Murray S. Davis’s research while affiliated with Northern Illinois University and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


That's Interesting!: Towards a Phenomenology of Sociology and a Sociology of Phenomenology
  • Article

June 1971

·

227 Reads

·

1,211 Citations

Philosophy of the Social Sciences

Murray S. Davis

QUESTION: How do theories which are generally considered interesting differ from theories which are generally considered non-interesting ? ANSWER: Interesting theories are those which deny certain assumptions of their audience, while noninteresting theories are those which arm certain assumptions of their audience. This answer was arrived at through the examination of a number of famous social, and especially sociological, theories. That examination also generated a systematic index of the variety of propositional forms which interesting and non-interesting theories may take. The fertility of this approach suggested a new field be established called the Sociology of the Interesting, which is intended to supplement the Sociology of Knowledge. This new field will be phenomenologically oriented in so far as it will focus on the movement of the audience's mind from one accepted theory to another. It will be sociologically oriented in so far as it will focus on the dissimilar base-line theories of the various sociological categories which compose the audience. In addition to its value in interpreting the social impact of theories, the Sociology of the Interesting can contribute to our understanding of both the common sense and scientific perspectives on reality.

Citations (1)


... The publication process in scientific research often prioritizes novel and intriguing findings, incentivizing researchers to produce results that stand out. This emphasis on novelty can be traced back to Davis (1971) encouraging generations of researchers to focus on findings that are "interesting and different" (Kilduff, 2006:253); without such qualities, "no value was added" (Eden & Rynes, 2003:680). This bias toward surprising, positive results can push researchers toward practices that make findings appear groundbreaking, even if it involves selectively reporting data or, in extreme cases, committing fraud. ...

Reference:

That’s replicable: building cumulative knowledge in the face of fads, obsessions and malpractices
That's Interesting!: Towards a Phenomenology of Sociology and a Sociology of Phenomenology
  • Citing Article
  • June 1971

Philosophy of the Social Sciences