radial distance (in au; panel (a)) and angular separation (in degrees; panel (b)).
Figure 3. Summary plot of the catalog of MEs measured simultaneously by two spacecraft. Panels (a) and (b) show the DiP and front-to-back ratio measured at both spacecraft, respectively, for all events (green and orange data points; bottom scale) and the absolute value of the difference between the two spacecraft (blue histograms; top scale).
Figure 5. Panel (a) shows the instantaneous profile following the procedure of Démoulin et al. (2020) at Wind on 1997 December 10. Panel (b) shows the reconstructed profile for the Wind-NEAR event marked by a red line. Light green and orange lines correspond to the portions of the ME profile at Wind and NEAR that are not used to build the reconstructed profile. See Section 4.4 for more details.
Catalog of the 19 Events with Simultaneous Spacecraft Measurements
ME Properties Measured by the Two Spacecraft
Investigating the Magnetic Structure of Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections Using Simultaneous Multispacecraft In Situ Measurements

October 2023

·

82 Reads

·

15 Citations

The Astrophysical Journal

In situ measurements from spacecraft typically provide a time series at a single location through coronal mass ejections (CMEs), and they have been one of the main methods to investigate CMEs. The CME properties derived from these in situ measurements are affected by temporal changes that occur as the CME passes over the spacecraft, such as radial expansion and aging, as well as spatial variations within a CME. This study uses multispacecraft measurements of the same CME at close separations to investigate both the spatial variability (how different a CME profile is when probed by two spacecraft close to each other) and the so-called aging effect (the effect of the time evolution on in situ properties). We compile a database of 19 events from the past 4 decades measured by two spacecraft with a radial separation of <0.2 au and an angular separation of <10°. We find that the average magnetic field strength measured by the two spacecraft differs by 18% of the typical average value, which highlights nonnegligible spatial or temporal variations. For one particular event, measurements taken by the two spacecraft allow us to quantify and significantly reduce the aging effect to estimate the asymmetry of the magnetic field strength profile. This study reveals that single-spacecraft time series near 1 au can be strongly affected by aging and that correcting for self-similar expansion does not capture the whole aging effect.


How Magnetic Reconnection May Affect the Coherence of Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections

July 2023

·

72 Reads

·

7 Citations

The Astrophysical Journal

On 2020 April 19–20, a solar ejection was seen by spacecraft in a radial alignment that included Solar Orbiter and Wind. The ejection contained a magnetic flux rope where magnetic field and plasma parameters were well correlated between spacecraft. This structure is called an “unperturbed magnetic flux rope” (UMFR). Ahead of the UMFR is a portion of the ejection (not sheath) that is referred to as “upstream” (US). We focus on the US and inquire why the correlation is so much weaker there. Specifically, we analyze data collected by Solar Orbiter at 0.81 au and Wind at L1. We show that a plausible cause for the lack of coherence in the US is a combination of front erosion and internal reconnection occurring there. Front erosion is inferred from an analysis of azimuthal magnetic flux balance in the UMFR. In the present case, we contend that the US, rather than the UMFR, is the source of the eroded field lines. The presence of erosion is supported further by a direct comparison of the magnetic field data at both spacecraft that shows, in particular, a massive shrinkage of the front portion of the US. Internal reconnection is also happening at thin current sheets inside the US. Strong nonradial flows are reconfiguring the structure. As a result of these reconnection processes, a whole section of the US is disrupted and field lines move down the flanks of the ejection and out of view of Wind.



