Mya L. Roberson’s research while affiliated with University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and other places

Importance Among older women (aged ≥50 years) with ERBB2 (formerly HER2 or HER2/neu)–positive breast cancer, research has shown racial and ethnic disparities in access to ERBB2-targeted therapies, with Black women receiving treatment at lower rates than their White counterparts. Objective To examine racial and ethnic disparities in receipt of ERBB2-targeted therapies and changes in receipt over time. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results–Medicare linked data from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2020. Beneficiaries who were diagnosed with ERBB2-positive breast cancer between 2010 and 2019, were aged 66 years or older at diagnosis, were continuously enrolled in Medicare Parts A and B in the 12 months before and after diagnosis, and had localized or regional stage disease at diagnosis were included. Data were analyzed from February through September 2024. Exposure Race and ethnicity defined as non-Hispanic Black or African American, Hispanic, or non-Hispanic White. Main Outcome and Measures The primary outcome was receipt of ERBB2-targeted therapies in the 12 months after diagnosis of ERBB2-positive breast cancer. Modified Poisson regression was used to evaluate the probability of receiving ERBB2-targeted therapy by race and ethnicity. Results Among 12 765 beneficiaries with ERBB2-positive breast cancer (median [IQR] age, 74 [69-80] years; 99.2% female), 8.1% were of Black, 6.9% Hispanic, and 85.0% White race and ethnicity, and 54.2% received ERBB2-targeted therapy. The overall proportion who received ERBB2-targeted therapies increased from 41.3% in 2010-2011 to 64.3% in 2018-2019. Compared with White patients, Black patients had a lower likelihood of receiving ERBB2-targeted therapies in 2010-2011 (adjusted risk ratio [ARR], 0.81; 95% confidence limit [CL], 0.68-0.97), as did Hispanic patients (ARR, 0.75; 95% CL, 0.62-0.92). Racial and ethnic disparities in receipt of ERBB2-targeted therapies narrowed over time, with no significant differences observed across racial and ethnic groups in 2018-2019 for Black patients (ARR, 0.97; 95% CL, 0.87-1.08) and Hispanic patients (ARR, 1.05; 95% CL, 0.95-1.16). Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest a narrowing of racial and ethnic disparities in receipt of ERBB2-targeted therapies over time among older Medicare beneficiaries with ERBB2-positive breast cancer. Future research is needed to understand the practices that contributed to the narrowing of racial and ethnic disparities and to develop implementation strategies to effectively improve the quality and equity of breast cancer care.

Background Geographic disparities in breast cancer outcomes exist. Few studies have examined community- and health system–level factors associated with care timeliness, an important measure of care quality. Methods The Carolina Breast Cancer Study is a population-based cohort of 2,998 women with invasive breast cancer (2008–2013). Using latent class modeling, patients’ census tracts of residence were characterized by healthcare accessibility and affordability. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ratings were used to classify hospitals as low- or high-quality. Six timeliness outcomes were assessed: (i) lacking prediagnostic regular care, (ii) being underscreened, (iii) late-stage diagnosis, (iv) delayed treatment initiation, (v) prolonged treatment duration, and (vi) lacking receipt of Oncotype DX genomic testing. Associations of geographic accessibility, healthcare affordability, and hospital-level quality with care timeliness were evaluated with relative frequency differences (RFD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Compared with “high-accessibility, high-affordability” census tracts, patients residing in “low-accessibility, low-affordability” areas were more likely to be underscreened (RFD = 18.7%, CI, 13.0, 24.3), have late-stage diagnosis (RFD = 6.2%, CI, 2.4, 10.1), and experience prolonged treatment (RFD = 6.9%, CI, 1.4, 12.3). “High-accessibility, low-affordability” areas had the highest frequency of treatment delay (RFD = 9.3%, CI, 3.9, 14.7). Initial surgery at a high-quality facility was associated with less delayed treatment (RFD = −3.9%, CI, −7.5, −0.4) and prolonged treatment (RFD = −5.9%, CI, −9.9, −1.9). Conclusions Community- and health system–level factors were associated with timely breast cancer care. Impact Policy efforts to improve access in communities should consider multiple dimensions of access, including geospatial accessibility and affordability.