Eruption and propagation of twisted flux ropes from the base of the solar corona to 1 au

November 2022

·

20 Reads

Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections (ICMEs) originate from the eruption of complex magnetic structures occurring in our star's atmosphere. Determining the general properties of ICMEs and the physical processes at the heart of their interactions with the solar wind is a hard task, in particular using only unidimensional in situ profiles. Thus, these phenomena are still not well understood. In this study we simulate the propagation of a set of flux ropes in order to understand some of the physical processes occurring during the propagation of an ICME such as their growth or their rotation. We present simulations of the propagation of a set of flux ropes in a simplified solar wind. We consider different magnetic field strengths and sizes at the initiation of the eruption, and characterize their influence on the properties of the flux ropes during their propagation. We use the 3D MHD module of the PLUTO code on an Adaptive Mesh Refinement grid. The evolution of the magnetic field of the flux rope during the propagation matches evolution law deduced from in situ observations. We also simulate in situ profiles that spacecraft would have measured at the Earth, and we compare with the results of statistical studies. We find a good match between simulated in situ profiles and typical profiles obtained in these studies. During their propagation, flux ropes interact with the magnetic field of the wind but still show realistic signatures of ICMEs when analyzed with synthetic satellite crossings. We also show that flux ropes with different shapes and orientations can lead to similar unidimensional crossings. This warrants some care when extracting magnetic topology of ICMEs using unidimensional crossings.


Figure 1. Left panel: ZDI stellar magnetograms of π 1 UMa obtained in 2007 and 2015 [from Rosén et al. 2016; Lüftinger et al. 2020]. Right panel: Comparison between solar B r magnetic field observations from NSO/SOLIS (top) with two lowdegree PFSS reconstructions [from Vidotto 2017].
Figure 3. Overview of the Lynch et al. [2019] simulation of a Carrington-scale, X58 superflare and CME from the young solar analog κ 1 Cet. (a) ZDI magnetogram. (b) Energized, preeruption field structure. (c) CME evolution through 30R .
Figure 4. Solarstellar scaling laws. (a) Flare frequency vs. energy [Shibata et al. 2013]. (b) Flare energy vs. active region area [Maehara et al. 2015]. (c) CME mass and kinetic energy vs. X-ray and Hα flare energy [Maehara et al. 2021].
Figure 5. Modeling stellar winds and starplanet interactions: TRAPPIST-1 system [upper left; Garraffo et al. 2017], TOI-700 system [lower left; Dong et al. 2020], and for Proxima c [right; AlvaradoGómez et al. 2020a].
Connecting Solar and Stellar Flares/CMEs: Expanding Heliophysics to Encompass Exoplanetary Space Weather

October 2022

·

247 Reads

·

1 Citation

The aim of this white paper is to briefly summarize some of the outstanding gaps in the observations and modeling of stellar flares, CMEs, and exoplanetary space weather, and to discuss how the theoretical and computational tools and methods that have been developed in heliophysics can play a critical role in meeting these challenges. The maturity of data-inspired and data-constrained modeling of the Sun-to-Earth space weather chain provides a natural starting point for the development of new, multidisciplinary research and applications to other stars and their exoplanetary systems. Here we present recommendations for future solar CME research to further advance stellar flare and CME studies. These recommendations will require institutional and funding agency support for both fundamental research (e.g. theoretical considerations and idealized eruptive flare/CME numerical modeling) and applied research (e.g. data inspired/constrained modeling and estimating exoplanetary space weather impacts). In short, we recommend continued and expanded support for: (1.) Theoretical and numerical studies of CME initiation and low coronal evolution, including confinement of "failed" eruptions; (2.) Systematic analyses of Sun-as-a-star observations to develop and improve stellar CME detection techniques and alternatives; (3.) Improvements in data-inspired and data-constrained MHD modeling of solar CMEs and their application to stellar systems; and (4.) Encouraging comprehensive solar--stellar research collaborations and conferences through new interdisciplinary and multi-agency/division funding mechanisms.