We determined triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtypes, genetic ancestry, and immune features in a cohort of self-reported Black females with TNBC diagnosed at or below age 50. Among 104 tumors, 34.6% were basal-like 1 (BL1), 17.3% basal-like 2 (BL2), 9.6% luminal androgen receptor (LAR), 26.9% mesenchymal (M), and 11.5% unsubtyped (UNS). Subtypes resembled those seen in Europeans or East Asians, with less LAR (9.6% vs. 14.6–24.4%) and more UNS (11.5% vs. 0–7.5%). “High” proportion of West African ancestry was associated with more LAR (14.9% vs. 4.9%) and less M (25.5% vs. 34.2%). M demonstrated reduced immune activity and was marginally associated with worse overall survival in a multivariate model including stage, West African ancestry, BMI, and TILs, meriting future research. Our study is the largest to date of TNBC subtypes in young Black females. These results reinforce TNBC subtypes’ application across populations and potential use as a prognostic biomarker.

Background Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, or another nonheterosexual or cisgender identity (LGBTQ+) cancer survivors experience high financial hardship. However, structural drivers of inequities do not impact all LGBTQ+ individuals equally. Using All of Us data, we conducted an intersectional analysis of behavioral financial hardship among LGBTQ+ cancer survivors. Methods LGBTQ+ inequities in behavioral financial hardship (ie, cost-related foregone care, delayed care, and medication alterations) and non-cost-related delayed care were estimated using All of Us data. Multivariable logit models were used to generate predicted probabilities, average marginal effects, and 95% confidence intervals. Models were then used to estimate inequities when disaggregating LGBTQ+ status and combing LGBTQ+ status with age, race, ethnicity, and treatment status. Results This analysis included N = 36 217 cancer survivors (6.6%, n = 2399 LGBTQ+). In multivariable models, LGBTQ+ identity was associated with higher probabilities of and significant average marginal effects for all types of behavioral financial hardship (foregone care 31.1% vs 19.4%; delayed care 22.6% vs 15.6%; medication alterations 19.2% vs 11.9%) and non–cost delayed care (14.3% vs 7.2%). Within the disaggregated analysis, cisgender bisexual and another/multiple orientation women and gender minority survivors had the highest predicted probabilities of all outcomes. In intersectional analyses, survivors who were aged 18-39 and LGBTQ+, Black and LGBTQ+, or Hispanic/Latine and LGBTQ+ had the highest predicted probabilities of all outcomes. Conclusions LGBTQ+ cancer survivors experience significantly more behavioral financial hardship and non-cost-related delayed care than non-LGBTQ+ cancer survivors. Interventions at the individual, system, and policy level are needed to address LGBTQ+ inequities in financial hardship.

Background Delays in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment lead to worse survival and quality of life. Racial disparities in care timeliness have been reported, but few studies have examined access at multiple points along the care continuum (diagnosis, treatment initiation, treatment duration, and genomic testing). Methods and findings The Carolina Breast Cancer Study (CBCS) Phase 3 is a population-based, case-only cohort (n = 2,998, 50% black) of patients with invasive breast cancer diagnoses (2008 to 2013). We used latent class analysis (LCA) to group participants based on patterns of factors within 3 separate domains: socioeconomic status (“SES”), “care barriers,” and “care use.” These classes were evaluated in association with delayed diagnosis (approximated with stages III–IV at diagnosis), delayed treatment initiation (more than 30 days between diagnosis and first treatment), prolonged treatment duration (time between first and last treatment–by treatment modality), and receipt of OncotypeDx genomic testing (evaluated among patients with early stage, ER+ (estrogen receptor-positive), HER2- (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative) disease). Associations were evaluated using adjusted linear-risk regression to estimate relative frequency differences (RFDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Delayed diagnosis models were adjusted for age; delayed and prolonged treatment models were adjusted for age and tumor size, stage, and grade at diagnosis; and OncotypeDx models were adjusted for age and tumor size and grade. Overall, 18% of CBCS participants had late stage/delayed diagnosis, 35% had delayed treatment initiation, 48% had prolonged treatment duration, and 62% were not OncotypeDx tested. Black women had higher prevalence for each outcome. We identified 3 latent classes for SES (“high SES,” “moderate SES,” and “low SES”), 2 classes for care barriers (“few barriers,” “more barriers”), and 5 classes for care use (“short travel/high preventive care,” “short travel/low preventive care,” “medium travel,” “variable travel,” and “long travel”) in which travel is defined by estimated road driving time. Low SES and more barriers to care were associated with greater frequency of delayed diagnosis (RFDadj = 5.5%, 95% CI [2.4, 8.5]; RFDadj = 6.7%, 95% CI [2.8,10.7], respectively) and prolonged treatment (RFDadj = 9.7%, 95% CI [4.8 to 14.6]; RFDadj = 7.3%, 95% CI [2.4 to 12.2], respectively). Variable travel (short travel to diagnosis but long travel to surgery) was associated with delayed treatment in the entire study population (RFDadj = 10.7%, 95% CI [2.7 to 18.8]) compared to the short travel, high use referent group. Long travel to both diagnosis and surgery was associated with delayed treatment only among black women. The main limitations of this work were inability to make inferences about causal effects of individual variables that formed the latent classes, reliance on self-reported socioeconomic and healthcare history information, and generalizability outside of North Carolina, United States of America. Conclusions Black patients face more frequent delays throughout the care continuum, likely stemming from different types of access barriers at key junctures. Improving breast cancer care access will require intervention on multiple aspects of SES and healthcare access.