Figure 3. Event-integrated fluences for protons larger than 80 MeV (panel (a)) and for protons larger than 500 MeV (panel (b)) vs. rollover energies predicted based on Equation (38) for γ = 2 and for different values of c 1 . The values of c 1 are listed to the right of different symbols.
Interpreting the Observed Positive Correlation between the Event-integrated Fluence and the Rollover Energy of Solar Energetic Particle Events by the PAMELA Mission with Coupled Hydromagnetic Wave Excitation and Proton Acceleration at Shocks in the Low Corona

September 2022

·

63 Reads

·

3 Citations

The Astrophysical Journal

An analytical model for diffusive shock acceleration (DSA) at one-dimensional stationary planar shocks in the lower corona is presented. The model introduces an upstream escape boundary through which a constant flux of protons streaming upstream out of the system is allowed. The nonvanishing flux of streaming protons out of the system limits the maximum attainable energy of DSA and produces a rollover in the high-energy spectra of the shock-accelerated protons. The condition for the rollover energy derived from the model can account for the approximately linear relation between the natural logarithm of event-integrated fluences and the natural logarithm of rollover energies as demonstrated in Bruno et al. Solar energetic particle (SEP) events with higher integrated fluences in principle exhibit higher rollover energies since proton-excited hydromagnetic waves in the turbulent sheath reduce the proton diffusion coefficient and throttle the upstream streaming of protons. The consistency between the observation and the theory of DSA at shocks in the lower corona serves as evidence for the shock origin of protons of the highest energies in large SEP events.


Citations (64)


... As shown in Figures A1 and A2, the MFR magnetic profiles are more asymmetric (stronger at the front) close to the Sun, while, with increasing solar distances, these profiles become more symmetric. It is well-known that the aging effect Démoulin et al. 2020;Regnault et al. 2024b) in association with the CME expansion can result in such asymmetric magnetic profiles. However, Figures A1 and A2 with well-fitted expansion speeds indicate that the incorporation of the MFR expansion is not sufficient to explain the asymmetric magnetic profiles when the MFR is close to the Sun (similar to the results as shown in Yu et al. 2022). ...

Reference:

Influence of the Deformation of Coronal Mass Ejections on Their in-Situ Fitting with Circular-Cross-Section Flux Rope Models
Exploring the Impact of the Aging Effect on Inferred Properties of Solar Coronal Mass Ejections

The Astrophysical Journal Letters

... Recently, F. Regnault et al. (2024) showed, using SolO and Wind, that even angular separations as small as 2  .2 can significantly alter the observed CME properties. ...

Discrepancies in the Properties of a Coronal Mass Ejection on Scales of 0.03 au as Revealed by Simultaneous Measurements at Solar Orbiter and Wind: The 2021 November 3–5 Event

The Astrophysical Journal

... st four decades, extensive research has been conducted using both remotesensing observations and in situ measurements to characterize these large-scale eruptions from the Sun (e.g., J. T. Gosling 1990;M. Leitner et al. 2007; J. Zhang et al. 2021). The morphology of CMEs can be understood through remotesensing observations (A. Vourlidas et al. 2013;B. Zhuang et al. 2024). CMEs, when measured in situ near 1 astronomical unit (au), exhibit distinct plasma and magnetic field signatures that differentiate them from the ambient solar wind (L. Burlaga et al. 1981;J. T. Gosling 1990;H. V. Cane et al. 1998; I. G. Richardson & H. V. Cane 2004;L. K. Jian et al. 2018). In in situ measurements, CMEs typically prese ...

Combining STEREO heliospheric imagers and Solar Orbiter to investigate the evolution of the 2022 March 10 CME

Astronomy and Astrophysics

... ), Solar Orbiter (SolO), and BepiColombo, which are often separated by large radial distances and small/large longitudes, there are studies exploring the radial/temporal evolution of CMEs and their substructures in the background solar wind medium (E. E. Davies et al. 2021b;E. K. J. Kilpua et al. 2021;R. M. Winslow et al. 2021;C. Möstl et al. 2022;F. Regnault et al. 2023). The interaction of CMEs with other large-scale solar wind structures (e.g., heliospheric current sheet, preceding CMEs, and stream interaction regions) can also lead to changes in their properties on different spatial scales (N. Gopalswamy et al. 2009;R. M. Winslow et al. 2016;W. Mishra et al. 2017W. Mishra et al. , 2021a; E. K. J. Kil ...

Investigating the Magnetic Structure of Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections Using Simultaneous Multispacecraft In Situ Measurements

The Astrophysical Journal

... Al-Haddad et al. (2013) found that different techniques may produce different outputs even though they are applied to the same CME. Furthermore, the evolution, e.g., magnetic erosion (Dasso et al. 2006;Ruffenach et al. 2012;Lavraud et al. 2014;Wang et al. 2018;Farrugia et al. 2023) or deformation of the CME during its propagation, is expected to affect the fitted results. In this study, we focus on the deformation aspect. ...

How Magnetic Reconnection May Affect the Coherence of Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections

The Astrophysical Journal

... There is a general trend toward lower τ for higher V CME , but there is a good deal of scatter. This scatter is expected for a number of reasons (e.g., Temmer et al., 2023). Firstly, there is uncertainty in V CME estimated from fitting cone models to coronagraph observations, as well as deriving the time of the CME leading edge at 0.1 AU. ...

CME Propagation Through the Heliosphere: Status and Future of Observations and Model Development

Advances in Space Research

... Thus, SW is not a smooth, homogeneous flow, but consists of expanding flux tubes (Borovsky, 2008), IMF discontinuities and fluctuations (e.g., possibly different wavelength Alfvén and compressional • The solar wind data by MMS and THEMIS are analyzed by using information theory to understand the propagation of solar wind structures • Mutual information, linear crosscorrelation, and minimum variance analyses sometimes give different lagtimes • Information theory analysis along with the traditional method of crosscorrelation analysis could be used successfully for space weather forecasting waves) (Nykyri et al., 2019), 2-D and slab turbulence (Adhikari et al., 2022), and advected SW plasma and magnetic field structures (Di Matteo et al., 2022;Viall & Borovsky, 2020;Viall et al., 2009). Recent studies showed that solar wind directional discontinuities can introduce significant perturbations to the magnetosphere and ionosphere even as the geomagnetic activities remain quiet (Farrugia et al., 2022;Wing et al., 2023). ...

Effects from dayside magnetosphere to distant tail unleashed by a bifurcated, non-reconnecting interplanetary current sheet

Frontiers in Physics

... The 38 events for the multi-event study were selected from previously identified EDR or near-EDR encounters observed by MMS, spanning the range of typical magnetospheric conditions. The largest subset of events is 23 asymmetric magnetopause reconnection events with varying guide fields [9,[37][38][39], followed by 11 magnetosheath reconnection events with varying guide fields [40], and symmetric magnetotail reconnection, with only 4 events [27,[41][42][43]. Events were discarded when no steady asymptotic inflow region could be identified, the local EDR parameters could not be clearly associated with the asymptotic inflow conditions, or if the MMS satellites were not in a tetrahedron formation. ...

An Encounter With the Ion and Electron Diffusion Regions at a Flapping and Twisted Tail Current Sheet

... There is also a growing interest in flying several spacecraft to various locations on the heliosphere to obtain a multi-dimensional view of the Sun (FIREFLY mission, Vourlidas et al. 2020;Raouafi et al. 2023). The multiple-vantage view of the Sun is not only interesting for performing time-distance seismology (Löptien et al. 2017), but also for increasing the sphere coverage, thereby reducing the mode crosstalk for any given (l, m) as seen in Figures 2, 3, and 4. The new ESA space mission VIGIL, planned to be launched in 2031, will carry an almost exact clone of the PHI instrument named as the Photospheric Magnetic field Imager (PMI: Luntama 2022). ...

The Science Case for the 4π4{\pi} Perspective: A Polar/Global View for Studying the Evolution & Propagation of the Solar Wind and Solar Transients
  • Citing Preprint
  • September 2020