Importance Young Black women bear a disproportionate burden of breast cancer deaths compared with White women, yet they remain underrepresented in genomic studies. Objective To evaluate the association of biological factors, including West African genetic ancestry, and nonbiological factors with disease-free survival (DFS) among young Black women with breast cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants This observational cohort study included Black women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2016. Participants diagnosed with breast cancer at age 50 years or younger were recruited through the Florida and Tennessee state cancer registries. The final analysis was completed between June and September 2024. Exposure West African genetic ancestry. Main Outcomes and Measures A multivariable model was developed to evaluate the association between West African genetic ancestry and breast cancer DFS, adjusting for immunohistochemistry subtype, lymph node (LN) status, and full-time employment. Results This study included 687 Black women with early-stage invasive breast cancer. Their median age at diagnosis was 44 years (IQR, 38-47 years), and the median follow-up was 10 years (IQR, 7-11 years). In multivariable analysis, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and LN involvement were associated with shorter breast cancer DFS (hazard ratio, 1.81 [95% CI, 1.20-2.73] and 1.77 [95% CI, 1.30-2.41], respectively), whereas full-time employment was associated with improved outcomes (hazard ratio, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.30-0.63]). Among the 551 participants for whom global genetic ancestry could be assessed, having a higher percentage of West African genetic ancestry was associated with shorter breast cancer DFS among 246 participants in the hormone receptor (HR)–positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 ( ERBB2 [formerly HER2])–negative subgroup (hazard ratio, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.04-2.04]). Of the 369 participants (53.7%) with PAM50 data available, basal (133 [36.0%]) and luminal B (107 [29.0%]) subtypes were the most common. Among the 179 patients with HR-positive/ ERBB2 -negative disease and PAM50 data available, luminal B and basal subtypes combined were also overrepresented (81 [45.3%] and 24 [13.4%], respectively) compared with luminal A (70 [39.1%]). Conclusions and Relevance In this study of young Black women with breast cancer, having a higher percentage of West African genetic ancestry, TNBC, and LN involvement were associated with shorter breast cancer DFS. Interestingly, full-time employment was associated with improved breast cancer DFS. These findings highlight the importance of considering genetic ancestry beyond self-reported race and accounting for social determinants of health, in efforts to improve survival outcomes among Black women with breast cancer.

91 Background: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in the US. Up to 25% of breast cancers are classified as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and associated with an aggressive tumor burden. HER2-targeting monoclonal antibodies improves survival in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. Prior work has demonstrated disparities in access to oncologic therapies among older women. Our study seeks to examine racial/ethnic disparities in receiving HER2-targeted therapies for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and trends in use over time. Methods: In the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Medicare-linked database we identified women diagnosed with breast cancer from 2010 to 2019. We included those >66 years old who survived 12 months after diagnosis, were enrolled in Medicare Parts A/B for 12 months pre and post-diagnosis, and had local or regional stage HER2-positive cancer. Our primary outcome was receipt of HER2-targeted therapies in the 12 months after diagnosis. Our independent variable was race/ethnicity as measured by the validated Research Triangle Institute race/ethnicity codes in Medicare. Due to small sample sizes, we focus our analysis on White, Black, or Hispanic women. We used multivariable Modified Poisson regression to evaluate changes in the probability of HER2-targeted therapy receipt by race/ethnicity over time, adjusted for sociodemographics, cancer factors, and medical comorbidities. Results: Our cohort comprised 13,887 patients including 8.7% Black, 7.5% Hispanic, and 83.8% White (mean age 74.9). Overall, 7,351 (52.9%) received HER2-targeted therapies in the 12 months post-diagnosis, with use increasing over time in all racial/ethnic groups (Table). Compared with White patients, Black and Hispanic patients had a 19% (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 0.81, 95% CI:0.69-0.96) and 27% (aRR 0.73, 95% CI 0.61-0.89) lower likelihood, respectively, of receiving HER2-targeted therapies from 2010-2011 (Table). By 2018-2019, no significant differences in receiving HER2-targeted therapies were observed across racial/ethnic groups. Conclusions: In a national cohort of Medicare enrollees with HER2-positive breast cancer, we observed significant racial/ethnic disparities which narrowed over time. Overall utilization rates were low. Future work is needed to understand how improved access to breast cancer treatments impact downstream outcomes. Use of human epidermal growth hormone receptor 2–targeted therapy from 2010-2011 and 2018-2019 by race/ethnicity. Race and Ethnicity Unadjusted Rates Adjusted Risk Ratios (95% CI)* 2010-2011 2018-2019 2010-2011 2018-2019 Black 36% 62% 0.81 (0.69-0.96) 0.97 (0.87-1.08) Hispanic 31% 68% 0.73 (0.61-0.89) 1.01 (0.92-1.12) White 42% 64% Reference Reference *Adjusted for age, marital status, region, breast cancer stage and year of diagnosis, and medical comorbidities.

Background: Delays in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment lead to worse survival and quality of life decrements. Racial disparities in care timeliness have been reported, but few studies have examined access at multiple points along the care continuum (diagnosis, treatment initiation, treatment duration, and genomic testing). Methods: The Carolina Breast Cancer Study Phase 3 (CBCS3) is a population-based cohort (n=2998, 50% Black) with invasive breast cancer diagnoses (2008-2013). We used latent class analysis (LCA) to group participants based on patterns of factors within 3 separate domains: “socio-economic status (SES)”, “care barriers”, and “care use.” These classes were evaluated in association with delayed diagnosis (approximated with stage 3 or 4 at diagnosis), delayed treatment initiation (more than 30 days between diagnosis and first treatment), prolonged treatment duration (time between first and last treatment – by treatment modality), and receipt of OncotypeDx genomic testing (evaluated among patients with early stage, ER+, HER2- disease). Associations were evaluated using adjusted linear-risk regression to estimate relative frequency differences (RFDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Overall, 18% of CBCS participants had late stage/delayed diagnosis, 35% had delayed treatment initiation, 48% had prolonged treatment duration, and 62% did not receive OncotypeDx. Black women had greater frequency of each unfavorable care outcome compared to non-Black women, including diagnostic delay (22% vs 15%, RFD= 6.9, 4.1-9.6), treatment initiation delay (39% vs 31%, RFD=7.9, 4.5-11.3), prolonged treatment (50% vs 46%, RFD= 4.3, 0.5-8.2), and OncotypeDx non-receipt (69% vs 57%, RFD= 12.2, 7.3-16.7). We identified 3 latent classes for SES (“high SES”, “moderate SES,” and “low SES”) 2 classes for care barriers (“few barriers”, “more barriers”), and 5 classes for care use (“short travel/high preventive care”, “short travel/low preventive care,” “medium travel,” “variable travel,” and “high travel”). Low-SES and more barriers to care were associated with greater frequency of delayed diagnosis (RFDadj = 5.5, 2.4-8.5; RFDadj =6.7, 2.8-10.7, respectively) and prolonged treatment (RFDadj = 9.7, 4.8-14.6; RFDadj = 7.3, 2.4-12.2, respectively). Variable travel (short time to diagnosis but long time to surgery) was associated with delayed treatment in the entire study population (RFDadj = 10.7, 2.7-18.8) compared to the short travel, high use referent group. The high travel group (representing long travel to both diagnosis and surgery) was associated with delayed treatment only among Black women relative to the same referent group (RFDadj = 10.0, -3.3-23.2). Conclusions: Black patients face more frequent delays throughout the care continuum, likely stemming from different types of access barriers at key junctures. Improving breast cancer care access will require intervention on multiple aspects of SES and healthcare access. Citation Format: Matthew R. Dunn, Didong Li, Marc A Emerson, Caroline A. Thompson, Hazel B Nichols, Sarah C Van Alsten, Mya L. Roberson, Lisa A. Carey, Terry Hyslop, Jennifer Elston Lafata, Melissa A. Troester. The heterogenous impact of healthcare access factors throughout the breast cancer care continuum [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr C135.